Monday, June 30, 2014

Are white Americans fighting back?




29
Jun

Anti-WhiteProvocative new billboard along I-20 in Alabama

A massive 48ft by 14ft billboard in Alabama. This is located along I-20 at mile marker 140.

Saturday, June 28, 2014

Why Barack Obama and most of the U.S.Congress are Guilty of Treason

Why Barack Obama and most of the U.S. Congress are Guilty of Treason

By Dr. David Duke – The American government has charged and prosecuted American citizens who have aided al Qaeda or other terrorist groups that pose a danger to the United States of America.
President Barack Obama announced he will give an additional half a billion dollars to the Syrian “rebels.”
In fact, as the government admits that it has supported the rebels in Syria that have effectively given al Qaeda groups control of almost all Syrian “rebel” held territory.
The government admits that Syria is now an international Jihad with thousands of the most radical, terrorist Muslim extremists streaming into support it from all over the world.
The U.S. Government admits that the ongoing take over of Iraq has come from the rebel controlled territory in Syria.
The U.S. Government admits the government of Syria has fought against these al Qaeda dominated rebels.
obamatreason
Without the treasonous support of the terrorists in Syria, ISIS could not have swept into control over most of Iraq, and now be poised to take over the whole country.
The U.S. Government says that these terrorists are planning 9-11 attacks against America and against any Americans in Mideast and wherever they can find in the world.
cbs-news-headline-iraq-isis-terror-clean-break-zionist2
So, the inescapable truth is that Barack Hussein Obama and most of the United States Congress has supported the most dangerous enemies of America, terrorist organizations who have come out of al Qaeda which the government claims was behind the worst civilian massacre in American history!
I say that this policy has occurred because of Zionist Jewish agents and their collaborators in high places in the United States Government, and in the mass media, who are in service to the admitted Zionist plan to support al Qaeda elements in order to perpetuate bloodbath and chaos in nations of Syria and Iraq which they see are strategic enemies of Israel.
The Zionists are supporting the biggest terrorist threat to Americans and to all Western nations solely for the interests of Israel.
Americans who support policies that aid al Qaeda are traitors. They empower the most horrific terrorist enemies of the United States and the Western World. In fact, the truth be known, Israel itself is state created by terrorism, first against the British and then against the Palestinians. In fact, Israel was caught red-handed committing terrorism against America in the Lavon Affair.
Leading Americans such as our Secretary of State at the time of the attack on the U.S. Navy Ship, The Liberty, say that the murderous attack on The USS Liberty was a deliberate, false flag act of terrorism against. America.
The fact is that President Obama or any member of Congress who supports the terrorists or al Qaeda in Syria and Iraq, or for that matter the Zionist terrorist State of Israel which has attacked America, is committing treason against the United States.
We demand that President Obama and Members of Congress who support the terrorists in Syria and the terrorist State of Israel, should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law!

Jew Feinstein Coming at Your Internet Freedoms, Again

Jew Feinstein Coming at Your Internet Freedoms, Again

Daily Stormer
June 28, 2014
Wicked Jewess  Dianne Feinstein is in your internet, taking your freedoms.
Good Gojims needing more protecting, keeping to safety time. Good gojims not needing to freedom, freedoming bringing danger to good gojims. Chosen people cannot Jewing the good gojims, so you not worrying.
The sickening evil Jewess Dianne Feinstein, an alien parasite completely obsessed with stripping White Americans of all of their most basic human freedoms, has brought back the campaign to crush internet freedom in the name of “oh my god I’m so scared someone could do something bad” ninnying female nonsense that the Jews are capable of selling to our woman and faggot dominated society.
CISPA is back for a third time—it has lost the ‘P,’ but it’s just as bad for civil liberties as ever.
The Senate Intelligence Committee is considering a new cybersecurity bill that contains many of the provisions that civil liberties groups hated about the Cybersecurity Information Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA). Most notably, under the proposed bill companies could not be sued for incorrectly sharing too much customer information with the federal government, and broad law enforcement sharing could allow for the creation of backdoor wiretaps.
The bill, called the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2014 (embedded below), was written by Senate Intelligence Chair Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) and is currently circulating around the committee right now but has not yet been introduced. Right now, the bill is only a “discussion draft,” and the committee is still looking to make revisions to the bill before it is officially introduced.
In any case, the bill will look familiar to anyone who has followed the trials and tribulations of CISPA: The general premise of the bill is to allow the federal government to share classified “cyber threat” information with companies (which is good), but also allows companies to share “cyber threat” information about their customers with the federal government—which could be bad, depending on how it’s implemented. Any programs created by the bill would be under the authority of the Department of Homeland Security, which is important, because it’s a civilian, not military group such as the National Security Administration.
If you’ll remember, the Senate is where the last CISPA went to die, and other Senate cybersecurity bills have limited the circumstances under which data can be shared with law enforcement. Not so in Feinstein’s new bill. The language of the draft would give companies a wide latitude to share information, in real time, with state, local, and federal law enforcement, a move that’s concerning to civil liberties experts.
“I think the Senate bill was much much better placed when this issue came up before—it limited law enforcement use to very specific circumstances, such as when there was the threat of imminent death or bodily injury,” Greg Nojeim, senior counsel at the Center for Democracy and Technology, told me. “This very broad criminal purpose creates the possibility that cybersecurity information sharing becomes a backdoor wiretap, because law enforcement would be receiving information it otherwise would not get unless it showed probable cause. You don’t want a world where very robust cybersecurity information sharing turns into a law enforcement tool that’s used to prosecute people for completely unrelated crime.”
It’s clear in the draft language that Feinstein is trying to assuage the concerns of civil liberties groups, but they’re still not going to be terribly happy with many of the provisions. The bill generally requires that companies strip identifying information from any information shared with the government that could pertain to a person not directly involved with a “cyber threat” and also calls for the attorney general to meet with civil liberties groups to devise the final policies and procedures for how the whole thing would work within 30 days of the bill’s passage.
But even those provisions don’t go far enough or have loopholes, according to Amie Stepanovich of the civil liberties group Access. While any information that goes from the government to private companies would have identifying information in it stripped, Stepanovich says there’s a “loophole large enough to drive a semi-truck through” that would allow companies to leave identifying information if someone tangentially relates to a cyber threat.
“A ‘cyber threat’ could mean you’re just on a spam email list,” and are therefore subject to having your information shared with the government, she said.
The bill also calls for the government to create some sort of “notification system” to let companies know when they’ve shared data that doesn’t pertain to a specific cyber threat.
In an utterly feminized and broken society, people are willing to go along with anything as long as they are told some vague danger exists.
Real men, who used to run European societies, revelled in danger.
And real men still do their best: they skateboard and ride motorcycles and get in bar fights.
But there is little danger left.
Until the race war cometh.

Evidence that Obama’s 1980 Selective Service card was made in 2008 or later

Evidence that Obama’s 1980 Selective Service card was made in 2008 or later


“America’s toughest sheriff” says there is “tons” more potentially shocking information on Barack Obama in connection with his probe into the president’s eligibility, and he calls the media’s suppression of his findings of a likely forged presidential birth certificate and Selective Service Card “probably the biggest censorship blackout in the history of the United States.”
“I’m not going after the president to keep him off a ballot or anything else, but that could happen,” Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio said. “I’m going at it strictly as a law-enforcement guy investigating a possible forgery and fraud. I’m sticking with that, but I’ll tell you one thing. We got tons of other information that could be very shocking, too, but I’m sticking now with just the [forgery] investigation and possible criminal violations.”





Friday, June 27, 2014

More Aid to ISIS:Zio-Puppet Obama and Jewish Lobby's Demand for Bloodshed in the Middle East

More Aid to ISIS: Zio-Puppet Obama & Jewish Lobby’s Demand for Horrific Bloodshed in Middle East

By Dr. David Duke — The new request by President Barack Obama for an increased $500 million “aid” to “rebels” in Syria—which actually means arming the al Qaeda militants in ISIS who threaten the US-supported government in Iraq as well—is a treasonous act which is only understandable in terms of the Jewish Supremacist control and direction of the American government.
The ISIS, al Qaeda offshoot which America has supported and trained in Syria, is now overrunning Iraq! This terrorist organization has promised terrorism and attacks against America as well as Americans anywhere in the world.
Zio-toadie Sen. Graham recently on the CBS Face the Nation program said that ISIS wants to make more 9-11 attacks against America.
Yet, our Zio-controlled talking heads didn’t dare ask him the obvious question. “Then why have you been supporting Syrian terrorists, considering that ISIS and al Nusra, al Qaeda elements dominate the rebel forces?
Hasn’t the U.S. Government prosecuted Americans who have given money to terrorists? Why shouldn’t you and most of the Congress of the United States as well as the President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, be prosecuted for treason?”
Treason!
The CNN map below shows the terrorist, al Qaeda organization, ISIS, dominating almost all of the “rebel held” territory in Syria, under the thumb of Zionists who hate Syria because of its strong support of Palestinians, traitors in the United States government have been supporting this al Qaeda offshoot with American money and weapons.
Now they have swept into Iraq as well. Now we are being told that they are planning 9-11 style attacks on United States.
Only when you understand the Zio stranglehold on the American government and media can one know why we have been supporting our supposed worst enemy in Syria.
The Syrian Government has been making great gains against the terrorists and with the end of the horrific bloodshed in sight American Nobel Peace Prize-winning Barack Obama is now sending a half of billion dollars of weapons of mass destruction to the terrorists in Syria to fulfill the Jewish Zionists wish for the slaughter to continue, even escalate.
Iraq-ISIS-map
There is one obvious reason why America would support the radical terrorists in Iraq against a Western educated medical doctor, Bashar Assad, who has the support of the majority of the citizens of Syria. He has dared to remain a supporter of the Palestinian people and the Hezbollah leaders in Lebanon who successfully defeated the Israeli invaders of Lebanon.

Syria was one of most advanced, secular states in the entire Mideast, as was Iraq. Both nations had flourishing Christian communities, education of women in universities, until the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and the driving out of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi Christians into Syria. Now the combined Christian population of the two nations is in danger of genocide from the mass murderers of ISIS.
The war in Syria has resulted in the persecution of Christians by groups paid for, and armed by the US government.
The war in Syria has resulted in the persecution of Christians by groups paid for, and armed by the US government.
Over a million Christians are in Syria and they all support the government as well as the leading Sunni Cleric of the nation, the Grand Mufti of Syria. The reason why America supported the al Qaeda invaders is simply because Israel wanted to see the successful, anti-Zionist state of Syria destroyed.
Why would America support al Qaeda terrorists and mass murderers, the answer is very, very simple: Because American policy and media is completely dominated by Jewish radicals who don’t give a damn about America. All they care about what they see as Israel’s interests.
There is simply no other reason why the American government would send even more money, arms and training, to the “Syrian rebels”—who, as everyone around the world knows, are completely dominated by the radical ISIS (also known by the acronym ISIL) element.
According to news reports, Obama sent Congress a $500 million request Thursday for a Pentagon-run program that would “significantly expand previous covert efforts to arm rebels” in Syria.
Although White House spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden claimed that the military assistance would “help the Syrian people . . . push back against the growing number of extremists like ISIL” this is an obvious lie.
The reality is—as has been shown even by a recent election in Syria, acknowledged by observers as free and fair, given the violence in that country, which saw President Bashar Al-Assad win nearly 90 percent of the vote—that the vast majority of the Syrian people support the current Syrian government.
There is therefore no reason for the White House to claim that the “Syrian people” are being attacked by their government. The only people doing the “attacking” are a handful of malcontents, backed by an internationally-motivated group of extremists such as the ISIS—and armed, trained and supplied by the American government.
On the face of matters, there is no rational reason why the US government would want to arm “rebels” who are aligned to the very group which is violently opposed to American interests in Iraq—and which is responsible for the most extreme, bloody and violent massacres and mass murders of recent times.
isis-terror01
The only way in which this apparent contradiction can be explained is by the “strategy” being employed by Israel in the Middle East—which is a microcosm of the overall worldwide strategy pursued by the Jewish lobby against all Gentile nations.
This “strategy” consists of creating discord and disunity, so that attention is diverted away from Jewish Supremacist activities.
This is no “secret” policy—it was recently openly declared by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on American television, particularly referring to Syria and Iraq.
Error loading player:
No playable sources found
On the NBC “Meet the Press” show, Netanyhau laid out the strategy as follows:
“What you’re seeing in the Middle East today in Iraq and in Syria is the stark hatred between radical Shiites — in this case led by Iran — and radical Sunnis led by al-Qaeda and ISIS and others,” Netanyahu said.
“Now both of these camps are enemies of the United States, and when your enemies are fighting each other, don’t strengthen either one — weaken both.
“And I think by far the worst outcome that could come out of this is that one of these factions, Iran, would come out with nuclear weapon capability. That would be a tragic mistake — it would make everything else pale in comparison.
“I think that there are two actions you have to take: one is to take the actions that you deem necessary to counter this ISIS takeover of Iraq, and the second is not to allow Iran to dominate Iraq the way it dominated Lebanon and Syria.

“You actually have to work on both sides — as I say, you try to weaken both.”
This “strategy”—as set out by the wirepullers who control the US government and its foreign policy—explains why Obama now seeks to increase “aid” to the “Syrian rebels” even though this is blatantly against American interests.
While the whole world calls for an end to the horrific bloodshed, the New York Times gives an insight into the Zionist position.
NYT-syria-israel
Here is a quote from the New York Times from September 5, 2013. The article’s title is“Israel Backs Limited Strike Against Syria.”
“This is a playoff situation in which you need both teams to lose, but at least you don’t want one to win — we’ll settle for a tie,” said Alon Pinkas, a former Israeli consul general in New York. “Let them both bleed, hemorrhage to death: that’s the strategic thinking here. As long as this lingers, there’s no real threat from Syria.”
This high up Israeli Zionist criminal says it all.
While the world wants to end the slaughter, The Israelis and their Zionist cohorts in the United States want the mass murder of innocents in Syria to go on and on!
There is simply no other reason for America to arm and supply “rebels” in Syria. All that will happen is that the bloodshed, suffering and misery of millions of innocent people will continue and even be extended.
Yet this extended bloodshed and suffering is exactly what the Jewish Supremacists want. It forms an intrinsic part of their atavistic hatred of all Gentiles. As long as the Jewish Supremacists can instigate violence and destabilize other nations, the less time the world will have to focus on their own activities.

Philly Mayor writes anti-white conspiracies for Huffington Post




27
Jun

Philly Mayor writes anti-white conspiracies for Huffington Post

Huffington Post published a column by the Micheal Nutter, the black mayor of Philadelphia. The column says that young blacks are not responsible for their own failure. It is the fault of the government.
Nutter says the government fails to spend enough money to ensure black people are successful.
Michael Nutter is the mayor of Philadelphia and…well, a nutter, which is Brit-slang for a crazy person. Hey, at least he has that “truth in labeling” thing going for him. He penned a piece for the Huffington Post today in which he “exposes” myths that are keeping young black men from succeeding. Not only doesn’t he disprove any myths, he essentially says that black men are not responsible for their own actions and their only saving grace is massive government intervention. Like I said: a nutter.
I think it’s safe to assume that the Honorable Mr. Nutter is not a member of the GOP based on his premise that a racist society is keeping black men down and the only fixes are more spending by the government. Let’s take a look at some of these myths and see if we can provide some real solutions instead of race-shaming and government expansion:

Thursday, June 26, 2014

Gary Oldman Becomes a Pariah

Gary Oldman Becomes a Pariah

Kevin MacDonald



You have to wonder what Gary Oldman was smoking during his Playboy interview — the one where he defended Mel Gibson and said that Jews “run” Hollywood.
So they persecute. Mel Gibson is in a town that’s run by Jews and he said the wrong thing because he’s actually bitten the hand that I guess has fed him—and doesn’t need to feed him anymore because he’s got enough dough. He’s like an outcast, a leper, you know? But some Jewish guy in his office somewhere hasn’t turned and said, “That fucking kraut” or “Fuck those Germans,” whatever it is? We all hide and try to be so politically correct. That’s what gets me. It’s just the sheer hypocrisy of everyone, that we all stand on this thing going, “Isn’t that shocking?” [smiles wryly] All right. Shall I stop talking now? What else can we discuss?
It seems like every few years a Hollywood celebrity comes out and states the obvious—Marlon BrandoWilliam CashOliver StoneRick Sanchez, Mel Gibson, and now Gary Oldman. The list includes not a few Jewish commentators as well, including Joel Stein in the LA TimesManny Friedman writing  in the  Times of Israel, Ben Stein (see below) and this issue of Moment.
Moment-Hollywood (1)
The LA Times, on the other  hand understands how the game is played. Every year around Oscar time they put out editorials and articles bemoaning the “overwhelmingly white male membership of the academy” and that “film, TV diversity doesn’t look like America’s.” Then the next year, they do it all over again because nothing changes.
Advertisement

Some departures from the benefits of diversity are not seriously contested.
The reason one must question Oldman’s state of mind is that we all know what happens next. The ADL goes crazy and Oldman issues an abject apology. Here’s Oldman’s apology, as reported by JTA:
“I am deeply remorseful that comments I recently made in the Playboy Interview were offensive to many Jewish people. Upon reading my comments in print — I see how insensitive they may be, and how they may indeed contribute to the furtherance of a false stereotype. Anything that contributes to this stereotype is unacceptable, including my own words on the matter.
“I hope you will know that this apology is heartfelt, genuine, and that I have an enormous personal affinity for the Jewish people in general, and those specifically in my life.”
Oldman also said that he had just finished reading “An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood,” by Neal Gabler. “The fact is that our business, and my own career specifically, owes an enormous debt to that contribution,” he wrote.
Heartfelt or not, it wasn’t enough for the ADL:
“While his apology may be heartfelt, Mr. Oldman does not understand why his words about Jewish control were so damaging and offensive, and it is therefore insufficient,” the statement said. ” His reference to the Neal Gabler book he was reading only reinforces the notion that Jewish directors, producers and financiers are there in Hollywood as Jews.  They’re not, and the book does not draw that conclusion.”
The ADL is implicitly saying that yes, Jews run Hollywood, but it really doesn’t make any difference. Their Jewish identity has absolutely no influence on the product. It’s reminiscent of Ben Stein noting that about 60% of the top positions in Hollywood are held by Jews: “Do Jews run Hollywood? You bet they do — and what of it?” (here, p. l)
Such pronouncements are made ex cathedra, as it were. We are not given a reference to a sober assessment of whether Jewish identity makes a difference. So, as a public service to the ADL and other like-minded organizations I would refer them to an article I wrote on the topic (Ibid., p. li ff)
In general, television portrays Jewish issues “with respect, relative depth, affection and good intentions, and the Jewish characters who appear in these shows have, without any doubt, been Jewish—often depicted as deeply involved in their Judaism” (Pearl & Pearl 1999, 5). …
Television presents images of Jewish issues that conform to the views of mainstream Jewish organizations. Television ‘invariably depicts anti-Semitism as an ugly, abhorrent trait that must be fought at every turn’ (p. 103). It is seen as metaphysical and beyond analysis. There is never any rational explanation for anti-Semitism; anti-Semitism is portrayed as an absolute, irrational evil. Positive, well-liked, non-Jewish characters, such as Mary Tyler Moore, often lead the fight against anti-Semitism ….
Regarding Israel, ‘on the whole, popular TV has conveyed the fact that Israel is the Jewish homeland with a strong emotional pull upon Diaspora Jews, that it lives in perpetual danger surrounded by foes, and that as a result of the constant and vital fight for its survival, it often takes extraordinary (sometimes rogue) measures in the fields of security and intelligence’ (Pearl & Pearl 1999, 173). …
In the movies, a common theme is Jews coming to the rescue of non-Jews …
Christianity is typically portrayed as evil, even going so far as depicting Christians as psychopaths. [citing Michael Medved] …
small towns [are portrayed] as filled with bigots and anti-Semites.
*    *   *
Since the 1960s the Hollywood creative community has disseminated views on issues such as sex, marriage, and family very different from those held by the majority of Americans and traditional American elites (Lichter et al. 1994; Powers et al. 1996; Stein 1979).
A substantial percentage of the Hollywood creative community (which now includes the higher levels of control over movie content rather than only the process of screen writing) have self-consciously aimed at a complete restructuring of America’s basic institutions in a left/liberal direction (Lichter et al. 1994; Powers et al. 1996). “The elite was [since the 1960s] and remains disproportionately anti-Establishment in its social and political views and . . . remains so even as a large segment of the American public continues to be ambivalent, or opposed to the new social paradigms” (Powers et al. 1996, 48). Moreover, the social and political messages emanating from Hollywood have been impervious to election returns, and “if anything, the ascendance of conservative politics in Washington may have accelerated television’s leftward tendencies by alarming and mobilizing the predominantly liberal Hollywood community” (Lichter et al. 1994, 418).
Powers et al. (1996, 207) characterize television as promoting liberal, cosmopolitan values, and Lichter et al. (1994, 251) find that television portrays cultural pluralism in positive terms and as easily achieved apart from the activities of a few ignorant or bigoted miscreants. On the other hand, Powers et al. (1996) find that themes of racial conflict resulting from white racism are more typical of the movies: “Today, moviemakers seem preoccupied with exposing and rectifying the evils of racism and are thus inclined to convey a quite pessimistic view of race relations” (p. 173). (Chapter 2 of Separation and Its Discontents, p. 57)
In other words, the Jews who run Hollywood have attitudes that are squarely within the mainstream of the American Jewish community and often sharply divergent from the attitudes of the rest of America. As Andrew Joyce notes,
But what of the impact of this cryptic Judaic subculture on the production of secular culture for the masses? It’s evident that in many cases the resultant cultural production is incredibly hostile towards the behaviors and traditions of non-Jews, and that the impartial objectivity of “Jewish artists” … is itself a self-deception. (see following link)
But what I would like to stress here is Andrew Joyce’s account of how Jewish identity influences Hollywood in his excellent series on Jewish self-deception, particularly Part 4: “Self-Deception in Jewish Participation in Secular Culture.”
Jews involved in the media and the entertainment industries have to a marked degree engaged in self-deception about the influence of their Jewish identity on their activities in these fields. For example, David Dresser and Lester Friedman have pointed out that literary critics are often perplexed by the denials of Jewish authors that their works have been influenced by their ethnicity, even when such influences are obvious. Dresser and Friedman note that such flagrant, yet apparently earnest, denials have been attributed by experts to “conscious evasion, a personal blind spot, or a psychological problem.”[3]
The second argument here is that Jews have engaged in self-deception about the extent and nature of that involvement. Self-deceptions regarding the extent of Jewish influence in the media are principally facilitated by two enablers: lies of omission, and the employment of language euphemisms. A typical example would be the fact that, even discounting the presence of Jews in the most influential positions, the enormous over-representation of Jews in the media professions is down-played to a truly remarkable degree. The most popular expression of Jewish self-deception in this respect is the concession that there is, as stated in the ADL-sponsored Anti-Semitism in America, only a “grain of truth” to assertions that this over-representation is vast and amounts to domination.[4] 
Producer David Selznick who proclaimed “I am an American, not a Jew,” is a good example.
This was despite the fact that Selznick had previously contributed to the work of the American Jewish Congress,[11] and was strongly attached to the Jewish causes like the Committee for a Jewish Army of Stateless and Palestinian Jews during the 1940s — along with other ‘assimilated’ secular media Jews like Sam Goldwyn, Louis B. Mayer, Jack Warner, and Harry Cohn.[12] That Selznick was embedded in a non-religious Judaic subculture is further evidenced by the fact he was involved in one of its most popular fads — he had a “preoccupation with psychoanalysis on both an individual and a social level,” which led to his collaboration with Alfred Hitchcock on Spellbound.[13] Selznick was “zealous in fighting anti-Semitism,” made personal financial contributions to Jewish charities, and also used some of his influence to ensure the subtle but steady presence of Jews in war films during the 1940s, in what Steven Carr describes as an “attempt to sell a pluralistic American ideal.”[14]
When asked to review the 1936 French biblical film Golgotha, Selznick found the picture to be anti-Semitic. He subsequently wrote to the head of the board of directors at his production company: “It is my duty as a Jew to do everything in my power to keep the picture from being distributed or exhibited in this country, and I will stop at nothing to achieve this end.”[15] Selznick even worked directly with the AJC on movie production. Carr writes that both Selznick and Irving Thalberg (producer of The Good Earth and Ben Hur) attended a meeting with the American Jewish Congress in 1936, during which they were given “story outlines for films” that would “promote a positive vision of the Jew.”[16]
It is therefore abundantly clear that there is more than a little deception and self-deception in Selznick’s claim “I am an American, not a Jew.”
Yes indeed. But of course the ADL is not concerned with honestly ascertaining Jewish identities and what that means for what comes out of Hollywood and what is off limits (e.g., any sense that it is legitimate and natural for Whites to identity as White and pursue interests as Whites). For them it’s not really about deception or even self-deception. It’s about coming up with a line that has some surface plausibility (if one doesn’t investigate any further) and then using all its power against anyone who says otherwise.
For the ADL it is truly a matter of “Is it good for the Jews?,” and since attributing too much power to Jews in Hollywood has an obvious downside for Jews generally, they will do what the can to crush people like Gary Oldman.
When the ADL and the people who run Hollywood are through with Oldman, he will become yet another example of a career destroyed by saying something that everyone knows is true. And in that sense, Gary Oldman will become an exemplar of the power of our hostile elite to enforce thought control.
It’s well known that if you you repeat an idea often enough, it starts to sound true and obvious — so much so that it will become a psychological reflex. So my advice is that you should studiously rehearse just what to say during interviews in very public places like Playboy. That way when you are feeling full of yourself during your interview (wow, I must be really cool to be interviewed by Playboy), you won’t impulsively blurt out inconvenient truths that will destroy your life.
So to stay out of trouble, just keep repeating thoughts like these over and you will be just fine:
Jews do not run Hollywood;
and even if they do (or even, as the ADL says, there’s a “grain of truth” in it), the Jews who run Hollywood have no sense of Jewish identity;
and the values promoted by Hollywood have nothing to do with being Jewish;
so even if Jews run Hollywood, it makes absolutely no difference that they do.
I know it’s a mouthful, but when these thoughts become psychological reflexes, you will feel much  more confident going into interviews, and your career will not be endangered by a moment’s thoughtlessness.
So study up America! Your life depends on it.
Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter