Friday, May 31, 2013

David Baillie Interviews Pro-White Activist Jim Ring

Listen to internet radio with American Nationalist Network on BlogTalkRadio
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/american-nationalist-network/2013/05/31/alba-voce-with-david-baillie

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Pro-Black Radio Host Chad aka the Black Version of Alex Jones Interviews Pro-White Activist Michael Weaver of the White Information Network

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=113475&cmd=tc                                                                                                                       



       On this show radio host Chad aka the black version of Alex Jones and his guests:John King,John De Nugent,and Michael Weaver discuss a plethora of topics such as:Race,Zionism,Drugs,Rogue public officials,etc..

Great Masters of the Lie by Dr. William Pierce

Bring Down the House- Dr. William Pierce

Thoughts on the Holocaust - Dr. William Pierce

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

We Are All Michael Weaver by:Andrew Anglin

  Michael Weaver,was a victim of an anti-White hate crime perpetrated by the State of Georgia.
It is the sacred duty of every White man involved in the struggle for the preservation of our race to stand up for his brothers-in-arms, whenever they are in need.  If we take a look at history, we see that the power of the Jew is contingent on us being divided, not being there to support our racial brethren.
When last week I heard the story of Michael Weaver, a White liberation activist from Columbus, Georgia, who was railroaded and locked up for nearly 21 months for purely political reasons, losing his fiance, his home and his job, I was discouraged I hadn’t heard about it sooner, disappointed that others in the struggle, who knew about Michael’s situation, had not done a better job of bringing attention to it.  It was clear that it was the duty of all of us in the White Nationalist community to be there for him, to rally around and support him in whatever way we can.  Because what happened to him could happen to any one of us.
The Jew has brought all Hell against our people, and our only strength is in solidarity.  It is both a duty and an honor for me to bring attention to this situation of Michael Weaver, that his brothers might come to his aid, and that we may all be stronger for it.


 


 

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Why Jews Push Gay Marriage

Jewish Leaders Are Pushing Homosexuality

By JOSH LEDERMAN — Associated Press WASHINGTON — Vice President Joe Biden is praising Jewish leaders for helping change American attitudes about gay marriage and other issues. Biden says culture and arts change people's attitudes. He cites social media and the old NBC TV series "Will and Grace" as examples of what helped changed attitudes on gay marriage. Biden says, quote, "Think - behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it's in Hollywood or social media, are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry." Biden says the influence is immense and that those changes have been for the good. Biden was speaking Tuesday night at a Jewish American Heritage Month reception hosted by the Democratic National Committee. He says Jewish values are an essential part of who Americans are. News source:www.ledger-enquirer.com/2013/05/21/2512230/biden-jewish-leaders-drove-gay.html

Monday, May 20, 2013

Michael Weaver Sets the Record Straight

Here is an internet radio interview that Michael Weaver did with The White Voice. It is Episode 11 and is entitled Ep 11; Interracial Marriage (Boehner Daughter), America's Death, Mike Weaver & Kyle Rogers.

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Politically Motivated Persecution by Susan Hillman

Imagine leaving a friend’s house and getting in your car, and two people see you get in your car and decide to approach your vehicle-one approaches the driver’s side and the other one approaches the passenger side, each with beer bottles in their hand. Then the person by the driver’s side door goes to grab for your door handle, and tries to open the door with no words spoken. Would this make you feel like you needed to protect yourself? This happened to Michael Weaver, who did 21 months behind bars for pepper spraying a man, who had a previous criminal record and was on felony probation at the time. Michael Weaver was coerced into accepting a guilty plea bargain or else face 20 years in prison, if a jury found him guilty. Which the prosecuting attorney was planning on using Mr. Weaver’s association with the National Alliance and the flyers Mr. Weaver use to distribute on illegal immigration, affirmative action, and media control against Mr. Weaver instead of the facts of the case. Basically, the Assistant District Attorney, Michael Craig, was planning on poisoning the jury with these fliers and Mr. Weaver’s association with the National Alliance, and the judge was going to allow this prejudicial evidence into a jury trial. Mr. Weaver took the guilty plea and was given a ten-year-sentence, which was serve one year and with the remainder on probation along with banishment from the six-county Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit. However, Mr. Weaver is the first person in Georgia to get an aggravated assault charge for pepper spraying a person. The so-called "victims" in this case were not injured according to the police report and declined medical treatment: Travis Parson and Frank Bellamy. Both Parson and Bellamy were on felony probation during the December 4th, 2010 incident.Parson was on felony probation for drug charges, providing false information to the police, and fleeing the police, and currently has an outstanding warrant for violation of probation at this time. Bellamy was on felony probation for robbery and other crimes. It has been said that Mr. Weaver was showing malice when he pepper sprayed Mr. Parson; however, if Mr. Weaver would have meant to show malice, he would have sprayed Mr. Bellamy, who was on the passenger side window. But Mr. Weaver only sprayed Mr. Parson, who was trying to open the driver side door. When Mr. Weaver was originally charged, he was charged with a misdemeanor charge of simple battery, and Mr. Weaver made bond on that charge for $60.00. This case was brought to the DA’s office attention originally by Officer Cathy Bush, who went to the State Solicitor’s office to see Mr. Ben Richardson, who then took the case to the Columbus District Attorney, Julia Slater. Mr. Weaver went to court three times under the misdemeanor charge, and the charges were not resolved. The first time, the “victim” Mr. Parson did not show up for court because he was in jail for probation violation. The second time Mr. Weaver went to court on the misdemeanor charge, the arresting officer was not there. The third time, Mr. Weaver went to court, he was informed that his charge had been handed over to the DA’s office because they were considering upgrading the charge to a felony charge of aggravated assault. The assistant District Attorney of Muscogee County at the time, Don Kelly, moved the charge up to a felony—Aggravated Assault. Then Mr. Kelly got arrested for a DUI and assistant District Attorney Michael Craig took over Mr. Weaver’s case. Mr. Weaver went to prison for a year and is now currently on probation. Mr. Weaver is now appealing his case. Mr. Weaver is appealing his case and banishment based on the fact that he is the first person in Georgia to get a felony aggravated assault for pepper spraying someone. However, there is a previous pepper spray case of Ms. Abril Wheeler, who got two misdemeanor charges for pepper spraying five people, including a 5-month-old child. Additionally, Mr. Weaver is appealing his case because he believes his prosecution is politically motivated. According to Michael Weaver, “Basically American citizens should not be penalized for espousing unpopular but truthful viewpoints. Shame on Assistant DA Michael Craig and former police detective Cathy Bush for maliciously going after an American citizen who exercises their beloved First Amendment rights in the People Republic of Columbus, Georgia. The Orwellian thought police are alive and well.” Link to original article by Susan Hillman.

Saturday, May 18, 2013

Racist black cop targets white citizens in Columbus,Georgia


By:Alva James-Johnson — ajjohnson@ledger-enquirer.com The president of the local NAACP chapter called Friday for an investigation into the police department’s handling of a black police officer who boasted of targeting “‘white folks” when writing tickets near Columbus State University. “I am a little bit upset that the police department would keep a police officer on the force that expressed such racist views,” said NAACP President Nate Sanderson. “We need answers. We need an investigation to see how much of this behavior the city has condoned and not brought to the forefront. ”They’ve really put the city in a quandary,” he said. “As an organization, we are concerned about racism as a practice and we have to call it out and stand up against it every time we see it.” The police officer Sanderson referred to is Jeff Foxx, who made the comments on March 5, 2007, according to reports obtained under Georgia’s Open Records Act. He was having a personal cell phone conversation while on patrol on University Avenue. He remarks were recorded by a dashboard camera. “I’m hooking these white folks up with tickets,” he sad while pursuing a truck driven by a white woman who he eventually stopped. He was given a one-day suspension and sensitivity training. Foxx also has been identified as the officer who falsely accused Chief Ricky Boren of using the “N” word in reference to Marshal Greg Countryman. Foxx resigned last week after failing a polygraph test as part of an investigation ordered by Mayor Teresa Tomlinson. Foxx worked 18 years in public safety, first with the Muscogee Sheriff’s Department, then the police department. He had multiple suspensions dating back to 2001 for a variety of infractions from lying during an investigation to failure to report to work. Sanderson said if Foxx was allowed to get away with such discriminatory behavior, then other officers could be as well. “I’m concerned that we would have a police department that would condone racism like that or think that it’s OK for a one-day suspension or whatever sensitivity training that he went through,” Sanderson said. Sanderson said those stopped and cited by Foxx should get a review. “Now, shouldn’t the citizens of this community — especially the white citizens that have been arrested by him, or given a traffic violation by him — shouldn’t (those cases) be reviewed to see if any of his views played into that?” Sanderson asked. Tomlinson said she was aware of the NCAAP’s call to look into other cases. “If there were other officers we would know for several reasons,” Tomlinson said. “One, we get complaints from the public and others in law enforcement. We also conduct reviews, evaluations and third-party audits.” Tomlinson said specific complaints would be investigated, but she would not call for a wholesale review. “Someone must come forward with a specific complaint — the name of an officer, the time or a location,” she said. “There are thousands and thousands of stops every year, you can’t just make the assertion if there was one, there must be another.” Boren said his department is regularly reviewing tapes. “We already have a process in place to review tapes,” he said. “We also look at tapes any time there is a complaint.” Senior Editor Chuck Williams contributed to this report. Read more here: http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/2013/05/17/2507523/naacp-calls-for-investigation.html?fb_action_ids=422524467845688&fb_action_types=og.recommends&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582#storylink=cpy

Friday, May 17, 2013

15-year-old girl learns the truth about the holohoax, submits a report and gets an A

A 15-year-old girl from Southern California who attends a public high school tells the story of how she recently became aware of questions concerning the holocaust. After hearing the establishment's version of the 'shoah' in her history class for weeks along with persistent rumors that Obamacare included provisions for microchipping all Americans, she was very upset at all the frightening and traumatizing details. But then she had an encounter which led her to question what she had been taught, and decided to conduct her own investigation. Upon completion of her research, she decided to submit a report for a school project in an elective class she was taking for extra credit. She titled it 'Holohoax,' and got an A on the report! Unfortunately for the regime, the widely accepted version of the 'holocaust' which has been passed down for generations and constantly promoted through Hollywood propaganda films is not enough to brainwash the youth, who are increasingly thinking for themselves, outside the box. Here is Jazzy's report as well as a brief video introduction. Holohoax A lie known worldwide, spreading to clueless people and creating disaster everywhere, has caused so many German lives to be spitefully taken. The "Holocaust", an alleged story of millions of Jews being tortured in concentration camps, has been proven time and time again to be inaccurate, For the acclaimed number of murdered Jews to be true is impossible, proven so not only by logic, but also the fact that the "survivors" of these evens have been known to and even admitted to being paid to lie about it. This in itself should be proof enough of this act of misleading propaganda being false, but there is indeed more evidence. One reason to believe that the Holocaust is a lie is that the Jews claimed to have been murdered in gas chambers, groups as a time. However, no evidence of such occurrences has been shown or documented. According to scientists who were assigned to study the bodies of the victims of World War 2, "Most of them died from typhus epidemics. Most of the rest of them died from starvation and lack of medical supply care resulting from allied bombing raids against food and medical supply lines. (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=holohoax) The Jews show pictures of hair and clothing of women and children, claiming that they were used for soap and rugs after their owners being stripped of them and brutally killed. However, the truth lies in the fact that "The Germans were against typhus, which was the real reason for shaving heads, fumigating buildings, and cremating corpses." (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=holohoax) Also, heads were shaved and people were gathered top be treated not with lethal gases in order to commit genocide, but with repellant, to stop the epidemic of head lice spreading throughout the camps. Another thing that contradicts the lies of faulty "survivors" is that the number of Jews said to be killed in the camps was inaccurately stated. Six million Jews were supposedly killed in the Holocaust, when not even such an amount existed in Europe entirely, let alone Germany. "In 1939, there were nearly 15,700,000 Jews in the world. After the Second World War that number had risen to over 18,000,000 Jews. What this means is that of the 15,000,000 original Jews on the planet, 6,000,000 were gassed, leaving only some 9,000,000-plus. Then, the world Jewish population rebounded and doubled to over 18,000,000 in less than nine years - an astronomical feat, which astounded biologists and baby doctors everywhere!" (http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.com/2009/09/fun-facts-holohoax-for-dummies.html) Not only were the Jews not murdered, but were give a choice. "For that we must go back to one Ilea Ehrenburg,* chief Soviet propagandist during the Second World War and later on to die in Israel, who coined the mythic number on Dec. 22, 1944 - BEFORE tens of thousands of Jewish internees, given the choice of staying to be "liberated" by the Communists or going with their German captors, did not hesitate to choose the latter option!" (http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.com/2009/09/fun-facts-holohoax-for-dummies.html) Thus proving that the Jewish population was not forced to concentration camps to be scalped and gassed. Not only do we have visible proof of the holocaust being a lie, but also some very trustworthy witness: The American Red Cross. The Red Cross was asked to do an investigation and search of the camps and corpses, and make accurate reports on their findings. "Says the Report: 'In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 ... In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorized to stay in each camp ...' (Vol. III, p. 83)." (http://www.ihr.org/books/harwood/dsmrd01.html) In reading this, one may conclude that the Germans did not intentionally kill the Jews, but strove to maintain lives. Many of the allegations against the Germans made by Jews involved gas chambers, which they claimed to be stripped, shaved, and gathered into for a mass killing. However, in order for a gas chamber to exist on a premise, there must be airtight doors and high chimneys, neither of which was found at the former "death camps." Also, there is no proof of the gassed Jews except for allegations made by hired phony witnesses. According to the Red Cross, "Though six million Jews supposedly died in the gas chambers, not one body has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning. We have been shown piles of bodies from World War II, but most of these persons died of typhus or starvation or Allied bombings and a great many of those were murdered Germans - the equivalent of ten football fields should be packed full of gassed bodies to present as evidence, yet not one body has ever been discovered." (http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm) If this is not proof enough, what else is needed? What excuse can be made in retort? This is not to say that the Holocaust did not take place. It is only to prove that it did not happen as it was told according to the Jews. Not only in the camps, but all over the world, people died; suffered from starvation, typhus and bombing raids in World War 2. Lastly, without being given the evidence that it did happen as it is told, we are shown clues that the effects on Europe of World War 2 was much different; not a story that would benefit the Jews, giving them compensation each month for some thing that was simply a hyperbole.

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Ezra Pound and WWII

By: Dr. Ian S. Gale, MD, JD Ezra Weston Loomis Pound is generally considered the poet most responsible for defining and promoting a modernist aesthetic in poetry. He was born October 30, 1885 in Hailey, Idaho Territory, United States and died at age 87 November 1, 1972 in Venice, Italy. His grandfather, Thaddeus C. Pound, was Lieutenant Governor of Wisconsin. Largely unremembered and uncelebrated today, he was an exceptional poet, critic and intellectual who was a major figure in poetry and music in the first half of the 20th Century. He opened a seminal exchange of ideas between American and British writers and generously advanced the work of major contemporaries such as Robert Frost, William Williams, Ernest Hemingway, and especially T.S. Elliot. He also had a profound influence on the Irish writers W. Butler Yeats and James Joyce. His own significant contributions to poetry began with his promotion of Imagism which derived its technique from classical Chinese and Japanese poetry, two of the several languages in which he was fluent. It eschewed traditional rhyme and meter in order to, as Pound put it, “compose in the sequence of the musical phrase, not in the sequence of the metronome.” Upon meeting him, the the critic Hugh Kenner said of Pound, “I suddenly knew that I was in the presence of the center of modernism.” While he was still a child, his family moved to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where he entered University of Pennsylvania at the age of 15 and finally received an MA from Penn in Romance philology in 1906. An American expatriate, he moved to Europe in 1908, living first in Venice where he self published his first collection of short poems , A LUME SPENTO, in Italian but then moved to London. In the years before World War I Pound edited his friend, T.S. Elliot’s THE WASTE LAND, the poem which forced Pound’s new poetic sensibility into public attention. In 1915 he published CATHAY, a small volume of poems which he described as “For the most part from the Chinese of Rihaku (Li Po) from the notes of the late Ernest Fenellorosa,and the deciphering of professors Mori and Ariga..” Unlike earlier American translators of Chinese poetry, who used strict metrical and stanza patterns, Pound gave his readers free verse translations because of their ease of diction and conversation. World War I had a profound effect on many writers and poets and shattered Pound’s belief in modern Western civilization, and he left London soon after to move to Paris in 1920, but not before beginning THE CANTOS in 1915, which pointed to his future work. In Paris he moved among a circle of artists, musicians and writers in the world of modern art and surrealist movements. He was close friends with Ernest Hemingway who was to become involved in the Spanish Civil War on the Republican (communist) side. He said to Hemingway later, “Every man of common sense, including the odd British MP, knows that every man of common sense prefers Fascism to Communism, from the moment he learns a few concrete facts about both of them.” During his Paris time he wrote critical prose and translations and composed 2 operas and several pieces for violin. In 1922 he met and began an affair with Olga Rudge, a violinist, which lasted the rest of his life. On October 10, 1924 Pound left Paris permanently and moved to Rapallo, Italy, where he continued to be a creative catalyst, giving the starving young sculptor, Heinz Henges lodging and marble to carve, and he organized an annual series of concerts to perform a wide range of Classical and contemporary music. In particular, his activity contributed immensely to the revival of the music of Vivaldi, who had been neglected since his death. In 1933, he befriended Benito Mussolini and presented him with a draft of XXX Cantos, which Il Duce found “amusing.” Later Mussolini was to ask him to do a series of broadcasts from Rome, which he did. In 1939, with the outbreak of World War II, Pound made his first trip back to United States in many years. He considered making the move permanent, but returned to Italy, largely because he and Olga Rudge had had a daughter, Mary, who had lived in Italy for 16 years since her birth. Pound remained in Italy after the outbreak of World War II and United States’ entry into it in 1941. He made several radio broadcasts from Rome during the war for which he was paid a small sum. He also wrote many newspaper pieces. He disapproved of American involvement in the war and tried to use his political contacts in United States to prevent it. Pound’s radio broadcasts from Rome centered on political and cultural matters, art, patronage and economic theories. He believed economics was the core issue for the war. Specifically, his talks were largely about Jewish usury and that representative democracy had been usurped by bankers’ infiltration of governments through the central banks which made governments pay interest to private banks for the use of their own money. He maintained the central bank’s ability to create money out of thin air allowed banking interests to buy up American and British media outlets to sway public opinion in favor of the banks and the war. Pound was not the first prominent American to expound these views. In 1922 New York City Mayor John Hylan had said “These international bankers control the majority of magazines and newspapers in this country.” Obviously, he touched on several sensitive political issues in his denunciation of the war. Pound’s biographer, Humphrey Carpenter said Pound’s broadcasts were a “masterly performance” and that “Certainly there were Americans in 1941 who would have agreed with every word Ezra said at the microphone about the United States government, the European Conflict, and the power of the Jews.” Pound was indicted for treason in 1943 by the United States government. When Allied Forces overran Southern Italy in July 1943, Mussolini was dismissed by King Victor Emmanuel III and interned at the mountain resort of Gran Sasso. However, Mussolini was freed 2 months later by German troops under the command of Otto Skorzeny and moved farther North, where a Fascist Republic was established without the King. Pound was also moved northwards, and, as Mussolini’s puppet regime crumbled on May 3, 1945, Pound was captured by partisans whom he asked to take him to the US Command at Levagna, from where he was transferred to Pisa and spent 25 days in an open cage before being given a tent. He drafted the PISAN CANTOS in the camp which was a meditation on his own and Europe’s ruin and on his place in the natural world. The PISAN CANTOS won the first Bollingen Prize from the Library of Congress in 1949. After the war, Pound was returned to United States to face charges of treason, but the charges only covered the period when Italy and United States were formally at war. That is, before the time the Allies captured Rome. Pound courageously and pointedly told the federal authorities, “You have the power and thus the right to punish me, but I will not allow you to drive me insane.” The United States government faced several problems in prosecuting Pound. First of all, because Italy’s radio broadcasts were so weak, they were unable to prove anyone in United States had actually heard his broadcasts. More importantly, Pound still had a strong following among the artistic and intellectual community in United States, and to have him publicly tried would have given him a forum to expound on his views on the war, Jewish bankers, the media and other hot- button topics. This would have been very much akin to trying the “enemy combatants” of the United States’ current undeclared and unconstitutional “war on terror” against an unnamed and ill- defined foe within the confines of United States. Thus they have been incarcerated at Guantanamo and tried before military tribunals outside the public’s view. A deal was thus made to have his lawyers plead him insane, and he was incarcerated on the psychiatric ward of St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Washington, DC for the next twelve years. Following his release, Pound was asked his opinions on his home country. He famously quipped, “America is a lunatic asylum.” After this he returned to Rapallo, Italy and then to Venice where he remained until his death in 1972. While incarcerated at St. Elizabeth’s Hospital Pound commissioned a book SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE which charged that Jewish bankers in charge of the Federal Reserve and their associates in the Bank of England were responsible for getting United States into both world wars, in an effort to drive up government debt beyond sustainable levels. He advocated abandonment of the present system of money being created by private bankers, and instead, favored government issued currency with no interest to pay, preventing the need for an income tax and national debt, much like the system used by the Pennsylvania Colony from 1723 to 1764. The following audio recordings are available with diligent searching: Pound’s Collected Poetry Recordings, University of Pennsylvania, read by Pound Earth Station 1: Ezra Pound WWII Propaganda Broadcast Audio Ego Scriptor Cantilenae: The music of Ezra Pound, excerpts from 2 operas plus 3 works for solo violin An educational synopsis of the author: Doctor Gale received his MD degree from Temple University School of Medicine in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, his Doctorate in Law from University School of Law in Columbia, South Carolina, and is a Board Qualified psychiatrist from University of Utah School of Medicine in Salt Lake City, Utah. He was a friend of Dr. William Pierce and is a member of the National Alliance. He first became interested in Ezra Pound while teaching forensic psychiatry to law students at University of South Carolina Law Center.

Monday, May 13, 2013

RIP Haywood Turner

This past May 8 marked the two-year anniversary of the passing of Judge Henry Haywood Turner, a white patriot and dauntless white-rights activist. An exemplary attorney, he spent the last years of his eventful life serving as a small claims magistrate in the city of Columbus, Georgia. Turner was no ordinary judge; his courtroom was not the playground of vicious and venal city officials who sought to enrich the city's bottomless coffers at the expense of the poor, the vulnerable, the faceless and despised down-trodden. As a true populist, an ardent "man of the people", Turner insisted on allowing the common man his voice, his rights as an American citizen...his dignity in the face of the landed powers that otherwise would have devoured him. Turner's sense of fairness and his insistence on justice for all, though, caused him many problems, problems that ultimately drove him from office. Turner spent the last few years of his life mentoring young people who sought to emulate his towering intellect, his sense of justice and fairness...and his love for the most creative, resourceful and innovative race ever to tread upon the earth. Henry Haywood Turner, May 3, 1944-May 8, 2011

Saturday, May 11, 2013

Pyotr Alexeievich Romanov; Czar Peter I (The Great), Creator of the Russian Empire

Introduction…. We are proud to present with the authors’ permission the feature article that was supposed to have appeared in the latest edition of National Vanguard magazine, # 143 to have been available to the public in June of 2011. That issue was never published although the final product was ready for release and despite claims to the contrary, there was funding to have it printed. To be certain of a readership for this deserving piece, we offer it to you here. We proudly present Dr. Ian S. Gale’s historical description of one of Europe’s greatest rulers, the Czar Peter the Great; the creator of the Russian Empire. The man who opened the “door to the West” and had, in his words “dragged” his ancient land “kicking and screaming into the modern world”. Enjoy! By: Dr. Ian S. Gale, MD, JD Most Westerners generally are taught little of Russia and don’t understand much about the country. Most in United States know Leif Erikson and the Vikings were Aryans from Scandinavia who explored the coast of North America and Greenland and led frequent sorties and attacks against the early British Isles. But few know these same Aryan explorers and colonizers also sailed East and settled large areas in eastern Europe where they were referred to not as Vikings, but as Rus. Their settled area came to be known as Russia. One of Russia’s most impressive leaders was Peter the Great, who was born in 1672 and died in 1725. Peter was an absolute autocrat and ruled Russia from 1682 until his death. He was very much a man of his time but far from a typical Russian. He was strong, resolute, a visionary and much the type of man readers of this magazine will appreciate, as a strong White leader of his people. Events occurring during his youth formulated Peter’s strength and attitudes for the remainder of his life. Most of his biographers mention Peter had an older brother,Ivan V, who was sickly and backward and who his older sister, Sophia, attempted to use against Peter to seize power for herself. Sophia was Peter’s nemesis and intrigued against him and caused him trouble throughout his life. But few of these biographers explain the reasons for this family strife. Peter’s father, Czar Alexei, had married twice, and after his death, there ensued a bitter power struggle between the family of his first wife, the Miloslavskys, and that of his second, the Narishkins. Sophia and Ivan were progeny of the first marriage, while Peter was born of the second. Neither of the boys were of age at Czar Alexei’s death, so Sophia of the Miloslavsky family was elected Regent during their minority. When Peter was about 4 years old, Sophia hid Ivan and spread the rumor Peter and his mother had murdered the lad to put Peter on the throne. She then unleashed the Streltsy on them and tried to have Peter and his mother killed so she could assume a permanent Regency over the fool, Ivan. The Streltsy were a large paramilitary organization originally formed by Czar Ivan IV, Grozhny (the terrible) to protect him against his Boyars, who were roughly equivalent to the landed nobles under the English feudal system. They were formed very much like the Sturmabteilungen (Storm Troops) would later be used by Adolf Hitler to protect himself and other Nazi leaders from Jewish and communist mobs, but by Peter’s time they had become little more than a band of thugs who preyed on the public, raping, robbing, and pillaging and occasionally being used in attempted coups d’etat. Like the Storm Troopers, it would later be necessary for Peter to decapitate the organization as Hitler did on the “Night of Long Knives” when they failed to understand their usefulness to a leader who has gained power is different from that to a leader who is seeking power against an entrenched enemy. Sophia’s plot was foiled but she still managed to maintain her position of Regent over the co- czars, Peter and Ivan during their childhood. Peter’s life had been saved by a peasant boy, Alexander Menschikoff, who shot a Streltsy about to murder Peter and his mother, and Peter gave this lad the royal title, “FRIEND,” and kept him close throughout their youths. Menschikov gradually became the second most powerful man in Russia. His loyalty and closeness to the Czar can be seen today in the edifice of his mansion on the Neva River in Saint Petersburg. Peter learned several things from this early experience. He no longer felt safe in the Kremlin and moved into the foreign colony making friends with various Westerners and began to make plans to move the Capitol away from Moscow to a new city he would build in Saint Petersburg close to East Prussia. He was also leery of the Streltsy from that period forward, and as soon as practicable, his mother, Natalya, prevailed upon him to marry and sire an heir to protect him from Sophia’s machinations. Natalya found Peter a noble virgin wife, Yevdokya. Peter, still a young man, did as his mother advised but had little interest in married life. His wife was a religious zealot and frigid and made little effort to share Peter’s interests. For this reason and because of his lack of safety in the Kremlin, Peter moved at age 14 to the wooden palace at Preobrezhanskoe where he began to train his own personal regiment for protection. He trained with them and was one of the soldiers himself. He had them trained by General Patrick Gordon, a Scot living in the foreign colony who also became his military adviser. From this point on, Peter showed himself to be the strong, imaginative, visionary leader of his people which he was. He loved to sail boats on the lake at Preobrezhanskoe but longed to go to sea. Russia’s history to this point had been a series of embarrassing incursions by invading Turks in the South, Swedes in the Northwest and Kazachs in the East, and the adolescent czar realized, since Russia was landlocked and had no ports which were free of ice all year long, it would always be a backward, inward-looking nation, with rigid, barbarous, xenophobic serfs for citizens unless he could gain access to warm water ports, build a navy, and develop trade with the advanced nations to the West. All of this he accomplished, but in so doing brought upon himself no end of hatred, opposition, and tragedy from his family, the Church, and the Russian citizenry generally. While at the wooden palace, Peter employed the Jew, Dimitry Shafirov, as his intelligence chief, beginning a pattern in Russian secret police administration which was to continue into the Soviet era. As a typical transient international Jew, Shafirov obtained valuable information as a diamond merchant in Amsterdam and masquerading as a Pole trading with the Turks. He informed Peter his sister, Sophia’s paramour, Prince Golitsyn, had been badly beaten in the South by the Turks at Azov, losing 45,000 men and that Sophia planned to bring Golitsyn back and fete him as a conquering hero at the Kremlin, portraying the fiasco as a great triumph. Initially, Shafirov provided the Czar with valuable intelligence on Sophia’s plotting, but later he was a strong influence leading Peter to torture and execute his own son for treason. We have no evidence Shafirov was disloyal to the Czar, but it cannot be denied he was a forceful factor in driving Peter to that tragic act. In the middle of Sophia’s festival for Golitsyn, Peter burst into the throne room and announced to the assembled Boyars and other dignitaries the true facts: Golitsyn had bivouacked his 100,000 man army on a barren plain surrounded by low hills. At night, while the soldiers slept, the Turks killed the sentries and then charged down on the troops at dawn, massacring 45,000 Russians and taking all their cannon. This bold move on Peter’s part had far-reaching results. Sophia again unleashed the Streltsy in an attempt to have Peter murdered, which failed, and Peter typically responded boldly by killing the head of the Streltsy, Shaklovity, as Hitler was to do to Ernst Roehm, the head of the Storm Troopers, some 350 years later during the “Night of the Long Knives.” But Sophia had moved too late against Peter. He had Alexander Menschikov take over as head of the Streltsy, exiled Golitsyn to Siberia and confined Sophia to a monasteryfor her treason. He was now in complete control of the government. During these past 6 months, his son, Alexei had been born, providing an heir to the throne, and his mother had died. It had been a momentous year for the young Czar. But the end of this triumphant year was to signal the beginning of a new triumphant but tragic period in Peter’s life. He now no longer had to operate under Sophia’s tutelage, but was free to follow his vision of freeing southern Russia from the Turks and building his beloved Russian navy. There was no Russian naval tradition as such, but Peter began by building flat- bottomed barges and ships with cannon to float down the Don River to Azov and the Black Sea. His naval campaign against the Turks was an enormous military success, but a domestic tragedy. He succeeded in capturing Azov from the Turks, but had taken his pubertal son on board to view the action and prepare him to be a great leader of his people in his turn, but Alexis had spent too much time under the wing of his mother, Yevdokya, who was a stubborn religious fanatic and who hated Peter and tried to thwart him at every turn. She had taught the Czarevich that Peter was possessed by the devil and had plotted to kill his brother, Ivan V, the imbecilic co-Czar. This was a blatant falsehood. Alexis had been overprotected in the extreme by Yevdokya and the priests who surrounded her and was horrified by the noise, bloodshed, and stench of battle. Unwisely, Peter forced him to watch the execution of Turks who had abused Russian prisoners. This was to begin an ever widening rift between Czar and son. While in Azov, Peter took up with a young Finnish laundress, a prisoner of the Turks, who became his consort and ultimately replaced Yevdokya and became Empress of Russia in her own right as Catherine the First. She and Peter had a daughter, Elizabeth Petrovna, who likewise would later become Empress from 1741-1762. With the conquest of Azov, Peter had opened Russia’s way to the Black Sea and, thus, to warm water ports to the East, the first of his great dreams. Now Peter turned his attention to the Northwest, to the Baltic Sea, to lands which had been taken from Russia by the Swedes when she was a weak and divided country. Again he attempted to take his son and heir with him from the control of his doting mother and effeminate priests, who taught Alexis and the citizenry generally that the Czar was possessed by the devil and consorting with foreigners and heretics to send Russia to hell. Peter had issued edicts to adopt a more western mode of dress and for men to shave off their beards, which the Church taught was a “treasure which God provides.” The Church was by now, of course in open opposition to Peter over his taxes for his new navy, and Peter responded typically, not by conciliation, but by melting the churches’ bells to make cannons for his coming campaigns against the Swedes. Peter’s need to move to the West, united Yevdokya, the Church Patriarch, and many of the Boyars against him, and the smoldering embers of dissidence began to be fanned into flames. Whenever Alexis wished to see his father, who was now living openly with Catherine in the wooden palace at Preobrezhanskoe, he was fed lies and opposition from his mother and the Church. In response to this opposition, Peter made a foolish move making the Jew, Shafirov, Head of the Office of Secret Affairs, free to operate either within or outside the law and answerable to no one but the Czar. When he was warned Shafirov was a Jew, Peter naively replied, “So was our Lord.” But Peter again made one of his masterstrokes. Needing ocean worthy ships and having no craftsmen in Russia, he organized an emissary with his entire entourage including Menschikov to Holland to learn ship building. Each became apprenticed in a particular trade. Peter’s was iron- working. He became a blacksmith!! This was no walk in the park politically. No Russian Czar had ever before left Russia and it panicked the people who saw it as the end of the world. The Czar was regarded as the father of all the people, and the average Russian saw this as a sign the priests were right and their father was abandoning them. And, of course, Yevdokya and the Church helped stoke the fires by involving Sophia in her monastery. This unholy alliance even sent a priest to Charles XII, King of Sweden, informing him of all the Czar’s plans, including that of building a new stone city on the Baltic, St. Petersburg. This city stands today as a monument to Peter with its buildings of stone with walls 5 feet thick against the winter cold. At this time Sweden was one of the most powerful seafaring countries in the world and Charles its very aggressive, youthful, and arrogant king. Peter tried to take Alexis with him to Europe but was again rebuffed by Yevdokya and the Church, but visited King Frederick in Germany, Louis IV (the sun king who built Versailles) in France, and King William III of Netherlands and England. In addition to Peter’s learning the blacksmith trade, Alexander Menschikov became a master sail maker, Count Tolstoy a master caulker, and General Gordon a shipwright. These men constructed the ship of the line, City of Amsterdam, while they were in that city. And, while in London, Peter visited with Sir Isaac Newton learning about light waves and gravity. However, while the Czar was abroad, the conspirators continued on apace. They intercepted all letters to and from Alexis and his father, rewrote them, forged the signatures, and murdered the couriers. They did the same with all dispatches from Shafirov to the Czar detailing the extent of unrest in Russia. Once again, Sophia planned with the Streltsy to start fires in the city, stoke the unrest, and murder her brother upon his return. And Sophia continued to feed Alexis lies that his father hated him and would never let him rule Russia – that his bastard daughter, Elizabeth, was named after Elizabeth I of England, because Peter intended to place her on the throne of Russia instead of his own son. But Peter was no fool. He became concerned none of Alexis’ or Shafirov’s letters ever answered the specific questions he asked of them and realized he had been away too long. He prepared to return and sent letters with couriers under heavy guard. When he learned they were attacked by the Streltsy, the whole enormity of the conspirators’ revolt became apparent, and he hastened back to Moscow at night to find the city in flames. Again Peter responded boldly by attacking the Streltsy with cavalry and cannon loaded with grape and shrapnel, decimating them. The following day he sent Sophia away for good to Siberia and had a massive public execution of the Streltsy by hanging and beheading them which he made Alexis watch in order to make of him a strong Czar who would treat treason harshly. As usual it had the opposite effect making Alexis more frightened and revolted. In response to Alexis’ weakness, Peter beheaded several of the Streltsy himself, saying, “In this world there is only one response for force – greater force. They will think twice before attacking me again.” With the downfall of the Streltsy, his childhood enemy, Peter was now free to deal with Sweden, the only stumbling block between his new Russia and the West. He married Alexis to Louisa of Austria and believed he had now established what would become a secure succession in his lifetime. Yevdokya he placed in a convent to become a nun because, as he put it, “She always had been one.” With Yevdokya now a “bride of the Lord,” Peter was free to marry Catherine under the law. Peter took the first step to negotiate the sharing of the Baltic ports with Sweden and met personally with Charles XII on neutral ground, offering to pay extravagantly for their use and to become allied with Sweden, but the arrogant young king believed war was the real sport of kings and challenged Peter. Even though Peter believed he had finally disposed of Sophia as a problem, Yevdokya in her convent and the Church continued their unholy conspiracy against him. Again they sent a priest, Fr. Theodosius to warn Charles of Peter’s plan to attack the Swedish port of Narva. They kept Alexis involved on the periphery of their scheme because they wanted to use him when they overthrew the Czar. This was no favor to Alexis as we shall see. By their treachery in divulging Peter’s plans to attack Narva, they set in motion his defeat in a trap and ambush which cost General Gordon his life. Charles sought to capitalize on this success by marching to Poltava in present day Ukraine from whence he planned to attack Moscow with artillery, cavalry and infantry. Peter realized now there could be no negotiation. He had to destroy the Swedish army completely, so he committed everything he had in a drive in what was to become one of the greatest battles in European history. Peter began what has become one of Russia’s principle defenses to invasion from the West, later used with great success against Napoleon and Hitler. He scorched all the earth between Poltava and Moscow, burning all the houses, killing all the livestock, and poisoning all the wells, so no invading army could live off the land. He knew if the Swedes reached Moscow, it would be the end of the Romanov Dynasty. When the arrogant Swedish king saw the devastation ahead of him, he thought he would simply drive straight to Moscow, realizing his army could not survive on the scorched earth. But the Swedish army drove straight into a withering barrage from the cannons Peter had cast from the church bells. He had said the Church must contribute just like everyone else to Russia’s defense, and Sweden was ignominiously defeated at Poltava in a battle in which King Charles was mortally wounded. Sweden was finished as a world power, and Peter would have his stone city on the Baltic. Unfortunately, Peter’s enormous success did nothing but harden the hearts of those who should have been pleased and supportive such as Yevdokya, the Church, and the other conspirators. They became more sullen and oppositional and sought now to treacherously involve Austria, Poland, and Sweden to rid Russia of the Czar to whom they referred as the anti-Christ. Although Alexis was aware of the general nature of their plans, it is unclear how much he knew and understood and whether he was simply an unsophisticated, naive fool, led astray by his devotion to his Church, or whether he was an active participant in the plot to depose his father by bringing foreign troops onto Russian soil and giving up Russian territory to the nations which helped. The priest who had alerted Charles to Peter’s plans, Fr. Theodosius, was arrested in Vienna on his way home and implicated them all. Peter did not believe initially his son was a traitor but the Jew, Shafirov, continuously persuaded the Czar that Alexis was deeply involved in the conspiracy. Shafirov arrested Alexis and dragged him back to Moscow from Vienna where he had sought to place himself under the protection of the Austrian Emperor and alleged he was there to make an alliance against Peter. Alexis divulged the names of several co-conspirators but never, even under torture, admitted he had tried to depose the Czar or bring foreign troops onto Russian soil. He was disinherited by Peter and forced to renounce any claim to the Russian throne. But Shafirov held him for “further questions.” Caught between the Czar’s uncertainty mixed with love and Shafirov’s viciousness Alexis was doomed. Peter repeatedly offered to pardon his son if he confessed and divulged “one more name,” but Alexis insisted he did not plot against Peter. This went on for several days with Alexis being periodically taken out and tortured by Shafirov. Catherine, in her wisdom, tried to put an end to it all by pleading with Peter to forget it all and send Alexis away or even to Siberia but not to continue the torture which she realized was destroying Peter as well as the Czarevich. She argued nothing could be proved one way or the other, and the whole episode was merely poisoning everyone. But Peter had endured a lifetime of treachery and, under Shafirov’s pressure, he trusted no one any longer. He was torn between his love for his son and his concern for Russia’s future if there were more conspirators left undiscovered. In her devotion to Peter, Catherine even went to Shafirov to plead for an end to the torture because of what it was doing to the Czar. It was all for naught. Shafirov condemned Alexis to death for treason. Peter built his new city of St. Petersburg and died in 1725. And Catherine was crowned Empress of Russia. Peter’s legacy to Russia and the world was enormous, yet he paid an enormous personal price for his achievements. First of all, he founded the Russian navy and made Russia into a first rate military and commercial naval power. To do that, of course, he had to open Russia to the sea in both the North and the South. His dream of reaching the Mediterranean Sea escaped him. That would have to wait for Catherine II (the Great). He built the beautiful European city of St. Petersburg. He established Germany, France, Holland and England as major trading partners with Russia. And far from least important he introduced the average Russian to education and the rest of the world and, as he would put it, “dragged them kicking and screaming into the modern world.”

Ice Age Columbus, Who Were The First Americans?

Thursday, May 9, 2013

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Who Brought the Slaves to America?

Who Brought the Slaves to America? By Walter White Jr., 1968. The story of the slaves in America begins with Christopher Columbus. His voyage to America was not financed by Queen Isabella, but by Luis de Santangelo, who advanced the sum of 17,000 ducats (about 5,000 pounds-today equal to 50,000 pounds) to finance the voyage, which began on August 3, 1492. Columbus was accompanied by five 'maranos' (Jews who had foresworn their religion and supposedly became Catholics), Luis de Torres, interpreter, Marco, the surgeon, Bemal, the physician, Alonzo de la Calle and Gabriel Sanchez (1). Gabriel Sanchez, abetted by the other four Jews, sold Columbus on the idea of capturing 500 Indians and selling them as slaves in Seville, Spain, which was done. Columbus did not receive any of the money from the sale of the slaves, but he became the victim of a conspiracy fostered by Bemal, the ship's doctor. He, Columbus, suffered injustice and imprisonment as his reward. Betrayed by the five maranos (Jews) whom he had trusted and helped. This, ironically, was the beginning of slavery in the Americas (2). The Jews were expelled from Spain on August 2, 1492, and from Portugal in 1497. Many of these Jews emigrated to Holland, where they set up the Dutch West Indies Company to exploit the new world. In 1654, the first Jew, Jacob Barsimson, emigrated from Holland to New Amsterdam (New York) and in the next decade many more followed him, settling along the East Coast, principally in New Amsterdam and Newport, Rhode Island. They were prevented by ordinances issued by Governor Peter Stuyvesant from engaging in the domestic economy, so they quickly discovered that the territory inhabited by the Indians would be a fertile field. There were no laws preventing the Jews from trading with the Indians. The first Jew to begin trading with the Indians was Hayman Levy, who imported cheap glass beads, textiles, earrings, armbands and other cheap adornments from Holland which were traded for valuable fur pelts. Hayman Levy was soon joined by Jews Nicholas Lowe and Joseph Simon. Lowe conceived the idea of trading rum and whiskey to the Indians and set up a distillery in Newport, where these two liquors were produced. Within a short time there were 22 distilleries in Newport, all of them owned by Jews, manufacturing and distributing 'firewater.' The story of the debauching of the Indians with its resultant massacres of the early settlers, is a dramatic story in itself. It is essential to comprehend the seaport of Newport. It is important in order to recognize the Jewish share in the Slave commerce. There was a period when it was commonly referred to as 'The Jewish Newport-World center of Slave Commerce.' All together, at this time, there were in North America six Jewish communities: Newport, Charleston, New York, Philadelphia, Richmond, and Savanuah. There were also many other Jews, scattered over the entire East Coast. Although New York held first place in the settlers of Jews in North America, Newport held second place. New York was also the main source of Kosher meat, supplying the North American settlements, then the West Indies and also South America. Now Newport took over! Newport also became the great trade harbour of the East Coast of North America. There, vessels from other ports met, to exchange commodities. Newport, as previously mentioned, represented the foremost place in the commerce of rum, whiskey, and liquor dealings. And to conclude, it finally became the Main Center of Slave dealings. It was from this port that the ships left on their way across the ocean, to gather their black human cargo and then derive great sums of money in exchange for them. An authentic, contemporary report, based on authority, indicates that of 128 Slave ships, for instance, unloaded in Charleston, within one year, their "Cargo," 120 of these were undersigned by Jews from Newport and Charleston by their own name. About the rest of them, one can surmise, although they were entered as Boston (1), Norfolk (2), and Baltimore (4), their real owners were similarly the Jewish slave dealers from Newport and Charleston. One is able to assess the Jewish share in the entire dealings of the Newport, if one considers the undertaking of a lone Jew, the Portuguese, Aaron Lopez, who plays an important part in the over-all story of the Jews and Slavery. Aaron Lopez Concerning the entire commerce of the Colonies, and the later State of Rhode Island, (which included Newport) bills of lading, concessions, receipts, and port clearances carried the signature name of the Jew Aaron Lopez (3). This all took place during the years 1726 to 1774. He had therefore more than 50% of all dealings under his personal control for almost fifty years. Aside from that there were other ships which he owned, but sailed under other names. In the year 1749, the first Masonic Lodge was established. Ninety percent of the members of this first lodge, fourteen all told, were Jews. And one knows that only so-called "prominent" individuals were accepted. Twenty years later, the second Masonic Lodge, "King David," was established. It is a fact that all of these members were Jews. In the meantime, the Jewish influence in Newport had reached such proportions that President George Washington decided to pay them a visit. Upon his appearance, both of the Masonic Lodges sent an emissary—a Jew named Moses Seixas (4) —to approach the President with a petition, in which the Jews of Newport stated: "If you will permit the children of Abraham to approach you with a request, to tell you that we honor you, and feel an alliance...... and then: "Until the present time the valuable rights of a free citizen have been withheld. However, now we see a new government coming into being based on the Majesty of the people, a government, not sanctioning any bigotry nor persecution of the Jew, rather, to concede the freedom of thought, which each shares, whatever Nation or Language, as a part of the great Government machine." It is necessary at this point to consider the disclosures as to who in reality obtained this legendary freedom in America at the founding of the Union. To be sure, the province became independent and severed from the English Jurisdiction. However, we can see from the petition (5) which Moses Seixas offered President Washington in the name of the Jews of Newport, that it was not in reality this type of freedom which they had in mind. They were merely concerned about themselves, and their "own civil rights," which had been withheld. Therefore, following the Revolutionary War, the Jews were accorded equal rights, and freed of all restrictions! And the Negroes? The Revolutionary War not withstanding, they remained Slaves! In the year 1750, one sixth of the population in New York was Negroid, and proportionately in the Southern parts of the Country, they outnumbered the others, but the proclamation of Freedom did not touch them. More of this later. Let us scrutinize at close range this dismal handwork of the Jews which gave them influence and power, so we may comprehend the Slave Trade; for there has been so much written since that time by the zealous Jewish writers, that at the present, long since removed, it might appear natural, for the time element has a tendency to make things nebulous. Let us follow the journey of one ship, owned by a slave dealer, Aaron Lopez, which had made many trips to the African coast. For instance, in the month of May, 1752, the ship "Abigail" was equipped with about 9,000 gallons of rum, a great supply of iron foot and hand restraints, pistols, powder, sabres, and a lot of worthless tin ornaments, and under the command of the Jewish Captain Freedman, sailed off for Africa. There were but two Mates and six sailors comprising the crew. Three and one half months later they landed on the African Coast. Meantime, there had been constructed an African Agency, by the Jewish slave dealers, who had corralled them, and prepared them for sale. This organization reaching deep into Africa, had many ramifications, including the heads of groups, villages, etc. This method to win over these leaders for the Jewish slave trade, was similar to' that which the Jews had employed with the Indians. At first, they presented them with rum, and soon found themselves in an alcoholic delirium. When the gold dust, and ivory supply was exhausted, they were induced to sell their descendants. At first their wives, and then their youths. Then they began warfare among each other, plotted and developed mostly by the Jews, and if they captured prisoners, these, too, were exchanged for rum, ammunitions and weapons to the Jews', using them for further campaigns to capture more Negroes. The captured Blacks were linked two by two and driven through the medieval forests to the coast. These painful treks required weeks, and some of them frequently became ill, and felled by exhaustion, and many unable to rise even though the bull whip was applied as an encourager. They were left to die and were devoured by wild beasts. It was not unusual to see the bones of the dead laying in the tropical sun, a sad and gruesome reminder to those who would later on tread this path. It has been calculated that for each Negro who withstood the rigors of this wandering, there still had to be the long voyage across the ocean, before they reached American soil, nine out of ten died! And when one considers that there was a yearly exodus of ONE MILLION black slaves, then, and only then, can one assess the tremendous and extensive exodus of the African people. At present Africa is thinly populated, not alone due to the 1,000,000 literally dragged out of huts, but due to the five to nine million who never reached their destination. Once they reached the coast, the black slaves were driven together, and restraints were applied to hold them until the next transport ship docked. The agents—many of them Jews—who represented the Chief, then began the deal with the Captain. Each Negro was personally presented to him. But the captains had learned to become suspicious. The Black one must move his fingers, arms, legs, and the entire body to insure that there were not any fractures. Even the teeth were examined. If a tooth was lacking, it lowered the price. Most of the Jew agents knew how to treat sick Negroes with chemicals in order to sell them as sound. Each Negro was valued at about 100 gallons of rum, 100 pounds of gun powder, or in cash between 18 to 20 dollars. The notations of a captain inform us that on September 5, 1763, one Negro brought as much as 200 gallons of rum, due to the bidding among the agents, raising the price. Women under 25 years, pregnant or not, resulted in the same measure, if they were well and comely. Any over 25 years lost 25%. And here it should be stated that those Negroes, purchased free at the African Coast for 20 to 40 dollars, were then resold by the same slave dealers in America for two thousand dollars. This gives one an idea how the Jews managed to acquire tremendous fortunes. Following the bargaining, Captain Freedman paid the bill, either in merchandise or cash. He also recalled some advice which his Jewish employers gave him as he left Newport for Africa: "Pour as much water into the rum as you possibly can." In this manner the Negro chiefs were cheated two times by the Newport Jews! The next step was to shave the hair from the head of the acquired slaves. Then they were bound and branded with a hot iron, either on the back, or the hip, identifying them with their owners. Now the Negro slave was indeed the property of the Jewish purchaser. If he fled he could be identified. Following this procedure, there was a farewell celebration. There were instances when entire families were brought out of the interior, to the coast, and then separated through the buyer—the father going with one ship, the sons and daughters into another. These "farewell" celebrations were usually packed with emotion, tears, drama and sadness. There was little joy, if ever. The following day the transport began from land to ship. It was managed by taking four to six Negroes at one time in rowboats to the ship. Of course the slave dealers were aware of how the Negro loved his homeland above all else, and could only be induced by great force to leave it. So, some of the Negroes would leap into the water. But here the overseers were prepared with sharp dogs and retrieved the fleeing men. Other Negroes preferred drowning. What came aboard alive was immediately undressed. Here was another opportunity to jump overboard and reach land and freedom. But the slave dealers were pitiless and ruthless; they were merely concerned to get their Black cargo to America with the least loss. Therefore, an escapee, recaptured, had both of his legs cut off before the eyes of the remaining Negroes in order to restore "Order." On board the ship the Negroes were separated into three groups. The men were placed in one part of the ship. The women into another, whereby the lusty Captain arranged it so that the youngest, mostly comely Negro women were accessible to him. The children remained on deck, covered with a cloth in bad weather. In this fashion the slave ship proceeded on its journey to America. In the main, the ships were too small, and not at all suitable to transport people. They were barely equipped to transport animals, which the Negroes were likened to. In one space, one meter high (39 inches) these unfortunate creatures were placed into a horizontal position, pressed close together. Mostly they were chained together. In this position they had to remain for three months, until the end of the voyage. Rarely was there a captain who sympathized with them or evidenced any feelings whatever for these pitiable creatures. Occasionally they would be taken in groups to the deck for fresh air, shackled in irons. Somehow, these Negroes were expendable and endured much. On occasion, one of them became insane, killing the other one pressed closely to him. They also had their fingernails closely cut so they could not tear at each other's flesh. The most horrible battles came about among the men, to acquire a centimeter or two for a comfortable position. It was then that the slave overseer stepped in with his bullwhip. The unimaginable, horrible, human excrement in which these slaves had to endure these trips is impossible to describe. In the women's quarters the same conditions prevailed. Women gave birth to children lying pressed closely together. The younger Negro women were constantly raped by the captain and the crew resulting, thereby, a new type of Mulatto as they came to America. In Virginia, or in any of the other Southern port cities, the slaves were transferred to the land and immediately sold. A regular auction would take place, following the method of purchase in Africa. The highest bidder obtained the "Ware." In many cases—due to the indescribable filth—some of the Blacks became ill during the sea voyage from Africa to America. They became unemployable. In such cases the captain accepted any price. It was rare to dispose of them for no one wanted to purchase a sick Negro. Therefore, it is not surprising that the Jewish, unethical doctor senses a new form of revenue. They purchased the sick Negro for a small sum, then treated him, and sold him for a large sum. On occasion, the captain would be left with a few Negroes for whom he did not find a buyer. In that case he returned to Newport and sold them to the Jews for cheap domestic help. In other cases, the Jew owner of the ships took them over. This is why the city of Newport and its surroundings had 4,697 black slaves in the year 1756. Slavery did not extend to the North. Moreover, in many of the North American Colonies, slavery was strictly forbidden. Georgia came under discussion; likewise also Philadelphia. And again it was the Jews who managed a loophole, which had given them freedom following the Revolutionary War, so, they schemed to make slave trading legal. One had but to read the names of those persons living in Philadelphia who were requesting the elimination of existing laws regarding the slavery dealing. They were: the Jews Sandiford, Lay, Woolman, Solomon, and Benezet. That explained it all! But let us turn back to the slave ship "Abigail." Its captain—and we are reading from his ship's books—did a profitable business. He sold all of his Negroes in Virginia, invested some of the money in tobacco, rice, sugar, and cotton, and went on to Newport where he deposited his wares. We learn from Captain Freedman's books that the "Abigail" was a small ship and could only accommodate 56 people. He managed, however, to clear from one trip 6,621 dollars, which he in turn delievered to the owner of the ship: one Aaron Lopez. The staggering amounts of money acquired by the Jew ship owners and slavery dealers is better illustrated when we emphasize the many years in which this sale and purchase of human flesh was practiced. Prior to 1661, all of the Colonies had laws prohibiting slavery. It was in that year that the Jews had become powerful enough to bring about the repeal of these laws, and slavery began in earnest. The Jews had discovered that the Colonists needed additional manpower to help them clear their fields for planting, helping in the construction of dwellings, and in general to help with harvesting their crops. This was particularly true of the Southern states which we have referred to earlier. The Southerners had vast tracts of rich soil suitable for rice, cotton, tobacco and cane sugar. At first, impoverished Europeans were recruited. English prison doors were opened and finally prisoners ot war from England and Holland were brought to the Colonies, made to work until they had paid the cost of transporting them by ship and then set free. It doesn't take a Jew long to discover what his brothers are doing, so a group of Jews settled in Charleston, South Carolina, where they set up distilleries for making rum and whiskey. They, too, learned that they could trade with the natives on the West Coast of Africa for ivory, and several ships were purchased and sent to Africa, trading the usual glass beads and other cheap ornaments for ivory, which, however, took up but little space on board ship. It occurred to these Jew traders that they could supply the plantations in the South with 'Black ivory', needed under swampy and malarial conditions which European labor could not tolerate without sickness, and which would not only fill the holds of their ships, but bring enormous profits. (This same group had earlier tried selling Indians as slaves but they found them completely unsatisfactory, as the Indians would not tolerate this type of work.) Thus, another segment of the slave trading had become active and profitable out of Charleston, South Carolina. Several shiploads of Black slaves were sent by the Dutch West Indies Company to Manhattan. During this time there were a number of plantation owners established in the West Indies and two Jews, Eyrger and SayUer, with strong Rothschild connections in Spain, formed an agency called ASIENTO, which later operated in Holland and England. It was through these connections that Jews in Holland and England exerted influence and both of these connections cooperated in helping the Jews provide Black Slaves for the Colonists. With the yearly capture and transport of one million Black slaves it is not difficult to figure that from 1661 to 1774 (one hundred thirteen years) approximately one hundred ten million slaves had been removed from their native land. About ten percent, or ELEVEN MILLION, Black slaves reached the Colonies alive. We have talked about the small ship "Abigail" which could accommodate only 56 people and yet the profits per trip were enormous, with little or no investment. There were many other ships but we will concentrate here on only a few, such as the "La Fortuna," "Hannah," "Sally" or the "Venue" which made very great profits. The "La Fortuna," by the way, transported approximately 217 slaves on each trip. The owner cleared not less than $41,438.00 from such a trip. These were dollars which the slave dealers 'could keep'. And these were dollars of value which would buy a great deal in return. When one considers that the Jews of Newport owned about 300 slave-transporting ships, active without interruption, docking at Newport-Africa, Charleston, (or Virginia), one can approximate the tremendous earnings which made their way to Jewish ship owners. Indeed, the Jews admit, that of the 600 ships, leaving Newport harbor into all the world, "at least half of them" went their way to Africa, and we know what these ships going to Africa "were seeking." The fact that Aaron Lopez had control of over more than half of the combined deals in the Colonies of Rhode Island, with Newport, is well-known. The well-known Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein, in his book, The Story of the Jews in Newport, attempts to remove these facts, maintaining that there is not any evidence that the Jews were connected with the Slave Trade. It is therefore imperative to prove that the Jew was indeed connected with the slave trading. Especially so since this rabbi insists they had made great contributions, and how very "blessed" their residence became for the city of Newport. Surely Morris A. Gutstein will grant us permission to present the facts which he was unable to find. Turning to one report of the Chamber of Commerce of the "Rhode Island Colony" in the year 1764, we find, for instance, that in the year 1723 "a few merchants in Newport" devised the idea to send their Newport rum to the coast of Africa. It developed into such a great export that in the matter of a few years "several thousand (hogsheads)" of rum went that way. To which purpose did this rum serve? The Carnegie Institute in Washington, D.C., presents and makes public authentic documents entitled "Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade in America". We wish to present a few facts from this particular collection of original documents and scrutinize them at closer range, and not at all to prove the heretofore Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein in error. In this collection of the first American institute of learning, we evaluate the capital "Rhode Island" which contributed the main share of the public documentation regarding the Slave trading. Here we find documented the recipients of the numerous shipping letters, also letters to the Slave dealers, and correspondence to the ship's captains, who were about 15% Jews, living in Newport. Among these we find, for instance, the Jew Isaac Elizar. He wrote a letter to Captain Christopher Champlin on February 6, 1763, saying he would like to be an agent for a load of slaves. Then follows the Jew Abraham Pereira Mendez, and one of the main slave dealers, Jacob Rod Rivera-the father-in-law of Aaron Lopez. And then there is Aaron Lopez, himself, and many, many more other Jews. Although we have considered Aaron Lopez several times, the size of this documented treatise limits us, and we cannot describe all of the writers concerned in the Slavery Dealing correspondence, their names and the special dates—rather, we wish to study the documentation of the 'Carnegie Institute' itself—keeping Aaron Lopez in mind. We wish to see what in the main this Jew was pursuing and what his business was. This is due to the fact that Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein presents him as a "lofty and fine civilian of Newport" who was so generous and even "made contributions to welfare." In a great number of published original unprejudiced writings in the Carnegie Institute, we find that Aaron Lopez pursued a tremendous commerce in rum with the African coast in exchange for slaves. These irrefutable facts are as follows: June 22, 1764, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez. July 22, 1765, a letter by Aaron Lopez to Captain Nathaniel Briggs. July 22, 1765, a letter to Captain Abraham All. February 4, 1766, a letter to Captain William Stead by Aaron Lopez. March 7, 1766, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez. February 20, 1766, a letter by Aaron Lopez to Captain William Stead. October 8, 1766, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez. February 9, 1767, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez. Aside from that, there are similar statements out of letters by Aaron Lopez in the original, which he directed to the Captains Henry Cruger, David Mill, Henry White, Thomas Dolbeare, and William Moore. Indeed, one letter by Captain William Moore to Aaron Lopez & Company, is particularly revealing, and of special mention at this point. We wish to remark on the main contents of this letter in which Captain Moore writes: "I wish to advise you that your ship 'Ann' docked here night before last with 112 slaves, consisting of 35 men, 16 large youths, 21 small boys, 29 women, 2 grown girls, 9 small girls, and I assure you this is such a one rumcargo (rum in exchange for slaves) which I have not yet encountered, among the entire group there may be five to which one could take exception." The date of the above letter was November 27, 1773. We have not yet concluded, because of lack of space, the excerpts and grateful compilations made available by the "Carnegie Institute." On November 29, 1767, the Jew Abraham Pereira Mendez—who had been cheated by one of his kind—from Charleston, where he had journeyed to better control his Black cargo, wrote Aaron Lopez at Newport: "These Negroes, which Captain Abraham All delivered to me, were in such poor condition due to the poor transportation, that I was forced to sell 8 boys and girls for a mere 27 (pounds), 2 other for 45 (pounds) and two women each for 35 (pounds)." (No doubt, English money) Abraham Pereia Mendez was very angry and accused Aaron Lopez of "cheating" him. This letter delineates to us that this generous and fine citizen of Newport was insatiable in his greed for money. This is what caused the Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein to present this nobleman, Aaron Lopez, to pursue his objectionable methods. Negroes presented to him but a commodity. In all of the letters which the "Carnegie Institute" published, it stresses the lack of human sympathy for the poor Negro slaves. This lack of feeling and compassion for the abused and pitiful Blacks at the hands of their Jewish dealers, can be read out of the diary of a captain who manned a ship owned by Aaron Lopez. The entrees concern a trip from the African Coast to Charleston. Moreover, they are authentic documents, published by the "Camegie Institute" in Washington, D.C., calling attention to an organization which had heretofore known little or nothing about; neither had they encountered further publicity in books or newspapers. Therefore, it is not to be wondered at that the facts of the leading share of American Jews in the slave trade could be pointed out as a monopoly, and unknown to the non-Jewish Americans, including the great masses of people all over the world. Others, however, acquainted with the facts, had good reason to remain painfully quiet. The captain of another ship, the "Othello" among other things, makes the following entries in his diary: February 6th: One man drowned in the process of loading. March 18th: Two women went overboard because they had not been locked up. April 6th: One man dead with Flux. (No doubt an illness.) April 13th: One woman dead with Flux. May 7th: One man dead with Flux. June 16th: One man dead by Kap Henry. June 21st: One man dead by James Fluss. July 5th: One woman dead with fever. July 6th: One girl, sick for two months, died. This vessel was on its way for five months. What terrible and unspeakable suffering was the lot of these millions of Blacks, who were torn with brutal force from their friendly African huts, jammed together, like animals below deck, and then sold with less concern than selling a head of cattle. Small wonder that ten of them died, being purchased for just a few dollars, and then sold for the sum of $2,000.00. Some Negroes managed, through insurrection, to gain control of one or another ship and turned it around, with full sails, toward their African home. The crew of one slave ship, "Three Friends" for instance, tortured their Black cargo in such a manner that the Negroes reciprocated in a bloody rebellion. They killed the captain and the entire crew and threw the dead overboard. They then sailed back to Africa where they had barely escaped their hard-won freedom. A similar fate struck the slave ship "Amistad". Among the slaves was the son of an enemy tribal chief. Once the ship was under way, he schemed with his compatriots to attack the ship's crew. Following a bloody battle, they managed to capture the captain. The Negro prince forced him to turn back to Africa, then in the evening, under cover of darkness, he changed his course, zigzagged for months untfl he came close to the American coast, and encountered a government ship. This took place in the year 1839 when slave trading was already forbidden and illegal. The Negro slaves were freed and the captain punished. These sea voyages were not without danger when they had Black cargo, which accounts for the fact that the Jews most always engaged non-Jewish captains. The slave dealers preferred to remain in their offices and counted the fat winnings following each journey, such as Aaron Lopez, who left his heirs one of the largest fortunes in the New England era. When reviewing the documented facts contained herein, it is important that one always remembers that it was a lucky captain who did not lose more than 9 out of 19 slaves on the return trip. It is equally important to remember that these poor Black creatures had to lie in human excrement for the entire trip. Think of it! No wonder sickness and disease took such a high toll. Remember the figures: approximately one hundred ten million Black people were captured and removed from their homeland in Africa. Only ELEVEN MILLION of these Black slaves reached the Colonies alive. And the Jews still talk about the Germans and Hitler and how six million Jews were exterminated during World War II. This is the greatest LIE ever perpetrated upon the people of the world-whereas the story of the poor Black slaves is documented. Documented with TRUTH. The evidence is still available for the people of the world to see. The "Carnegie Institute of Technology" is located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. As this document is distributed, eventually reaching the hands of the Jew, the evidence will probably be removed and destroyed until finally all documentation is removed which is damaging to the Jew. The Jews have been engaged in this practice for centuries. Truth, however—truth which bears fact cannot remain covered or hidden forever—and more truths are being disclosed by those of us who intend to free America of these sons of the devil—the Jews. The published documentation contained herein was obtained from the Carnegie Institute of Learning, presently known as "The Carnegie Institute of Technology." The following is a partial of the slave ships owned by Jews: 'Abigail' by Aaron Lopez. Moses Levy and Jacob Franks. 'Crown' by Isaac Levy and Nathan Simpson. 'Nassau'by Moses Levy. 'Four Sisters' by Moses Levy. 'Anne & Eliza' by Justus Bosch and John Abrams. 'Prudent Betty' by Henry Cruger and Jacob Phoenix. 'Hester' by Mordecai and David Gomez. 'Elizabeth' by David and Mordecai Gomez. 'Antigua' by Nathan Marston and Abram Lyell. 'Betsy'by Wm. DeWoolf. 'PoUy'by James DeWoolf. 'White Horse' by Jan de Sweevts. 'Expedition' by John and Jacob Rosevelt. 'Charlotte' by Moses and Sam Levy and Jacob Franks. 'Caracoa' by Moses and Sam Levy. Slave-runners, also owned by Jews were the 'La Fortuna', the 'Hannah', the 'Sally', and the 'Venue'. Some of the Jews of Newport and Charleston who were engaged in the distillery or slavery trade, or both, were: Isaac Gomez, Hayman Levy, Jacob Malhado, Naphtaly Myers, David Hart, Joseph Jacobs, Moses Ben Franks, Moses Gomez, Isaac Dias, Benjamin Levy, David Jeshuvum, Jacob Pinto, Jacob Turk, Daniel Gomez, James Lucana, Jan de Sweevts, Felix (cha-cha) de Souza (known as the 'Prince of Slavers' and second only to Aaron Lopez), Simeon Potter, Isaac Elizer, Jacob Rod, Jacol) Itodrigues Rivera, Haym Isaac Carregal, Abraham Touro, Moses Hays, Moses Lopez, Judah Touro, Abrtham Mendes and Abraham All. Of some 600 ships leaving the port of Newport, more than 300 were engaged in the slave trade. A typical cargo of one ship, 'La Fortuna', was 217 slaves which cost about $4,300 and sold for $41,438.00. Only about 10% of the slave ship captains were Jews, not wanting to subject themselves to the rigors of the 6-month journey. They preferred to stay at home and continue their distillery operations which continued to supply rum and whiskey to the Indians for many years at a very great profit. REFERENCES DOCUMENTATION Elizabeth Donnan, 4 Vols. Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade to America, Washington, D.C., 1930-1935. "Carnegie Institute of Technology," Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Adventures of an African Slaver, by Malcolm Cowley, 1928. Published by Albert and Charles Bori, New York. The Story of the Jews in Newport, by Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein. The Jew Discovem America, by Cthmar Krainz. The International Jew, by Henry Ford. The Plot Against the Church, by Maurice Pinay. Protocol for World Conquest, 1956, by The Central Conference of American Rabbis. Behind Communism, by Frank L. Britton We cannot undertake even this brief history of the modern Jew without taking note of a phenomenon which his confounded Gentile societies for twenty centuries. This is the ability of the Jewish people to collectively retain their identity despite centuries of exposure to Christian civilization. To any student of Judaism, or to the Jews themselves, this phenomenon is partly explained by the fact that Judaism is neither mainly a religion, nor mainly a raciai matter, nor yet is it simply a matter of nationality. Rather it is all three, it is a kind of trinity. Judaism is best described as a nationality built on the twin pillars of race and religion. All this is closely related to another aspect of Judaism, namely the persecution myth. Since first appearing in history, we find the Jews propagating the idea that they are an abused and persecuted people, and this idea is, and has always been, central in Jewish thinking. The myth of persecution is the adhesive and cement of Judaism: without it Jews would have long since ceased to exist, their racial-religious nationality notwithstanding. It is a fact that the Jewish people have suffered numerous hardships in the course of their history, but this is true of other peoples too. The chief difference is that the Jews have kept score. We Must repeat—they have kept score—they have made a tradition of persecution. A casual slaughter of thousands of Chriestians is remembered by no one in 50 years, but a disability visited upon a few Jews is preserved forever in Jewish histories. And they tell their woes not only to themselves, but to a sympathetic world as well. End of original essay The following references are addes by the editor to facilitate your research. Ref. The International Jew by Henry Ford Adventures of an African Slaver by Malcolm Cowley, 1928, p.11 Aaron Lopez and his family arrived in Newport around 1750 from New York via Lisbon, Portugal. Lopez arrived in the new world as a member of a "Marrano" family with the Christian name of "Don Duarte Lopez." Lopez immediately dropped his Christian name and took the Hebrew name of Aaron and submitted to ritual circumcision. Within twenty years, Lopez owned or had interests in over 80 sailing vessels. Lopez was also one of the original founders and contributors of Touro Synagogue and by the end of his life was recognized as one of the "Merchant Princes" of early America. His merchant trading interests included rum, molasses, dry goods and African slaves. Moses Levy and the Moses Seixas families both lived in one of Newport's large colonial mansions at 29 Touro Street. Seixas was a founding member of the nation's oldest Jewish Masonic Lodge (King David in Newport) and Grand Master of the Masonic Order of Rhode Island. Seixas was well known as the Cashier of the Bank of Rhode Island. President (Parnas) of Touro Synagogue at the time of the George Washington visit and letter to the congregation, Seixas also performed the Covenant of Circumcision (B’rith Milah). Prominent merchant and trader Moses Levy of New York and Newport was one of several Ashkenazi Jewish families in Newport at that time. Levy owned the Touro Street Mansion and willed the property to Moses Seixas in 1792. "Sir: Permit the children of the stock of Abraham to approach you with the most cordial affection and esteem for your person and merit, and to join with our fellow-citizens in welcoming you to Newport. ... Deprived as we hitherto have been of the invaluable rights of free citizens, we now-with a deep sense of gratitude to the Almighty Disposer of all events — behold a government erected by the majesty of the people-a government which to bigotry gives no sanction, to persecution no assistance, but generously affording to all liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship, deeming every one of whatever nation, tongue, or language, equal parts of the great governmental machine. This so ample and extensive Federal Union, whose base is philanthropy, mutual confidence and public virtue, we cannot but acknowledge to be the work of the great God, who rules in the armies of the heavens and among the inhabitants of the earth, doing whatever seemeth to Him good. For all the blessings of civil and religious liberty which we enjoy under an equal and benign administration, we desire to send up our thanks to the Ancient of days, the great Preserver of men, beseeching Him that the angels who conducted our forefathers through the wilderness into the promised land may graciously conduct you through all the difficulties and dangers of this mortal life; and when, like Joshua, full of days and full of honors, you are gathered to your fathers, may you be admitted into the heavenly paradise to partake of the water of life and the tree of immortality. Done and signed by order of the Hebrew Congregation in Newport, Rhode Island, August 17, 1790. Moses Seixas, Warden"

Boston Bombing Aftermath: David Sirota and Ben Shapiro Claim Jews Are Not Part of White America.

Boston Bombing Aftermath: David Sirota and Ben Shapiro Claim Jews Are Not Part of White America. By Kevin MacDonald. | David Sirota’s blog hoping that a White guy was responsible for the Boston terror has gotten quite a lot of mileage (“Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American”). [David Sirota had his fingers crossed for a white male marathon bomber.] The basic idea is that if it’s a Muslim, say, people might start thinking that increasing legal immigration by 50% and amnestying God knows how many illegals in a time of high unemployment—the Senate bill that insane Republicans think will bring them back to power—might not be a good idea. That’s because , if it’s a Muslim, people will start blaming whole groups of people and maybe not want to continue importing more of them. Or maybe they’ll tend to just blame immigration itself. (See LATimes: “Boston suspects’ background threatens to derail immigration bill.”) The bombers appear to be ethnic Chechnyans and Muslim, although at this point it can’t be said exactly what their motives were. In any case, it’s pretty obvious that these immigrant bombers don’t have much love or respect for America. So Sirota is right that people like him should hope that it was a White guy. But I rather doubt he would like the logic: It’s probably true that quite a few people would blame an entire group or even all immigrants for the actions of a few people. But that’s not really the issue. Even the least likely to stereotype would reasonably wonder why any of the group are here if even a small number are causing such death and destruction. Even if a tiny percentage of immigrants of a certain sort turn out to be terrorists who wreak major havoc (VDARE has documented the immigrant mass murder syndrome), it’s still a very bad policy to bring them in, especially when the only reason to do so is to meet the political goal of the left in swamping the White majority and the Republican’s goal of destroying the labor market.. Boston Marathon Bombers Are Not “White Americans”. Liberals Saddened. The same can be said about crime, low IQ, and high rates of welfare dependency and single parenting, although it would take more than a few bad apples to sway the argument on these issues. (High percentages of illegal immigrants [58% in Texas, 55% in California] are already on means-tested welfare; the new bill ensures that they will continue to do so, likely at much higher rates.) Of course, for the left and now the Republicans envisioning all those welfare recipients voting for Marco Rubio, no cost is too high in the drive to eclipse White America. But it’s worth pondering the other side of the coin—that a White American bomber would not result in stereotyping Whites. Anti-White activist Tim Wise took the opportunity presented by the Boston bombings to claim that the fact that Whites do not suffer group stigma for such an act is yet another example of “White privilege” — a “privilege” enjoyed by any demographic majority. But of course that’s the real reason why Wise and Sirota are exercised: they hate the fact that there is still a White majority. (See here for TOO articles mentioning Tim Wise.) Of course the media would have been ecstatic if they could report that a “White supremacist” had done it—”White supremacist” being the term of art routinely employed by the media for any White who dares to think that Whites have interests and will suffer huge costs by becoming a minority. The story would play into the common stereotype among many on the left that any White person is a potential “Nazi” who could rise up and murder innocent people. Which leads into the main point: Sirota discussed his column in an online debate with Ben Shapiro of Breitbart.com. So we are treated to a debate between two Jews representing the very narrow limits of respectable discussion on issues related to race and multiculturalism. Former AIPAC staffer Sirota thinks that America is a nasty, xenophobic place ( (unlike Israel whose latest bits of ethnic chauvinism include proposing an AIPAC-approved visa waiver program with the U.S. that would exclude Arab-Americans and insisting that France discriminate against Blacks and Arabs as baggage handlers for a state visit by Shimon Peres). To which Shapiro responds: racism exists. But it is not the dominant force in American life. Speaking of which, I do find it odd that Jews are considered members of the white privileged class when less than two generations ago, whites wouldn’t let us into their country clubs. So they disagree on how dominant racism is in American life—a good example of how discussion of racial issues is confined within narrow boundaries in the elite media. White people are evil, but they disagree on just how much their evil permeates American culture. Nevertheless, they are in complete agreement that Jews have been victimized by White America and are not reasonably considered to be part of White America on issues related to White guilt. This says a lot about Jewish attitudes toward White America. Whites are “the other”—the people who hate Jews and have historically excluded them. Jews do not identify with White America and see themselves as an oppressed minority, despite their elite status in all the areas that matter in American life. For Jews, the history of White America is little more than discrimination against Jews and other non-Whites. Jews were excluded from country clubs; they were excluded by the 1924 Immigration Restriction Act; they were excluded by Ivy League universities. These acts warrant Jewish hatred toward White America. Jews as a hostile elite. The fact that the most egregious discrimination going on now is Jewish discrimination against Whites in elite areas of American society—Ivy League universities being Exhibit A in this regard—is irrelevant to their world view. The fact that the most egregious discrimination going on now is Jewish discrimination against Whites in elite areas of American society—Ivy League universities being Exhibit A in this regard—is irrelevant to their world view. The fact that White elites attempted to protect themselves is hardly surprising. Nor is it surprising that our new Jewish elite is protecting itself—chiefly by effectively preventing any discussion in the mainstream media and academia of Jewish power, interests and attitudes, especially with respect to White America. As I have said many times, it would not matter much that Jews are an elite if they were not hostile toward the traditional people and culture of America and did not see themselves in conflict with White America. Given the prospect that Jews will continue as an elite hostile toward White America and given the ethnic/racial transformation of the country resulting from importing millions of people who do not identify with the traditional people and culture of the country (presumably the Boston bombers) and often have historical grudges of their own to grind, the future of Whites in America is grim indeed. White Americans should push back! Change your party allegiance to the American Freedom Party. A Nationalist party that shares the customs and heritage of the European American people. We need a Nationalist Party interested in defending our borders, preserving our language and promoting our culture. The American Freedom Party is not beholden to foreign governments, special interest groups, nor Wall Street. The American Freedom Party is for America First! The American Freedom Party (AFP)–formerly The American Third Position Party (A3P)–supports the right to keep and bear arms. Emancipate yourself from the anti-Western Democrat and Republican parties. Join a Nationalist Party that puts America first, The American Freedom Party! American Freedom Party