Friday, January 30, 2015

Retainer amount reached…Battle for Gary’s Freedom will soon start

http://silentbrotherhood.org/retainer-amount-reached-battle-for-garys-freedom-will-soon-start/



Yes, you read the title right. The retainer for the law firm to represent Gary Yarbrough to fight the great injustice by the BOP, has been reached. We have reached $5,000 thanks to all those who put in a lot of hard work, including: Pastor Gulett/Aryan Nations, Warrior’s Pride, and WarHag Clothing…and all the individuals and groups who also contributed. We still have to raise $2,500 to reach the final total of $7,500, but if we raised $5,000….$2,500 is just a drop in the bucket!
This goes to show what we can accomplish when we work together without all the bickering and fighting. We accomplished something major because this will not only help get Gary home, but also some of the other Bruders, who are still behind those walls. The BOP will be less likely to mess them over on their mandatory parole release date. We accomplished something great…the possible freedom of some of our folk heroes, who have already been held in prison to long!
Get ready Bureau of Prisons…you can’t cover up all the injustice you have done to these men! The light always shows what has been hidden in the dark. Justice will prevail!
This is truly a HAPPY DAY in our history!
Susan Yarbrough
Don’t forget we now have the black T-shirts for sale! Go to Warrior’s Pride!

Monday, January 26, 2015

NARRG’s Pledge of Intent

http://www.narrg.com/2015/01/pledge-of-intent/

Our Vision for the Management of the National Alliance

Preamble

At this point in our mission to restore the National Alliance, it is time for NARRG to share some thoughts about our vision of the necessary changes needed for the eventual governance of the NA corporate structure, and the overwhelming need to overhaul its membership criteria.
We are well into this legal process now and what we have seen thus far is very much encouraging; so much so that we’ve been thinking about a vision of the future management of the National Alliance and therefore want to share some of those thoughts and ideas with you. With a successful conclusion of this legal action, we must be prepared for the next steps in the recovery of the organization.
The following should be considered simply as a conceptual framework for the future agreed upon by the entireNARRG team. We absolutely must, upon taking up management of the National Alliance, make essential changes to the corporate structure and membership. We must never again put the organization into the jeopardy in which it has found itself after the death of Dr. Pierce.
While there aren’t any known extraordinary persons available with the ability and integrity of a Dr. Pierce to give complete command to, there are nonetheless good quality people available to select from for the various management posts, as well as for the chairman’s position.
We must learn from our experiences, adapt to the realities and create a new paradigm from which to build and thus guarantee the organization a succession of qualified leadership for generations to come.
We propose in the following paragraphs basic concepts to the structure of governing the corporation that will effectively prohibit any individual(s) who prove to demonstrate questionable ability or lack of character that could harm the National Alliance, from becoming a member, much less a leader. The first line of defense is a proper membership program.
For the organization to be managed successfully, we need to make the necessary changes. Thus continue reading the initial framework we envision. Keep in mind that this is similar to the initial member’s book published in 1981, and that this is by no means comprehensive, but in a process of evolutionary development.

Corporate Property & Assets

1. Our intent is to operate and manage the National Alliance in a professional manner and grow the organization and its related businesses through accepted Good Corporate Business Practices and in conformance with laws relating to its incorporation.
2. We intend to operate from the central office of the National Alliance, the home of Dr. Pierce obtained for us at Mill Point, WV. Therefore we intend to staff this facility and refurbish it to acceptable operating standards. Dr. Pierce referred to our home as The Land.
Once the national office administrative building and minimal housing are in working order, the person appointed as chairman of the organization must live and work from the national office property. Other staff will be added as we are able to accommodate.
3As a consequence we have no intention to sell the national office property nor any portion thereof.
4. Furthermore we will not sell any National Alliance special assets, whether it be Dr. Pierce’s library, his firearms, the NA organizational library or any artifacts or personal possessions of his, nor any other items of historic value such as artifacts and possessions of Commander George Lincoln Rockwell and Robert Mathews owned by the Alliance.
Unfortunately, many items of our history and other valuable artifacts have already been sold off by Erich Gliebe to various individuals, including Will Williams and John McLaughlin; another Gliebe associate and new Board of Directors member under the current management, in addition to Gliebe’s close personal friend Jayne Cartwright who also serves as Secretary under Will Williams.
All items of this type must be preserved in a protected state in an organizational museum to be housed within the Dr. William L. Pierce Memorial Hall. We pledge in the course of this lawsuit to pursue legal process, in order to obtain full recovery of these items.
We should mention also that the Resistance record company is also an item of the present litigation.
5. All property and assets of the National Alliance will belong to the company or related business enterprise(s), and will not be the domain of anyone’s private ownership, no matter what their position is within the organization. The National Alliance being a corporation belongs to and is responsible to its membership.
6. We pledge to begin anew the development of the Dr. Pierce Memorial Garden left abandoned years ago, as well as the continuance of improvements and initiation of new projects as we are able. Initially of course the first priorities must and will be basic operating facilities.

Organizational Structure

1. Initially, the National Alliance will be managed by a newly appointed Board of Directors. Some of these directors may come from the litigant team, but the formation will not be limited to those people. There are other members who make up a larger auxiliary support group of the litigant team who would also make good candidates for board positions. Some of these people have been members of the National Alliance since the 1970’s and ’80’s. It will be the responsibility of the Board to select replacement members.
2. The Board of Directors will be made up of at least 5 members who will select a chairman who will not occupy a seat on the Board. The chairman will be responsible to the Board of Directors, and will serve a standard set term of office, which can be renewed concurrently through the Board’s agreement. Theoretically there is no limit to the renewals, if the chairman performs his duty to the satisfaction of the Board. Otherwise the Board may upon conclusion of the term or in an emergency session, select a replacement.
3. The purpose of the chairman’s office will be to guide and direct the activities of the organization. The chairman will be given wide latitude for the execution of his duties and responsibilities. His role therefore carries with it a great amount of authority.
However, the chairman’s activities are to be transparent always to the Board of Directors whose job is to safe guard the organization’s assets, and to ensure that anything the chairman may wish to do that involves major financing, or affects corporate assets, or anything else that is of extraordinary or exceptional nature will need a convening of the Board for recorded discussion and agreement first. Only then will the chairman be duly authorized to proceed forward with those proposed actions.
Simply put, the chairman of the National Alliance becomes responsible for his actions to the Board of Directors, and there will no longer be such a thing as perpetual chairmanship for life, without concurrent periodic approval of the Board of Directors. Consequently, the chairman may no longer do as he wishes with company property, and use assets as if they were his own, answering to no one.
If we are one day fortunate enough to have a man of the caliber of a Dr. Pierce or a George Lincoln Rockwell among us, only then we can once again put full faith and authority to the command of such an exemplary person.
Our system of process will ensure that the best we have will lead and anyone who proves deficient can and will be replaced.

Membership(& supporters)

1. Membership will be vastly overhauled. There will no longer be a process of simply down-loading and filling out a basic application and sending in $20.00, and you’re considered a member.
This process will be one that will allow the new person to introduce themselves as a supporter only, with no rights or privileges of membership. This will be the pathway to membership if the supporter aspires to achieve it.
A supporter of the National Alliance has no obligation whatsoever other than fulfillment of their pledge of financial support.
A supporter who wishes to become more closely associated with the National Alliance and eventually become a member must remain in good standing, demonstrate commitment and be well known to the national office for a time period of at least a minimum of one year, but otherwise generally a 2 year or more period.
The potential member must be invited by the national office to apply for membership or otherwise be recommended for membership by an existing member who has been in good standing for at least one year. The new applicant is therefore sponsored by an existing member who thus puts their own judgment to test by their sponsorship.
Such aspirants will be required to submit a detailed application as well as a background check, and demonstrate their ideological understanding of our worldview and its application to current events and history.
By the time a prospective member reaches this stage he or she will have already well demonstrated in one manner or another or in multiple ways their commitment to furthering the National Alliance message amongst our people.
Members who will have obligations and responsibilities to the National Alliance they must uphold, will also have the privileges of membership that distinctly elevates them above the role of supporters.
It goes without saying that we will not allow into membership anyone who has a history of mental health or psychological issues, alcohol and drug addictions, non-White dependents and most felony criminal convictions, including sex crimes. Nor will we accept homosexuals. This list is not inclusive, but given as examples.
We must tighten up criteria for membership. Doing so will provide us with people that will be assets to the National Alliance instead of liabilities. We will not allow anyone to bring drama and division into the organization. We want our National Alliance to be representative of the best of our people, not the worst.
2. As in the past, potential recruits will not be turned away because of religious belief or lack of it. The National Alliance is not a religious organization although certainly its mission does contain an important spiritual element. What is asked of every member is that the mission and philosophy of the National Alliance, that of preserving and advancing our race, represents  eminent importance in that individual’s personal life.

Cosmotheism in Context

Having stated that the mission and philosophy of the National Alliance is that of preserving and
advancing our race, the National Alliance will be republishing Dr. Pierce’s essays on Cosmotheism. Those essays will be available to anyone who wishes to reflect further on our Founder’s early thoughts and writings on the subject, from the ten year period from the mid-’70’s to the mid-’80’s.
As everyone knows, Dr. Pierce let these ideas go fallow after the mid-1980’s for various reasons. What was most important to him, especially in his later years, was the development of the National Alliance as a secular organization; a movement, a real national alliance.  Nonetheless, there are important uplifting concepts imparted in these writings and we’d like them to continue to be available.
As evidence of these intentions we exhibit below from court documents, the testimony of Will Williams in a notarized, sworn affidavit given in 2005 about his experiences as a national office staff member from 1992 to 1993.
We thank Will Williams for his testimony, as his eyewitness account proves what the status of Cosmotheism with Dr. Pierce was during the time he spent working at the office with him. There are many other members out there that can attest the same sentiment as stated by Williams. The fact that this particular statement is in legal form makes it exceptional to demonstrate our point. 
Therefore keeping this idea in its proper context within the National Alliance is just as important to us today, as it is stated here by Will Williams in 2005.

Click on each of the three icons below in succession to review Will Williams’s sworn statement.

Saturday, January 24, 2015

DOJ: No evidence of a civil rights violation in Ferguson. The White Information Network stands with Darren Wilson.



The Rent a Riot Crowd

Black Who Tortured and Murdered White Teens Yells “Black Lives Matter” at Victims’ Families During Sentencing

Daily Stormer
January 24, 2015
    Jacob Kudla and Jourdan Bobbish were both murdered in cold blood by wild Blacks.
Jacob Kudla and Jourdan Bobbish were both murdered in cold blood by wild Blacks.
As we keep telling you, Black people are wolves who have been taught by Jews to play the innocent sheep.  They have made this their collective identity.
A Black man recently proved this point when he was found guilty of torturing and murdering two White teenagers who went to buy drugs from him shouted “Black lives matter!” at the families of the victims.
Fredrick Young and Felando Hunter were sentenced Wednesday to life in prison without parole for robbing, torturing and murdering Jourdan Bobbish and Jacob Kudla, who had met up with them in July 2012 to buy drugs, a local Fox affiliate reported.
Young shocked the courtroom when he was given the chance to address the victims’ families, but instead apologized to the families of Michael Brown and Eric Garner.
“I’d like to say sorry to the families of Aiyanna Jones, Michael Brown, Eric Garner,” he said. “And I want to apologize to them for not being able to get justice for their loved ones who was murdered in cold blood.
“And in respect for the peaceful protest, I want to say ‘hands up don’t shoot,’” he said, raising his hands in the air. “Black lives matter — that’s it your honor.”
Despite Young’s message, Jourdon Bobbish’s mother, Carrie Bobbish, spoke of forgiveness during her impact statement, the Fox affiliate reported.
See.  They have a collective identity as victims and even when they are convicted of torture-murder of White kids – which this guy apparently just did for the fun of it – they view themselves as the one being injured.
How are you supposed to negotiate with that?  How are you supposed to address grievances from people who not only refuse collective responsibility on the level of society, but will literally blame personal acts of murder on oppression by the people who pay for their entire lives and take care of them like they are children?

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

White Activist Robert Ransdell Arrested for Protesting MLK Day


UNITED STATES CODE
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS
§ 241. Conspiracy against rights If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured - They shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results, they shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
§ 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such inhabitant being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.        Guilty of violating Ransdell's Civil rights.
Police Chief John McDermond
Florence Police Department
Florence Government Center
8100 Ewing Boulevard
Florence, KY 41042
Phone: (859) 647-5420
Fax: (859) 647-5436
 

                                         

White Activist Robert Ransdell Arrested for Protesting MLK Day

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 21, 2015


Robert Ransdell, pictured during his 2014 campaign for US Senate
The heroic White activist Robert Ransdell was arrested on Monday by the agents of the Jew-Negro Occupation government for peacefully protesting the national day of revelry devoted to the terroristic Negro communist plagiarist Martin Luther King, Jr. Through email, he explained to me what went down on this dark day.
Ransdell showed up at the government building in Florence, Kentucky where the annual MLK Day celebrations are held on Monday afternoon, prepared to exercise his Constitutional right to protest. He had with him two placards, one reading “Happy Marchin’ Lootin’ Killin’ Day,” and the other a collage of White victims of Black murderers.
He arrived at 1:45pm, in advance of the Negro fiesta, which was to begin at 3:00. There he saw a row of displays honoring the communist Black revolutionary, which he said “looked like it was put together by a fifth grade class or something.”

 
Martin Luther King, Jr. literally attended a Jew-run communist school.
He stood near the ridiculous display with his signs, speaking with a local comrade who had come to show his support for the resistance. Within ten minutes, he was approached by three Florence police officers, one of which he recognized as the Chief of Police. They began as soon as they approached with “you need to leave.”
Ransdell responded that he was on public property, and had every right to protest the public event. The police officer began playing a mind game with him, saying “the city owns the property,” as though that meant he was trespassing, when in fact it merely confirms that it is public property where he is Constitutionally entitled to peacefully protest.
The officer, Robert told me, then put his hands behind him and began guiding him toward the exit. He protested, only to once again hear “you have to leave.”
“I think it was just the record of token harassment I have got from this city in particular for my political activity in the past that moved me to just refuse to be bullied around anymore. As we were walking I stopped and said I am not leaving,” Ransdell says that is when the cop who had been attempting to guide him called to the other to arrest him. He complied peacefully, simply telling the ZOG agents: “you have taken this to a whole new level.”
It was not until he arrived at the local jail that Ransdell found he’d been charged with 3rd degree criminal trespass. He was booked in and released on his own recognizance.
“Some of the intake officers, while they did not come out and say it, seemed a bit confused on why I was even arrested,” Ransdell said of the scene at the jail.
He then had to walk more than ten miles back to his car. A true soldier, he continued his protest, turning the long walk to the car into a freedom march, “freedom,” he said, “from this rotten, phony, hypocritical, Jew-corrupted, non-White infested shithole of a country.” He held high his “Marchin’ Lootin’ Killin’ Day” sign up for everyone who drove past him to see.
Due to the ordeal, he was forced to cancel a second protest he had planned that day.



The MLK Day march in nearby Cincinnati – looks to me like these people should be arrested before they start rioting and looting!
Ransdell’s attorney says that he may have a civil lawsuit against the city, but he first has to beat the criminal charge. The cops are definitely going to have a hard time explaining how they saw fit to arrest a patriotic American exercising his right to protest on public property.
“They will have a hell of a time explaining their actions and I look forward to that,” he said.
He potentially faces a $250 fine. His first court appearance is on February 3rd, and we will be following up on these happenings here on the Daily Stormer.

Ransdell expressed deep disappointment in the fact that he was illegally targeted for persecution in this once-great country, saying “I feel depressed at the fact that I was arrested, I have been able to walk that line over the years and it is something I have taken pride in, getting out there balls to the wall and at the same time not being shackled for doing so. I wasn’t shackled literally today but I was handcuffed and arrested for doing nothing more than speaking out against this contrived and artificial hero the anti-White establishment has pressed on the Whites of this country as someone to put on a pedestal.”
 
Robert Ransdell’s campaign for Senate featured the slogan “With Jews, We Lose,” and garnered international media attention
Robert Ransdell, a former US Senate candidate, has been active in the Nationalist scene for ten years, and this is the first time he has ever been arrested. But he remains unshaken.
“My resolve cannot be strengthened, it is however still at full capacity despite this incident.” He said. “There is always another day and another fight in this war, the events of this day have only made certain that that day and that fight is one I will be eagerly seeking out. We have hoax remembrance day coming very soon so there will not be long to wait.”

#BlackLivesMatter protests at the home of new Jewish Mayor of Oakland

#BlackLivesMatter protests at the home of new Jewish Mayor of Oakland


Oakland has always been a center for extreme black power movements. It was even the scene of mass murder in the 70s, when a Nation of Islam splinter group killed dozens of white people.
In the pre-dawn hours of Martin Luther King day, dozens of black power activists gathered in front of the home of Oakland Mayor-elect Libby Schaaf. They screamed hysterically, chanted, danced, wrote messages with chalk, and pounded on the front door. They called their protest #WakeUpTheMayor.
They spent about two hours screaming and chanting outside of Schaaf’s home.
The protesters accused Schaaf, who is Jewish, of being a pro-Israel capitalist.
Schaaf’s husband eventually answered the door. They gave him a flyer decorated with black fists. It told Schaaf to “end your relationship with Israel” and crack down on the police. It demanded that the entire Oakland University police department be dissolved.
The flyer also denounced capitalism in general and called for 80% of the city operating budget to be re-allocated to public schools. Oakland public schools already receive over $12,000 per student student per year to operate. It is among the most lavishly funded school districts in the entire state.
Libby Schaaf was elected on November 4, 2014. She is a liberal Democrat. The previous Mayor is an Asian female. In late January, black power activists put posters of Schaaf up with a Nazi Party Swastika insignia on her forehead. The posters referenced eminent domain.
Inspired by the so-called #BlackBrunch offensive, Oakland black power activists also “invaded” a grocery store and screamed hysterically. On twitter, one of the participants vowed “no comfortable grocery shopping until we get Justice.”
The is all part of an ongoing escalation of militant, confrontational tactics. They are partially inspired by a segment on MSNBC which urged black people to go to “white safe havens” and “make white people feel uncomfortable.”

Aspiring gangster rap starts new “viral” vandalism/assault trend

Aspiring gangster rap starts new “viral” vandalism/assault trend


filthy-dirty-thugAn aspiring gangster rapper by the name “VonMar” posted videos of himself committing vandalism on the internet. Now it has sparked a trend of copycats posting videos of themselves. Many use the hastag #PutEmInTheCoffin, which was started by VonMar.
VonMar began videotaping himself vandalizing cars and other property to promote his song Put Em In The Coffin. The song calls for the murder of “snitches.”

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

We need your support!

Please use the donate button located at the upper right hand corner if you'd like to help.Thank you.

Federal Court Says It’s 100% Legal To Give Cops The Finger

http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/01/federal-court-says-its-100-legal-to-give-cops-the-finger/


It’s now perfectly legal to flip off a cop.A police officer can’t simply pull you over because you gave them the “finger,” according to a federal appeals court ruling from 2013.
The 14-page opinion issued by the the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled that the “ancient gesture of insult is not the basis for a reasonable suspicion of a traffic violation or impending criminal activity.”
The ruling comes in response to a case where John Swartz and his wife Judy Mayton-Swartz were forced to bring suit against two police officers who arrested Swartz back in May of 2006. The arrest was made simply as a result of John Swartz flipping off the officer who was using a radar device at an intersection in St. Johnsville, New York.
Swartz was charged with “disorderly conduct,” the common way that officers charge people when they have not committed any crime.
Even though a federal judge in the Northern District of New York had granted summary judgement in favor of the officers back in July of 2011, the Court of Appeals erased that decision.
The cops tried to defend themselves, saying that the did have probable cause because they thought being flipped off meant the couple was “trying to get my attention for some reason.”
But the court didn’t buy this ridiculous excuse, saying that the “nearly universal recognition that this gesture is an insult deprives such an interpretation of reasonableness.”
In the end, they ruled that that “gesture” of insult is protected.


Pseudo Labels-Administrative Camouflage by Gary Yarbrough

The second superseding indictment against the men of “The Order” in 1985 reads: This organization constituted an enterprise, that is, a group of individuals associated in fact for the purposes of advancing their views of “white” or “Aryan” supremacy and the political, social, and economic ascendancy of persons of a White or Aryan background, and of making and retaining profits for the enterprise through acts and threats involving robbery, murder, arson, counterfeiting, and interstate transportation of stolen property (as defined by Title 18, United States Code 1961.4).
I have read Title 18, no where in the code does it refer to “White or Aryan Supremacy.” Yet, the Department of Just-Us is threatening to keep me incarcerated another ten years, ten years beyond the court established guideline for a “mandatory two-thirds release” date for “views of white or Aryan Supremacy.” Oddly enough, views that no members of the Order held. None of us were “white supremacists,” we were white separatists. We did not believe in the concept of reigning supreme over non-white people, we wanted our own white nation, void of non-whites entirely. We were not tried, convicted, and sentenced to lengthy prison terms for our political views, which are not illegal, we were prosecuted for the violations noted in Title 18: “robbery, murder, arson, counterfeiting, and interstate transportation of stolen property.” The accusation of “white supremacy” in the indictment was merely spurious postulation. We didn’t even believe in being supreme over other whites, let alone, non-whites. The allegation of white supremacy was just window dressing to ensure that the public would interpret the event of our trial from a particular point of view, i.e. “spin”.
The term “white supremacy” is a buzzword or catchword utilized to illicit a pre-conditioned reflexive response, that is, to sway public opinion. Americans have been bombarded with propaganda daily about the evils of white supremacists of the 1900’s. Images of slavery, whippings, and lynchings of black people automatically come to mind when we hear or read the term “white supremacy.” The accusers wanted to detract from what the Order truly wanted-government reform, hence the contrivance to distort the facts. The authorities were worried that the public would side with the ideals of The Order.
The tactic of distorting the events to mold and sway public opinion has been around a long time. Whether the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” are genuine or a forgery the contrivance is true: Protocol No. 19.3, “In order to destroy the prestige of heroism for political crimes we shall send it for trial in the category of thieving, murder, and every kind of abominable and filthy crime. Public opinion will then confuse its conception of this category of crime with the disgrace attaching to every other and will brand it with the same contempt.” This is exactly what happened to the men of The Order at trial in 1985. And now, 30 years later, after serving the sentence for my “crimes,” The Department of Justice is attempting to utilize the spurious postulation of my “continued advocacy of white supremacy” to extend my sentence by 10 years.
Many labels have been used by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to misrepresent me: “white supremacist” being foremost, along with “extremist, radicals,” and “anti-government.” Slanderous labels utilized to create stigma, to stain and brand me, to characterize me as something I am not in order to justify their nefarious acts and condemnation of me.
There is an old proverb that goes: Whoever digs a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolls a stone, it will return upon him!” that is to say, the wicked will be snared by their own devices. It is ironic that all the labels with which they erroneously branded my character really are only applicable to the authorities of the United States!
According to my Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, “White Supremacy” is defined as: “A doctrine based on belief in the inherent superiority of the White race over the black race and the correlative necessity for the subordination of blacks to whites in all relationships.” I have at least a dozen “advancement denial notices,” “referral notices,” and “Notices of Action” wherein the DOJ claims that I am an advocate of white supremacy. I defied them to provide any evidence whatsoever to indicate that I ever said, wrote, or did anything to advocate white supremacy. They produced nothing, because there is nothing to produce. I am not a white supremacist, and there is not a single pro-white group in America that advocates this odious concept. The only entity that did, and covertly still does, is the national, state, and local authorities within the United States. It is the authorities, and the aristocrats from which they came and were elected that white supremacy, defined by Webster’s, is derived. It was them who allowed the institution of slavery in America, them who profited from it. It was them who considered themselves superior to blacks and other races. It was them who believed that the non-white races were inferior; and therefore, an exploitable resource. However, it was not about race as far as they themselves were concerned, they were not about racial cultivation, they were merely supremacists for their own sake and profit. They enslaved, manipulated, and exploited the “lower class”–whites as well! Blacks had nothing that the average white man wanted, the average white man was, more or less indifferent about blacks.
The terms, “extremist” and “radical” have similar definitions. “Radical”: of or relating to the origin: fundamental-marked by a considerable departure from the usual or traditional: tending or disposed to make extreme changes in existing views, habits, conditions, or institutions; of relating to or constituting a political group associated with views, practices, and policies of extreme change: advocating extreme measures to retain or restore a political state of affairs.
“Origin, fundamental,” I interpret this to represent the foundation and basis for the beginning of our existence and the conditions thereof, that is NATURAL LAW. The definition: “Marked by a considerable departure from the usual or traditional” Any authority that legislates laws that are contrary to the laws established by nature, constitutes a departure from the usual or traditional, the fundamentals of mans existence.
The so-called Founding Fathers of the United States practiced a faith known as “deism” advocating “natural reusion” over time, the U.S. Government and legislators are marked by a considerable departure from the tradition! It use to be that only free white males could vote or own property; segregation was enforced by law; inter-racial marriages, homosexuality, abortion, and pornography were illegal. According to Websters definition of “radical” define the US authorities as the true “radicals.” Definition: “Advocating extreme measures to retain or restore a political state of affairs.” I guess, with a bit of spin, the last definition could apply to me, except the retention of the previous state of affairs is beyond reconstruction or restoration. And the only advocacy on my part was to create a separate territory for a white racial imperative, a return to the natural state of affairs, the fundamentals. This could hardly be defined as “extreme measures.”
As previously noted, “radical” and “extremist” are practically synonymous terms. “Extremist”-advocacy of extreme political measures: radicalism.” So, Webster’s definitions for both terms indicate that it is the U.S. authorities who are the real radical extremists! Just because the legislators define “legality,” and are so big it lends them an air of “authority,” it does not mean they are just or legitimate. There is a greater authority, the Laws of Nature and its Creator. Laws that no authority have right to encroach upon. I advocate a reform, a return to Natural Law. I have the Faith of my Fathers before me. The laws, morals, and ethnics established by nature and learned by observance. That is the TRUE DEFINITION of “Patriotism.” From the Latin: “Pater:Father.” “Patriot (late Latin) Patriota, lineage: one who has the faith of his fathers before him and propagates his fore fathers ethics.
So, the real white supremacist, radical extremist is not me, but those who accuse me. Those that want to incarcerate me for then more years for crimes THEY COMMITTED, not me! And, regardless of what my political beliefs are, and what I advocate, according to the “Bill of Rights,” I am, as a citizen, entitled to those beliefs without fear of imprisonment for merely exercising my constitutional freedoms! Title 18 listed the “crimes” as: “threats involving robbery, murder, arson, counterfeiting, and interstate transportation of stolen property.” Freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom from being oppressed due to political views, are not listed as crimes in Title 18 United States Code 1961.4.
“Anti-government:” apparently the Department of Just-Us equates expressing verbal dissent to abuse of authority as being “anti-government.” I am not anti-government, but I am averse to injustice and inequity. Social structures are organized on the fundamental precepts of Natural Law. Any “authority” that legislates laws contrary to nature is a crime against nature and all mankind. The innate instinct to survive, to procreate and propagate is a powerful natural instinct among all organisms. Self-preservation is a fundamental law of nature, and, by extension, the protection, cultivation, and propagation of the family, tribe, race, and nation is of the utmost importance! The term “nation” is from the Latin “natio” meaning: birth, race, nation, to be born, to begat, more at KIN. “Social” is defined as: “trending to form cooperative and interdependent relationships with others of one’s kind.” A “society” is: “A voluntary association of individuals for common ends; a natural group of plants, usually of a single species; the progeny of a pair of insects when constituting a social unit (as a hive of bees).” In light of Webster’s dictionary, who is the real anti-government, anti-social entity? I defer to the superseding indictment: “The political, social, and economic ascendancy of persons of a white or Aryan ethnic background…” Except the authorities seem to convey the idea that we were only out for cultivation of our own kind. We must first be in a position to help ourselves before we can help others. However, I believe all mean are sovereign and should never be coerced, forced, or tricked in to doing anything against ones freewill. It is the authorities who have usurped the sovereignty of mankind……
By the usurpation of the sovereignty of the populace, America is reduced to an anomic commercialistic  pseudo society. We are all thrall born slaves today, laboring for the psychopathic personalities of a runaway bureaucratic aristocracy. REDEEM THY SELF!
Gary Lee Yarbrough
November 2014

The Emperor’s New Clothes

http://www.narrg.com/2015/01/the-emperors-new-clothes/

A Comparison of Williams vs. NARRG Views on NA Membership Requirements

Prologue

picEmperors-New-Clothes1Williams’s newly posted NA membership requirements have been recently posted online.  Their updated website posts a picture of a White family seemingly living in a world of White uni-cultural peace and harmony.  That is the image that the current management regime of the NA wants to portray.  To potential future new recruits for the NA does the image that is portrayed fit reality?  That is the subject matter of this article, in which we will quote in Williams own words and writings what type of members will be allowed into his version of the NA.
Also some discussion is mentioned on how Williams and his staff would qualify, if any, under the membership requirements under Gliebe’s former NA control, which is the subject of NARRG’s current lawsuit against the Board of Directors of the National Alliance Corporation.  Note that one defendant of the lawsuit; a Ms. Jayne Cartwright (a long time personal close friend of Gliebe) continues to remain as a Board of Director under Williams and also holds the NA officer position as Secretary under Williams current reign at the NA.  To those few who still don’t get it, the lawsuit is just not about Gliebe but all NA officers who enabled and helped Gliebe raid the NA assets for their own personal benefit.
In regards to Williams’s membership standards for the NA, and what type of people he would allow in, can one presume what is an obvious serious public relations issue for the National Alliance in the eyes of NARRG and also from the viewpoint of potential recruits to the NA and other White Nationalists; is on the other hand the exact opposite in the eyes of Williams?  Williams appears to be oblivious to this fact and in his own eyes erroneously instead sees his membership standards for the NA and the people he has already allowed in as a public relations promotional event for his own brand of philosophy, with which he wants the NA to be turned into as a religious organization. Perhaps he’ll appoint himself some sort of religious title in addition to all the other “hats” he wears.
After reading this article, sufficient information should have been provided to the careful reader that the logical obvious answer to the question of what are appropriate membership standards for the NA may be the correct viewpoint of NARRG and potential NA recruits, and not the viewpoint of the current NA Chairman Williams.  Thus the aptly described analogy between Will Williams and the fairytale comical character of The Emperor’s New Clothes who sees the world thru rose colored lenses.

PART I: Web posted comments by Williams and others comments about Williams

1. Excerpts of SPLC Interview of Williams posted on 12/17/14: The SPLC states that Williams insisted he has been using his savings, social security and military disability benefits.  Williams states “Of course, it had an effect on the rest of your life,” he said, referring to his combat experience. “I also got PTSD from it.”  The SPLC states that in his 10th and last book, Trials, Tribulations and Triumphs, self-published shortly before his suicide in 1993, Klassen devoted chapter 35 to the turbulent time he spent with Lucinda and Will Williams.  Klassen is quoted as writing that it was clear that Williams “had not recovered from the psychological scars of Vietnam”.  There were times, Klassen wrote, “when he [Williams] talked about it he would be on the verge of crying, and it affected his moral attitudes in general.”  Soon after the wedding, Klassen wrote “he [Klassen] received a telephone call from the new bride.  She was sobbing and pleaded with Klassen to rush over to the apartment and ‘protect her from Will’.” “They were apparently having one hell of a fight and Will was beating up on her,” Klassen wrote.
2. Mark Denton’s posting on NARRGs website on 12/23/14 the following:
“Will Williams in his latest SPLC interview spills his guts out on some of his own personal information.  One of these pieces of personal information is that he admits that he receives military disability benefits, and that he ‘also got PTSD from it’ in reference to his combat experience.  According to the United States Department of Veterans Affairs : ‘Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a mental health problem that can occur after a traumatic event like war’.   Ben Klassen’s last published book stated that it was clear that Williams ‘had not recovered from the psychological scars” of Vietnam’.   Holding the position as a former NA membership coordinator, Williams should know better what the requirements are for obtaining and retaining membership in the NA.  As a former NA member myself, I have with me a copy of the NA Member’s Handbook [2005].  It says under the subheading ‘Ineligible persons’ that, and I directly quote: ‘The following categories of persons are ineligible for membership – Persons who have been admitted into any mental hospital, either voluntary or involuntarily; Any individual who receives state assistance for a mental condition or has been declared mentally unfit for duty from the military or declared mentally handicapped by any state agency.’  So the real question is, whether or not Will Williams meets the minimum membership requirements of the National Alliance?  And if not, then he should immediately resign, and if he refuses, then the Board of Directors of the NA should then immediately expel Williams from the National Alliance, and appoint a new chairman, president and treasurer, all posts held by Williams.”
3. Williams on 12/28/14 at 9:54 AM, replied on his own web blog:
”[Potential] members will be able to download our new membership applications and send to me for consideration.”  “ An aspirant to our Alliance must sign this simple pledge when applying for membership: I am a White person of good moral character, with no ineligibility.”  “It is up to me to ascertain if an applicant agrees with our goals and program, based in part on his known behaviour.”  “Mr. Denton’s suggestion that I’ve been declared mentally handicapped by some state agency or that I have been admitted to a mental hospital, so therefore am ineligible to be a National Alliance member.”
4. On  12/30/14  Williams cohort M.P. Shiel states:
“[Williams Web site], It will serve as an initial ‘first impression’, for those new readers with an interest, there are feeds and direct links to our mentoring/discussion forum, White Biocentrism.”   
(Editor’s note: hence the direct link that Williams is trying to enforce between the secular National Alliance Corporation and his own personal philosophy and brand of religion as manifested in his White Biocentrism web blog.)
5. Strom on 01/03/15 on his web blog:
“Will Williams is as honest in his life and in his dealings as he is uncompromising in his philosophy. All of us should ask ourselves these questions: Where can the seeking White man or woman find your values, your moral system?”

PART II: NA Membership Handbook membership criteria statements

A. 1981 edition of Membership guidelines pamphlet (pre Williams involvement in NA)

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/National_Alliance_Membership_Handbook_(1981).
Source: Membership Handbook National Alliance: A Guide for the National Alliance Member by Dr. William Pierce (presumed) February 1981.  From Metapedia- The first edition of the National Alliance Membership Handbook was issued February 1981. The handbook was grey, soft cover, approximately 5×4 inches, and contained 38 printed pages. The front cover heading was ‘Membership Handbook’ with a two and a half inchLife Rune centered and the name ‘National Alliance’ lower semicircular below the symbol. In smaller print ‘A Guide for the National Alliance Member’ was printed at the bottom of the handbook.  The handbook showed no copyright.  Pertinent contents from this First Edition version are quoted verbatim below:
“It is by no means comprehensive at this time, and many members will fail to find the answers to some of their questions in it. This defect will eventually be reduced by the publications of later editions, which will contain additional information.”
“Questions from members about topics which are inadequately treated in this edition and suggestions for additional topics to be added to later editions will be essential to the process of evolutionary development of a Membership Handbook which will gradually come closer to serving every member’s needs fully.”
“Revocation of membership-  Among the more common reasons for which membership is revoked are:(3) the commission of any act, intentional or unintentional, by a member which casts discredit on the National Alliance; (4) the determination by the National Office that the continued association of a member would be harmful to the interests of the National Alliance.”

B. 1993 edition (circa Williams involvement in NA):

Pertinent contents from this Second Edition version are quoted verbatim below:
b_namembership

C. 2005 edition (post Williams departure from NA):

Pertinent contents from this Third Edition version are quoted verbatim below:
c_namembership

D. NA website 2015 edition (direct Williams involvement in NA):

Pertinent contents from this Fourth Edition version are quoted verbatim below:
“REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIONAL ALLIANCE MEMBERSHIP-  Ineligible persons:No homosexual or bisexual person, no person actively addicted to alcohol or to an illegal drug, no person with a non-White spouse or a non-White dependent, and, except in extraordinary circumstances, no person currently confined in a penal institution may be a member. (The National Alliance does not advocate any illegal activity and expects its members to conduct themselves accordingly.)”
“What We Believe: If you believe as we do, we invite you to join us.”

PART III: Comparison of and contrast of different editions of the NA Membership Handbook

The First (1981) Edition states “evolutionary advancement and improvement”.  Williams 2015 online version on the other hand is de-evolutionary, and retrogrades back in time to fit Williams and company particular peccadillos and persuasions.
Williams 2015 online version states that he is the final arbitrator of who can join and who cannot join the Alliance according to his criteria.  “An aspirant to our Alliance must sign this simple pledge when applying for membership: I am a White person of good moral character, with no ineligibility.” “It is up to me to ascertain if an applicant agrees with our goals and program, based in part on his known behaviour.  I do not like liars; liars in my book do not have good moral character.”  These comments from Williams thus begs several questions for Mr. Williams:  Is the sole criteria for having good moral character, is only being truthful, and not being a known proven liar?   In Mr. Williams’s book, does someone who disagrees with him, become a liar in Williams mind?  If someone else were NA Chairman, would Williams himself (and Strom also) meet his own criteria of having ‘good moral character’, and also not being a liar?
The Third (2005) Edition states no persons with mental health issues can be NA members.  Williams Second (1993) Edition which he reverts back to (purposely?) emits this key requirement.  The question thus arises, is it in the best interests of the NA to exclude known mentally ill people?   Evidently Williams and Strom think otherwise, as they have omitted this requirement from their version of the NA Membership Handbook.  What would Dr. Pierce think about this requirement, would he want known mentally ill persons to be in the NA, let alone hold leadership positions to boot?

PART IV: Summary on what type of a White world does Williams envisage according to his criteria

Williams low bar membership criteria allows the following types of persons to join the NA:
1. Claims moral persons only can be members, but yet accepts as a member and also appoints as one of his NA Officers his longtime friend Kevin Strom, who is registered with the Pennsylvania State Police on its “Megan’s Law” List of Sex Offenders. Strom plead guilty to charges of possession of child pornography, served two years in prison and is still serving under supervised probation of the authorities mentioned.
2. Allows mentally ill former and potentially existing patients (such as himself?) to join the NA.  Williams in his own words admits that he [Williams] receives military disability payments, and has PTSD which is a form of mental illness according to the US Veterans Administration and other recognized mental health authorities.
3. Allows publically acknowledged persons who commit acts of domestic family violence and others who practice patterns of spousal abuse to join the NA.  It should be noted that Klassen alludes to the physical violence of Williams against his then first wife of three.  Thus if this is true, then Klassen implies that Williams is a known wife beater/girlfriend abuser.  If this charge is true, then is this the type of family values of peace and harmony that under Williams and Strom’s reign wants to allow, or tolerate?
4. By Williams claim of being the sole judge of who is a NA member (and NA Officer), Williams in effect has attempted to exert total control over any NA assets located at his private property located in Tennessee.  Under Williams attempted rules, neither the Corporation itself, the NA Board of Directors, nor the NA members would have any recourse over a rogue Chairman who controls access to any NA assets located at his so called media complex and research center in Tennessee.  Under Williams attempted sole proprietorship type of organizational setup, if the Board and/or Officers go rogue the members would have absolutely no recourse as the Board and/or Officers cannot be held accountable to anyone but themselves, just like what the previous regime of Gliebe et.al. tried to get away with before the NARRG lawsuit was filed in order that justice can be rightly served, on all those found guilty as charged in a Court of Law.

Epilogue and “potential Post Mortem” for the NA if Williams has his way

The question for morally upright White racially conscious families is at what point does an inordinate amount of excessive negative baggage that the Williams entourage retain become the tipping point for revulsion and rejection of the NA no matter what amount of previous good work was done while NA founder Dr. Pierce was still alive.  Under Williams present low bar for membership standards in which he is the final arbitrator, all sorts of undesirables can join and potentially rise up to leadership positions such as Williams media director Kevin Strom and even obtain the highest position of Chairman such as Williams himself currently occupies.
NARRG’s retention of the Third Edition (2005) NA Membership Handbook’s high standards for membership requirements on the other hand keeps the wasteland of morally reprehensible undesirables out of the NA by raising the bar to include only those not having proven mental and or/psychological issues, those not having publicly published reported spousal abuse/ wife beating issues, and also excluding anti-family values legally convicted characters such as those that are listed on State Megan’s Law web sites for all the world to see.
Who in their right mind would want to join a self-proclaimed family friendly organization when right off the bat would force oneself to public ridicule and derision by being susceptible to the charge of being guilty by association, such as would exist under Williams rules for NA membership.  Thus rightly so in the minds of most racially conscious White people, this will doom the NA, under Williams membership requirements, to perpetually being only a group of a tiny small minority with absolutely no hope whatsoever of ever growing into a vibrant and forceful movement that actually accomplishes anything useful or fruitful.  The media loves this soap opera personality of the current NA leaders and will have a field day with Williams if he continues his present wrong course for the NA.
For most potential new NA members, it appears more and more evident that indeed Williams is blinded by his own overrated opinion of himself and thus naively is deluded into thinking that his and Strom’s version of the NA will succeed.  Williams thus by his actions does appear to fit very well the character of the fairy tale of the Emperor’s New Clothes that is oblivious to his own detrimental negative impact on the NA.  To everyone except himself he appears to fit the stereotype for many of some sort of king who believes his own rhetoric, with only a small group of misguided followers who will stand with him thick and thin.

Appendix A:  Abstracts from U.S. Veterans Administration government web site

VA » Veterans Benefits Administration » Compensation » Disability Compensation
Disability compensation is a monthly tax-free benefit paid to Veterans who are at least 10% disabled because of injuries or diseases that were incurred in or aggravated during active duty, active duty for training, or inactive duty training. A disability can apply to physical conditions, such as a chronic knee condition, as well as amental health conditions, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Evidence Required:  Medical evidence of a current physical or mental disabilityAND Evidence of a relationship between your disability and an injury, disease, or event in military service. Medical records or medical opinions are required to establish this relationship.
Evidence:  You must submit all relevant evidence in your possession and/or provide information sufficient to enable VA to obtain all relevant evidence not in your possession. This includes the following as part of your application:  Discharge or separation papers (DD214 or equivalent), Service Treatment Records if they are in your possession, Medical evidence (doctor & hospital reports)
Standard Claim: VA will provide a medical examination for you, or get a medical opinion, if determined it is necessary to make a claims decision.

Appendix B:  Excerpts from various other sources regarding PTSD.

Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) can occur following a life-threatening event like military combat, natural disasters, terrorist incidents, serious accidents, or violent personal assaults like rape. Some people have stress reactions that don’t go away on their own, or may even get worse over time. These individuals may develop PTSD.
People who suffer from PTSD often suffer from nightmares, flashbacks, difficulty sleeping, and feeling emotionally numb. These symptoms can significantly impair a person’s daily life.
PTSD is marked by clear physical and psychological symptoms. It often has symptoms like depression, substance abuse, problems of memory and cognition, and other physical and mental health problems. The disorder is also associated with difficulties in social or family life, including occupational instability, marital problems, family discord, and difficulties in parenting.