Friday, January 31, 2014

Race HustlersBlack MU students and faculty demand campus police scale down efforts to catch black perpetrators

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/01/black-mu-students-and-faculty-demand-campus-police-scale-down-efforts-to-catch-black-perpetrators/

Black MU students and faculty demand campus police scale down efforts to catch black perpetrators

A while back, this website researched and published a bombshell. The media in Minneapolis, MN has been reporting a surge in violent crime against students of Minneapolis University [MU].  However, the local media is completely censoring the race of the perpetrator in every crime story involving a student victims.
We did an audit of crime alerts from the campus police. In every single incident since the beginning of the fall 2013 semester, in which the race of the perpetrator is known, the perpetrator is black.
Now, in part because of our efforts, several black students groups and the Black Faculty and Staff Association are demanding that campus police reduce efforts to catch black perpetrators. They want campus police to censor descriptions of black crime perpetrators in their bulletins. This would put the public at greater risk and make it harder for the police to find potential witnesses.
The black students groups and black faculty groups are trying to provide direct aid to the black gangbangers who commit crimes, many of which are violent racially motivated hate crimes, against MU students. They are running interference for the gangbangers by accusing the police of “racism.” This is a tactic that goes back to New York City in the 1920s, and was originally used to derail investigations into immigrant crime syndicates.
The people making these demands against the campus police are trying to create a safer environment for the criminals.
Number of crimes reported:
January: 1 all perps are black
December: 4 all perps are black
November: 9 all perps are black (mob attacks on multiple victims counted as one)
October: 3 (4 groups of 2 or more students attack in separate incidents counted as one, all perps black), (woman raped at random by man with two accomplices. UMPD does not list the race of the suspects in the rape.)
September: 2 all perps black (multiple armed robberies counted as 1)
August: 3 all perps are black
Type of crime reported:
Armed Robbery: 9
Violent Mugging/Attack on women: 3
Mob Attack: 3
Attempted Abduction: 1
Sexual Assault: 2
Armed Home Invasion: 1
Multiple Mob Attacks on the same day: 2
Multiple armed robberies believed to be same suspects: 1
School officials at the University of Minnesota are working with black student and facility organizations after they wrote a letter to the school’s president about the racial descriptions given in crime alerts.
The letter, sent on Dec. 6, 2013, was issued by members of the African American and African Studies, Black Faculty and Staff Association, Black Graduate and Professional Student Association, Black Men’s Forum, Black Student Union and Huntley House for African American Males.
It was directed to University President Eric Kaler and Pamela Wheelock, the vice president of University Services.
Students and staff mailed the letter more than a month after the campus went on lockdown because of an attempted robbery at Anderson Hall on Nov. 11, 2013. University of Minnesota Police wrongfully identified a student as the suspect.
On Tuesday, school officials reported there have been 25 robberies in and around the University, an increase of 27 percent over the last few years.
The organizations wrote that while campus safety is crucial, the profiling can be devastating for black male students.
“[We] unanimously agree that campus safety should be of the UMPD’s utmost importance; however, efforts to reduce crime should never be at the expense of our Black men, or any specific group of people likely to be targeted. In addition to causing Black men to feel unsafe and distrusted, racial profiling is proven to inflict negative psychological effects on its victims.”
At Wednesday’s forum, Ian Taylor Jr., president of the Black Men’s Forum, said members of his organization feel threatened when the use of a racial description is given in the crime alerts.
“The repeated black, black, black suspect,” Taylor said. “And what that does it really discomforts the mental and physical comfort for students on campus because they feel like suspicions begin to increase.”
The letter then gave 12 recommendations to UMPD Chief Gregory Hestness on how to improve their response.
The recommendations include requiring officers to attend diversity training, and attach a link on crime alerts to the U’s no-tolerance policy on racial profiling.

Thugs brutally beat Flint, MI bus driver for the fun of it

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/01/thugs-brutally-beat-flint-mi-bus-driver-for-the-fun-of-it/

Hate CrimesThugs brutally beat Flint, MI bus driver for the fun of it

The media is calling it “knockout game” violence. This is a media euphemism for racial hate crime violence.
Police say a Mass Transportation Authority bus driver was punched in the face as part of the so-called “knockout game” that’s gained national attention.
The “knockout game” has been blamed for attacks in several cities and involves suspects punching strangers for no reason.
The Flint bus incident occurred around 6:40 p.m. Thursday, Jan. 23, when a man was attacked while driving the bus.
The driver suffered several facial injuries, according to police. Another teen filmed the incident as it took place.
Police originally said the incident occurred because one of the suspects was upset about having to pay a bus fare, but further investigation showed it was a planned attack, said Flint police Capt. Collin Birnie.
“This was planned, orchestrated and filmed,” he said.
A juvenile who punched the driver and a juvenile who filmed the incident have been arrested, Birnie said. A third suspect who police believe helped orchestrate it remains at large, he said.
“The assault on the MTA bus driver, you’ve heard it referred to nationwide as the knockout game,” Birnie said. “That’s exactly what we had.”

Former Anderson County, SC Sheriff attacked and shot in random hate crime, local media censors story.

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/01/former-anderson-county-sc-sheriff-attacked-and-shot-in-random-hate-crime-local-media-censors-story/

Former Anderson County, SC Sheriff attacked and shot in random hate crime, local media censors story.

Gene Taylor was attacked at random by two black male thugs right in front of his own apartment. They beat him and shot him the leg. The victim was unloading groceries from his car when he was attacked.
The victim in this story is a former County Sheriff and a former employee of WYFF, the largest local media affiliate. Yet this story is a tiny blip in the local news. Imagine if the races were reversed. Imagine if two white thugs attacked and shot a former black County Sheriff. This would be the biggest news story in America. It would be the “racial hate crime of the year.”
WYFF, Taylor’s own former employer, is censoring the story! They are omitting the race of the perpetrators in their on-air coverage. Previously this website editor has talked to the WYFF news room and they openly admit having a policy of censoring black crime. I was even told by a WYFF news room employee that they hold meetings to decide which stories to censor the race of the perpetrator.
WYFF states that these are dangerous at large suspect and help from the public is needed to apprehend them. Yet WYFF censors the physical description of the perp. They only report on clothing the perps had on, which they would no longer be wearing at this point. WYFF feels that political correctness is far more important than public safety. They would rather put the public at greater risk than accurately report the story.

Atlantic Magazine declares beards to be racist

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/01/atlantic-magazine-declares-beards-to-be-racist/

Atlantic Magazine declares beards to be racist

It is cool to attack white people.
A major US magazine just published a bizarre diatribe claiming beards are racist. The outlandish article further highlights that it has become trendy to demonize white people. Alexa ranks The Atlantic website as one of the top 500 websites in America.
What follows is the lost story of American facial hair. Like countless other histories, it is rife with contradictions. It begins with white Americans at the time of the Revolution who derided barbering as the work of “inferiors.” It continues with black entrepreneurs who turned it into a source of wealth and prestige.And it concludes with the advent of the beard—a fashion born out of desperation but transformed into a symbol of masculine authority and white supremacy.
A series of urban public health crises also had dire consequences for the shop. Sanitation in American cities remained haphazard to say the least. In New York City, for instance, monstrous pigs continued to bear responsibility for garbage disposal throughout the early 19th century. Not surprisingly, cities were ravaged by epidemics, making many Americans newly cautious about interpersonal touch. Health writers D. G. Brinton and George H. Napheys advised men to shave themselves, for “it is not pleasant to be lathered with the brush which the minute before has been rubbed on the face of we don’t know whom.”
The most important explanation for whites’ anxiety about the shop, however, involved black barbers’ growing wealth. For many, the success of leading African-American barbers seemed to threaten the social order. As white customers were shaved by men with fortunes worth many thousands of dollars, some must have wondered who was serving whom.
But the real problem ran deeper. During the 19th century, intellectuals increasingly subscribed to pseudo-scientific theories of race. Some even believed that people of different races had been the result of separate acts of creation. The German biologist Karl Vogt called whites and blacks “two extreme human types” and wrote that people of African descent “remind us irresistibly of the ape.” All of this helped buttress notions of African-Americans as primitive and intrinsically violent.
White fears were further fed by a string of slave rebellions, from present-day Haiti to Nat Turner’s Virginia. For many whites, these seemed to confirm not the injustice of slavery but blacks’ “innate” propensity for violence. As a result, some white customers began to cast a wary eye on their barbers, who commanded resources and occupied positions of authority within their communities. Few seemed better poised to lead an insurrection.
These fears were made powerfully manifest in American fiction, where the figure of the murderous black barber became a fixture during the 19th century. Among the character’s more vivid appearances was a little-known 1847 vignette entitled “A Narrow Escape,” in which a wandering sailor enters an Alabama barbershop and watches helplessly as the shop’s barber slashes the throat of a customer. But the figure also appeared in better-known works of fiction, including Herman Melville’s Benito Cereno.
The results of these fears were dramatic. Between the turn of the century and 1850, American elites abandoned black-owned barbershops in considerable numbers. In major American cities, the number of barbers relative to the populations they served declined dramatically, as demand for their services plummeted. Ambitious young African-American men began to view barbering as a dead-end career.
Meanwhile, at the other end of the social spectrum, immigrant barbers—many of them Germans—catered to a growing population of working-class customers: men too poor, and in many cases too resentful of black barbers’ success, to patronize the best black-owned barbershops. Thus, while whites, according to Douglas Bristol, constituted a mere 20 percent of Philadelphia’s barbers in 1850, by 1860 they represented a near majority. A handful of elite black barbers continued to prosper, but the days when African-Americans dominated the trade were coming to an end.
At first, these untamed beards proved controversial. Many Americans continued to harbor 18th-century fears that beards marked maniacs, fanatics, and dissimulators. But by the late antebellum period, they were more widely accepted, thanks partly to a strenuous public relations campaign that reimagined the beard as a symbol of white, masculine supremacy.
A 21-part series in Boston’s Daily Evening Transcript, published in late 1856, was typical of such efforts. In these wide-ranging articles, pro-beard polemicists argued that the beard represented a rugged and robust ideal of manhood, proving white Americans’ dominion over “lesser” men and “inferior” races. The pseudonymous “Lynn Bard,” for instance, claimed that men took up shaving “when they began to be effeminate, or when they became slaves.” Ancient Britain’s manly Anglo-Saxons, he claimed, “wore their beards before the conquest; and it is related as a wanton act of tyranny, that William the Conqueror compelled the people to shave; but some abandoned their country” rather than submit.” (Incidentally, Victorian Englishmen were going through a beard revival of their own at that time, though for different reasons.)
An anonymous “lady on beards,” writing in an 1856 issue of the New YorkTribune, made the case even more succinctly. The “bearded races,” she proclaimed, “are the conquering races.” And in “Song of Myself,” Walt Whitman transformed the case for beards into poetry: “Washes and razors for foofoos … for me freckles and a bristling beard.”

Hate CrimesYoung Pittsburgh woman savagely beaten in racially motivated mob attack

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/01/young-pittsburgh-woman-savagely-beaten-in-racially-motivated-mob-attack/

Young Pittsburgh woman savagely beaten in racially motivated mob attack

If the races were reversed, this would be a major national news story!!! Instead the story is quarantined to local coverage only. Surprising WPXI Pittsburgh has stated that the perpetrators are black and that racial abuse was yelled during the attack. Many media outlets around the nation would have censored these details.
Ginger Slepski, a beautiful young woman from Pittsburgh, PA was brutally beaten and hospitalized savage racially motivated hate crime mob attack. She was attacked at random by a mob of black females solely because of the color of her skin. The perps screamed racial abuse as they nearly killed her.

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Illegal immigrant kills three year old in Utah

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/01/illegal-immigrant-kills-three-year-old-in-utah/

Illegal immigrant kills three year old in Utah

Family is left in ruins so men like Senator Lindsey Graham can have cheap landscapers at their private golf courses.
A three-year-old Utah boy has been killed after an allegedly drunk driving illegal immigrant rear-ended his family’s car while it was stopped at a red light, causing a five-vehicle pile up.
Zane Thurber, who was strapped into his car-seat in the back of his dad Matt’s Subaru, died instantly in the horrific collision that occurred at a Taylorsville intersection Saturday night.
Witnesses said suspect Manuel de Jesus Guinea, 55, was driving at about 70 mph shortly before he slammed into the Thurbers vehicle, and ‘smelled like a bar’ as he attempted to blend in with the crowd. Onlookers managed to hold him until officers arrived.
Because of his immigration status, Zane’s family believe Guinea does not have insurance and fear they will be unable to pay for his funeral and medical costs.
Jail booking records also show there is an immigration hold on Guinea, who was being held at the Salt Lake County jail in lieu of $250,000 bail.
Because of the question mark over his insurance, relatives set up a fund at YouCaring.com, where more than $22,000 has already been raised.
In addition to Zane’s death, the crash caused Matt Thurber to suffer a concussion, and knocked his 6-year-old son Holden’s tooth out.
‘It was just, very, very painful. I [have been] rear-ended before, but it was nothing like this. It was the most jolting feeling I’ve ever had,’ Thurber said.

Anti-racist spree killer. 17 year old says he killed sister and mother because they were racist.

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/01/anti-racist-spree-killer-17-year-old-says-he-killed-sister-and-mother-because-they-were-racist/

Anti-racist spree killer. 17 year old says he killed sister and mother because they were racist.

A seventeen year old Texas boy murdered his sister and mother and planned to kill three other relatives. In his confession he said he was targeting “racists” in family for murder.
Evans, who was home schooled, said he argued with his 15-year-old sister, Mallory, that day after she made a racist comment, and he felt his family were becoming people he hated.
‘The people who are racists, bullies, and who are full of themselves are the really evil ones. And it amazes me because those three qualities are extremely common today.
‘I was very sad because I felt like my own family were becoming the people I hate’, he wrote.
After hitting golf balls, running errands with his grandmother and watching television at home, Evans put a knife in his pocket and thought about killing Mallory, according to the statement.
But he decided to kill his mother and younger sister with a gun stolen from his grandfather so they wouldn’t feel pain, he wrote.
‘I then spent probably over an hour walking nervously around the house thinking how life will never be the same and how I would never see them again,’ he wrote.
‘Thoughts of causing her pain kept entering my mind and were really bothering me,’ he wrote. ‘But then I’d think about the times she hurt my feelings or really pissed me off.’
Evans then reveals he went to his sister’s bedroom door and asked her to watch The Waterboy with him. But he later excused himself and went into the art room. There, he imagined killing Mallory again, he told investigators.
After about 30 minutes he came back with the knife in his pocket and thought about killing her.
‘I sat for about 5 minutes and then playfully threw a pillow at Mallory,’ he wrote. ‘We started having a pillow fight in the room.
‘After a while I thought to myself that if I were going to kill my mom and Mallory, I wouldn’t want them to feel anything.
So I decided to kill them both with the .22 revolver I stole from my Grandpa.’
Evans shot Mallory and then his mother, Jami, with the .22calibre but went back and shot his sister again after realizing she was alive, according to the statement.
He also shot his mother again to make sure she was dead, he wrote.

African Immigrant sexually assaults dozens of children in Sweden, claims it is normal in his culture

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/01/african-immigrant-sexually-assaults-dozens-of-children-in-sweden-claims-it-is-normal-in-his-culture/

A 29 year old immigrant from Eritrea has been convicted of sexually assaulting over a dozen children in Bromley and Kristianstad. He faces charges of assaulting many more. He claims the assaults are perfectly normal in his culture and that it is racist to prosecute him.
The immigrant was allowed to move to Sweden as part of a refugee quota requested by the United Nations. He has been sexually terrorized a community, grabbing male and female children and fondling them. The victims have been as young as six. Many of the attacks have been in very public areas. He is back in court for the third time in less than six moths to face his third set of charges.
During one arrest, he pulled his pants down and asked a female officer to have sex with him. He was first convicted of sexually attacking ten children and only received probation. When he went to court on a second batch of charges, he was sentenced to four months in prison, but has not actually served any time yet.
The communities that the immigrant molester is terrorizing are outraged. Right before Christmas, 200 people held a rally to demand that something be done about the perpetrator.
Locals rally to demand that the courts do something about the serial child molester from Eritrea.

Monday, January 27, 2014

Media censors racial angle in Columbia mall shooting spree

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/01/media-censors-racial-angle-in-columbia-mall-shooting-spree/

Media censors racial angle in Columbia mall shooting spree

If the races had been reversed, the national media would be speculating that the mall shooting was racially motivated. Instead the media has been omitting the race of the shooter. We only found out he was black when police publicized his photo.
The media is not reporting this, but the Columbia Mall shooting spree is yet another black on white shooting spree. This was another one of those miscegenation sprees killings. They first victim was a white female who had alledgedly just broken off a relationship with the black male shooter. After killing her, he shot another young white male for the fun of it.
Other pedestrians were wounded by ricocheting shotgun pellets and from being trampled.
According to one University student white women involved with black men are 12.4 times more likely to be a victim of femicide compared to white women involved with white men. The same study showed that blacks commit femicide at 9 times the white rate, but are even 33% more likely to kill their girlfriend if she is white instead of black.

IRS gave blatant preferential treatment to Islamic charity linked to terrorism and run by half-brother of Obama

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/01/irs-gave-blatant-preferential-treatment-to-islamic-charity-linked-to-terrorism-and-run-by-obamas-half-brother/

IRS gave blatant preferential treatment to Islamic charity linked to terrorism and run by half-brother of Obama

Aboonju/Obongo Malik Obama is a major international player in the Muslim Brotherhood according to the Egyptian Security Agency.
According to the Egyptian Security Agency Obama’s half-brothers is leading a radical Jihadists group along the border of Egypt and the Sudan. He goes by Malik Obama. His first name is usually reported as Obongo, but in the Egyptian documents is spelled Aboonju. He is called an international figure in the Muslim Brotherhood. Until recently the Muslim Brotherhood was classified by the US as a “terrorist organization.” That changed when the Obama administration began supporting the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. At that time Hillary declared that the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt was committed to democracy, even as she continued to attack the Muslim Brotherhood in the neighboring Gaza Strip.
Malik Obama also runs an Islamic charity called the Barack H. Obama Foundation. It was quickly granted a retroactive 501(c)3 status by the IRS after it was reported that the charity had been fraudulently claiming 501(c)3 status for years.
Malik Obama is wanted by the Egyptian authorities for being a Jihadist leader.
Shoebat referenced the publication of the leaked documents in Arabic by the Al-Masry Network in Egypt as evidence Malik Obama’s organization is the main sponsor of the effort to Islamize the Nuba area, Aswan and Luxor.
“The Aswan region is a territory in southeastern Egypt that borders northern Sudan, which includes a long stretch of the Nile River,” Shoebat wrote. “During the Mohammed Morsi regime, both Egypt and Sudan (under Omar al-Bashir) would have presented an opportunity to work toward the slow erasure of the border between the two nations. Such negotiations in Aswan would have predictably caused Egypt’s Security Forces great concern.”
Shoebat noted the Al-Masry report indicated that Malik Obama’s role with the Sudanese branch of IDO is much more significant than previously thought.
According to Shoebat’s translation from the original Arabic, the article says in part:
“Authorities within Egypt’s security apparatus have warned over the past two and a half years of the movements of the Islamic Dawa Organization (IDO), based in the Sudanese capital of Khartoum, headed by businessman Kenyan owner Aboonju Obama (Malik), the elder brother of U.S. President Barack Obama, according to security authorities who are privy to the details of the investigation. One official said the organization and its president, a close friend of the President of Sudan Omar al-Bashir, support the Muslim Brotherhood with money, as well as the international organization of the group.”
Shoebat further notes the Al-Masry report suggested that Malik has headed not only the Kenyan branch of IDO but the Khartoum-based organization that is “overseen by Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir.” Malik Obama’s role allegedly includes assisting and regulating the global Muslim Brotherhood agenda.
In November, WND reported Egyptian lawyers had filed criminal terrorist charges in the International Criminal Court against President Obama in addition to the criminal terrorism charges previously filed in Egyptian courts against Malik Obama.
WND reported in August that Tehani al-Gebali, the vice president of the Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt, gave a speech and participated in an interview broadcast on Egyptian television, identifying Malik Obama as “a major architect” managing investments for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
On Sept. 7, 2011, two years before the IRS targeting of conservative groups became a national scandal, WND reported the Barack H. Obama Foundation, a 501(c)3 tax-exempt raising operated by Malik Obama in Kenya, appears to have received IRS approval one-month from the application submitted in May 2011. The IRS determination letter dated June 11, 2011, granted a highly irregular retroactive tax-exempt approval only after the group came under fire for operating as a 501(c)3 foundation since 2008 without ever having applied to the IRS for a tax determination.
“Malik Obama’s prominent role as Executive Director of the IDO, at minimum, implicates his brother in a serious conflict of interest matter relative to national security,” Shoebat said.
“That Malik was given illegal tax-exempt status by Lois Lerner may implicate his brother, President Barack Obama, as an accessory to terror funding, which is why Lerner should be granted immunity for her testimony,” he said. “So far, members of Congress who sit on such committees have shown no desire to do this.”

Family files complaint against Auburn over hate crime murder of daughter

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/01/family-files-complaint-against-auburn-over-hate-crime-murder-of-daughter/

Family files complaint against Auburn over hate crime murder of daughter


Lauren Burk was abducted and killed by a black male in a hate crime/thrill killing.
The left-wing Atlanta Journal-Constitution calls the abduction and murder of a beautiful young college student a “botched robbery attempt.” This is an insult to the victim. This was a murder motivated by hatred and a desire to kill. If the races had been reversed, the same newspaper would be screaming “racially motivated hate crime murder.”
The parents of a slain Auburn University student from Cobb County have filed an official claim against the school stating their belief that their daughter might still be alive if Auburn had a campus police department.
“It’s like it happened yesterday,” said Jim Burk, Lauren’s father.  “There’s not a day that goes by that my family doesn’t have her close in our mind and heart.”
“Losing a child is like carrying stones in your pocket at all times,” said Lauren’s mother, Viviane Guerschon.  “You get used to the weight, but the weight is always there.”
According to police, Lockhart kidnapped Burk from a parking lot outside an Auburn dorm in a botched robbery attempt.  Investigators said he forced her to strip, then drove around considering what to do with her.  Deciding she needed to escape, police said Burk jumped from the moving car, but as she did, Lockhart shot her through the chest.  She died in the street minutes later.p
Phenix City
police arrested him days later after a massive manhunt.
The Burk family believes Auburn might have prevented the crime had they had a campus police department.  The school ended their campus police department in the
2000s in an effort to save money and uses Auburn City police to patrol campus.  They also believe Auburn failed to follow security recommendations in a federal report released before the murder happened.
But under sovereign immunity laws, Auburn University cannot be the subject of a lawsuit.  So the Burk family said it has filed a claim against Auburn with the state of Alabama’s Board of Adjustment.  That board has the power to consider the claim and use state money to compensate those cases it feels has merit.  Their claim asks for $1
million, but Jim Burk said it’s about more than money.
 

Saturday, January 25, 2014

Strom’s Admission of Perversion in Court Documents

http://natallnews.net/2014/01/23/stroms-admission-of-perversion-in-court-documents/

Strom’s Admission of Perversion in Court Documents

American Nationalist Networkbroadcaster Rodney Martin has produced a second program of information concerning the Kevin Strom pedophilia case on his World View Foundations program aired on January 22, 2014.
As we’ve noted, Mr. Martin has been carefully studying this case having taken a keen interest in it for the protection of all those working for the interests of our people. He capably argues that the introduction of and toleration for any low-life in our circles, whether a pedophile, homosexual, federal stool pigeon, mental case, etc. need to be spiritually and politically subjected to a communal “Night of the Long Knives” of ostracism applied towards the scum who infect too many circles. Rodney Martin draws a “line in the sand” with this broadcast taking a cue from our founder Dr. William Pierce to advocate a firm disassociation with all the “movement freaks”.
In this 45 minute program, Mr. Martin focuses on Kevin Strom’s perverted“courting” and harassment of a 9 year old little girl and also reads a selection of statements of admissions of wrongdoing by Mr. Strom from the actual court documents. Strom admits to populating his computer with the perverted child images he plead guilty to. You can listen to Mr. Martin’s program here.
Again, NARRG must take every opportunity to alert our viewers about Kevin Strom as he is trying to illegally appropriate the identity and intellectual property of the National Alliance with the aid of other undesirables. We loath the idea that we now have to focus additionally on this disgusting person but we must speak out to protect the National Alliance’s interests as long as Kevin Strom and Will Williams threaten it.
Listen now to Rodney Martin’s program.


Download

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Dissidents Face Jail & Poverty In Canada

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/01/dissidents-face-jail-poverty-in-canada/

Dissidents Face Jail & Poverty In Canada

Brad_Love
Brad Love
by Paul Fromm
Canada doesn’t deserve its reputation as a bastion of human rights. Its diplomats talk a lot about human rights, but free speech, especially for populist dissidents, is in short supply in the Dominion of Canada.
When Russian President Vladimir Putin warned that homosexuals would not be allowed to recruit or propagandize at the upcoming Sochi Winter Olympics there was an international outcry from the homosexual lobby and the left. Canada’s unmarried Foreign Minister John Baird scolded: “What’s going on in Russia is probably just as much about freedom of speech as about gay rights,” he said. “You can’t even have free speech to advocate your own political views?”*
In enduring Canada’s self-righteous lecturing, the Russian President might have whispered the names of a few Canadian dissidents who are in jail or face jail for nothing more than the non-violent expression of their political views.
There’s Brad Love.The decade long saga of state persecution of inveterate Canadian letter writer Brad Love reached a new low November 28, when he was charged with writing a letter to his own lawyer! Mr. Love was jailed in 2003 for 18 months for writing non-threatening letters to public officials. Most of his letters opposed Canada’s open-door immigration policies.
While many of his fellow prisoners while away their time watching television or semi-comatose on the medications freely ladled out by the authorities, on the twice daily “candy wagon”, Brad prefers to read and write. Can’t have that. Better be a compliant zombie than a dissident thinker in politically correct Canada. Mr. Love’s incoming mail was held up for more than a month and he has been informed he is not allowed to write to anyone.
Brad Love, a decade after his conviction under Canada’s notorious “hate law” (Sec. 319 of the Criminal Code) for writing non-threatening letters to public officials criticizing Canada’s immigration mess, is still mired in the toils of repression.
In March, 2009, he was arrested by eight armed detectives at a Toronto free speech meeting for sending some information packages to four Toronto Jewish groups. In July 2012, after 10 court appearances which required travel from Alberta, time off work, loss of wages, he was sentenced to a further 18 months in prison, plus a further three year gag order from writing letters to the media or politicians. He has called his ordeal “an abuse by process.”
He applied for bail, pending an appeal. In July, 2013, this bail was arbitrarily revoked. So, for the past five months, he has languished in jail, again for nothing more than the non-violent expression of his populist, no nonsense working guy views,
Brad was employed in a lucrative job in Alberta’s tar sands in Fort McMurray. The arbitrary imprisonment punishes him for his views, denies him an income and, ironically, denies the state a hefty junk of his pay in taxes.
Brad Love reported that, on November 28, police arrived at the prison in Lindsay, Ontario. He was charged with violating an Alberta bail undertaking or condition forbidding him to write, text or e-mail to any person. [Yes, that was a condition for freedom pending trial in Alberta, not North Korea!]
In July, Mr. Love went back to Court and had the bail conditions amended so that he could write to anyone, except the parties to whom he was charged with sending “scurrilous” political material.
“The cops are just bullies,” Mr. Love said. “They arrest the free speech guy in jail for writing to his own lawyer about free speech. It’s crazy! I told them to check the paper work. I’m allowed to write to my own lawyer” Peter Lindsay, and, indeed, anyone other than certain politicians and media people in Fort McMurray.”
Further, Mr. Love reported, a fellow inmate who had sent out some letters for Bad was warned: “You could be getting out of here soon. You’d better have nothing to do with Brad!”
When Mr. Love appeared in Court, December 19, he provided a copy of his amended bail conditions, permitting him to write to anyone but the parties in his case. The Crown or prosecution refused to accept this and insisted on obtaining the court transcript. So, back to jail for Brad. In court, January 2, Mr. Love was again remanded. Offering the excuse that it had been holiday time, the prosecution had not yet obtained the transcript.
“What did they think I had done,” Mr. Love demanded, “forged my amended bail conditions in my prison cell?” Mr. Love is not allowed to take his legal papers to his cell even to prepare or study them.
You can write to political prisoner Brad Love, one of our “men behind the wire” at:
Brad Love [557137416]
C.E.C.C.,
541 Highway 36,
Box 4500,
Lindsay, ON.,
K9V 4S6
CANADA
Another case with huge implications for freedom of speech is currently working tis way through the Court of Queen’s Bench in New Brunswick.
Robert McCorkill, a retired university chemistry professor, died in 2004 in St. John, New Brunswick, and left a substantial collection of ancient coins and artifacts to the White Nationalist National Alliance in the U.S..The anti-free speech U.S. partisan group called the Southern Poverty Law Centre has vowed to kibosh the bequest. Joining the hitherto silent — for nine years! — sister (who, though claiming straitened circumstances is represented by a pricey Moncton law firm) in seeking to quash the bequest is the Attorney General of New Brunswick, the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith and the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, all seeking to overturn the will.
The long-estranged sister Isabelle McCorkell (different spelling) who had taken no part in the 9 years legal proceeding leading to the will being probated in May, 2013, took a sudden interest and obtained an injunction, freezing the estate.
The Canadian Association for Free Expression, headed by CoCC International Director Paul Fromm, has intervened in the application to try to prevent a dangerous precedent from being set. Isabelle McCorkell and the Attorney General of New Brunswick who is supporting her position argue that the bequest is advancing the bold argument that the bequest is “contrary to public policy.” CAFE counters: “ Abortion on demand is the law of the land in Canada. Would a bequest to a pro-life group be ruled contrary to the public good? The implications of this case are frightening!”
Several more rounds in court have seen the affidavits of the Southern Poverty Law Centre seriously challenged. In a November 13 ruling, a New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench judge sided with many of CAFE’s submissions in striking down many passages in five affidavits filed by parties seeking to nullify a sizeable the bequest..
Judge William T. Grant “went half and half,” CAFE’s lawyer Andy Lodge noted. He struck much of the Mark Potok affidavits. Potok, an official with the Southern Poverty Law Centre, which instigated the attack on the National Alliance’s legacy, provided two affidavits heavy with name calling — “neo-Nazi, white supremacist” — and light on facts. Under New Brunswick legal rules of procedure, affidavits presented in an application must be strictly limited to facts within the knowledge of the person swearing the affidavit.
“The judge’s ruling will help them keep to the facts,” Mr. Lodge commented. “We are focused on keeping the state and courts out of wills,” he added.
CAFE intervened to prevent hyped up emotionalism and the vilification of a beneficiary from thwarting the clear intention of a testator. “Beneficiaries must not be subjected to a politically correct litmus test. That would be a legal revolution and a huge break with our Anglo-Saxon legal traditions,” a CAFE statement said.
An unfavorable outcome could set a precedent on both sides of the border. – Paul Fromm

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Michigan University black power student group makes thinly veiled threat of violence against school

http://topconservativenews.com/2014/01/michigan-university-black-power-student-group-makes-thinly-veiled-threat-of-violence-against-school/

Michigan University black power student group makes thinly veiled threat of violence against school

A militant black power student group is demanding that Michigan University give blacks free tuition, special subsidized student housing for blacks,  increase funding for black racial groups, and adopt radical anti-white teachings as part of the official curriculum.
The black group is threatening “physical action” if their demands are not met in seven days.
“We have heard the phrase ‘we are listening’ since 1970, and I am tired of waiting for a response,” senior Shayla Scales said.
“… Without action, alternatively, we will be forced to engage as an entire community in ways to implement the changes we request. We will allow the university seven days to end negotiations and come to conclusions on our seven demands. If negotiations are not complete we will be forced to do more, beginning to increase valiantly our activism for social progress and take physical actions on the University of Michigan’s campus.”
The group’s seven demands were read by senior Erick Gavin:
  • We demand that the university give us an equal opportunity to implement change, the change that complete restoration of the BSU purchasing power through an increased budget would obtain.
  • We demand available housing on central campus for those of lower socio-economic status at a rate that students can afford, to be a part of university life, and not just on the periphery.
  • We demand an opportunity to congregate and share our experiences in a new Trotter [Multicultural Center] located on central campus.
  • We demand an opportunity to be educated and to educate about America’s historical treatment and marginalization of colored groups through race and ethnicity requirements throughout all schools and colleges within the university.
  • We demand the equal opportunity to succeed with emergency scholarships for black students in need of financial support, without the mental anxiety of not being able to focus on and afford the university’s academic life.
  • We demand increased exposure of all documents within the Bentley (Historical) Library. There should be transparency about the university and its past dealings with race relations.
  • We demand an increase in black representation on this campus equal to 10 percent.

47 Senators Take AIPAC’s Word Over U.S. Intel Community

http://davidduke.com/47-senators-take-aipacs-word-u-s-intel-community/

In a further indication of the power of the Jewish Supremacist lobby’s control over Washington D.C., nearly half the US Senate has opted to take the word of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and Benjamin Netayhau on Iran over that of all the American intelligence agencies.
nie_iran-nuclear
In a report written by the Washington Bureau Chief of the international news agency Inter Press Service (IPS), Jim Lobe, it was announced that AIPAC has published the list of senators who so far have agreed to co-sponsor the “Nuclear Weapon Free Iran Act of 2013, aka the Wag the Dog Act of 2014.”
As Lobe wrote: “You’ll recall that the initial list, which was introduced by its principal engineers, Sens. Mark Kirk and Robert Menendez, Dec 19, included 26 co-sponsors equally divided between Democrats and Republicans, to which newly elected New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker quickly added his name.
Since then, 20 other senators — all Republicans, unsurprisingly — have added their names, for a grand total of 47 — still short of a majority, let alone one that could survive an Obama veto that the White House has already committed the president to cast if the bill is passed in its present form.
“According to the AIPAC list, 53 senators, including 36 Democrats and the two independents who normally vote with the Democratic caucus, have not agreed to co-sponsor the bill, or, in the dreaded moniker used by AIPAC to score lawmakers’ voting records (presumably for the benefit of the ‘pro-Israel’ PACs that decide how to dole out campaign cash), are labeled ‘DNC.’
“They will undoubtedly be the top targets for AIPAC’s legendary powers of persuasion when the Senate reconvenes early next week.
“What is remarkable about this list, however, is that very few of the 47 co-sponsors have chosen to publicize their support for the bill to their constituents through local media or other means.”
Lobe pointed out that the co-sponsors of the bill have been very shy about telling their constituents about their support for the bills, saying that they “appear to be targeting a very narrow constituency — AIPAC, which is now touting their names — rather than  their voters back home, most of whom probably have no idea of what their senator’s position is or what may be at stake.
“Which raises an interesting question: If the folks back home knew that their senator was supporting a bill that would make another war in the Middle East more, rather than less likely, would there be an outcry as there was after Obama (and AIPAC) asked Congress to approve military action against Syria? Would some senators feel compelled to reassess their support?
“. . . the 47 co-sponsors of this bill, most notably the 14 Democrats who have signed on to it, have effectively decided that Bibi Netanyahu and AIPAC are more credible sources about Iran and what it is likely to do in the P5+1 negotiations if this sanctions bill becomes law than either the U.S. diplomats who are directly involved in the talks or the U.S. intelligence community.”
“As the most recent assessment by the intelligence community, for which these same 47 senators have approved annual budgets ranging as high as 70 billion dollars in recent years, concluded: ‘[N]ew sanctions would undermine the prospects for a successful comprehensive nuclear agreement with Iran.’
“Of course, that’s precisely why Netanyahu and AIPAC are pushing the new sanctions package,” Lobe says.
* What does the US intelligence community say about Iran?
According to a February 2912 report in the New York Times titled “U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb“, American spy agencies are “broadly consistent with a 2007 intelligence finding that concluded that Iran had abandoned its nuclear weapons program years earlier.
“The officials said that assessment was largely reaffirmed in a 2010 National Intelligence Estimate, and that it remains the consensus view of America’s 16 intelligence agencies,” the NYT article continued.
“The Central Intelligence Agency and other intelligence agencies believe that Iran has yet to decide whether to resume a parallel program to design a nuclear warhead — a program they believe was essentially halted in 2003 and which would be necessary for Iran to build a nuclear bomb.
“In Senate testimony on Jan. 31, 2012, James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, stated explicitly that American officials believe that Iran is preserving its options for a nuclear weapon, but said there was no evidence that it had made a decision on making a concerted push to build a weapon.
“David H. Petraeus, the C.I.A. director, concurred with that view at the same hearing. Other senior United States officials, including Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, have made similar statements in recent television appearances.”