Friday, August 29, 2014

Freedom of Speech? Not for AntiZionists on US Campuses

The recent revocation of a tenured academic position at the University of Illinois on the American Indian Studies course to Professor Steven Salita because he dared tweet against the Israeli genocide in Gaza, has once again served as a perfect example of the tribalist Jewish Supremacist racist control of America’s higher educational institutions.
Professor Salita’s Twitter account contained such perfectly legitimate and accurate comments such as:
 Steven_Salaita_twitter02
And
Steven_Salaita_twitter01
For this sin, his offer of a tenured professorship at the University of Illinois was revoked before he even took up the position—a move which was then lauded in the Jewish Supremacist magazine Tablet as “good thing” and “the rightful consequences of bigotry and violence.”
tablet-sa
The university’s chancellor, Phyllis Wise, refused to approve his appointment, explaining that the university “cannot tolerate personal and disrespectful words or actions that demean and abuse either viewpoints themselves or those who express them.”
However, what the Tablet magazine and other Jewish Supremacist controlled media coverage of Professor Salita’s dismissal media control have all failed to mention, is the fact that the is a dedicated Jewish Supremacist pressure group—whose existence is completely hidden from the general public—whose sole job it is it suppress any anti-Israeli opinion at educational institutions.
amcha
This highly active organization is called the AMCHA Initiative, which, according to its own website, uses the results of its “research and analysis to inform university administrators and the public about the antisemitic incidents, the individuals and groups that are perpetrating them, and to pressure university leaders to act.”
AMCHA has a list of what it defines as “anti-Semitic activity” which includes “denying Jews their right to self-determination,” “demonizing Israel” and “promoting Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) against Israel.”
This is of course ironic, because the only people being denied the right to self-determination in Palestine are the Palestinians.
Nonetheless, the activity of AMCHA has resulted in a crackdown against any academic organizations even peripherally involved in the BDS movement, such as the Association for Asian American Studies, the American Studies Association and the Native American and Indigenous Studies Association.
In a recent letter to the University of California Board of Regents, the National Lawyers Guild described the way in which AMCHA operates:
They concoct demonstrably false narratives about specific campus events involving criticism of Israeli government policies, describing them as if they targeted, even violently so, Jewish students.
They then paint an overall picture of campuses in which Jewish students are under constant attack in a pervasively hostile environment – in direct contradiction of actual surveys of those students, who overwhelmingly report the opposite.
They write to UC chancellors and CSU presidents, citing falsified events, to demand that they condemn the speech of advocates for Palestinian rights and shut down their campus organizations.
They attack academic freedom of faculty members by similarly mischaracterizing expressions of personal views and pretending that the faculty purport to represent official university positions; and by proffering outlandish accusations against academic departments that sponsor speakers with whom they disagree, or that affiliate with academic associations that adopt certain positions on important issues.
harvard-comparisons-diversity-lie
elena-Kagan-final-chart580
America—and the world—will never be free until the power and ideology of Jewish Supremacism is broken forever.

Jews Promote Same Sex Marriage – But Not in Israel!

David Duke
August 29, 2014
The ruling by a state rabbinic court in Jerusalem which forbids a divorced woman from letting her children meet her new lesbian lover has highlighted the staggering hypocrisy in Jewish Supremacists with regard to non-Jewish nations—and revealed their own racist tribal loyalty to Israel.
The rabbinical court ruling—announced quite openly in media outlets aimed at Jews (such as the Israeli newspaper Haartez) but completely suppressed in the Jewish Supremacist-controlled media aimed at the larger non-Jewish public in America and elsewhere—came during divorce proceedings between a Jewish woman and her husband.
Haaretz-Lesbian-ruling
According to Haaretz, the divorcing couple agreed that the woman would have custody of the children, but the husband asked the court to issue an order prohibiting the woman’s new female partner from seeing the children.
Without such an order, the husband said he would refuse to grant his wife a get, or a ritual divorce. The court has agreed to his request.
What would the Jewish Supremacist-controlled “western” media’s reaction to be any other country on earth which outlawed a lesbian woman from allowing her children to meet her new girlfriend? There would be an uproar.
The Jewish Supremacist controlled media would be screaming “discrimination” and calling for “change” and even political action against any such state.
Proof of this can be seen in their hysterical demonization of the Russian Federation’s government, which has not even outlawed homosexuality, but in attempting to protect adolescent children, prohibited the propagandist promotion of the homosexual lifestyle.
Israel, on the other hand, where homosexual marriage is actually outlawed, is given a completely free pass by this same media—because the Jewish Supremacists who control the “west’s” media, always cover up and protect their own tribe.
This can also be seen in the endless list of “gay activists” among Hollywood “movie stars,” actors, journalists, politicians etc.—all of whom are very vocal about gay rights in America and other countries— even to boycotting states or nations that don’t allow homosexual marriage, but who will not support a boycott of Israel. Jewish blood it seems runs far thicker than principle.
This shows again that tribal loyalty is covered up by the Jewish-controlled media up because it is loyal to tribal, racist, and homophobic Israel.
ADL-gayrights
The hypocrisy is never-ending: the leading Jewish Supremacist pressure group, the Anti-Defamation League, has, according to its own website, a “longstanding commitment to protecting civil rights, particularly those that affect the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) community.”
“For nearly twenty years, ADL has ardently advocated in the courts on behalf of LGBT rights. ADL has filed amicus briefs and joined coalition briefs on issues that directly affect the LGBT community. This has included filings on the appellate levels in both state and federal courts.
“ADL has filed amicus briefs in a number of cases urging courts to hold a ban on marriage equality unconstitutional, and has been a strong voice advocating against measures to deny that fundamental right” and the “ADL has emerged as the nation’s leader in crafting and advocating for inclusive state and federal hate crime laws,” that organization boasts.
JPOST-ADL_GAY_MARRIAGE
“The Anti-Defamation League has brought together a number of religious and Zionist organizations in what it is calling a ‘broad coalition in support of marriage equality.’ 
“Among the Jewish groups that have joined the ADL’s coalition are the Central Conference of American Rabbis, the Women of Reform Judaism, Hadassah – The Women’s Zionist Organization of America, Truah: Rabbis for Human Rights – North America and the Women’s League for Conservative Judaism.”
 This is the same ADL, a so-called human rights organization that completely supports Israel, a nation built on the ethnic cleansing of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. A state notorious for human torture, and that is periodically massacres thousands of Palestinians men, women and children, and a state as the above article shows, that will not allow a divorced woman to allow her children to meet her girlfriend.
So, is the ADL’s support of gay marriage truly a support of gay marriage, or is it a weapon it uses to weaken and divide Gentile society? The vast racism, murder, and other human rights crimes of Israel, does not bother the ADL at all.
Even vice president Joe Biden publicly congratulated the Jewish Community in America for “helping change American attitudes about gay marriage and other issues.”
Biden-Jews-Gay-Marriage
According to the Haaretz newspaper, Biden said NBC TV series “Will and Grace” as examples of what helped changed attitudes on gay marriage.
“Think … behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media, are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry.”
Thus, in America, and other Western nations, Jewish Supremacists have been behind the legalization of same-sex marriages; but they devotedly support Israel where same-sex marriage is illegal.
In addition, the remarkably long list of Jewish Supremacist activists in the homosexual movement is also serious reason for concern. A comprehensive list of prominent activists, too long to include here, can be found at this link.
Some of the more prominent specimens are:
- Larry Kramer: Co-founder of “Act Up,” a homosexual/AIDS activist organization; co-founder of the Gay Men’s Health Crisis.
- Alan Klein: Co-founder of group ACT UP, co-founder of group Queer Nation, National Communications Director and chief spokesperson for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
Alan Klein and Larry Kramer
Alan Klein and Larry Kramer
- Arnie Kantrowitz: Co-founder of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
- Jonathan D. Katz: Founded and chairs the Harvey Milk Institute, the largest homosexual studies institute in the world. A long time gay political activist, was a co-founder of Queer Nation.
Bella Abzug and Israel Fishman
Bella Abzug and Israel Fishman
- Israel Fishman: Founder of the Gay Liberation Caucus in 1970, now known as the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered Round Table.
- Bella Abzug. The first members of the U.S. House of Representatives to introduce legislation banning discrimination based on sexual orientation [1974].
Judy Weider and Kevin Koffler
Judy Weider and Kevin Koffler
- Len Hirsch: President of the GLBT federal government employees group, GLOBE.
- Kevin Koffler: Editor-in-chief, Genre gay magazine.
- Judy Wieder: Editor-in-chief, The Advocate gay magazine.
Rick Rosendall and Terry-Lobel
Rick Rosendall and Terry-Lobel
- Barney Frank: Member of U.S. Congress; helped create non-discriminatory employment policies in all U.S. federal agencies
- Evan Wolfson: Senior Staff Attorney, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund — and — the executive director of Freedom to Marry.
Alison Bechdel and Fred Hochberg
Alison Bechdel and Fred Hochberg
- Allan Ginsburg: Jewish poet and leading member of North American Man Boy Love Association.
- Roberta Achtenberg: Civil rights lawyer and federal official; appointed as Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity by President Bill Clinton in 1993.
Roberta Achtenberg and Allan Ginsburg
Roberta Achtenberg and Allan Ginsburg
Thus, in America, and other Western nations, Jewish Supremacists have been behind the legalization of same-sex marriages; but they devotedly support Israel where same-sex marriage is illegal.
pink-news
In addition, Jews in the “entertainment” industry are deliberately trying to destroy America’s “family-friendly culture” by being as obscene as possible—an act which also allows them to:
“assert their Jewishness by glorifying obscenity”
Writing in an article in the Israeli Haaretz newspaper, Professor Josh Lambert, academic director of the Yiddish Book Center and visiting assistant professor of English at the University of Massachusetts,  said that “American Jews have found the explicit representation of sex, and four-letter words, so very useful. The answers vary: Some Jews use obscenity to fight anti-Semitism, while others use it to rewrite traditional Jewish stories in a contemporary idiom.”
sarah-silberman-jews-obscenity
In the article, titled “’Dirty Jews’ and the Christian right”, the Jewish professor goes on to say that;
“Brilliant actors like Larry David and Sarah Silverman are challenging America’s powerful religious, family-friendly culture and asserting their Jewishness by glorifying obscenity.
“In a tidy coincidence, two separate videos went viral last week, demonstrating that American Jews’ love affair with obscenity is still going strong. Sarah Silverman talks about being visited by Jesus Christ, who asks her to spread a message about women’s reproductive rights (“We’ve got to legislate that shit,” the comedienne said, mocking conservatives who want to use the law to limit women’s health care options), while a fan-produced supercut strung together three minutes of uninterrupted insults by Larry David on ‘Curb Your Enthusiasm.’”
Professor Lambert goes on to claim that American Christians are behind all attempts to censor obscenity and to maintain family values—and that Jews are deliberately using pornography and obscenity to attack those values.
“So, who’s behind the tightening of American obscenity laws in the 21st century? Like Anthony Comstock’s crusade against smut in the late 19th century, this one is understood by many of its leaders as a Christian project,”
Professor Lambert writes.
“Even those few Jews involved with anti-pornography crusade organizations are dismissed as “marginal” and as “Jewish crackpots.”
“The contemporary Christian right has a much more complex and self-aware relationship with American Jews than its 19th-century predecessors did, though. So recent anti-porn campaigns have welcomed with open arms any Jews with compatible ideas, like Orthodox modesty crusader Wendy Shalit. Today’s anti-porn organizations, even if funded by Christians, often seek out Jews to sit on their boards – though mostly they attract only very marginal rabbis and other Jewish crackpots,” Professor Lambert said.
This blatant hypocrisy shows how Jewish Supremacists go to work: they promote one thing which is “good for Jews” in the ultimate Jews-only state, but then they promote exactly the opposite—what they consider bad—for every Gentile state where they are a minority.

America’s first slave owner was a black man

According to colonial records, the first slave owner in the United States was a black man.
Prior to 1655 there were no legal slaves in the colonies, only indentured servants. All masters were required to free their servants after their time was up. Seven years was the limit that an indentured servant could be held. Upon their release they were granted 50 acres of land. This included any Negro purchased from slave traders. Negros were also granted 50 acres upon their release.
Anthony Johnson was a Negro from modern-day Angola. He was brought to the US to work on a tobacco farm in 1619. In 1622 he was almost killed when Powhatan Indians attacked the farm. 52 out of 57 people on the farm perished in the attack. He married a female black servant while working on the farm.
When Anthony was released he was legally recognized as a “free Negro” and ran a successful farm. In 1651 he held 250 acres and five black indentured servants. In 1654, it was time for Anthony to release John Casor, a black indentured servant. Instead Anthony told Casor he was extending his time. Casor left and became employed by the free white man Robert Parker.
Anthony Johnson sued Robert Parker in the Northampton Court in 1654. In 1655, the court ruled that Anthony Johnson could hold John Casor indefinitely. The court gave judicial sanction for blacks to own slave of their own race. Thus Casor became the first permanent slave and Johnson the first slave owner.
Whites still could not legally hold a black servant as an indefinite slave until 1670. In that year, the colonial assembly passed legislation permitting free whites, blacks, and Indians the right to own blacks as slaves.
By 1699, the number of free blacks prompted fears of a “Negro insurrection.” Virginia Colonial ordered the repatriation of freed blacks back to Africa. Many blacks sold themselves to white masters so they would not have to go to Africa. This was the first effort to gently repatriate free blacks back to Africa. The modern nations of Sierra Leone and Liberia both originated as colonies of repatriated former black slaves.
However, black slave owners continued to thrive in the United States.
By 1830 there were 3,775 black families living in the South who owned black slaves. By 1860 there were about 3,000 slaves owned by black households in the city of New Orleans alone.

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Federal Judge Strikes Down Florida Gay Marriage Ban

This is what Columbus Mayor Teresa Tomlinson supports.The abjectly corrupt powers-that-be in Columbus,Georgia are morally depraved individuals.
beach_gay_pride_marry_me_credit_george_martinez
It was statewide this time … there have been so many county level decisions that the Florida case has been difficult to follow:
“In the first decision on same-sex marriage with statewide impact, a federal judge ruled Thursday that Florida’s gay-marriage ban is unconstitutional, ordering the state to allow the marriage of same-sex couples and to recognize marriages performed elsewhere.
“When observers look back 50 years from now, the arguments supporting Florida’s ban on same-sex marriage, though just as sincerely held, will again seem an obvious pretext for discrimination,” wrote U.S District Judge Robert L. Hinkle of Tallahassee. “Observers who are not now of age will wonder just how those views could have been held.” …”
The federal judge quoted MLK and cited the Loving decision:
“”When observers look back 50 years from now, the arguments supporting Florida’s ban on same-sex marriage, though just as sincerely held, will again seem an obvious pretext for discrimination,” Hinkle wrote in his decision. “To paraphrase a civil rights leader from the age when interracial marriage was struck down, the arc of history is long, but it bends toward justice.
“The Florida ban on same-sex marriage stems entirely, or almost entirely, from moral disapproval of the practice,” he continued, and that denying marriage rights to same-sex couples has “no rational basis.” …
You have to admire Hinkle’s logic: the gay marriage ban is based on morality. Therefore, it has no “rational basis.”

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Columbus Mayor Teresa Tomlinson is a Sodomite Supporter

http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/2014/08/25/3265386/gay-pride-event-inappropriate.html?sp=/99/178/172/

Columbus Mayor Teresa Tomlinson
  • 6th Floor, Government Center Tower
  • Phone: (706) 653-4712 | Fax: (706) 653-4970 or via e-mail at:

    Teresa Tomlinson


A dark precedent was set this past June when Mayor Teresa Tomlinson issued a proclamation making June "Gay Pride" month in Columbus.
To add insult to injury, an open "gay pride" concert was held downtown flaunting this aberrant lifestyle choice. As a responsible citizen and grandfather, I am ashamed that our mayor would legitimize this behavior in front of our community, especially our impressionable children. By this proclamation, she has willfully insulted the God-respecting majority of our city who know that homosexuality is unnatural and hurtful. When this behavior is heralded by our elected officials, the upright citizens of Columbus should rise up and make our own proclamation of pride in goodness and purity. If our mayor applauds homosexuality, what counterproductive behavior will be next on the list? Will she proclaim "Alcoholism Pride" month, "Adultery Pride" month or "Pedophilia Pride" month next? I hope not.
Let me say in closing, this is not a matter of hatred toward anyone, but it is a summons to return to the values of faith and responsibility which used to be very evident in our city. Our Mayor should commend right behavior and discourage the wrong, not vice versa. I call on the readers to let Mayor Tomlinson know we do not want a repeat of this "gay pride" proclamation in 2015.
Craig Harbin
Columbus




Read more here: http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/2014/08/25/3265386/gay-pride-event-inappropriate.html?sp=/99/178/172/#storylink=cpy



A “Jolly Good” Ad for NARRG From Across “The Pond”

NARRG Candour add

Here is another nice example of advertising for NARRG published in a British nationalist publication called Candour.
This 1/8th page display ad appears in Candour’s latest issue dated July, 2014. Candour  currently publishes on an approximately bi-monthly to quarterly interval in magazine format.
This ad appears courtesy of a stalwart NARRG supporter here in the U.S. who blended previous ads for NARRG by other supporters who placed advertising with the American Free Press and the First Freedom newspapers.
Anyone interested in learning more about Candour can visit their website at: www.candour.org.uk

Black Mob In Mississippi Nearly Beats White Man To Death In Retaliation For Michael Brown
























Does the name Matt Owens ring a bell? Probably not.
Some of you may recall that Matt Owens was a White man in Mobile, AL who was viciously beaten by a Black Undertow mob in retaliation for the death of Trayvon Martin. The Mainstream Media, which was fomenting a lynch mob against George Zimmerman in 2012, swept the Matt Owens case and numerous other Trayvon Martin related black-on-white attacks under the rug.
Now it appears that the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO has provoked the first example (at least that has surfaced) of a retaliatory act of anti-White black mob violence:
“WEST POINT, Miss. — West Point police said a man received life-threatening injuries in what they are investigating as an aggravated assault at a restaurant.
Ralph Weems IV, who was injured early Saturday, was in fair condition Sunday at North Mississippi Medical Center, hospital spokeswoman Genie Causey said without elaborating. …
David Knighten of West Point told AP earlier by phone that he and Weems had gone to a Waffle House early Saturday. He said a man waved him over outside the restaurant and told him politely that people were upset by the killing of 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, and it wasn’t a safe place for whites. …”
We are George Zimmerman. We are Matthew Owens. We are Darren Wilson. We are Ralph Weems IV.
Update: The West Point police have made an arrest and have backtracked on hate crime charges.

Drinking and Driving Democrats


Saturday, August 23, 2014

Michael Brown vs. Dillon Taylor


Horrors of ISIS Created by Zionist Supremacy

By Dr. David Duke. The horror of ISIS terror which has unfolded across media outlets over the past few days is the product of years of intrigue, subversion, torture, terrorism and wars, all caused by the Jews-only state of Israel and the Jewish Lobby which controls the US government.
Foley580
The entire Muslim world has been radicalized over a period of at least two decades—if not more—by a series of planned, deliberate actions, all initiated by the Zio-Supremacist fanatics who seek to spread disunity, infighting and turmoil among all non-Jews, and particularly those neighboring their international headquarters of Israel.
These planned actions include the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, the torture of Palestinians and even Iraqis (at Abu Gharib) by Zio-extremists, support for the Syrian “rebels”—now revealed as ISIS, and the outright control of the US government to support the Israeli Holocaust and ethnic cleansing against Palestinians.
All of these events have created an atmosphere of hatred—in which the Zio-extremists thrive—between non-Jews, and especially against Americans and Europeans in general, who the Muslim world perceives as supporting the ongoing reign of terror by the Jews-only state of Israel. In fact, it misdirects Arab and Muslim anger from Israel and the world Zionist influence to America, the UK and the rest of the Western World.
1. The Invasion of Afghanistan
The invasion of Afghanistan was presented to the world as a “reaction” to the attacks of September 11, 2001. It was claimed—by the Jewish Supremacist dominated George Bush administration—that the Taliban was involved in the attacks and was deliberately sheltering Osama Bin Laden.
Despite there being in reality no evidence at all that Afghanistan or the Taliban were involved in the events of 9-11, an American military invasion was duly launched, all in line with a Jewish Supremacist plan hatched in 1996 by the Israeli think tank, “The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS),” and spelled out in their briefing paper titled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.” A key part of that plan was changing America’s non-involvement strategy, and because Osama bin Laden was hiding in the mountains of Afghanistan, that was used as a pretext to invade the whole country.
Demanding that the Taliban turn over bin Laden was ridiculous as they had no ability to do that anymore than America had the ability to do it in 9 years of effort in Afghanistan. But the invasion of Afghanistan set the stage for even more American involvement against perceived enemies of Israel in the middle east, including war against an American ally, Iraq, because Iraq was anti-Israel and supported the Palestinians.
The IASPS conference study group leader was a Jewish neocon named Richard Perle, and another Jewish neocon named Douglas Feith. Both the Jewish Supremacists then emerged as key players in the Bush administration: Perle was Chairman of George Bush’s Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee, and Feith became Under Secretary of Defense and the Pentagon’s Policy Advisor.
The invasion, launched in 2001, has become one of America’s most costly and lengthy wars ever. It is now in its thirteenth year and although US troops are officially slated to withdraw this year, there is no real end in sight.
Tens of thousands of completely innocent Afghanis have been killed, and hundreds of thousands—if not millions—more have been radicalized into supporting groups such as ISIS. And the Jewish lobby’s warmongering is solely to blame.
2. The Invasion of Iraq.
The invasion of Iraq was presented—by the same Jewish neocons who generated the war against Afghanistan—as necessary because Saddam Hussein was allegedly involved in the attacks of 9-11, and because he had “nuclear weapons, chemical weapons” and other “weapons of mass destruction” which he was about to launch on the west.
In reality, Saddam had none of these weapons—as was later proven—and had nothing to with 9-11. In reality, Saddam was an enemy of Osama Bin Laden, who described the Iraqi leader in taped messages as an “infidel” who needed to be killed.
Arial Sharon and the Jewish Supremacist  neo-cons who dominated the administration of George W Bush.
Ariel Sharon and the Jewish Supremacist neo-cons who dominated the administration of George W Bush.
The only state to which Saddam was hostile, was the Jewish tribalist Zionist state of Israel—and for that reason alone, he was singled out for destruction by the Zio-puppets in Washington D.C.. In fact, Saddam Hussein ran a secular state and was opposed to al Qaeda and Arab radicalism. The invasion of Iraq unleashed the al Qaeda radical elements in the country.
The Jewish neo-con involvement in the Iraq war is well-known, and was most recently exposed by America’s famous journalist, Carl Bernstein, who first sprang to prominence as the exposer of the Watergate scandal which brought down former president Richard Nixon.
Bernstein, himself Jewish, speaking in the Joe Scarborough show on NBC during a debate over the Bush legacy, openly stated that “Jewish neocons” (neoconservatives) were behind the war against Iraq.
bernstein
Over a million innocent people were killed as a result of the invasion of Iraq. Once again, this action unquestionably radicalized millions more into supporting groups such as ISIS. And, just like Afghanistan, the Jewish lobby’s warmongering is exclusively to blame.
3. Torture in Israel.
A feature article by Joel Greenburg in the very pro-Israel New York Times titled“Israel Rethinks Interrogation of Arabs,” stated matter-of-factly that Israel tortures 500 to 600 Palestinians every month.
That figure, which is probably too low, bearing in mind that it comes from the Jewish Supremacist New York Times, means that each year at least 6,000 Palestinians are tortured in Israel.
israel-tortures
Torture of Palestinians has been going on in Israel since 1948. Even if one uses just one-half of the number of Palestinians that Greenburg says suffer torture each year — at least 150,000 human beings have been tortured in Israeli jails since the founding of the Jewish state, and likely the numbers are a lot higher.
This alone would serve to radicalize millions of Palestinians and Muslims throughout the entire Middle East—but, as the Abu Gharib example, shows, these Zio-fanatics cannot even stop there.
4. Torture at Abu Gharib, Iraq.
The exposure of the horrible torture used on Iraqis detained at the Abu Gharib prison remains one of the greatest black marks against the US invasion of that country—if one discounts the invasion itself.
However, the Jewish Supremacist-controlled media—which gave plenty of coverage to the exposure of the prison—almost completely blacked out the reality that Jewish Supremacists were once again behind the outrages.
torture-trail-leads-to-ghraib-independent1
The key figure at Abu Ghraib was a shadowy, “third country national” named John Israel. Here are excerpts from an article by Robert Fisk of Britain’s The Independent titled “The re-writing of Iraqi history is now going on at supersonic speed” (26 May 2004):
And let’s cast our eyes upon that little, all-important matter of responsibility. The actual interrogators accused of encouraging U.S. troops to abuse Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib jail were working for at least one company with extensive military and commercial contacts with Israel. The head of an American company whose personnel are implicated in the Iraqi tortures, it now turns out, attended an “anti-terror” training camp in Israel and, earlier this year, was presented with an award by Shaul Mofaz, the right-wing Israeli defense minister…
A July 3, 2004 report by Britain’s BBC titled “Israeli interrogators ‘in Iraq’” was subtitled “The US officer at the heart of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal says she has evidence that Israelis helped to interrogate Iraqis.”
israelis-at-abu-ghraib-bbc1
Once again, how could such outrages have any other effect except to radicalize millions—against America?
And, like the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, the Jewish Lobby is completely to blame.
5. Support for the Syrian “Rebels”
When the so-called “rebellion” against the Syrian government first started, the Jewish Lobby in America and the Israeli state openly declared their support for the “rebels” and did everything in their power to ensure that the US government armed, financed and supported them.
Syria’s great “sin”, of course, was the fact that Basheer Assad is hostile to the Jewish racist tribalist state of Israel, and it is in the Jewish Supremacists’ interests to have chaos in Syria rather than a united enemy right on their borders.
As reported in the Times of Israel, all the major Jewish organizations in America “including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the Zionist Organization of America, Americans for Peace Now and the Anti-Defamation League” took part in lobbying efforts to incite the US government into supporting the rebels and even attacking the Syrian state with American armed forces.
TOI-ISRAEL-SYRIA-STRIKE
The largest Jewish lobby, AIPAC, was quoted as asking Congress to grant Obama “the authority he has requested to protect America’s national security interests”—without of course saying what those “national security interests” are.
“I would predict that the overwhelming majority of the American Jewish community will support the president’s decision on moral grounds and national security grounds,” Abraham Foxman, the ADL’s national director, told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
Fortunately, the Internet managed to undermine the Zio-lies about “chemical weapons” in Syria, and American military intervention was prevented. But they succeeded completely in arming and funding the “rebels” with enough sophisticated weapons for the “rebellion” in Syria to have dragged on long enough so that a recent UN Report has stated that over 190,000 people have now been killed in that country.
Once again, the Jewish Supremacists are behind all of the war-mongering against Syria.
In September 2013, a large number of senior analysts, CIA officers, senior U.S. military personnel, judges and even the Deputy National Intelligence Officer for the Middle East wrote an open letter to Obama warning that the “intelligence” being used to promote an attack on Syria is “dubious” because it comes from Israel.
An article which appeared in the New York Times of September 5, 2013, quoted Alon Pinkas, a former Israeli consul general in New York as follows about the “civil war” in Syria:
“This is a playoff situation in which you need both teams to lose, but at least you don’t want one to win — we’ll settle for a tie. Let them both bleed, hemorrhage to death: that’s the strategic thinking here. As long as this lingers, there’s no real threat from Syria.”
NYT-PINKAS
BBC-Syria-Deaths
And so the Obama administration, following its orders from the Jewish Lobby, armed the rebels—even though it was clear very early on in the “rebellion” that they were dominated by ISIS fanatics who beheaded and crucified Christians—and, incredibly, were literally mass-murdering cannibals. The invaders of Syria Zio-controlled America supported literally made videos of eating the hearts of their enemies.
Despite all this evidence, even the Christian Zionist leaders in America joined in with the Jewish Supremacists in demanding that the US government back the “rebels”—and hence it is now ironically tragic that these same Christian leaders are now decrying the nightmare which their Jewish Supremacist-directed policies have now unleashed in Iraq.
These five major events outlined above have together created a poisonous brew of hatred, extremism and murderous violence –and it is ordinary Americans like James Foley—among thousands of others—who have been called upon to pay the price for the Zio-blood lust.
When I was fortunate enough to visit Syria, I met with all the major Christian and Muslim leaders. All of them supported the government, and were well aware of the grave threat posed to them by Islamist extremism.
It is doubly tragic to think about what has happened to them, and the Christians in Iraq, since then. They have been murdered, exiled, forced to convert to Islam, and more. Many of these Christian Zionists also don’t know that large numbers–in some areas, up to a third–of the Palestinians were also Christians.
All the while, those blind Christian Zionists in America and elsewhere continue to support Israel, while it bombs and murders Christians in Palestine and its agents support the anti-Christian “rebels” in Syria and Iraq!
The truth is that the Christians who support Zionist power in the US are literally underwriting the massacre of Christians by ISIS and others. In fact, ISIS is a creation of the US government–because it is unlikely that the “rebels” in Syria would even have lasted this long in Syria had the Obama administration not been pressured by the Jewish lobby into arming them.
Let the whole world–and especially the Muslim world–know: what they perceive to be the actions of the”American” government in the Middle East, no more represents ordinary Americans than does the state of Israel represent the Palestinians.
Both America and Palestine are occupied, by the same Zio-Supremacists whose never-ending hatred, political manipulation and violence lies at the root cause of all the bloodshed we see around us today.