Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Jew NBA Master Silver Bans Jew Sterling for Life

http://www.dailystormer.com/jew-nba-master-silver-bans-jew-sterling-for-life/

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer

April 30, 2014
Adam Silver: Like his predecessor Stern, he is a White man, like Sterling, holding a position of power over the colored ball-chuckers.
Adam Silver: Like his predecessor Stern, he is a White man, like Sterling, holding a position of power over the colored ball-chuckers.  These Negros really should rise up and take back their balls from these evil White ball-grabbers.
I think Sterling really upset the Jews with his racist Jew rant.
But come on. It was a private conversation.
I now find myself feeling almost sorry for the Jew Sterling.
Seriously though – no I don’t.
I’m loving this.
From Fox:
The NBA threw the book at LA Clippers owner Donald Sterling, banning him for life, fining him $2.5 million and raising the possibility of a forced sale of the team over racist remarks he made to an ex-girlfriend that surfaced on a tape recording.
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver made the announcement at a New York press conference moments after Sterling told Fox News that he was not interested in selling the team. When reached after the press conference by Fox News’ Jim Gray, Sterling declined to comment.
Silver, who succeeded David Stern as NBA commissioner in February, said the league interviewed Sterling during its investigation. He said NBA investigators determined that the voice heard on the audio tape obtained by TMZ was Sterling’s and called the comments “deeply offensive” and vowed to “do everything in my power” to force a sale of the team, which could be worth more than $500 million.
Silver succeeded Stern, eh? It is a terrible thing, this NBA with all of its black mules being totally controlled by White men.
Why should something called the Negro Ball-chuckers of America (NBA) be controlled by White people like Silver, Sterling and Stern?
These White people like Silver, Sterling and Stern are everywhere, controlling all of the institutions, controlling all the poor oppressed colored folks, stopping them from getting ahead.
If I were the coloreds, I would be really upset about these Whites like Silver, Sterling and Stern controlling all of my balls.

Stand Up To The SPLC: Southern Marriage & Family Defense Rally (Montgomery, AL – May 9th)

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/

Alabama
Here’s the link to the CofCC version of the SPLC rally:
Note: The League of the South has its own event page.
Stand Up To The SPLC

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

"NO HATE CRIME" WHEN JEWS BEAT UP BLACK GAY

http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/No-Hate-Crime-When-Jews-Beat-Up-Black-Gay.html

By Rev. Ted Pike
29 Apr 14

Government officials described the recent alleged murder of three non-Jews in Kansas by former KKK leader Frazier Glenn Cross as a “hate crime”—though no Jews were killed. His intention to kill Jews, said officials, is enough for indictment under the federal Matthew Shephard Hate Crimes Prevention Act. This means he could be punished three times more harshly than if he had killed the same people without anti-Semitic feelings.
Yet last week the justice system had a very different response to a similarly violent hate crime.
In December 2013, black, homosexual student Taj Patterson was violently assaulted in Brooklyn by Jewish “shomrim” (security police) who are Ultra-Orthodox and thus strongly oppose homosexuality. The attackers, who blinded Patterson in one eye, shouted anti-homosexual epithets.
Taj PattersonBut a New York Grand Jury ruled last week that the five attackers will not be charged with a hate crime, only civil penalties. Jewish watchdog group, “Failed Messiah,” describes the attack:
Members of the patrol detained Patterson while investigating neighbors’ reports that he had damaged cars; however, they did not call the police. Despite the fact that these reports of vandalism proved to be unfounded, the group, which had grown to approximately 15 members, surrounded Patterson, preventing him from continuing his walk home. When Patterson tried to get away from the group, he was held down, and savagely punched and kicked by a number of the males surrounding him, including these defendants. Patterson sustained injuries to his head and body, the most serious of which was a torn retina and a broken eye socket, causing him to lose vision in his right eye. The beating ceased only when passersby arrived and threatened to take pictures of the group assaulting Patterson. All of the assailants fled the scene, leaving Patterson on the ground injured. None of the attackers were present when the police and an ambulance responded to 911 calls.
The District Attorney said that a Kings County grand jury has indicted the following (5) defendants...for acting in concert to commit Gang Assault in the First Degree, and other related charges. If convicted, the defendants each face up to 25 years in prison.
Why are these defendants not charged with a hate crime for a clearly bias-motivated assault against a person who has not one but two identities—black and homosexual—specially protected under the federal hate law? They committed the crime while shouting their bias for all to hear! If these were white attackers, yelling “homophobic” slurs while beating a black homosexual, it would have been front-page news across the nation and resulted in hate crime charges for all attackers. But these assailants face no tripled penalties, no hate crime charges. Why? Because they are Jewish.
In 2009, Attorney General Eric Holder informed the Senate Judiciary Committee that Jews who commit hate crimes, with other ethnic minorities, homosexuals, Muslims, and even women, will not be prosecuted under the Matthew Shepard Act. They will only face civil penalties. White men and Christians, however, face possible triple penalties—even if they fail, as did Cross, to harm members of federally protected groups; all that is necessary to be convicted of a hate crimes charge is a crime and bias against members of a federally protected group.
Indictment of the five Shomrim attackers without hate crimes charges contrasts sharply with the quickness of the government to label, indict, and prosecute 15 Amish Christians in 2012 for the “hate crime” of forcibly shaving the heads of theological rivals. Although no one was hurt, the FBI and US Justice Department were proud to have “served justice” by meting triple penalty prison sentences of up to 15 years for 15 Amish adults, disrupting families and effectively orphaning many children. (See Convicted Amish Are Not "Hate Criminals")
Conspiracy to Ensnare Christians
Who contrived such twisted, discriminatory laws? The Jewish Anti-Defamation League proudly boasts that “Our legal experts pioneered hate crime laws and work to implement them nationwide." ("Problems to Solutions: Building a Better World, ADL Annual Report," adl.org). ADL continues to argue in court against efforts by lawyers for the Amish to overturn their defendants’ convictions. It supports without compromise the fifteen year sentence meted to Sam Mullet, patriarch of the beard cutting Mullet clan, as just and proportional to the offence.
ADL’s goal in more than 60 nations and 45 US states which have adopted its hate laws is sinister. They aim to arrest Christians and members of the political right as often as possible, stacking the legal systems with indictments and convictions of those of a traditionalist, nationalist, or anti-Zionist perspective—while being careful no Jew is ever indicted for a hate crime. This creates a legal record testifying that Christians and conservatives are notoriously inclined toward hate and violence, while Jews are not. Jews are victims of Christian hate. Someday, when ADL’s hate crime gestapos really bite down on the right, innumerable legal precedents will be available to prosecutors against Christians and patriots, but virtually none against Jews. Jesus prophesied that in times of persecution preceding his Second Coming, anti-Christ Jews will judge Christians in their synagogues and deliver them to prison. (Matt. 10:17)
The case of Taj Patterson reveals that of three privileged groups under the federal hate law, Jews are given the highest privilege of all. Hate laws—which were, according to ADL, conceived, written, and implemented by Jews—make members of their tribe the most protected of protected groups. Under ADL hate laws, “equality and justice for all” has been replaced by a new prosecutorial credo: preferential treatment for Jews, no mercy for Christians.
The fact that Taj Patterson, a member of two usually highly protected groups, blacks and homosexuals, cannot obtain hate crimes justice and protection, certainly also puts blacks and homosexuals in the category of second-class citizens. Where does that then put lowly whites, males, Christians, and members of the Christian/conservative and anti-Zionist right? We are now third-class citizens.
This is a reminder that Jewish Supremacists, making use of blacks, homosexuals, even Zionist Christians, have no real love for any of these groups. They are fodder for Zionist world ambitions. They are expendable. The sooner all of these factions realize they are being exploited, and work to roll back a half century of freedom-destroying hate laws, the safer we all will be.

Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.
To contact Rev. Ted Pike call (503) 631-3808 or email tedpike@truthtellers.org.
The freedom-saving outreach of Rev. Ted Pike and the National Prayer Network is solely supported by sale of books, videos and your financial support. All gifts are tax-deductible.

National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015

“Apartheid,” John Kerry-Cohen and Subservience to Israel

http://davidduke.com/apartheid-john-kerry-cohen-subservience-israel/

The sudden backtracking by US Secretary of State John Kerry on his mild remark that Israel might become like an “Apartheid” state if current peace talks with Palestinians failed, highlight the fact that the Jews-only state and its lobby in America have overwhelming influence in the corridors of power.
Kerry-Cohen’s remark, made during a meeting of the Trilateral Commission, which includes senior officials from the United States, Europe, Russia and Japan, was reported as follows:
“A two-state solution will be clearly underscored as the only real alternative, because a unitary state winds up either being an apartheid state with second-class citizens or it ends up being a state that destroys the capacity of Israel to be a Jewish state.”
Despite this comment actually been massively pro-Israeli—in the sense that it calls for measures to protect and enhance the Jews-only state—his comparison to “Apartheid” immediately drew the ire of the largest Jewish lobbies in America.
Of course, even this comparison is false—the South African apartheid state never phosphorus bombed black people, or committed the wholesale ethnic cleansing and other crimes of which Israel has been, and is still guilty.
Nonetheless, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the National Jewish Democratic Council and the U.S. House of Representatives majority leader and the most senior Jewish official in government, Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.), all joined together in condemning Kerry.
kerry-state-dept
In face of the uproar, stirred up by the Jewish Supremacist-controlled media, Kerry-Cohen immediately backed down, and issued a statement on the US State Department website titled “On Support for Israel.”
This statement revealed completely not only the effect of the pressure of the Jewish Lobby in Washington DC, but also contained a number of admissions by Kerry-Cohen as to the true nature of the “Jewish state.”
Kerry-Cohen’s statement said that he believed that a “tow-state” solution was the only answer to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict—because if Israel allows Palestinians to live in it as equal citizens, it would destroy the “Jewish state.”
In other words, Kerry-Cohen admitted outright that the Zionist Supremacists must have a Jews-only state—a Jewish ethnostate—in order to survive.
Yet this is something that they—and the Jewish Lobby in every other country—actively seek to deny to all other people on earth.
As Kerry-Cohen said: “In the long term, a unitary, binational state cannot be the democratic Jewish state that Israel deserves or the prosperous state with full rights that the Palestinian people deserve.”
Here we have the Secretary of State of what still is the most powerful nation on earth, quickly pulled into line for daring to make a comment which actually is supportive of Israel—and then issuing a groveling apology  in which he reaffirms the Zionist state’s right to exclude anybody but Jews from its population makeup.
To put this in perspective: what would Kerry-Cohen have to say if any other state on earth announced that it could not continue to exist if it allowed Jews inside its borders?
Any such state making an announcement of that nature would probably be bombed.
But because the Jewish lobby is so powerful in America, it is not even the Israeli state which has to make a claim saying that the presence of Palestinians will lead to the destruction of the “Jewish state”—no, such statements are left to be made by the US Secretary of State himself!

Bill Clinton: Pioneer in Courting Jewish Money

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/04/bill-clinton-pioneer-in-courting-jewish-money/
The  Republican grovelfest continues to reverberate.  Philip Weiss compiles a few additions, including an editorial writer from the New York Times (“It’s hard to imagine a political spectacle more loathsome…”. ) The interesting thing is that Weiss includes a quote from David Frum’s book on GW Bush (The Right Man) noting the prominent role of Jews in making Bill Clinton’s wonderful career. This  includes Clinton “getting very rich rapidly” right after he left the presidency. (I recall that pretty much the first thing that Clinton did after leaving office was to give a speech to a Jewish audience in LA for $100,000—just a little thank you note, with the promise of much more to come.)
Sociopathy can be very lucrative, and the recent grovelfest shows that there is no shortage of White politicians willing to do anything for the fame and fortune of the presidency. All they have to do to climb onto the gravy train is to make it very clear that they care nothing about the future of their own people. Clinton’sstatement to an audience at Portland State University in 1998 is classic:
Today, largely because of immigration, there is no majority race in Hawaii or Houston or New York City. Within five years, there will be no majority race in our largest state, California. In a little more than 50 years, there will be no majority race in the United States. No other nation in history has gone through demographic change of this magnitude in so short a time … [These immigrants] are energizing our culture and broadening our vision of the world. They are renewing our most basic values and reminding us all of what it truly means to be American.
And then there’s this quote from his 1997 State of the Union speech: “My fellow Americans, we must never, ever believe that our diversity is a weakness — it is our greatest strength.” If we believe strongly enough, it will come true, never mind the reality of ethnic conflict throughout human history.
Here’s David Frum:
Clinton can fairly be called the most philo-Semitic president in U.S. history. His closest friends and most trusted aides were Jews, his administration was crammed with Jewish appointees, both his nominees to the Supreme Court were Jewish—even his most famous girlfriend was Jewish. And Jews liked Clinton as much as he liked them. They appreciated his intellectuality and his social tolerance, his liberated wife, and his moderate liberalism. Jewish donors contributed generously to Clinton’s election campaigns; after he left office, some of those former donors helped him to grow very rich very rapidly.

Monday, April 28, 2014

Bob Carr under fire from Jewish leaders over influence of pro-Israel lobby

http://m.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/bob-carr-under-fire-from-jewish-leaders-over-influence-of-proisrael-lobby/story-fn59niix-1226879654922

http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2014/s3982168.htm

Bob Carr
Former foreign minister Bob Carr says the pro-Israel lobby had an unhealthy influence on Labor policy. Picture: sam Mooy Source: News Corp Australia

FORMER foreign minister Bob Carr has hit back at those who have accused him of being a bigot, and denied his views on Israel were influenced by Muslim communities in western Sydney electorates.
Mr Carr’s attack on the power of the pro-Israel lobby in Australia in his forthcoming book, Diary of a Foreign Minister, has sparked a furore, with federal Labor MP Michael Danby labelling his views bigoted.
“No lobby in Australia, I understand, has that kind of influence. It’s laughable,’’ said Mr Danby, a Jewish MP and strong supporter of Israel.
Key Jewish leader Mark Leibler also rejected the former foreign minister’s assertion that the pro-Israel lobby wielded “extraordinary influence’’ on Labor’s policy under Julia Gillard.
In his new book, Mr Carr says Ms Gillard subcontracted out Middle East policymaking to the powerful Israel lobby in Melbourne, which had its own “falafel faction” in Labor’s caucus.

He says “extreme right-wing’’ lobbyists had had an “unhealthy’’ influence on Australia’s policy towards Israel and the Occupied Territories.
“Certainly they enjoyed extraordinary influence. I had to resist it and my book tells the story of that resistance,’’ Mr Carr told ABC’s 7.30 program.
“It needs to be highlighted because I think it reached a very unhealthy level.
“I think the great mistake of the pro-Israel lobby in Melbourne is to express an extreme right-wing Israeli view rather than a more tolerant liberal Israeli view.’’
In his 18 months as foreign minister, Mr Carr helped achieve a shift in Australia’s Middle East policy to swing support behind Palestine at the United Nations.
Mr Carr today denied his desire to support the bid by Palestinians to upgrade their status at the United Nations was influenced by growing Muslim communities in key electorates.
“That was not the case,” he said.
“The case for not blocking, not voting to block Palestinian status at the UN, persuaded a majority of countries of the world.
“The position I was advocating to the government can’t be attributed to some crude pursuit of votes from ethnic communities.”
Mr Carr rejected Mr Danby’s accusation of bigotry.
“For years I was president of Labor Friends of Israel,’’ Mr Carr told ABC radio today.
He also said he had previously argued that Holocaust survivor Primo Levi’s book If This is a Man was the most important book of the 20th century.
Mr Carr said the lobbying was not in the interests of Israel or peace in the Middle East.
“(It) was being inappropriately and bullyingly exercised in the government. It needed to be resisted so I resisted and I am proud to have done that,’’ he said.
Mr Leibler, the national chairman of the Australia-Israel and Jewish Affairs Council, rejected Mr Carr’s claims of influence as “a figment of his imagination’’.
“How does the Jewish lobby control the prime minister? Through donations to the ALP and sending people to Israel. I mean, give me a break. Would anyone seriously accept that?’’ Mr Leibler told Lateline.
“Julia Gillard is an independent-thinking woman. She can come to her own conclusions without being influenced by the Jewish lobby,’’ he said.
Mr Danby also said “no-one has that kind of influence”.
He added: “I suppose in the current climate, as George Brandis says, it’s OK to be a bigot.”
Mr Carr clashed with Ms Gillard over her planned support for Israel during a crucial vote in the UN, and he effectively rolled the former prime minister on the issue in caucus.
“I had to resist it, and my book tells the story of that resistance, coming to a climax when there was a dispute on the floor of caucus about my recommendation that we don’t block the Palestinian bid for increased non-state status at the United Nations,’’ Mr Carr said.
Mr Carr has defended publishing private text messages between himself and Ms Gillard, without her consent, to reveal the level of influence of the pro-Israel lobby, saying it was in the national interest.
He said his view was that Israeli settlement activity ought to stop and Australia should not block Palestine’s increased status in the UN General Assembly.
Mr Danby accused Mr Carr of being ungrateful to the Labor Party and says Ms Gillard made a mistake by bringing the former NSW premier in as a foreign minister.
“In retrospect, given all the division he caused ... it was a mistake,’’ Mr Danby told ABC Radio.
“Here’s a bloke plucked from obscurity ... a former provincial premier who dumps on Gillard and the former Labor government ... the Labor Party supported him all his political life, how about a bit of decency?’’
Additional reporting: AAP

Beware of the Internet Liberal

David Duke's Infamous 'Jewish Enemy' Incident at Amren 2006

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RELmEPUy6lQ#t=47

Mother of notorious teenage hate crime killer sues son and his father

Autumn Pasquale was a white twelve year old who was killed by two black teenage brothers. They killed her for the fun of it. They only thing they stole was some parts off of her bicycle. One of the brother was slapped on the wrist with almost no punishment as part of a plea deal.
The parents of Pasquale are suing the parents of the two thugs. The mother of the thugs is trying to protect her assets by suing her imprisoned son and their father.

Unaired portion of Sterling audio denigrates blacks in Israel

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/04/unaired-portion-of-sterling-audio-denigrates-blacks-in-israel/

DS: It’s the world! You go to Israel, the blacks are just treated like dogs.
V: So do you have to treat them like that too?
DS: The white Jews, there’s white Jews and black Jews, do you understand?
V: And are the black Jews less than the white Jews?
DS: A hundred percent, fifty, a hundred percent.
V: And is that right?
DS: It isn’t a question—we don’t evaluate what’s right and wrong, we live in a society. We live in a culture. We have to live within that culture.
V: But shouldn’t we take a stand for what’s wrong? And be the change and the difference?
DS: I don’t want to change the culture, because I can’t. It’s too big and too [unknown].
V: But you can change yourself.
DS: I don’t want to change. If my girl can’t do what I want, I don’t want the girl. I’ll find a girl that will do what I want! Believe me. I thought you were that girl—because I tried to do what you want. But you’re not that girl.
Donald Sterling was sued by the Bush administration in 2006 for allegedly refusing to rent to blacks and Hispanics in a Beverly Hills complex and to non-Koreans in a Koreatown complex. He settled the case by paying $2.75 million. In 2009, he was sued by a black Clippers executive who claimed Sterling was racist for only paying him $350,000 a year.
















http://davidduke.com/jewish-racism-revealed-l-clippers-owner/

Jewish Racism Revealed by L.A. Clippers’ Owner

donald sperling smallThe Times of Israel Headline about Jewish Clipper owner Donald Sperling says it all. It is headline that would be verboten in the American mainstream media.
It reads:
“Clipper owner:  Black Jews treated like dogs in Israel.”
In actual tape recording he says:
DS: It’s the world! You go to Israel, the blacks are just treated like dogs.
He goes on:
V: So do you have to treat them like that too?
DS: The white Jews, there’s white Jews and black Jews, do you understand?
V: And are the black Jews less than the white Jews?
DS: A hundred percent, fifty, a hundred percent.
V: And is that right?
DS: It isn’t a question—we don’t evaluate what’s right and wrong, we live in a society. We live in a culture. We have to live within that culture.
V: But shouldn’t we take a stand for what’s wrong? And be the change and the difference?
DS: I don’t want to change the culture, because I can’t. It’s too big and too [unknown].
Of course, everything he says about Israel and how it treats its “Black Jews” is true. The Ethiopian Jews are a pariah in Israel. But, Americans and the rest of the world hears very little about the Jewish racial supremacist policies of Israel.
And the truth is that the “Black Jews” are treated light-years better than the Palestinians and other non-Jews in Israel. Of course none of that is mentioned in the article. And of course, Sperling would never had said anything about Israel treating Blacks “like dogs” if he knew the tape would be made public.
In fact, Israel is a segregated state, with thousands of segregated schools, settlements, neighborhoods and apartment building. Chief rabbis and public officials tell Israelis publicly that it is immoral for a Jew to sell or rent to a non-Jew in a Jewish neighborhood.
Israel has ethnic based immigration laws and even bans marriages between Jews and non-Jews, something that would be condemned to the heavens if any European populated nation did the same.
Occasionally the truth ekes out. It is important than when it does we take it far beyond the insulated Jewish community. — David Duke

The Kosher Food Racket: How Americans Pay Extra for Their Food to Keep Jews Happy

http://davidduke.com/kosher-food-racket-americans-pay-extra-food-keep-jews-happy/?fb_action_ids=874757315874485&fb_action_types=news.publishes&fb_ref=pub-standard

The Kosher Food Racket: How Americans Pay Extra for Their Food to Keep Jews Happy

is-it-kosherEven though Orthodox Jews constitute around two percent of America’s population, the rest of the country is forced to pay a special levy on almost all food and grocery products just to please the Orthodox Jewish community, in a swindle which even Jews themselves have described as the “kosher food racket.”
Astonishingly, very few Americans even know about the extent of this Orthodox Jewish swindle, or even how it works.
Most people know of, or have heard of, “kosher food.” This is supposed to be food which, in the case of livestock, is slaughtered in such a way as to be “holy” (but which is actually highly inhumane and involved slitting an animal’s throat and letting it painfully bleed to death while a rabbi prays over it).
This “kosher food” is therefore passed off as something which only affects Jews, and Orthodox Jews at that, as some sort of peculiar but benign religious practice.
In reality, “kosher” food is far more than just slaughtered animals, and covers almost any sort of grocery item.
The racket works like this: in order for a grocery product to be certified as “kosher”, it must carry a little “U” inside a circle, called a “Kosher Logo,” somewhere on its packaging, which looks like this:
 oukosher15
This symbol is issued by the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America (the “Orthodox Union”) which is the sole and exclusive owner of the OU “Kosher Logo.”
In order to use this symbol, a product manufacturer must apply to the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America for certification—to “ensure” that their manufacturing process is “Kosher” and meets all the Jewish dietary standards.
This is where the catch comes in: the product manufacturer must pay the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America a fee for this certification process—and this “fee” is then added to the product’s cost—which is then passed on to the consumer.
Thus, non-Jews who buy these products—and they range from things such as coca-cola to toothpaste, and more—are forced to pay extra to cater the demands of Orthodox Jews, even in areas where there are few or no Jews.
koser-website
The Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America has a special website set up through which companies can apply for kosher certification. Called “OUKOSHER”, this site reveals exactly how big the kosher food swindle is:
“Most Americans eat some kosher food every day, but chances are they’re not aware of it. Take a walk down the aisle of any supermarket and you will see that the OU kosher symbol appears on over 60% of America’s kosher certified foods, from the coveted Oreo to the thirst-quenching Coca-Cola. Over $150 billion of kosher certified products are consumed annually, and spending continues to rise dramatically.
“The OU Kosher Logo logo has become an increasingly important marketing device, which generates additional revenues by expanding the size of the market. OU Kosher Logo Certification gives a product a competitive edge that makes it sell faster, thus causing supermarkets to favor brands with certification. That also means that OU Kosher Logo certification can lead to an increase in a company’s private label business.
“There is clear evidence that a kosher symbol boosts market share, that a kosher product can win more favorable shelf space, and that when positioned next to a competing non-kosher brand, a kosher product will do better by 20%. This data has remained constant even in smaller cities, far from city with heavy concentrations of kosher Jews. (Source: Integrated Marketing Communications.)”
The “Kosher Food” website even has a “product search” facility, which allows visitors to look over which grocery items are kosher or not.
The costs of this process are, as mentioned earlier, passed directly onto the consumer. As long ago as 1959, a Jewish newsletter described it as a “Kosher Racket” and said that the “business” of certification has already become one of the “big business rackets in the United States and is threatening to assume gigantic proportions.” (The Jewish Newsletter, William Zukerman, editor, June 1, 1959).
kosher-food-racket01
Confirmation that the Kosher food racket actually drives up the price of food for all consumers has also come with an article in the Haaretz newspaper of April 27, 2014.
haartez-kosher
The article, titled “Ministries urge Rabbinate to relax kashrut control of food imports” discusses the fact that the rabbinate in Israel have a rule in place which forces food importers to undergo kosher certification even if the product is already certified as kosher in its country of origin.
The Haaretz article says that “The kashrut inspection requirements for the importation of hard cheese increases the cost of the cheese to the Israeli consumer by some 35%, Israeli cheese importers say.”
In other words, the increased price consumers are forced to pay for food being produced to “kosher” requirements can be as high as 35% more than without that certification—and that is in Israel!
The “Kosher food racket” has become, in the words of William Zukcerman, one of the biggest swindles in America today.

Saturday, April 26, 2014

Three more Hollywood big shots accused of child molestation

Three more Hollywood big shots accused of child molestation

Hollywood executives Garth Ancier, David Neuman and Gary Goddard have been accused of sexually abusing teenage boys in lawsuits filed Monday in Hawaii federal court.
“I would not wish on my worst enemies what I went through,” declared plaintiff Michael Egan at a Monday news conference at the Four Seasons in Beverly Hills.
Ancier is the former president of BBC Worldwide America and also served as head of programming for Fox, NBC and the WB. He’s also the head of year-old Quad Media Partners, formed to launch four fully curated linear TV networks, “each built around a modern decade in broadcast and cable network television.”
Neuman, the former president of Disney TV, previously worked for Digital Entertainment Network, which was headed by Marc Collins-Rector, who was cited as being involved in the sexual activity at the heart of Egan’s original lawsuit against director Bryan Singer.
Goddard heads a design firm in Los Angeles that has created theme park attractions for Universal Studios.
Alan Grodin, an attorney for Goddard and a partner at Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin, issued a statement: “Gary Goddard is out of the country and we have not seen the complaint.  Based on what we have heard, the allegations are without merit.  Once we have seen the complaint we will respond appropriately.”
Ancier did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
As with the suit against Singer, Egan made four claims against each of the three execs — intentional infliction of emotional distress, assault, battery and invasion of privacy by unreasonable intrusion. Each of the suits recounted in explicit detail the sexual acts that took allegedly place between Egan and each of the men in Hawaii in 1999.
“Somebody has to stand up to these people,” said the 31-year-old Egan.
The filings were unveiled at a news conference Monday at the Four Seasons Hotel in Beverly Hills by attorney Jeff Herman, Egan and his mother.
“It’s not about money, it’s about disarming these powerful pedophiles,” the alleged victim’s mother, Bonnie Mound, told reporters through tears.
The new lawsuits were filed five days after “X-Men: Days of Future Past” director Singer was accused of sexually abusing a teenage boy in 1999 in a suit filed in the same court. Egan claims he was 15 years old when Singer forcibly sodomized him, among other allegations.
Corey Haims and Corey Feldman, co-stars of the blockbuster Lost Boys, talk about being raped by Hollywood execs.

Live Thread: 2014 Amren Conference

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2014/04/25/live-thread-2014-amren-conference/

Alabama
Here are some photos from the Battle of Franklin National Monument in Franklin, TN:
Note: The Tennessean has a puff piece on Preston Gilmore and the failed effort to shut down Amren.
IMG_20140425_143144_313
IMG_20140425_143158_399
IMG_20140425_143323_991
IMG_20140425_143243_401

Major black political leader said the same thing Bundy said nine months ago. No one cried racism.

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/04/major-black-political-leader-said-the-same-thing-bundy-said-nine-months-ago-no-one-cried-racism/

Major black political leader said the same thing Bundy said nine months ago. No one cried racism.

At a Juneteenth event in Newport News, E.W. Jackson, the Republican candidate for lieutenant governor, said slavery did not destroy black families, but government welfare programs launched in the 1960s caused them to deteriorate.
Speaking before a small crowd Wednesday at King-Lincoln Park, not too far from where the first African slaves entered the Colonies, Jackson referred to his great-grandparents, who were slaves and sharecroppers in Orange County.
“I am a direct descendent of slaves. My grandfather was born there to a father and a mother who had been slaves. And by the way, their family was more intact than the black family is today,” Jackson said.
“I’m telling you that slavery did not destroy the black family, even though it certainly was an attack on the black family. It made it difficult,” he said.
Juneteenth marks the day in June 1865 when enslaved blacks in Texas learned that the Civil War was over and that the Emancipation Proclamation was in effect.
Democrats began circulating a video of Jackson’s speech late Wednesday.
“The Cuccinelli-Jackson-Obenshain ticket cannot go a week without dividing and offending Virginians with their extreme rhetoric,” said Charniele Herring, chairman of the Virginia Democratic Party.
“This Republican ticket’s preoccupation with comparing things to slavery is insulting, as is E.W. Jackson’s dangerous suggestion that legislation in the 1960s was somehow worse for African-American families than slavery,” Herring said.
Jackson claims that new welfare programs created in the 1960s caused the deterioration of black families.
“The program that began to tell women, ‘You don’t need a man in the home, the government will take care of you,’ (and) that began to tell men, ‘You don’t need to be in the home, the government will take care of this woman and will take care of these children,’ ” he said.
Jackson was referring to the Food Stamp Act of 1964, which attempted to address the nation’s problem of hunger by providing another means-tested program for the poor, the disabled and single-parent households, in the form of food stamps.
“In 1960, most black children were raised in two-parent, monogamous families,” Jackson said. “By now, by this time, we only have 20 percent of black children being raised in two-parent, monogamous families with a married man and woman raising those children. It wasn’t slavery that did that, it was government that did that, trying to solve problems that only God can solve, and that only we as human beings can solve,” he said.
Shawn Utsey, chairman of the Department of African-American Studies at Virginia Commonwealth University, said Jackson may not have been far off the mark with his assessment of the relative impact of slavery on families, but that he was oversimplifying things for political purposes.

Friday, April 25, 2014

Leading Jewish Paper Admits: American Jews “Turn Blind Eye” to Jewish Racism

http://davidduke.com/leading-jewish-paper-admits-american-jews-turn-blind-eye-jewish-racism/

The Jewish Daily Forward, one of American’s leading “leftist Zionist” publications, has openly admitted that American Jews “turn a blind eye” to Jewish racism while continually accusing everybody else of being racist.
Israelseverdayracism-forward1
In what is a rare example of Jewish Supremacist honesty, the Jewish Daily Forward said in an article titled “Israel’s Everyday Racism — and How American Jews Turn a Blind Eye to It,” that “Jews were outraged when Jesse Jackson referred to New York as ‘Hymietown.’  Where’s the anger over Israeli public figures’ rampant racism?”
The Jewish Daily Forward continued:
“The Anti-Defamation League and the rest of the American Jewish establishment owe Jesse Jackson a big apology. They put the man through the wringer, they made him apologize in every possible forum for his “Hymie” and “Hymietown” remarks back in 1984. Yet look at the kinds of things Israeli leaders — senior government ministers, chief rabbis — get away with without ever having to apologize, without ever being punished in the slightest.”
The paper goes on to list a number of incidents, including Israeli government officials saying that Arabs need to be murdered to the Ashkenazi chief rabbi of Israel, David Lau, saying that Jews should not watch Basketball on television. “What difference does it make,” Lau said, “if the kushim who get paid in Tel Aviv beat the kushim who get paid in Greece?”
Kushim, especially when used in a dismissive context like Lau did, is a well-understood derogatory term for blacks, equivalent to the N-word.
The paper goes on to list a number of other examples of racism in Israel which have been ignored by American Jewry (and the Jewish Supremacist controlled media in America):
- Likud lawmaker Miri Regev is doing fine after having called Sudanese refugees “a cancer on our body” to a crowd of hopped-up south Tel Avivians in May of last year, shortly before the crowd went on a window-smashing mini-pogrom against the Africans in the neighborhood.
- Legendary basketball coach Pini Gershon’s career and public stature didn’t suffer at all after he explained his racial theory about blacks to a class of amused army officers in 2000. “The mocha-colored guys are smarter, but the dark colored ones are just guys off the street,” Gershon said. “They’re dumb like slaves, they do whatever you tell them.”
- Nor was there any blowback whatsoever after Bibi Netanyahu bragged in 2007 that the cuts he’d made to child subsidies had brought a “positive” result, which he identified as “the demographic effect on the non-Jewish public, where there was a dramatic drop in the birth rate.” Imagine the scandal if an American political leader boasted publicly that his cuts to child subsidies had reduced the “non-Christian” birth rate. Imagine the ADL’s reaction. But in Israel, in 2007, from the mouth of a once-and-future prime minister — nothing.
Could the reader imagine what the reaction would be among Jewish Supremacists if any European Gentile leader had to boast about how they manage to reduce non-European birth-rates?
Although the article is revealing, and, as said, unusually honest, it is also an exercise in misdirection. It focusses on comments by individuals and thereby tries to make out that these are just one-off unfortunate remarks which anybody could make.
The reality of the Zionist state is of course completely different—its racism is not limited to individual derogatory comments here and there, but instead is founded on an institutionalized and legally enforced Jewish Supremacist racist ideology.
The Jewish Daily Forward article deliberately ignored these examples in its review:
- In the Jews-only state, immigration is strictly controlled, and theZionists use DNA tests on potential immigrants to ensure that their state remains racially pure. Of course, in America and other nations, these same Jewish Supremacists are at the forefront of demanding “open borders” for everyone else.
-  In Israel, the Jewish state funds organizations, private and public, which work full time to prevent Jews from mixing with non-Jews. The same Jewish organizations which promote racial intermarriage for every other nation, support Israel where a Jew cannot legally marry a non-Jew. In America and other nations, Jewish groups are at the forefront of promoting the mixing of Gentiles of all ethnicities.
- In Israel, asylum seeking is virtually impossible. In 2011, for example, the Jewish state granted exactly one (1) asylum seeker refuge in Israel. In America and other nations, Jewish groups are at the forefront of demanding that asylum seekers be given refuge, even if they have crossed dozens of safe countries to reach their intended destinations.
-In Israel, it is that state’s formally declared policy to be a “Jewish state” and nothing else. In any other nation around the world, any attempt by the indigenous people to preserve their identity is vehemently opposed by the organized Jewish lobby.
- In Israel, the Jewish state builds entire settlements on land it stole from the Palestinians, where Palestinians are forbidden to live. Israel has thousands of segregated schools. institutions, apartment buildings and neighborhoods, reserved for Jews only. In America—or any other nation on earth—Jewish Supremacist  groups such as the ADL or SPLC are at the forefront of legal actions against any local authority or public organization which is segregated on any basis whatsoever—and especially any organization which might want to exclude Jews.
These are just some of the very real examples of  Jewish racism which the Daily Jewish Forward could have listed—but that level of honesty would probably be asking too much.
Nonetheless, the point is still valid: In Israel, Jewish Supremacy is rampantly racist, while in America and elsewhere, the Israel-supporting Jewish lobbies pose as “anti-racists.”
Jewish Racism Strongest When Directed against Europeans
There are two other truths which the Jewish Daily Forward article has covered up:
1. That Jewish Supremacist racism, although applied against all Gentiles, is most vituperative and strongest in its hatred when directed against Europeans and European-Americans in particular; and
2. That this vicious anti-European racism is not limited to Israel, but is prevalent among Jewish Supremacists living in America as well.
For example, Dr. Richard Steinlight, a former Director of National Affairs (domestic policy) at the American Jewish Committee, wrote in an article titled “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography:  Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy” published by the Center for Immigration Studies in 2001, stated it very clearly:
“I’ll confess it at least, like thousands of other typical kids of my generation I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months of ten formative years . . . I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language… and was taught the superiority of my people to the ‘Gentiles’ who oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as… people less sensitive, intelligent and moral than ourselves.”
Rabbi Yhitzhak Ginsburgh: "Gentiles are not human."
Rabbi Yhitzhak Ginsburgh: “Gentiles are not human.”
American born Rabbi Yitzchak Ginzburg and his teachings are discussed in a by Motti Inbari called “Jewish Fundamentalism and the Temple Mount: Who Will Build the Third Temple?” (State University of New York Press, April 23, 2009) as follows:
“In his writings, Ginzburg gives prominence to Halachic and kabbalistic approaches that emphasize the distinction between Jew and non-Jew (Gentile), imposing a clear separation and hierarchy in this respect.
“He claims that while the Jews are the Chosen People and were created in God’s image, the Gentiles do not have this status, and are effectively considered subhuman.
“Accordingly, for example, the commandment ‘Thou shall not murder does not apply to the killing of a Gentile, since ‘You shall not murder’ relates to the murder of a human, while for him the Gentiles do not constitute humans.
“Similarly, Ginzburg stated that, on the theoretical level, if a Jew requires a liver transplant to survive, it would be permissible to seize a Gentile and take their liver forcefully.” (“Jewish Fundamentalism and the Temple Mount: Who Will Build the Third Temple?” Page 134.)
Racist Rabbi Ovadia Yosef with his good friend, Benjamin Netanyahu.
Racist Rabbi Ovadia Yosef with his good friend, Benjamin Netanyahu.
Recently deceased racist Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, head of the Sephardic Jewish community in Israel, was famous for his open hatred of Gentiles.
For example, he is on record in the Jewish Telegraphic Agency as saying that “Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel,” he said during a public discussion of what kind of work non-Jews are allowed to perform on Shabbat.
“Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat,” he said to some laughter.
ysef racist jew gentiles donkey
Could the reader imagine what the reaction would be among Jewish Supremacists if any European Gentile leader had to make such remarks?
Jewish organizations in America and elsewhere spend billions of dollars on anti-assimilation policies designed to prevent Jews from marrying non-Jews.
Could the reader imagine what the reaction would be among Jewish Supremacists if any European advocacy group had to spend millions on programs to prevent Europeans marrying Jews?
Most importantly of all, the reason why Jewish Supremacists have been able to take over so many institutions created by Europeans (such as Hollywood, the media, educational institutions and so on) is precisely because of their racist clique which actively discriminates against Europeans in favor of themselves.
All of these factors are deliberately ignored by the Jewish Daily Forward, which instead focusses on individual acts of ant-African racism to be found in Israel. After all, anything is better than admitting to their real focus of their racism: a ongoing and driven hatred of Europeans and European-Americans in particular.