Saturday, November 8, 2014

Additional Analysis & Commentary on NARRG’s Second Court Hearing

This is an updated analysis and further commentary on NARRG’s successful Second Court Hearing on Oct 24, 2014 attended by this writer (Brian Wilson), Gliebe and not so surprisingly Will Williams, as can be seen by his recent posting on one of his affiliated blog spots. There he states: “Mr. Gliebe reached out to me for advice, which I gave to him. That was back in January of this year.”  Further on he then states: “… now that Gliebe has satisfied their (NARRG’s) demands for him to name a successor, I’m certainly not going to turn over any of the sensitive Alliance membership and financial records that I’ve inherited from Mr. Gliebe.”
So all along since almost the start of NARRG’s filing on the lawsuit on Jan 2, 2014, Mr. Williams has been in active communication with Gliebe, as this is stated as such in Williams own posting. Looking back at one of Williams’ previous postings from a forum, in regards to Gliebe’s ill handling of the NA, Williams stated earlier:“What has Gliebe won, exactly? The privilege of having to look over his (Gliebe’s) shoulder the rest of his life, waiting for retribution for having hijacked the Alliance and driven it into the ground? Some winner. He (Gliebe) actually believes he can convert Alliance assets for his own personal use with impunity. That’s treason in the eyes of many.”


One may ask, so if Mr. Williams previously believed that Gliebe was in it for the money illicitly and NARRG will attempt in Court to prove this was illegally done, then why the apparently sudden turn in Williams opinion of Gliebe, if in fact they were not all along working with each other since the beginning in some type of collusion?One may also note that the NARRG lawsuit is not just against Gliebe only, but against all three NA board members, and the proper effectual control of the NA.
No one yet mentions that Jayne Cartwright apparently has not yet resigned, nor even intends to resign. So one of NARRG’s goals of changing the entire NA board to one that Dr. Pierce would approve of has not yet been achieved, as it appears Cartwright has not resigned, and we do not know who will be the other board members (Kevin Strom perhaps if Williams has his way?).
As Williams purportedly proclaims that he has copies of NARRG’s lawsuit against Gliebe and company and the NA, he can plainly see that NARRG’s lawsuit is not just about Gliebe handing over control to some accomplice, but also is to seek Justice for hijacking the assets of the NA for Gliebe’s own personal peccadilloes. How else does Williams expect financial impropriety, malfeasance, potential criminal theft (if that can be proven), etc., if the Court does not have access to the NA financial records?
Now that Williams claims that he has all of the NA  financial records, is he and his associate Mr. Strom going to exert the hands of justice so that Gliebe gets his day in Court and thus the wrath of legal justice? Or is Williams now going to forget all that and let Gliebe slide back into obscurity unscathed by his personal damage he has done to the NA?
In the past, Dr. Pierce was not shy about using the legal system whether for purposes such as incorporating his organization, nor appealing a lawsuit that went against his favor. Nor is Mr. Williams not shy about using the legal system to right what he considered was wrong. So how does Williams expect Gliebe to be forced to give over control of the NA and the NA documents, unless an enforced means such as a lawsuit verdict against him is hanging over his head?
One must note here that Williams and Strom resigned from the NA a decade ago, and thus could never get legal standing to even successfully attempt to file a lawsuit.  If it were not for NARRG’s relentless legal proceedings, Gliebe would still be in control of the NA, and Williams would be just hunkering down at his private Tennessee mountain home, instead of his current fancy for taking on interviews with the SPLC.
Williams also in a published comment on one of his blog spots claims that by the use of NARRG’s civil lawsuit complaint against the board members of the NA, that NARRG intends to use the dissolution action supposedly for nefarious reasons.  Williams is here disingenuous to say the least in attempting to personally persuade NARRG to follow his legal ill-advice.  Williams expects NARRG to dump one of its several legal tools that provide extra enhanced leverage during the discovery process which Gliebe has repeatedly tried to circumvent.
Yet now Williams’s states will do the same evasive maneuvers in order to disregard the October 24, 2014 Court order signed by the Judge compelling them and the NA Corporation to turn over the subpoenaed documents and comply with the oral deposition.  Note that the dissolution action can be dropped by NARRG at any time and gives NARRG enhanced capability for enforcement of the discovery process of both the defendants and also the Corporation of which Williams now claims he is in control of.
Several misleading and erroneous comments have been circulating about NAARG’s attorney and NARRG Team Members since the first hearing in April. One example is that of Williams claim that NARRG’s attorney at the first hearing stated that he thinks the NA’s views are repugnant. As I (Brian Wilson) was there at this first hearing, while Williams was not, let me categorically deny that false allegation. NARRG’s attorney stated that he did not agree with the NA’s views. He did not say that the NA views are repugnant. Let it be known that beside the Court officials, the NARRG plaintiffs, and Gliebe, Maziarka and Cartwright as defendants, there were no others present inside the Courtroom at the first hearing.
Thus any rumors or allegations purportedly made by Williams, or others, either in the past or future can only come from one of the three defendants, most likely Gliebe, as Williams nor anyone else were not present at the first hearing. If Williams wants to perpetuate undocumented false comments purportedly made at the hearing, let it be known that others will judge the validity of those comments based upon the trustworthiness and reputation of those sources making these misleading and erroneous statements.
Williams claims that he is now the NA chairman yet according to the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission online records as of November 7, 2014, (two weeks after this purported changing of command at the NA), no such filing of change in officer has yet been filed. Thus one could possibly surmise that Gliebe is just pulling the wool over the eyes of NA current and former members, and presenting a charade of appearance of resigning, while it may very be that Gliebe has not resigned and may even have no intention to do so, unless he is forced to.
One may also wonder why would Gliebe turn over control of the lawsuit to an outside third party interest, such as Williams? If he does so, then what would prevent Williams from not throwing Gliebe under the bus and leak out damning evidence of potential financial impropriety previously performed by Gliebe, which would then ensure Gliebe to lose in Court?
On the other hand, if Gliebe is still legally in control, despite all such protestations and proclaiming by Williams who at this point may not legally be in control, then Gliebe can continue to control the flow of information and documents according to his own pleasure. Even if NARRG goes to trial and Gliebe who personally is being sued as a defendant, along with the NA corporation itself (with someone representing the current controlling office such as Williams), then the world will see if in fact whether Gliebe is bluffing and blowing smoke and whether Williams is playing a poker game of deceit. That all remains yet to be proven.
Note that Gliebe was not being questioned as a witness under oath, when he stated during the Court hearing that he was stepping down. Also note that at that time he did not say who was the new chairman, he remained silent on that issue. As this was legally off the Courts records, then he is not bound to go forth and resign. In addition, there is nothing preventing him from at any time being reappointed back to the chairman’s position.
Yet Williams comments made during the day of the hearing was after the Court hearing was adjourned. In addition it was made outside of the Court chambers, where neither the Judge nor the Court staffs were not present. One can make bold statements and proclamations, but it remains to be seen if this is legally binding, as no legal evidence has as yet been submitted by anyone.
The lawsuit continues to go on, even though the purported wrinkle of Williams may be in the mix, NARRG’s plan is still the same, and does not significantly change the legal game plan, for NARRG’s goal to have legitimate, ethical and morally responsible officers in charge of the NA. Williams purportedly now coming on board does not clean the slate. NARRG will continue on to trial with the goal of winning over both Gliebe andthe Corporations officers (whoever may or may not be appointed by Gliebe to take his place in interim status or such). The fact remains that Gliebe is still on the hook regardless of who is now in command, and if Williams is now such that person, he now inherits part of Gliebe’s legal mess.
Williams and Strom have a dubious past, and their past performance in professionally running a corporation is questionable to say the least. Can Williams or Storm state one business or organization that they have led, or managed as either managers or officers? Some say that neither Williams (age 66) nor Strom (age 58) are presently gainfully employed. In the case of Strom one of his websites accessed 11/05/14 states “I’m looking for work”, while a web based biography of Williams states that “Williams dropped out of the workforce as a taxpayer in 1985, becoming a ‘starving artist’ and a full-time political activist.”
tn_ww_office
Supposed Tennessee office building construction (12/28/13)
One may ponder, if in fact Williams has indeed not had a paying job since 1985, is he getting some type of monthly U.S. government check or other type of outside support for all of these years? Also one may wonder where did he get the money to construct the large building structure in Tennessee shown in one of his several websites, if in fact he is a self-proclaimed ‘starving artist’?
What have they done since, what are their qualifications if any? If they want to publicly refute their past lack of employment history, then NA existing and former members would like to see their past track records. Without such proven history of success, they are unqualified for the job. Gliebe states that Williams is the most knowledgeable person to take over the NA, but note that is coming from a person (Gliebe) who himself has a proven track record of over 10 years of being unqualified. Yet, it is reported that Dr. Pierce himself in 1997 forced Williams to resign due to Williams using NA resources for his own personal legal issues.
Williams implies that if NARRG gets Court documents that membership information will be revealed. He does not answer the rebuttal of NARRG’s attorney to Gliebe’s same claim made at the hearing. Membership information can remain sealed and confidential in Court. Under Gliebe’s management partial membership lists of a few chapters have leaked out. In addition Gliebe himself has purported leaked out membership information to employers or in the case of former NA board member Kitty Molz threatened to reveal her NA membership to her then current employer.

In regards to the subject of membership security, it should be noted that due to insufficient security at the national office level, the membership list has several times been exposed to others by disgruntled employees who left Gliebe’s service. At least one of Williams’ current allies is among these people. Gliebe never took the precautions necessary to protect the membership rolls. Many times members found themselves recipients of mail from competing groups as well as exposition to the public from political enemies due to lack of proper security measures. If NARRG wins control of the NA then proper administrative and security measures to prevent these breaches from happening would be enacted and enforced, unlike what occurred during the carefree, slipshod Gliebe regime.
One should also wonder about one’s confidentiality when dealing with either Gliebe and/or Strom due to their purported use of routinely recording their phone conversations with others (which in some states is illegal). In the case of Strom this has been publicly revealed via published Internet sources.  In the case of Gliebe this has confirmed by two separate independent individuals.  Thus one should exercise extreme caution when in communication with either of these two individuals.
Due to Strom’s legal predicament, it is purported that anyone corresponding to him can possibly have their computers confiscated by government authorities, so why would anyone wishing to keep their confidentiality put themselves as risk by having Williams right hand man being associated with the NA? Strom is under supervised probation due to his particular type of criminal conviction. Yes, authorities can come and take his computer and/or scan its contents anytime they wish without warrant or legal process. The condition of his probation may also possibly allow authorities to access computers of those who communicate with Strom.
Williams’ up until recently had a well-documented friendship with Frazier Glenn Miller, the two-time government informer and mass murderer. As a result of that friendship, Mr. Miller was Williams’ mouthpiece on a Pro-White Forum as Williams was banned from posting there. It was quite hypocritical of Gliebe at the first hearing in front of the Judge to falsely claim NARRG to be like Miller, when at the second hearing Gliebe verbally resigns in front of the Judge and then purportedly appoints a friend of Miller, Mr. Williams to be his successor.
Membership in a new NA by necessity needs to be radically improved and more stringent. Both Williams and Strom wouldn’t even be qualified to be members let alone participate as in a leadership position. High profile officers of the NA cannot have damaging baggage in their personal and professional lives, caused by reported and documented bad behavior, etc.. The image of the NA and those representing it must be cleaned up in order to survive the scrutiny it will get from potential new member recruits who are looking for an honest and respectable organization to join.
For one thing NARRG wouldn’t allow membership for anyone who has documented mental disorder or instability. Also anyone with a freewill admission of possession of child pornography and/or conviction for any type of sex crime would be shunned from our society; especially so the nature of Mr. Strom’s admission, and probation in Pennsylvania.
In conclusion, upon information and belief, the following points are only a few examples of what can be made summarized from what we now know and/or suspect about what some may have alluded to be some sort of Gliebe- Williams- Strom cabal:
  1. Whereas if Gliebe stayed in command he could potentially settle before trial, thus avoiding the courtroom proceedings.  In doing so, this would allow the NA to clean house and also allow proper management for the NA via the NARRG team.
  2. If on the other hand, Williams is legally in charge, then the lawsuit may likely proceed to trial, with nothing changed for Gliebe except he won’t have the power to stop the trial by settling and thus will be forced into the witness stand.
  3. Going to trial on a positive note will flush out the full and true nature of Williams & Gliebe’s business connections. (Gliebe on the witness stand may be anxious to have his revenge on Williams for forcing him into trial.)
  4. Strom’s supervised probation due to his particular type of criminal conviction is a serious liability for any respectable organization.  Authorities can come and take his computer and/or scan its contents anytime they wish without warrant or legal process. The condition of his probation may also possibly allow authorities to access computers of those who communicate with Strom.
  5. Membership in a new NA by necessity needs to be radically improved and more stringent. Both Williams and Strom wouldn’t even be qualified to be members, let alone participate as in a leadership position.  In Strom’s case, anyone with a freewill admission and/or conviction for any type of sex crime would be shunned from our society; especially so the nature of Mr. Strom’s admission.
  6. Now that there is published written proof of collusions between Gliebe and Williams, since at least January 2014, Gliebe’s silence on Williams and Strom using the NA’s trademarks, service mark, other assets, etc. can be considered by some to be a conspiracy.
  7. By Williams publically stating to this writer and NARRG’s attorney that he intends to not hand over any NA documents, Williams is thus in effect making a concentrated effort to try to protect Gliebe from potential future prosecution and possible further punitive legal actions.
  8. By Williams publicly stating on his weblog thread that he has carefully positioned himself for this purported change in NA control to himself,  can one possibly with some conviction believe that Williams is potentially alluding to himself now taking on the role of a crook, similar to what has been purportedly alleged against Gliebe?
  9. There are others items not summarized here, that the readers can come to a conclusion for themselves.

1 comment:

  1. NARRG wants a true successor, one who will carry on the work that Dr. Pierce did for our people, not one who is a pawn of the Jews at the SPLC.

    ReplyDelete