Saturday, November 29, 2014

Jurisdiction Appeal Written by Gary Yarbrough

Original Jurisdiction Appeal
August 202014
Re: Appeal of Parole Hearing Conducted on July 15, 2014, “None of Action”
Dated August 8, 2014
#1 The Guidelines were incorrectly applied in my case: © Time in Custody:
Hearing examiner Hilton had no knowledge of my actual sentence guidelines and therefore made no recommendation. She was unaware that, as an “old law” sentenced prisoner with a sentence over 45 years, I have a court appointed two-thirds date of 30 years. That two-thirds date is exactly the same date examiner Howard set for a “presumptive parole,” and which the commission approved in 2009, being: November 23, 2014. The “Presumptive Parole Date” of November 23th, 2014 was vacated in 2010; however, the court appointed two-thirds date of November 23, 2014 has not been vacated as far as I am aware.
According to the Notice of Action for the previous parole consideration dated September 19, 2012: “The commission parole consideration dated September 19th, 2012: “The commission will conduct a record review of your case approximately 9 months prior to the two-thirds date. If a parole is not ordered as a result of the record review, the commission will conduct a hearing for you.” I was given no notice of such a hearing, nor notice of the results of such a hearing if there was a record review or hearing. Since no notice was issued, and I was not given the opportunity to be heard or appeal the results of the hearing if the two-thirds date was revoked or vacated, a decision to deny the court appointed two-thirds release date should be considered null and void.
The “Notice of Action” dated August 8, 2014 noted: “No change in 15-year reconsideration hearing in July 2024 or continue to expiration, whichever comes first.” As far as I am aware, my sentence expires on the court appointed two-thirds date of November 23, 2014. The parole commission has not justified or given a reason for continuing my incarceration beyond the 30 year November 23rd, 2014 guideline.
As noted in my letter to the commission, given to examiner Hilton, dated July 15, 2014, the sentencing court in Seattle, WA for the 60 year sentence considered all priors, the “seriousness of my offenses” including the weapons offense case in Boise, Idaho when the court set the sentence and guidelines with a two-thirds date of November 23rd, 2014. As of yet, the commission has not issued a reason, nor given me Notice of Intent to continue my incarceration beyond the November 23rd, 2014 two-thirds date. According to the September 19, 2012 Notice of Action there are two reasons to consider:
  1. “Whether there is reasonable probability that I will commit a federal, state, or local crime; or
  2. “Whether I have frequently or seriously violated the rules of the institution.”
If the commission considered these two reasons at a “review” or “conducted a hearing for me,” I was not informed, nor given any due process regarding either. As to reason #1 its ambiguity and equivocality leaves it too uncertain to even address. It is a reason that is easily abused by any authority. As to reason #2, there are aggregate guidelines to prevent abuse or authority in this respect, and, as also noted in my July 15, 2014 letter to the commission, “I am 10 years beyond any aggregate guidelines for infractions.” That said, and as noted in previous appeals, this standard is easily exploited by the Bureau of Prisons staff, who abuse their authority to manipulate and orchestrate incidences to force inmates to commit infractions. They do this all the time. A disciplinary hearing is hardly conductive to a truly adjudicatory performance. Likewise, to extend my incarceration beyond the 30 year two-thirds date by ten years utilizing the two considerations noted above, without any notice, due process, or opportunity to be heard and rebut the accusations would be a miscarriage of justice. Eighteen years about the aggregate guidelines would be extremely excessive and truculent. Even the 10 years is contrary to guidelines (I’ve had no incident reports in 8 years).
As of November 23rd, 2014 I will have served 360 (30 years) months in prison, five years more than double the original guideline lower range of 150 months.
The decision was based on erroneous information
In July 2009 Examiner Howard recommended a 5 year parole date to November 23rd, 2014. That date was approved by the commission in October 2009. Four months later the commission vacated that date and a ordered a “special reconsideration hearing” to consider “new adverse information.” After being examined by Mr. Glen, he recommended to reinstate the November 2014 parole date. The commission denied that recommendation and ordered a second reconsideration hearing for July 2010. Examiner Kubic recommended a 15 year set off of 2024. The commission “notice of action” dated January 8, 2013 claims “The commission found posts attributed to you on websites that provide a forum for expressing white supremacist, anti-Semitic, militant, and anti-government views.” I would note here that I have been in prison since before the world wide web and internet existed. I have not had access to a computer, nor never seen any websites whatsoever. I have no way of knowing who, nor what, is on any website. The commission noted that these websites provide a forum “for expressing” views. It is a complete impropriety for the commission to hold me accountable for what others express in a public forum, especially since I have never viewed that forum and have no knowledge of who or what is posted on the side. I still do not know who or what these expressed views are. The Notice of Action  goes to the note, “Your continued affiliation through the internet contradicts your claim that you have for years renounced such views.” The commission has me “affiliated” with websites, people, and expressed opinion I have never seen, met, or heard? This also is complete impropriety. The commission claims that I “renounced such views” at the 2009 parole hearing. The 2009 parole hearing was audio recorded, I never made such renunciation. I stated at the hearing that “My beliefs have changed.” My beliefs never included “white supremacy” nor “anti-government” views. Therefore, not only is there adherence to such views there is no “continued adherence to such views,” nor any “affiliation” with anyone who professes such obvious views. That is: There was absolutely no “new adverse information” to “reconsider,” and no valid reason to vacate the November 23rd, 2014 presumptive parole date. The commission did so based entirely upon misperception and misrepresentation.  In paragraph four of the January 8, 2013 Notice of Action the commission goes on to allege my “continued expression of white supremacist” and “anti-government views via the internet” AS IF I HAD EXPRESSED SUCH VIEWS MYSELF!!!!!!!! The commission is apparently attributing to me the views that others have expressed in the format of a PUBLIC forum. This is yet additional impropriety.
Returning to paragraph one of the January 8th, 2013 Notice of Action, the commission claims that “White Supremacist Documents” were seized from my home over 30 years ago. No such documents were seized, nor presented as evidence in my trials in Idaho or Washington. I submit now that no such documents of “White Supremacy” exist. The court reinterated numerous times during the trial in Seattle, Washington that we were not being not being tried for our political/religious views, but for our violations of U.S. Laws. Regarding my October 23rd, 2009 appeal to the commission, in the May 12th, 2011 Notice of Action the commission noted that I “claimed that your ideological motives for committing the offenses were irrelevant.” I never made that claim either, I merely stated that my political beliefs and motives at that time were not illegal in themselves. Indeed, my religious beliefs were entirely the motivating factor behind my offenses 30 years ago. It is those beliefs which I referred to at the 2009 parole hearing that I have changed. And those beliefs were entirely from a biblical prospective, not white supremacy nor anti-government. The commission tends to read into my actions and statements concepts that are not relevant to me. It is a miscarriage of justice that not during my 30 years of incarceration has any government agent approached me and expressed concerns about any perceived political or religious beliefs I may or may not have, until after I was approved for parole in 2009. This seems to suggest a malicious intent. The commission will jump to wrong conclusions about my character and beliefs, but not make a single inquiry into what I actually believe?
This seems to suggest a malicious intent. The commission will jump to wrong conclusions about my character and beliefs, but not make a single inquiry into what I actually believe? Indeed, on numerous occasions I attempted to discuss my political/religious views with federal bureau of prison agents. Fifteen years ago I made a request to the psychologist, program coordinator Dr Ahrens requesting therapy with a “specialist” deprogrammer regarding my beliefs. (This request is noted in a memo from Dr. Ahrens to unit manager Adelsberger dated March 9, 2001. See Central File). I made this request so that my personal beliefs would be clarified and documented. I again requested counseling in July 2011 to Dr. Zahn and Dr. Koch to discuss the very concerns the commission raised, though those concerns are purely conjecture; my request went unanswered…….I made another attempt at counseling in a request to unit case manager, Mr. Fenlon, in written format dated March 18th, 2012. Again, no response, nor to a follow up request dated April 25th, 2012. It is inequitable for the commission to adversely judge me concerning my beliefs when the commission does not know what my beliefs consist of. I would also note that in 30 years of custody that I have no incidence of a racist nature, and no “white supremacist” prison gang activity. In fact, the Federal Bureau of prison staff has placed a “separations” order on me because I refused to allow a prominent white prison gang to force me to get involved in a prison “racial war”! My actions back up my words and dispel the accusations of the commission. I have had this separation since 1998. Since the commission had issues with websites, and sent me the disclosure material related to those sites in 2010, my wife threatened local action against those sites to force them to remove any and all mention of my name. Those disclosures were the first time I became aware of the contents of the website. Two refused to remove mention of me. There is nothing I can do about that. None of these people or websites are “affiliates” of mine. It is difficult to alter one’s past, and it takes considerable time to modify core beliefs. However, I never advocated white supremacy, racism, or anti-government views. I was, at one time, passionate about government reform. The commission should bear in mind that “The Order” was made up of men with a wide range of political and religious views. The description the government and commission note regarding The Order in the Notice of Action is untenable, the concepts of “Nazism,” “White Supremacy,” and a “White Christian Nation” are not ideologies that are compatible. This was not the objective of the Order nor was it a goal to “topple the U.S. Government.” Such a statement is purely sensationalism and hyperbole. Catch words to illicit an automatic programed reaction. Appeals are allegedly “decided on the basis of the written record.” But quite often that written record is simply an exaggerated distortion, as I believe I have demonstrated in this appeal utilizing only the Notices of Action. Perception must not be reality, reality stands on its own merits, good or bad. I have been fabricated into something I am not.
Co-defendant disparity
Also noted under appeal reason #4 the decision was based on erroneous information and the facts justify a different decision; and appeal reason #5 incorrect procedure;
Further errors and impropriety in the January 8th, 2013 Notice of Action: which notes that “Your co-defendants were not considered advocates of white supremacy.” I alleged co-defendant disparity because the commission claimed I was a white supremacist advocate. “You acted to advance the Neo-Nazi objectives of a paramilitary white supremacist organization.” (i.e. The Order). All co-defendants were members of the Order. According to court records, Richard Kemp was a “founding member.” Kemp was charged in the death of Walter West as an act of racketeering associated with the Order, he was paroled in 2008. Frank Silva, Randall Evans, and Andrew Barnhill are alleged to be Klu Klux Klansmen. All three are out on parole. I have never advocated white supremacy nor accused of any act in which someone was physically harmed. And yet the commission utilizes the claim of “white supremacy” in conjunction with membership in the Order to vacate the November 23rd, 2014 parole date. It is evident tht the commission utilizes a double standard wherein I am concerned. How is the label of “white supremacy” applicable to me, yet not to my co-defendants? The claim of “white supremacy” in the Notice is erroneous, and by associating this accusation to me and not the affore mentioned co-defendants is wrong reasoning and procedure. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that I ever advocated white supremacy or the “toppling of the U.S. Government.” Expressing dissenting opinion and views does not equate to being anti-government. And the commission is wrong to equate me to the views and opinions of others noted in a PUBLIC FORUM.  The paroled Co-defendants are noted as having blogs on the very same websites in the disclosure material provided by the commission to claim I am “affiliated” with. This is complete impropriety. Additionally, the court made no charges as to religious or political beliefs, there charges were only violation of U.S. Laws. If the commission distinguishes one defendant from the others in regard to political views, then that same standard should justly apply to all defendants. How is it that I am accused of being a “white supremacist,” adversely decided against, and denied parole as a results of that accusation while “co-defendants,” alleged members of the same enterprise are “not considered advocates of white supremacy”? The April 1985 issue of “California Magazine” Page 97 shows a photograph of 8 individuals holding a KKK banner, two of those individuals are Frank Silva and Randall Evans at a “white power” gathering. The commission does not consider these two co-defendants, noted as “Klansmen,” as advocates of white supremacy but consider me, someone who has never believed in nor advocated such a concept, a white supremacist? These two are paroled, but I am labeled a white supremacist, and as a result of that label my sentence is extended by ten years? This is totally improper disparity counter to the goals of the sentencing guidelines. I am not “anti-government,”I do express verbal dissent to abuse of authority and injustice, which is a constitutional right of free speech, as is freedom of the press or media, and the right to be free from oppression due to political and religious beliefs.
Salient Factor Score
The Salient Factor score is 5, which does not indicate a “serious threat” or the probability that I will reoffend if released.” I have no “public safety factor” classification. Indeed, the Department of Justice offered to release me in 1994 if I would “cooperate” in the conviction of Robert Miles for a crime department of justice agents knew full well that Mr. Miles was innocent of. I was not “too dangerous to release” in 1994. And the Department of Justice has offered deals for downward departures twice since then on cases involving prison gangs. I refused.
For the parole commission to claim I advocate white supremacy utilizing the exaggerated claim of website “affiliation”. To suggest that I may not obey federal, state, and local laws is injudicious and exaggerated trepidation. As previously noted, the beliefs I held 30 years ago, which led to my offenses have changed.
Especially mitigation circumstances justify a different decision:
“The Order” was made up of men with beliefs of varying degrees, none advocated the “Neo-Nazi” or “White Supremacy” concepts. None of us participated in the RICO trial 30 years ago, and none refuted the government’s charges or claims. The claims of white supremacy and anti-government sentiments were purely exaggerated sensationalism. At the time, we were “separatists” not supremacists. We did not believe any one race was superior or inferior to any other race, we simply believed we were all different. We sought to preserve and cultivate our own racial heritage, nothing more. We were tried for our violations of U.S. Law. Trying 10 men altogether, regardless of legal justification, is a miscarriage of justice. The court claimed the Order was a well organized enterprise, but in reality nothing could be further from the truth. Men committed offenses entirely on their own, act I had no knowledge of or participation in. The court considered my own offense behavior in determining the sentence. Those guidelines mandate a two-thirds mandatory release date of November 23rd, 2014, which is more than double the lower guideline range. I’ve done 20 years for my co-defendants offense behavior. That should be satisfaction enough for anyone.
A More Light Decision Should Be Rendered on Grounds of Compassion
I committed my offenses as a young man at age 28, I am now 59 and in very ill health. I have severe Rheumatoid Arthritis, Liver Disease, Thyroid Disease, and COPD. My wife is ill also and currently on disability income. After the 2014 parole date was approved she adopted two children (One being her grandson) for us both to raise. Since the 2014 date was later vacated that means my wife is forced to raise the children alone. She needs help. I will not survive a 10 year set off for parole. I am also a father and a grandfather to 7 grandchildren. I have never seen because of distance and expense. I would like to see them and spend what remaining days I have left in life to enjoy my family.
For all the above noted reasons I do humbly request parole release at the earliest possible date. I have age and educated myself, improved my character and bettered myself. I am remorseful for all my offenses.
Thank you for your consideration.
Gary L. Yarbrough
August 20th, 2014

Are Whites or Blacks more Likely to be Shot by Police ? The Shocking Truth!

The ongoing unrest over the Ferguson-Michael Brown incident—which has now spread countrywide—has allowed the Jewish Supremacist dominated media to once again launch a barrage of articles claiming that European-Americans are somehow inherently racist towards African-Americans—and that this “culture of racism” is so pervasive that it even results in the mass shootings of unarmed black civilians by “racist white police.”
A typical recent such article was published in the online journal Mother Jones. Its title,“Exactly How Often Do Police Shoot Unarmed Black Men?” sets the tone for the entire screed, which includes numerous quotes blaming alleged racism by the police, the court systems, and basically everybody else who is white.
Mother-Jones1
Mother Jones is a self-described “progressive” journal, which is actually the news outlet of something called “The Foundation for National Progress” or FNP. It will come as no surprise to hear that the FNP in turn is funded by the well-known Jewish Supremacist George Soros, through his “Open Society Foundations.”
It will also come as no surprise to hear that the publisher of Mother Jones is yet another Jewish Supremacist, Steve Katz.
jew mother jones katzweb
As part of its attempts to blame European Americans, the Mother Jones article quotes several official authorities, such as the NYPD Firearms Discharge Report, 2011, and then goes into say that:
When you look at the racial breakdown of New Yorkers, black people are disproportionately represented among those targeted as criminal shooting suspects, firearms arrestees, and those fired upon or struck by police gunfire.
In fact, blacks have vastly disproportionate, dramatically higher rates of violent crime. In fact, African Americans commit are over 700 percent, (6 times) more likely to commit violent crimes than than are European Americans. Black people are not “targeted as criminal shooting suspects,: they are the  vast majority of criminal shooting suspects. Meaning they are have been identified and charged, or identified and sought for shooting a criminally shooting a firearm in a crime.  The authorities keep very strict racial records by both assailant and victim.
It should be noted that the NY police authority is by far the largest in the United States and encompasses over 9 million people. The Jewish-owned Mother Jones uses their figures to show Police bias in shooting Black people when it really shows the direct opposite.
As far as those “being fired upon or struck by police gunfire,” in truth they are fired upon or struck by police gunfire at a dramatically lower rate than are white shooting suspects.
The shocking reality, as revealed in the article’s own graph, is completely the opposite.
nypd_annual_firearms_discharge_report_2011-46
The chart below shows that whites are less than 3 percent of the hundreds of suspects who criminally fired weapons, while blacks, who make up only 23 percent of the population, were over 70 percent of the shooters. Of those killed by police, whiles who only 3 percent of the criminal shooters were an astounding 44 percent of those killed, Blacks who were over 70 percent of the shooters make up an astoundingly low, 22 percent of those killed!
As the figures show, it is blacks who are far less likely to be fired upon or hit by police gunfire in proportion with their criminal activities, and, astonishingly, according to the official statistics, there are no—zero—recorded incidents of white suspects actually firing guns at the police, while nearly 70 percent of all shots fired at the police in that city came from gun-wielding black people and the rest from Hispanics.So, even though not a single white suspect fired at any police officer, 44 percent of those killed by police were white!
No-one can deny that blacks commit a massive disproportionate level of violent crime in contrast to their population…and the reality is that police shoot white suspects in vastly great per capita proportion than they do black suspects.
In fact, the statistics show that, per capita, white criminal suspects are far more likely to be shot by police than are black criminal suspects!
Take a look at the Mother Jones article which stupidly reveals the own blind anti-white racism in their own charts and stats.
black-whites-shot-in-NY-city
The six columns in the chart shown above for 2012 show the following:
1. Blacks are about 22 percent of the population of NY, whites are over 32 percent of the population.
2. It shows that although blacks are under 25 percent of the population they are almost 70 percent of those arrested for firearms violations.
3. It leaves out the vastly higher violent crime rate, but does show that blacks were well over 70 percent of the totaled 771 criminal shooting suspects!
4. It shows that only 41 of these shooting suspects were fired upon by the police.
4a. Yet, even though blacks were over 70 percent of the shooting suspects, they were less than 50 percent of the suspects fired upon by the police.
4b. Even more amazingly, whites, who are less than three percent of the shooting suspects, were 15 percent of those fired upon by police.
5.  It shows that only 28 suspects were struck by police gunfire.
5a. Whites, only three percent of shooting suspects were over 20 percent of the ones struck by police gunfire.
5b. Blacks who were over 70 percent of the identified shooting suspects were only 45 percent of those struck by Police gunfire.
6. This column shows that of the shooting suspects who actually fired at the police were all either black or Hispanic and not one white had fired at the police.
7  As the previous chart shows that although whites constituted only 3 percent of violent criminals who used guns, (and other crime figures reveal that only about 5 percent of violent crime in NY is committed by whites) — Whites are 44 percent of those killed by police gunfire. Whereas Blacks who commit over 70 percent of the violent crime in NY are only 22 percent of those killed by police.
In fact, according to the NYPD 2011 Annual Firearms Discharge Report,–the same one quoted by Mother Jones–the stark facts of who is getting shot and who is doing the shooting is actually spelled out in a pie chart on page 28: --NYPD 2011 Annual Firearms Discharge Report. (shown above)
As can be seen from the official statistics of NYPD, MORE whites are shot by the police than blacks! The EXACT OPPOSITE of what the media is claiming.
The facts therefore, show clearly that the claims by the Jewish Supremacist-controlled media are simply lies.  However, they would rather put this disinformation out, than report on the only true racism: that of Jewish Supremacism.
When, it might be asked, will Mother Jones do a report on Israel’s banning of marriages between Jews and non-Jews?
When, it might be asked, will Mother Jones do a report on Israel’s use of DNA tests to screen potential immigrants for racial purity before allowing them into their “holy land?”
When, it might be asked, will Mother Jones do a report on Israel’s policy of arresting, detaining and deporting all African asylum-seekers?
When, it might be asked, will Mother Jones do a report on the vicious anti-Gentile outbursts by all manner of top religious and political leaders in Israel?
When, it might be asked, will Mother Jones do a report on why all official Jewish organizations in America support Israel—and all its policies—while demanding that the US adopt the exact opposite policies here at home?
Don’t hold your breath waiting for the Mother Jones expose on Jewish Supremacist racism: they, and the other Zio-controlled media only have an interest in fermenting hatred against European-Americans.
RECAP: It is not just Mother Jones that is presenting this damnable lie about white “racist” police shooting down Blacks. The mainstream Zio media is full of headlines suggesting that blacks are being shot down by white police when the the truth that police are far more likely to shoot down and kill white criminals than Black criminals. Yet, even though the facts are clear the mainstream Jewish media promotes this lie incessantly.
The deluge of this lie in the mainstream media actually results in more racist hatred and violence against innocent people across America. For instance, the riots, and violence across America are a direct result of the hate-filled lies dished out by the Zio media!
The truth is that the lies promoted by the mainstream, Jewish dominated entertainment destroys thousands of times more lives than cases such as Michael Brown. Millions of young white people are led into drug abuse, alcohol abuse, sexual abuse and disease, and violence — by a media that drenching our kids in blood. Gangster rap and the gangster, drug and violence lifestyle has become a role model for millions of blacks and whites in America, all promoted by the Jewish run record and entertainment industry. That is the real killer of both African American “teens” and whites alike.
In fact, the hatred against a white policemen, the gangster actions of Michael Brown in the physically violent robbery of the Ferguson store just minutes before the confrontation with Darren Wilson, can certainly be associated with the ziomedia climate of hate instilled against European Americans and the police.
The massive  zio lies about police shooting down black teens will likely result in more violent thugish, hate-fulled African Americans becoming enraged and violent with the same tragic results. — Dr. David Duke

Garth Brooks cancels Tonight Show appearance to show solidarity with Ferguson rioters


Left-wing pop/country music star Garth Brooks says he is cancelling his Tonight Show appearance to show solidarity with the rioters in Ferguson.
The move highlights the fact that the major “country music acts” have little in common with their fan base. Current “country music stars” are more pop music than anything else. Most of the people running the industry are on the far-left, like the Bronfman family.
These singers are little more than paid actors. They are used to promote cultural Marxism by their handlers.
Effeminate, pop-sounding “country music” stars like Garth Brooks have little, if anything, in common with classic country music stars like Hank Williams, David Allen Coe, Johnny Cash, George Jones, and others.
Singers like Garth Brooks are often referred to in terms like “neo-country,” “alt-country,” or “urban cowboy.”
Garth Brooks was supposed to appear on a special Thanksgiving episode of the Tonight Show this evening. He released a statement today cancelling. He said it would be “distasteful” to perform given the events in Ferguson.
Militant Black Power groups and the Revolutionary Communist Party have been urging supporters to “shut American down.” It appears Brooks is honoring their call.
People who own Garth Brooks albums are being encouraged to smash them and boycott all future concerts.

MSNBC airs 21 minute attack piece on St. Louis County ADA Kathi Alizadeh

 

National Public Radio, Associated Press, and ABC National News have all conceded that numerous pro-Mike Brown witnesses committed perjury. Mike Brown was not shot in the back. Mike Brown also did not have his hands up. At least a dozen witnesses committed Class A felony perjury under Missouri law.
A man, described by NPR as “the most compelling witness,” fingered Mike Brown’s own stepfather as the source for both phony made up accounts.
Instead of conceding that the media’s Mike Brown narrative was false from the start, MSNBC has launched a new narrative. The network aired a 21 minute sensationalist attack piece on Assistant District Attorney Kathi Alizadeh! They are accusing her of misconduct and gross incompetence. They say she torpedoed the Grand Jury process and made it impossible to get an indictment.
MSNBC is the same network that openly green-lighted black on white hate crime violence. Network hosts urged black protester to “go to white safe havens” and “make white people feel uncomfortable.”
MSNBC is now trying to ruin another’s person’s life in a desperate attempt to keep their flim flam Mike Brown narrative going.
Why would MSNBC devote an entire half hour, with commercials, to attacking one ADA in one Grand Jury hearing? Clearly the network is intentionally trying to foster racial hatred. They are trying to keep alive provably false claims that have been totally buried with the fact. For the past three months the network has been relentlessly hammering the fake Mike Brown narrative and openly promoting and encouraging hatred against white people.
Clearly MSNBC is about as credible as grocery store rags that print articles about Bat Boy and Sasquatch.

White protesters told they must remain silent and stand behind black people


White people who showed up for a Mike Brown protest in Toronto were in for a rude awakening.
Whites and “non-black POCs” were given a set of rules. All non-blacks must remain silent and stand behind black people.
The event was put on by “Black Lives Matter: Toronot,” and they Facebook page is full of racial hatred against white people.
The group claims that whites benefit from “privilege” and black shortcomings are causing by white oppression. The group claims on their Facebook page that white people are systematically and inherently “racist.”
The group continued to defend their set of rules on their Facebook page even after coming under criticism on social media.

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Looting in Ferguson


Full scale mass rioting and looting in Ferguson

Most of the following information has come straight from the Ferguson police department scanner. Click here to tune in to the Ferguson, MO police scanner
University City double shooting. A woman was murdered and a University City police officer seriously injured by a man “with dreadlocks.” Police believe the perp was the son of the woman that was killed. Police say they do not believe the double shooting was related to Grand Jury decision.
Keep checking this page for updates.

26 Structures were set on fire:
Fashion R boutique has burned to the ground.
The entire intersection of W. Florissant and Canfield was being described as “everything on fire” on the police scanner.
Taco Bell fully engulfed in flames.
Red’s BBQ set on fire by armed men.
O’Reily Auto Parts fully engulfed in fire.
Walgreen’s set on fire.
Little Caesars Pizza has been set on fire.
A storage building set on fire using Molotov cocktails.
Sams Meat Market set on fire.
The fire department was forced to retreated from the Walgreen’s fire due to shots fired.
At least one man was shot in Ferguson.
Hundreds of gunshots fired in dozens of incidents.
Several burglaries and mugging took place outside of the large scale looting.
Cars set on fire in front of Dellwood City Hall.
At least 29 arrests have been made in Ferguson so far. Many for many felonies.
At least three memebers of the media were attacked:
Female CNN reporter was hit by a rock live on the air.
A cameraman for FoxNews was attacked.
A journalist was hit in the head and injured with either a brick or a large battery.
Another police car smashed up.
“Black male shooting at passing cars”
Shots fired with a rifle from a car.
Rioters are blocking I-270.
An Auto/Tire shop is being destroyed. Stolen car rammed into front.
Gunshots aimed directly at the Ferguson police department.
Men spotted brandishing guns near police station.
One man spotted brandishing an AR-15.
Fires started.
Police car set on fire.
At least two police cars have been smashed up by mobs.
The Ferguson Market & Liquor has been looted.
A Boost Mobile cell phone store has been looted.
A BP Gas station has been looted.
A Walgreen’s store has been looted.
A Family Dollar store has been looted.
A Dollar General store has been looted.
A Toys R US store has been looted.
Barborshop robbed/looted by two men.
A white journalist has been bashed with a brick in Ferguson.
Another victim was seen being attacked by a mob.
Rioters are blocking traffic and climbing on cars in Ferguson.
Rioters are hurling bottles as police.
Gunshots have also been reported in neighboring Clayton and Florissant.
Other cities:
A huge mob is blocking traffic in Philadelphia

Black Female Missouri State Senator Declares Race War in Ferguson

Daily Stormer
November 25, 2014

Hahahaha. Wacky bitch.
Here you have a Black female Missouri state senator, Maria Chappelle-Nadal, declaring a race war in Ferguson.

Can’t really get any more clear-cut than this, and it surely isn’t just coming from some feral black on the street – this is the highest level of Black society in the whole world declaring…
RACE WAR NOW!

Friday, November 21, 2014

Hear Dr. David Duke on the Unconstitutional Amnesty Action by Obama

Now available on the Rense Radio Network archive: hear Dr. David Duke, Don Black and Dr. Patrick Slattery have an amazing show beginning with the unconstitutional amnesty action by Obama. He shows how it frankly cannot be called an action by Obama as he is just a ZioPuppet and does whatever his masters want.
noamnesty
Dr. Duke also shows how Republicans such as the conservative Icon Ronald Reagan did the first great amnesty and arranged for it by law which did immeasurable harm as it was like a neon sign to illegals that if they come to America illegally there will be ways to get amnesty in the future.
Then the three of them talk about the evolution of both “right” and “left” toward an understanding of the truly extreme racism that ruled America, our media, banking and politics: Jewish racism!
Next all three get into a great discussion of the book which is now available for shipment: The Mutiny of the Elsinore by Jack London and the incredible importance of this book into not only making people aware of the Jewish takeover, but it also is a clarion call for courage in each of us to fight against this tyranny, for in the book, the Hero overcomes the Jewish-led mutineers! Be sure to give a generous book, and there are still some low numbers available  for generous gifts, as a few numbers under 10 are still available for very generous gift givers.  — Share this show and be sure to support this book’s publishing! Thanks to all!
Our show is aired live at 11 am replayed at ET 4pm Eastern and 4am Eastern time.
You can also hear the live stream by calling 712-432-7855 on your cell or home phone (US) or Skype (US and international).

Zio-Racists Welcome Obama Immigration ‘Amnesty’—but Support Immigrant Expulsion from Israel

The ongoing saga of Jewish Supremacist racism and hypocrisy has been highlighted once again with the news that the world’s most racist Jewish Supremacist organization—the Anti-Defamation League—has welcomed the effective ‘amnesty’ granted to at least five million illegal immigrants in the US, while at the same time fanatically supporting Israel which actively expels illegal immigrants.
ADL-reform580
ADL-supports-Israel
net-threat580
The executive order signed by President Barack Obama effectively opens the door to allow at least half of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants to stay in America. Even though Obama has denied that this is an amnesty, everyone knows that the reality is that once embedded into the system, it is just a matter of time before the illegals’ status will be changed.
This strategy—of ensuring that America’s founding European population be reduced to a minority—and then preferably into total irrelevance—has been a major goal of the Jewish Supremacists since the days of Jacob Javits and his fellow Zio-racists since the 1960s, when the first Jewish-promoted immigration reforms were started.
Hence it comes as no surprise to learn that the ADL was one of the first major Jewish organizations to welcome Obama’s executive order on immigration—which, of course, completely side steps Congress and is in direct contradiction to the general trend of the most recent congressional elections.
TOI-DNA580
In a special statement issued by Barry Curtiss-Lusher, ADL National Chair, and Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director of the ADL, that Jewish Supremacist organization announced that they:
[W]elcomed President Obama’s executive action on immigration, calling it “an important step toward fixing our nation’s broken immigration system.”
This executive action not only serves our common humanity, it is a step forward toward the more just and orderly immigration
system we hope Congress will craft and pass.  We hope the president and Congress will work together in a bipartisan spirit to enact reform that will fix the broader system.
The president’s executive action follows a 2012 measure to provide relief from deportation for immigrants brought to the United States as children, which ADL supported.  The League has long advocated for fair and humane immigration policies and has helped expose the anti-immigrant bigotry and hatred that has been an undercurrent of the immigration debate in the past few years
At the same time, the ADL—and all other major official Jewish organizations in America, including the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations,
which is the most senior representative body of American Jewish Supremacists—continue to fanatically support Israel.
Israel also outlaws marriages between Jews and non-Jews—a law which, if implemented the other way around by any other nation, would have the Jewish Supremacists screaming “holocaust.”
In addition, Israel has built a 26 foot high wall around its borders with the Arab population in order to prevent them entering Israel, and a major fence along its southern border with Egypt to prevent African asylum seekers from entering the Jews-only state.
Those asylum seekers inside Israel are detained and deported without trial, and the government officially calls them “infiltrators” who “threaten the Jewish nature of Israel.”
This then is the Jewish Supremacist strategy laid bare: promote a policy in America—mass immigration—which they firmly oppose in their own country, Israel.
The Jewish Supremacists know very well that mass immigration represents a threat to Israel’s ability to maintain its Jewish identity.
So why would they support this very same policy for America—knowing that its ultimate effect is harmful to the host nation?
The explanation for this hypocrisy and blatant double standard on the part of the Jewish Supremacists is simple: it forms part of their openly declared strategy of divide and conquer—of setting all other peoples and races against each other, so that Jewish Supremacists can manipulate and rule over them all with impunity.

Thursday, November 20, 2014

The Free American

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/claydouglas/2014/11/20/the-free-american

My Guest today is: Thursday November 20 Susan Yarbrough The Ongoing Saga of Gary Yarbrough 30 years in Prisonhttp://susan1219.wordpress.com/2014/11/15/letter-in-text/http://www.suite101.com/profile.cfm/susan1219
Gary Yarbrough, was one of the founding members of the Order or otherwise known as the Silent Brotherhood. Here is a little background, but of course written by the enemy http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&file_id=7921The Order tried to educate people about what was coming and to secure a white area without government control. The government had them fired from their jobs, their homes and churches condemned, etc...But Gary was arrested in Oregon so that Bob Mathews could escape from the hotel...then Bob Matthews was murdered by the feds and the rest were arrested. Gary was not involved with the murder of Berg, the Jewish radio talk show host..he was in Idaho when that happened...he has no murder charge or violation of Berg's civil rights. His main charge is RICO, counterfeiting, and armed robbery. He has been in prison for 30 years. He was approved a 2014 parole date in 2009 but it was vacated in 2010 and changed to 2024 (without due process) because of posts made on places like StormFront by people he didn't even know. He was in Florence ADX at the time
Every American needs to understand that the entire national press is controlled, and is simply giving you the "news" you are supposed to have.  . Please go to http://freeamerican.com and www.shop.freeamerican.com to order my books and the new Free American Magazines

Check Out Education Podcasts at Blog Talk Radio with Clay Douglas on BlogTalkRadio

The Federal Government Versus Gary Yarbrough by David Carothers

The U.S. federal government and its dozens of attached agencies are Mafia-style organizations--criminal enterprises that prey on the people they are supposed to serve. Among the most abusive of these agencies is the Federal Bureau of Prisons, an incarceration mill that falls under the aegis of the U.S. Department of Justice. The U.S. Attorney General wields the ultimate authority over the bureau. The Bureau of Prisons ( BOP ) is a labyrinthine gulag archipelego that administers 116 state and federal detention facilities nationwide. Currently, over two million inmates ( 716 people per 100,000 ) are confined behind its stone walls and steel doors. America, the "Land of the Free"-- incarcerates more people than any country on Earth. And, despite vehement claims to the contrary by politician-pundits and Jewish media talking-heads-- political dissidents are of particular interest to the minions who man the mill, and thus are targeted for special punishment. Gary Lee Yarbrough knows this fact all too well, for he has been a political prisoner in America for the past 31 years. He was 28 when he was swallowed into the Belly of the Beast. He is now 59. "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong." Yarbrough was one of the nine original members of The Silent Brotherhood, a white patriot organization founded in Washington State in 1983 by the young and idealistic Robert J. Mathews. The name of the activist group later was changed to The Order. While under the leadership of Mathews, The Order inflicted considerable damage upon what its members perceived to be the gravest of all threats to the survival of the white race: the-all pervasive Jewish power structure that, like a voracious and vicious octopus, devours everything in its path--a malevolent creature whose grasping tentacles extend into every aspect of American social life and political affairs. Mathews, Yarbrough and their Aryan kinsmen were determined to destroy this beast by whatever means necessary, whether legal or extra-legal. The activists would have preferred the former route, but chose the latter. One is foolish to play a game the rules of which were contrived by one's opponent. And the quest for the continued existence of the white race was no game to them--but War! In June of 1984 a trio of Order exterminators hastened Alan Berg's entry into the Promised Land. Berg, a Denver, Co.-based radio talk-show host, was a member of The Tribe, a fact of which he was immensely proud. Berg's on-air anti-Christian and anti-white diatribes spewed venomous, almost demonic hatred for all things good, pure, decent. When his body was found sprawled beside his black Volkswagen his tongue was no longer moving. Twelve .45-calibre slugs from a MAC-10 had done their job. The FBI sought to implicate Yarbrough in the extermination, but to no avail. He was at the bedside of a dying loved one in a hospital in Idaho at the time of the incident. Yarbrough had perhaps committed a few indiscretions during his time in The Order, but he had never knowingly hurt anyone. The following month The Order struck again, this time in a more lucrative manner. A dozen Aryans brandishing rifles, pistols and fake bazookas relieved a Brinks armored truck of almost four million dollars. The heist was both successful and unsuccessful. The money was put to good use for the most part--some of it may have contributed to the founding of one of the most effective white rights groups ever to exist anywhere on Earth: the National Alliance.

On the other hand, the heist was not successful and, in fact, led to the deadly demise of The Order later that year. Bob Mathews had dropped his pistol during the heist. It was discovered by the FBI and traced to Mathews. The FBI had already been closing in on the activists. The end of The Order was near. In early December of 1984 Mathews was slain on Widbey Island, an islet off the coast of Washington State. About 150 FBI agents armed with automatic weapons and incendiary devices surrounded an unoccupied vacation home in which Mathews had taken refuge. A fierce 36-hour gun battle ensued, but the agents could not flush out the lone defender. Frustrated, the impatient--and cowardly--agents hurled the firebombs into the cabin. Still Mathews refused to surrender. He was burned alive. Gary Yarbrough was already in jail at this time, having been arrested for racketeering and the manufacture of counterfeit Federal Reserve "money." He served several years in the Atlanta, Ga. federal penitentiary, then was transferred to the world-notorious prison in Marion, Ill. Years later came the gulag in Terre Haute, Ind, one of BOP's main inmate processing centers. He met and subsequently married his wife, Susan, there. Then came the most desperate detention facility of all: SuperMax, a massive facility in Florence, Co. Only the most hardened of irredeemable prisoners are supposed to be incarcerated there--but Gary L. Yarbrough is a political prisoner. Those wishing to correspond with this intrepid Aryan brother can locate his contact info on the White Information Network ( WIN ) at news4whites.blogspot.com. Yarbrough's wife, Susan, and white rights activist Michael Weaver contributed to this article. 

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Monkey Wrench Injustice by Gary Yarbrough

Monkey Wrench Injustice
Parole Commission Manipulation
In Retaliation for Refusal to Testify
Written by Gary Yarbrough
October 27, 2014
Transcribed by Susan Yarbrough
I was sent to Supermax ADX, Florence, CO, October 11, 2007. ADX was designed for predacious prisoners and prison gangs. One is referred to ADX via Due Process Hearing after being found guilty of an infraction of prison rules. ADX is meant to be a 3-5 year program with “step-down” stages or phases to advance to.
I am not a prison gang member, nor have I ever participated in any “disruptive group activity.” I was referred to ADX by an unknown entity, even though I had violated no rules, had 2 years clear conduct, and was participating in institutional programs. I was less than 20 months from my July 2009, “15 year reconsideration parole hearing.” The only excuse given for the ADX referral was “adjustment purposes.” The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) had to raise my security classification and place a management variable for “greater security” in order to refer me to ADX. However, I was already confined in a facility which was classified as the greatest security within the BOP, the “Security Confinement Unit” at U.S. Prison Terre Haute, Indiana, which houses death row and utilizes an electrically charged “kill fence” perimeter wire.
To advance through the first stage of ADX “program,” one must accumulate one year adult education or psychology course every 6 months. The administration automatically screens a prisoner for advancement referral after 1 year. I was routinely denied advancement referral to the intermediate unit 7 times every six months after the first year. I had clear conduct the entire time and completed dozens of ACE and psychology programs. Each time one is denied the advance a type of “notice” is issued. The first denial noticed is dated November 5, 2008. These notices are completely ambiguous and read virtually the same for all prisoners. My first one read, “You have been denied placement because it is believed that the factor which led to your placement at ADX have not been sufficiently mitigated to indicate you can function successfully in a less restrictive unit without posing a threat to the security or orderly running of the facility.”  As previously stated, I was referred to ADX by an unknown person, I violated no rules or regulations, did nothing wrong, and had no due process hearing. In December 2008, I still had no idea of why I was referred to ADX. What “factors” are being “mitigated” to indicate I can function successfully? I did nothing to indicate I could not function in a less restrictive unit in the first place, otherwise I would have received an incident report for an infraction of rules. I completed the one year clear conduct and programs, is there some other “indication” I need to accomplish? I was denied advancement one more time, and that is double the criteria time, before the format of the notices changed. I went to my parole hearing in July 2009. The examiner recommended a presumptive parole date of November 23, 2014, which was approved by the parole commission on October 3, 2009. So, I had a 5 year set-off date for parole, which I appealed.
One month later I received the 3rd step-down denial notice dated November 17, 2009, in addition to the previous format: “Your placement at ADX and your recent communications of white supremacy writings. This demonstrates your compliance with institutional rules is solely due to the heightened controls and security procedures at ADX and a willingness to trade the time at ADX for the complementary time you would have in open population to prey upon others and/or work your disruptive activities.” By this time, I had been in ADX for 25 months with no notice given for “reasons resulting in your placement.” This notice was signed by Assistant Warden J. Fox. I sent him a written request asking for specifics as to what recent “communications” of “white supremacy writings” does he refer to; when have I demonstrated non-compliance with institutional rules; who are the “others” I am alleged to “prey upon”; and what disruptive activities have I committed? I received no response. Firstly, I do not believe in nor advocate white supremacy. The only entity I am aware of that did advocate “white supremacy” and the exploitation of non-whites is the United States Government and the aristocracy from whom it is elected. Whatever “writings” Fox refers to do not communicate the odious concept of “white supremacy.” The authorities practiced this heinous concept, and America suffers the ill attempts to ameliorate that atrocity to this day. I do not believe that any one race is superior to, or inferior to, any other race. I do not even believe white should reign supreme over other whites, let alone non-whites. I believe every man is sovereign in his own right and no man has rightful authority to coerce any man against his own free will. Secondly, to demonstrate non-compliance means to commit an infraction to rules, as to “prey upon others” and “work disruptive activities”..where is the incident report for these activities? I HAVE NONE. And the Federal Bureau of Prisons is chock full of racist of every race!!!!!Whatever ones political views are, there is no rule or regulation within the BOP that prevents the free expression thereof. To reiterate, I did nothing wrong to warrant the referral to ADX. And why was none of the accusations included in the first 2 step-down denial notices? That is, how do I “mitigate” circumstances I am unaware there are concerns about? I had been in Federal custody for 25 years at that point, no one voiced any concerns previous to this. I had 10 co-defendants, none of them were sent to ADX…So, what is really going on? Approximately 2 months later, I found out why.
On February 1, 2010, the parole commission vacated the previously approved parole date of November 23, 2014 and ordered a “Special Reconsideration Hearing” to “consider new adverse information.” Reasons: “To reassess your ‘risk’ based upon your continued affiliation with white supremacist advocates through websites.” BOP Sabotage?
I have never known the Parole Commission to vacate an approved date unless a prisoner had violated a rule since the date was approved.  And the excuse for reconsideration is a complete violation of my First Amendment Rights to Freedom of Religion or Political Beliefs, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Press, and Freedom to Peaceably Assemble. What “risk”? Expressing my rights as a citizen? What rule, regulation, or law have I violated? “White Supremacy” as a concept, odious as it is, is not against the law, though it has nothing to do with me.
The reconsideration hearing was held March 30, 2010. The examiner questioned me about websites. I informed him that I have been in prison since before the internet existed. I’ve had no computer access, and never seen any websites whatsoever. He asked me if I had read the disclosure material, I said I was not provided any. I waived the disclosure and requested to continue. I informed him that I was not a racist or supremacist. He opted to recommend the November 24, 2014 date be reinstated. This made my case manager, Mr. Fenlon, angry and redfaced for some reason. Three months later Felon brought me another “Notice of Action” from the parole commission ordering another special reconsideration hearing to provide disclosure material not available to me at the first hearing. At this point, I realized that they would hand pick some lickspittle flunky to recommend a 15 year set-off date. Which is exactly what happened at the hearing in July 2010 claiming they “found posts attributed to me on websites that provide a forum for expressing white supremacist, militant, and anti-government views. Your continued adherence to such views is relevant because of your original offenses.” Why would I renounce views that I never held? The hearing was audio recorded, no such statement was made. So, the commission vacated the November 23, 2014 date based totally on conjecture about what they think my beliefs are, and upon posts expressed in a “public forum” by people I’ve never met or see, or websites I’ve never seen.
I was denied step-down advancement 4 more times over the next two year. Denial notice #4 was signed by a different assistant warden, one L.J. Milusnic. So I sent him a request for information on September 2, 2010 inquiring as to the denial notice he signed dated 6, 2010 which stated that I was denied, “Due to your ‘possible’ involvement in white supremacy activity. Milusnic’s response is dated October 4, 2010 and claims I will receive an updated written decision. That being denial #5 reading: Denied, “Specifically, your communication with white ‘separatists’ and radical groups is disruptive to the safe and orderly running of the institution.” Now it’s become “white separatists” instead of “white supremacists” and the notice claims my communications are “disruptive.” The ambiguity is still there, what white separatists and radical groups, what “communication,” and what “disruption”? The notice goes on as before: “This demonstrates your compliance with institutional rules is solely due to security at the ADX.” Again, where is my non-compliance to the institutional rules? Where is the incident report for any violations related to the communications and/or disruption? THERE IS NONE! Keep in mind that not once in 25 years had any staff ever related to me any concerns about my political views, nor whom I can and cannot communicate with. I was given no indication of why I was referred to ADX in 2007, and nothing mentioned about “white supremacy” until the third step-down denial notice in November 2009. The mention of “white supremacy” to reconsider the approved parole date indicates that this surreptitious plot had been in the works for a number of years.
I was at the U.S. Prison Super Max in Marion, IL when it switched from a U.S. Prison to an F.C.I. in 2006. I was transferred to the “security confinement unit” in U.S.P. Terre Haute, IN. Staff at that facility claimed they had no idea as to why I was sent there. Staff at ADX made the same claim in October 2007 when I arrived at ADX. I filed a Freedom of Information Act Request to ascertain the reason for the transfer to Terre Haute and ADX. I received a document of “notice to inmate of transfer to communications management unit” at FCI Terre Haute, IN. This document is undated, nor signed, nor delivered to me as instructed therein. I was not transferred to the CMU at the FCI, I was sent to the SCU at the U.S. Prison. I was given no notice or due process, nor given the opportunity to appeal the transfer decision. The document claimed that I have “continued to communicate with members of extremist organizations.” All the harsh conditions the BOP has utilized against me since 1998 has been in my retaliation for my refusal to aid the Dept of Justice in its efforts to prosecute the Federal prison gang known as the “Aryan Brotherhood;” and for my refusal to accept a “deal” to aid in the prosecution of Robert Miles in the attempted bombing of Judge Benson in South Dakota. Since I refused their deals, they would insure that I never get out of prison? A S.I.S officer at ADX came to my cell in February 2009, five months prior to my parole hearing and informed me that it was one unnamed individual in Washington D.C. that had me sent to ADX, and that I would never get out of prison.  That one person is likely the person who had the parole commission vacate the recommended November 23, 2014 parole date approved by the commission previously. Department of Justice sabotage?
I had another parole hearing on August 1, 2012, the Notice of Action stated: “No change in 15-year reconsideration date of July 2024 or continue to expiration, whichever comes first.” The notice also stated, “The parole commission has decided to continue you to the expiration of your sentence. If the two-thirds date of your sentence (30 years in the case of a sentence of 45 years or more) precedes the mandatory release calculated by the Bureau of Prisons, the commission will conduct a record review of your case approximately 9 months before your two-thirds date. If a parole is not ordered as a result of the record review the commission will conduct a hearing for you. The purpose of the review or hearing is to determine whether there is a reasonable probability that you will commit a federal, state, or local crime, or whether you have frequently or seriously violated the rules of the institution. See 28 C.F.R. 2. 53 (a). If a parole is denied, you will be continued until the expiration of your sentence less good time.” I was never informed that all old law sentences over 45 years had court mandated two-thirds “mandatory release” after 30 years served. This notice indicated that the 15 year hit was tentative, as yet. Also, calculating my sentence, I noted that the 30 year two-thirds date and the presumptive parole date approved by the commission in 2009, then vacated in 2010 due to “new adverse information” was exactly the same: November 23, 2014. Why did the commission use pretense to give me a parole date that the courts established 30 years previously? Then pretend to vacate the date in 2010, when in actuality, that release date is still pending. Then September 19, 2012, notice stated that a record review would be held approximately 9 months prior to November 23, 2014. Putting the review sometime back in February 2014. It is October 25th at the time of this writing. I’ve no idea if there was a record review, but I have been given no due process hearing to rebut the two criteria for continuing me past November 23, 2014. Both of which could easily be abused by any authority.
BOP staff manipulate prisoners and orchestrate situations to force or coerce prisoners to “violate the rules of the institution.” However, I’ve had no violations in over 8 years. Still, this Notice of Action gave me a clear understanding of why the adverse confinement conditions, and the surreptitious nature behind the “communications”. Also why none of my co-defendants have been treated as extremely as I have, they did not get pressed to “cooperate” in aiding in prosecuting Bob Miles or the “Aryan Brotherhood”, two cases I compromised severely by refusing to aid the Department of Just-us. The BOP wanted to make my conditions so miserable that I would violate rules and stack up incident reports. They wanted me to continue to communicate with members of “extremist organizations” so they could claim there is “reasonable probability” that I will reoffend if mandatory released in November 2014. So, they never voiced any concerns about my politics, nor my communications. Since 1998 the BOP placed a “separations classification” on me from the Aryan Brotherhood, and confined me only around non-white prisoners. The only white prisoner I’ve been around is a homosexual that caters to black prisoners. Staff continually alienate me and segregate me to make me appear to be “no good.” I have written/documented every adversity the BOP has intentionally caused me. They wanted me to assault that homosexual…..
On September 11, 2012, (the irony of the date does not escape me) I was approved for step-down advancement to the intermediate Unit-J. I received no approval notice until after I had written and requested one. I wanted to know what changed in my situation to enable the advance. But the notice simply stated, “approved.” It took me 5 years to advance to J-Unit when only one year was required. I was placed on a range by myself with the exception of the deviant homosexual noted above. It took another 17 months to advance to the “transitional” unit when only 12 months was required. Thus far, 8 years to be in a 3 year program. Remember this program is designed for recalcitrant prisoners and gangs. It is a death trap, plain and simple!!!! I was sent to the only prison in the entire system that confines all the gang members the BOP “separated” me from in 1998, and was forced to participate in a program designed as punishment for disciplinary referrals to ADX when I had violated no rules and was not a disciplinary referral.
I had an interim parole hearing 3 months ago on July 15th. The examiner knew nothing of my case or the 30-year two-thirds date. The case manager here called the parole commission after I aggressively convinced him of the mandate. According to him, “The commission will examine the case and get back to him.” It’s been 8 weeks and no returned phone call as yet.
I am currently confined in the “pre-transfer” stage of the ADX program. I am the only white prisoner here, except for the homosexual. All the rest are Mexican gang or cartel members, black muslims, racical muslim terrorist, and other assorted non-white people. Alienated and segregated from my own folk-kind, kindred, and I have kept from communicating with anybody that the authorities may accuse of being extremists or advocates of “white supremacy”, anti-Semitic, or militant/anti-government views. As Carl Jung wrote, “I stand at the bottom of the deepest hell, and I can fall no further.” He was wrong. I believed at I was at the bottom many times over, but the bastards always found a way to increase the depths of my misery.
No indication of release yet, 28 days remain.
And so it goes,
Gary Lee Yarbrough
Florence, CO 2014
As I transcribed this letter, he only has 9 days left to see if they let him come home or not…….
Susan Yarbrough