Thursday, June 30, 2011

ONLY 30% OF U.S. EVANGELICAL LEADERS BACK ISRAEL

National Prayer Network

ONLY 30% OF U.S. EVANGELICAL LEADERS BACK ISRAEL
By Rev. Ted Pike
29 Jun 11

Over the past several years I have been encouraged that nearly half my email response comes from evangelicals! My most popular articles often address Israel in Bible prophecy. (See, Babylon the Great is Israel, Michael Savage: Obama 'Laying Groundwork' For Apocalyptic War Against Israel) Increasingly, tens of thousands of Christians visit Truthtellers.org and Rense.com, the largest anti-Zionist internet news site with over one million unique visits a month (Rense.com's readership now equals World Net Daily, the largest Christian pro-Israel internet news service).

This trend toward greater openness to a truly Biblical perspective is seen in a new Pew Research poll of 2,196 evangelicals worldwide, 16 percent of which included evangelical leaders in the United States. "Among evangelicals from the United States three-in-ten (30%) sympathize more with Israel. Thirteen percent favor Palestinians and nearly half (49 percent) say they sympathize with both equally.

The survey showed that many evangelical leaders do think for themselves about the Mideast, particularly after Israel's embargo in Gaza and terrorist attack on the "Free Gaza" flotilla. Many clearly reject pressure to support Israel by Jewish muscle groups such as ADL as well as evangelical media and authorities. Over the past ten years, the voice of our National Prayer Network has been joined by other vocal Christian ministries. Through the airwaves, internet and direct mail we are blanketing the world with truth about Zionism. This Pew poll provides encouragement that together we may have had a more extensive impact than we dreamed. John Hagee-style support of Israel does not describe all evangelicals!

Tea Party Also Hears Truth about Israel

Two years ago, the National Prayer Network began sending our e-alerts to 850 Tea Party chapters in America. Within several weeks, about 185 chapters demanded removal from our e-list. But soon the objections stopped. For nearly two years, about 650 chapters have received our articles with hardly a murmur. Clearly, they remain curious and tolerant of truth they find nowhere else.

Tea Party chapters include many evangelicals and may well be adding to the number of enlightened Christians worldwide. Independently and in the grassroots, their fairness, good sense, and respect for Biblical values may be planting the seeds for eventual enlightenment of the church and nation.

Why Don't They Speak Out?

Yet why are pastors and Tea Party leaders silent? As in Israel under Baal-worshipping Ahab and Jezebel, the powers of intimidation are overwhelming. God was worshipped by a tiny minority in Israel who had not bowed the knee to Baal. Yet when Elijah challenged the false prophets, not one true believer had the courage to brave death and stand with him.

Today, militantly Zionist evangelicals swell the ranks of churches and Tea Party chapters. If they hear the slightest hint of displeasure with Israel, they sound the alarm, "Anti-Semitism!" This sends shock waves through the membership of religious and conservative organizations, compelling leaders to quickly back away. The Anti-Defamation League relies on such devotees of Israel to suppress any potential rebellion. When criticism of Israel manifests itself publicly, ADL has traditionally used local media and Christian authorities to vilify the critic as a hateful anti-Semite. Local media figures, Christian leaders and seminary professors join in excoriating the offender.

This has been ADL's modus operandi for nearly a century. But today criticism of Israel pervades the nations, especially prevalent on college campuses. Abe Foxman’s shooting gallery is too crowded by influential, high-profile targets—including the UN, European politicians, prestigious academics, a new Gaza flotilla, and others. The League is increasingly too distracted to persecute mere local outbreaks of truth telling.

Like terrorists, ADL has largely depended on fear of what it can do if opposed. Yet Christian and conservative leaders should take courage. Like the watchman of Ezekiel 33, they are responsible before God to sound a complete warning of danger to all who listen. Scripture warns such watchmen that unless they are willing to speak only the whole truth, they would be better off not to lead. Failure to speak such truth results in "greater condemnation." (James 3:1)

It is time that evangelical and Tea Party leaders who are becoming enlightened do more than silently agree with truth. They must speak it to their audience and to each other. Brave leaders could educate together and overwhelm ADL's ability to crush individuals.

If the Pew report is representative then, of roughly 70,000,000 evangelicals worldwide, Christian critics of Zionism could number in the millions! This consensus represents tremendous political and educational power if those with like minds have the courage to find each other and coalesce into a united force for truth and freedom.





Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.

TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.

National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015

THE TRUE MEANING OF GOD'S COVENANT WITH ABRAHAM

National Prayer Network

THE TRUE MEANING OF GOD'S COVENANT WITH ABRAHAM
By Rev. Ted Pike
30 Jun 11

Israel-first evangelicals believe God’s covenant with Abraham gives Jews today unconditional blessing from God, unconditional ownership of Palestine and rights to occupy it as a nation, even in unbelief, and that divine wrath threatens Israel's critics. But Scripture contains none of these promises! Nowhere does it say that God unconditionally blesses the Jewish people no matter what they do.

God first announced His covenant with Abraham in Genesis 12:2-3. In this and later affirmations, He established an everlasting covenant with Abraham in response to the patriarch’s incredible faith. This covenant is first spiritual. It applies to everyone who is the spiritual seed of Abraham by obedience (Galatians 3). But it is also physical. It promises a covenant land to an obedient Jewish race.

God has never canceled His promise to Abraham that he would father a vast multitude and that his physical, obedient seed will occupy Palestine.

Yet St. Paul says clearly in Romans 8 that apostate Jews have broken God’s covenant. They can’t receive God’s covenant promises because they do not hold up their end of the bargain: giving God the faith of Abraham. Consider:

Genesis 17:9 says Abraham’s seed must keep the covenant through obedience.

Genesis 17:14 says covenant breaking means being cut off.

Genesis 17:19 says Jews only find covenant blessing by keeping the way of the Lord.

Genesis 26:4 reinforces that the covenant exists because of obedience.

Deuteronomy 1:37 details how Joshua’s obedience empowered Israel to inherit the covenant promise of occupying Canaan.

Deuteronomy 7:12 is particularly definitive: “If you pay attention to these laws and are careful to follow them, then the LORD your God will keep his covenant of love with you, as he swore to your ancestors.”

So is Deuteronomy 28:1: “If you fully obey the LORD your God and carefully follow all his commands I give you today, the LORD your God will set you high above all the nations on earth (i.e. He will fulfill His covenant promises).”


These are just a handful of the many, many verses that spell out the conditional and reciprocal nature of God’s relationship with the Jews.

Not every Christian believes Jews still have a covenant with God. Hebrews 8 is cited by “displacement” theologians to say the Abrahamic covenant has been replaced by a “new covenant” which makes all Christians the inheritors of God’s promises. God says "I will effect a new covenant with the house of Israel… not like the covenant which I made with their fathers…" (Hebrews 8:8-9)

Yet this passage actually is from Jeremiah 31:31-34, whose context makes it very clear that the old covenant applies to obedient, physical Jews for all time. Apostate Jews may break God's covenant with Abraham, but God will never end it. At Christ’s second coming, remnant Jews will repent and inherit its blessings.

God says it is easier for the universe to be fathomed than that the Abrahamic covenant be dissolved. Jeremiah 3:37 continues, “Only if the heavens above can be measured and the foundations of the earth below be searched out will I reject all the descendants of Israel because of all they have done.” Jews may descend to deepest apostasy, losing all covenant blessing and their eternal souls. Yet God’s over-arching covenant with Abraham remains.

As Paul affirms, even the present depths of Jewish apostasy cannot frustrate the Almighty in His majestic determination to restore a believing Jewish remnant to obedience at His second coming. This is why “the adoption and the glory and the covenants and the giving of the law and the service of God and the promises” still pertains to the Jewish nation, says Romans 9:1-8. Yet Paul reinforces that not all who claim Jewish blood are “Israel.” Some “which are the children of the flesh are not the children of God but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.” Unbelieving Jews, he says, are "enemies of the gospel" (11:28) and are "broken off" (11:17). Taking his theology from the Old Testament, Paul thus opposes the prevailing American evangelical mentality that anyone with Jewish ancestry is worthy of blessing and non-criticism.

Christ confirms that unbelieving “Jews,” though physical descendants of Abraham or converts, are “liars,” pseudo-Jews who are actually the “synagogue of Satan” (Rev. 3:9). In fact, Paul denies that God’s blessing on the “seed” of Abraham ever applied to Abraham’s physical descendants! It only applies to Jesus and those who trust in Him.

So then, those who are of faith are blessed with Abraham, the believer…Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to His seed. He does not say ‘and to seeds,’ as referring to many, but rather to one. And to your ‘seed,’ that is, Christ…And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to the promise. (Galatians 3:9, 16, 29)

Summary

Scripture clearly rejects all “Israel-first” misinterpretations of God’s covenant with Abraham. It says God only blessed Abraham and his spiritual, not apostate, descendants. Unbelieving Jews have no right to occupy Palestine as a nation in unbelief. They never did. They never will. (See, List of Conditional Salvation Verses) God’s curse is not on those (like the Hebrew prophets) who criticize wicked Jews. Rather it is on those who curse Jesus through their Talmud—apostate, pro-Zionist Jews. Similarly, God’s curse is on evangelicals who ignore God’s law and instead bid Godspeed to the synagogue of Satan. Such “become partakers of their evil deeds.” (2 John 1:11)

Like Calvin’s doctrine of eternal security, which promises heaven to “sinning saints,” so these misinterpretations of Abraham’s covenant promises are based on fleshly not spiritual criterion. Both Calvinist and Zionist heresies flourish because of the pervasive inability of the church today to comprehend that God is transcendently holy and will not bless wickedness, in heaven or on earth.

How can heresies this deeply rooted in evangelical Christianity and Judaism be ended?

Fear of a holy God who insists on worship and obedience in sincerity— without formulas—must be revived in the church. With a return to authentic spirituality, these heresies will automatically retreat. If the church cannot return, it will be devoured by Babylon the Great (See, "Babylon the Great" is Israel), a monster very largely of its own making.



Listen to an expanded discussion on this subject in our lastest Bible Study "The True Meaning of God's Covenant with Abraham" at our Truthtellers.org's Biblical Answers Page.





Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.

TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.

National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

[Pretty Norwegian girl never got a chance to live thanks to liberals and Africans.]

Fourteen Year Old Gang-Raped by Africans in Norway


[Pretty Norwegian girl never got a chance to live thanks to liberals and Africans.]

by James Buchanan

An article on Western Voices News reports: “A 14-year-old girl in Trondheim took her own life after being assaulted and raped by three teenage boys. Only four weeks after she reported the rape at Kristiansten fortress, the ninth grader could not bear to live any longer. The girl’s mother believes the group rape is the direct cause of why her daughter chose to take her life two weeks ago: ‘This shows how brutal consequences of such a serious crime can get,’ said her mother through her daughter’s counsel, Sigrun Dybvad. Her mother has consented to the Adresseavisen’s mentioning the tragic incident, and she has provided information to the case. The incident has shaken many in Trondheim. Address newspaper has in recent days received emails and phone calls from desperate and upset parents. Over 1300 people have joined in a memorial group for 14-year-old online community Facebook. …245 people (showed) up to say goodbye when she was buried in the Lutheran Free Church. Police in Trondheim (are) worried after five unsolved assault rapes…. In three of the five cases, (there were) several perpetrators, all of which are described as African or Middle Eastern men. Police believe that the rapes have been planned in advance.”

This death should be placed squarely on the shoulders of all the liberals and socialists in Norway. These fools have betrayed their country and allowed their homeland to be invaded by dangerous Third World people, whose only interest in Norway is its welfare system.

The United States has had 146 years of experience trying to live with Africans. They impose a gigantic tax burden while producing very little despite their large population. America has had 40 years of racial quotas, that gave Blacks preferential admission to universities and a first choice of jobs. These racial quotas have done nothing except to introduce an incompetent quota-hire population at every American corporation and these quotas have STOLEN millions of jobs, promotions and college entry slots from better qualified Whites.

And there is the crime. Blacks commit at least half the rapes in the US even though they make up only 12.6 percent of the population. If any of the proud arrogant liberals, who changed Norway’s immigration laws, had taken the time to visit the bad neighborhoods in Los Angeles and Detroit, they would have quickly realized what a horrendous idea it is to import large numbers of these people into their homeland.

Now a once innocent Norwegian girl lays dead, the victim of liberal politicians just as much as their African collaborators, who carried out the gang rape. This is what liberals have done for Norway. These liberals deserve to be damned and forsaken by all sane White people, not just in Norway, but in all White nations that are plagued by their insane immigration polices and the horrible crimes that result.

Quote of the Day

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher (1788 - 1860)

ABC Chicago: Mayor Emanuel LIED about violent black mobs.

ABC Chicago: Mayor Emanuel LIED about violent black mobs.

Mayor Emanuel and Police Superintendent McCarthy. Two extremely left-wing individuals. Both caught in a campaign of deceit to hide black crime from the public.

Radical left-wing Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel and radical left-wing Chicago police superintendent McCarthy, who was recently featured on this website, aggressively tried to cover of an explosion of black crime that occurred last memorial day weekend.

Outrage of the current wave of violent black on white crime has boiled over online. Now media outlets are being forced to report the, at least some of, the truth.

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Quote of the Day

Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live.
Adolf Hitler

Monday, June 27, 2011

Rahowa - Hall of the heroes

Quote of the Day

Without music, life would be a mistake. By:Friedrich Nietzsche

The Assassination of Albert Patterson

Albert Patterson (January 27, 1894 – June 18, 1954) was an attorney in Phenix City, Ala. He was assassinated outside of his law office shortly after he won the Democratic nomination for Alabama Attorney General on a platform of reforming the rife corruption and vice in Phenix City.

Sunday, June 26, 2011

Why Is Government-Mandated Racism against Whites Still Allowed?

We’ve had four decades of anti-White discrimination by the Feds.


Why Is Government-Mandated Racism against Whites Still Allowed?

by James Buchanan

The mainstream media continues to pummel Americans with claims that White people are “racist”. Blacks make up 12.6 percent of the US population. According to the likes of Jesse Jackson and a great many liberals, when the Blacks fail to make up 12.6 percent of the student population of M.I.T. or 12.6 percent of brain surgeons or 12.6 percent of rocket scientists, it isn’t some failing on the part of the Black population; it’s the fault of “White racism”.

Most corporations in the US are scared to death of being accused of “racism”. Often they go out of their way to hire Blacks and Latinos, no matter how unfit they are for the jobs. If anything has been going on in the US since the 1970s, it has been terrified managers bending over backwards to appease racial quotas imposed by the federal government. The net result has been that millions of better qualified Whites have lost jobs, promotions and college entry slots to less qualified Blacks and Latinos.

The intelligence of each race can be represented by a bell shaped curve as shown above. The area under each curve represents each population. The bell curve for the Blacks is shifted over to the left considerably because the average Black IQ is considerably less than for Whites.

Notice that beyond an IQ of 125 there is virtually no area under the Black IQ curve, which means there are few -if any- Blacks with IQs over that amount. Even if a mulatto has an IQ over 125, that’s no guarantee he worked hard in high school and got the grades to qualify for college. This means the number of Blacks who were better qualified than Whites for college entry or for some sophisticated job would be few if any.

In contrast, millions of much smarter White people have had the college door slammed in their faces to make room for less qualified Blacks and Latinos thanks to “Affirmative Action”. Only the Jewish media could be so supremely dishonest to put all the focus on “minority victims” dating from the 1950s while we have ongoing and massive racist discrimination against White college applicants going on today.

Notice that virtually all discrimination lawsuits are based on an inequality of outcome and the assumption that the races are equal and the outcomes should therefore be equal. A more logical course (and the only one with legal precedence) would have been to pay individuals who suffered discrimination on an individual basis if each could prove his case.

Instead of addressing past discrimination in a fair and reasonable manner, lawsuits were filed by Jewish lawyers working for activist organizations and federal judges decreed that an era of anti-White discrimination was necessary to “make up for past wrongs”. Apparently no one ever told these judges that two wrongs don’t make a right.

The result has been a period of anti-White discrimination mandated by the federal government that has gone on since the early 1970s. Most politicians are literally AFRAID of standing up for the White race. The Jewish media has created an atmosphere that is so thoroughly anti-White that everyone just goes along with racial quotas and Affirmative Action even though those programs are nothing less than blatant, anti-White racism that has become part of government policy.

Anyone who looks into the history of anti-White government policies will find over and over that Jews are behind these policies. Jewish lawyers have filed countless lawsuits alleging racism against Blacks. Far left judges have made decisions that laid the groundwork for anti-White racial quotas by the federal government. The Jewish news media has set the tone with extremely biased coverage which never asks if a government policy is unfair to Whites. You could watch thousands of hours of television and not have a clue that Whites were second class citizens in the US today. Only websites like this one tell the truth on racial issues and stand up for the Rights of White people.

Coming up next! Exposing the Ongoing Corruption in Phenix City, AL. a.k.a. Sin City

We are going to expose the ongoing corruption in Phenix city,Alabama and the corrupt Judges,District Attorneys that are part of the problem.

Making The Responsible Choice

Making The Responsible Choice


ADV Broadcast Of June 25, 2011

Hello, and welcome to another broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of the National Alliance. I’m your host and Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

I have spoken in the past about the necessity of building an infrastructure of White racialists and having them placed in key positions throughout the System. That is, we need Whites who share our worldview in positions of influence in areas such as education, law enforcement, the military, business and finance, the judicial system, the FBI, etc. And while currently there are White racial activists in certain positions of influence – most of them clandestinely – there are nearly not enough of our people entrenched in the System to counter the destructive behavior of Jews who are in positions of power.

With that said, I’d like to mention one White racial activist who did hold a key position, that being in the judicial system. And that individual would be former Muscogee, Georgia Municipal Court Judge Haywood Turner, who recently passed away after a brief illness in his hometown of Columbus, Georgia. Turner remained active till the end, and had even attended the October 2010 National Alliance Leadership Conference at our National Office in Mill Point, West Virginia. He was 67.

Haywood Turner was defeated in 2008 by Stephen Hyles, a Columbus attorney. Until then, his judgeship remained undefeated for nearly two decades. Asked his philosophy when first elected Municipal Court judge in 1988, Haywood told a reporter: “It should be one of our greatest duties to live in such a way that vulnerability is never exploited.”

Haywood Turner proved that as White racialists we can make inroads into the System. He set a perfect example for other White activists to follow. Haywood Turner will be greatly missed by all those fortunate to have known him.



We live in a very uncertain world. Despite all of the advances in communication -- Internet and cell phones, for instance -- there is still a lot that we don't know. The technological gizmos allow what we DO know or think we know to be communicated more rapidly and more easily, but they can't solve the problems related to our inability to REALLY know some definite answers.

For example, when meteorologists analyze data about weather patterns in a given region of the country, they make predictions about the future weather. As we all know, those predictions are only about the weather in the immediate future. Predictions about weather that is more than a week or so down the road is essentially meaningless. Watch the 10-day forecast for a week and keep track of how the projected weather for a particular date changes as that date draws nearer and nearer. It changes.

That isn't to say that meteorologists are deliberately trying to deceive the rest of us. It simply means that there are lots of variables to account for when dealing with the weather, and not all of them are known with a high degree of certainty. And if you guess wrong about one variable, then it could throw off what you thought would happen later. Consider a basketball player shooting from the three-point line; on consecutive shots, a small difference in how a shot approaches the basket determines if the ball goes in the hoop or whether it misses. And if it misses, here again small differences will determine HOW it misses: whether it bounces high off the rim or directly down toward the floor, whether there will be a weak- or strong-side rebound, and so on.

The same sort of uncertainty and variability occurs when predicting the weather, and in fact occurs with just about everything in life. Life is inherently uncertain, and just when you think you know what will happen, something changes and the whole scenario has to be re-worked. It's like trying to predict which team will win the World Series in a given year; it can't be done. All you can do is look at the available data and try to come up with the odds of something happening.

As many of you know, the founder of the National Alliance and its leader for about three decades until his death in 2002 was Dr. William L. Pierce. Dr. Pierce earned a Ph.D. in physics and was therefore a scientist by training who eventually left academia in order to dedicate his life to the salvation of his people. The sort of thinking that I've been talking about -- dealing with uncertainty and weighing the odds -- is something like how a true scientist, like Dr. Pierce, is forced to think when dealing with scientific problems.

So Dr. Pierce would be much more qualified to talk to you about uncertainty than I am, but he's no longer with us. I know a little about such matters, and I think that there are a few good points of thought that we can go through together, even though I don't have a Ph.D. in physics. I'm not so much interested in scientific uncertainty, though, as I am with uncertainty dealing with our position as a race in the world today.

Even the White American mainstreamer is aware of uncertainty in his life that is related to the political, social, and philosophical issues that we White racialists are trying to address. Many of our blue collar workers, having seen so many of our industrial and manufacturing jobs head to the Orient, live every day with the uncertainty of whether or not they'll be back at work tomorrow. The fear and uncertainty involved in the possibility of getting pink-slipped takes its toll on the White American worker and his family.

Similarly, especially as the non-White population in the United States has continued to grow, there is the constant uncertainty of whether or not one is going to be robbed or raped or killed on any given night. Many non-White gangs are known to require that new gang members successfully pass initiation rites, which might include any of a number of crimes that must be committed against a White victim.

How about the uncertainty felt by the thousands and thousands of relatives of members of the U.S. armed forces? These people are in a constant state of tension as their sons and husbands -- and even, in some cases, their daughters and wives -- are scuffling through the boiling sands of Iraq and Afghanistan on a purposeless mission pushed through and maintained by a corrupt government. Unfortunately, the relatives of about 6,000 of those soldiers have had some of the uncertainty removed from their lives, having been made aware by representatives of the U.S. Government that their loved one has given his or her life in the line of duty.

Sadly, in those cases, the uncertainty of a loved one being alive or dead has been replaced by the uncertainty of why exactly the U.S. is in Iraq in the first place. President Obama, of course, has offered no plausible explanation to clear up this uncertainty.

All of these uncertainties are short-term ones -- one might even say immediate ones. But White American mainstreamers are dealing with longer-range uncertainty as well. Some American Whites are asking longer-range questions like...

"If things keep going like they have been, what is the place that used to be my quiet -- almost boring -- hometown going to look like ten years from now?"

"When I graduated from high school, my class was all White. When I went to the Homecoming football game last fall, it looked like three-fourths of the team and half the cheerleaders were non-Whites. What will it be like in five years?"

"It seems like every restaurant in town is almost fully staffed with Mexicans. How many will be around here in ten years, and what will they be doing?"

Questions like those I just listed are the ones that fester in the backs of the minds of perceptive mainstream Whites, but to some degree, all Whites are asking questions of this nature. In fact, it has been my experience that usually whenever people talk about crime or the high rate of teen pregnancy or drug use among young people, there is an implicit connection in the mind of the questioner between these issues and race. In my dealings with others, I have often succeeded in getting the White askers of such questions to admit that race plays a role in all of these issues, although most people won't say so at first.

And the reason White mainstreamers think that race plays a part in these issues is because it does. Or, in light of what I stated earlier about Dr. Pierce and his scientific frame of mind, perhaps I should say, "To a high degree of certainty, race plays a part in such issues." As the race problem has grown and the degree of diversity has increased, these problems have grown as well. Obviously, the amount of Muslim terrorism in Britain has definitely increased as the Muslim population of the British Isles has grown in recent years.

Now, the scientific purists out there will tell you that nothing can be known with absolute certainty. They'll tell you that the best we can do is to look at the available evidence and make our best judgment call based on that. Later, if and when new evidence becomes available, we might have to modify our conclusion, either a lot or a little. But to NOT draw a conclusion is not possible, so we might as well draw a conclusion that is logically consistent with the facts as we know them at the present time.

Those ideas -- that we can't get away from making decisions and taking action AND so we should therefore make decisions that are well-informed -- were a common theme that ran through the writings and speeches of the late American philologist, scholar, and patriot Dr. Revilo P. Oliver. Dr. Oliver believed that Western science, which is based on the idea that we must be as objective as possible about the world around us, was one of the crowning achievements of Western man. Whatever information we have available, that information must be considered in making a decision. We know in advance that we cannot obtain all the information before deciding; in other words, there will always be uncertainty. Nonetheless, our lack of information and our uncertainty don't excuse us from doing our best to make the best judgment possible, based on what we DO know.

And in the case of most interest to me and to the audience of these broadcasts -- which is the case of the present and future situation of the White race -- what we DO know are two things. One, we have a lot of information at our beck and call that tells us about the races in the world today: their relative populations, their rates of growth and decline, and their average physical and psychological differences. I'm not a geneticist, but if the Human Genome Project can identify every gene in the human genome, then I don't see why we shouldn't be able to identify the essential average differences in the genes between the various races of man. Perhaps this has already been done, and I encourage an experienced geneticist to contact me and point me in the right direction here. But my point is that we have an avalanche of evidence on the racial situation today, not only in individual countries but also worldwide. Granted, not all of this information is easy to find, but the growth of the Internet over the last decade has made more of this sort of information available to an ever-wider audience.

And secondly, there is plenty of information out there about the racial situation in the past: how the individual races came into being, which races have created which civilizations, the guiding principles of some of those civilizations, and what has happened when different races have tried to occupy the same living space. There are many questions that yet remain to be answered -- that is, there is still a good deal of uncertainty -- but, as living beings, we are required to make the best decisions we can, based on all the information we can lay our hands on.

It is my contention that the men who are making the decisions that are affecting our people today are not making decisions that are in the best interests of our people. Now, when someone makes a decision that has a negative effect on another, it is usually because they either didn't have enough information available to them OR because they don't share the same values. In other words -- and this is key -- if I make a decision that hurts you, it is usually because I didn't gather the necessary information to make a better decision OR... I don't like you.

Now, in the case of White people as a worldwide group, the essential information is known to everyone in any position to influence the decisions that affect that population group. The essential information is the following:

The percentage of Whites in the world is decreasing, while the percentage of non-Whites is increasing. Furthermore, the RATE at which the White population is falling is not a steady rate; that rate of decline is increasing. In addition, the areas that have traditionally been populated only by Whites are now being increasingly invaded by non-Whites, with miscegenation becoming more and more prevalent. All of these facts amount to the fact that the White race is being snuffed out.

About those facts, the only uncertainty is in the nit-picky details. The essentials of those facts are undeniable, which rules out the first part of the problem -- which is a lack of information -- when someone makes a decision that hurts another.

And this brings us to the second part of the problem: different values. In my value system and in the value system of all National Alliance members and even in most White mainstreamers, the White race is an entity worth saving. The reasons as to WHY it's worth saving will vary between individuals. Some will say that the White race has contributed much that is worthwhile to humanity, including not only Western literature and the marvel of Western science, but also the highest art -- such as music, architecture, painting, and sculpture. Some will talk in vague terms about beauty, or about the White man's love of freedom and his concern for the rights of the individual, and so on. But MOST Whites believe that our race should continue to exist.

Well, given that we are being snuffed out, it would seem reasonable to assume that our leaders would take such action as to halt and even reverse the decline in the White population... IF they (or those who influence them) share our belief that the White race should survive.

It's obvious, isn't it? Neither our leaders NOR those who control them share with the White population even the most primitive value of desiring that a race that has given so much to humankind should survive. And I'm not talking about the many explicit racialist values that form the worldview of the National Alliance. I'm talking about the simple desire that the White race survive. Our leaders don't have it. Neither do the strongest powers in the land, which are the men who manage our media of news and entertainment.

Our leaders don't care that the White race survives because all they care about is themselves. A good income, lots of material possessions, phony popularity, and the ability to strut around in the marble halls of government... these are the things that drive them to prostitute themselves to those whose blessing or curse has the power to give or take away these superficial materialisms.

The media masters don't share the value of White racial survival because they aren't White. They are Jews -- the vast majority of them -- as has been shown elsewhere. Yes, there's a lot of uncertainty about the Jews, but based on the available evidence -- their ancient historical writings, their modern commentaries, and their activities in the West since the beginning -- the only rational conclusion is that they seek to destroy us and, while in the process of destroying us, they seek to exploit us. Even leaving room for uncertainty, the available evidence -- taken as a whole -- leads to that conclusion.

And for that reason we must distance ourselves from the Jews and from all other races as well. If we want our highest value to prevail, and that value is that our race survive and make progress, then we have to have the courage to take measured action based on the evidence available and the most probable conclusions that can be drawn from it.

If you're going to be outside today and the weatherman says that it's probably going to be hot and sunny, you'd better bring along your sunscreen. There's some uncertainty, and it's all based on probabilities, but it's better to be safe than sorry.

If you're going to be out of town all day and the weatherman says that it's probably going to rain, you'd better make sure all the windows are closed. There's some uncertainty, and it's all based on probabilities, but it's better to be safe than sorry.

If, based on the available evidence, your people are in danger of disappearing off the face of the planet within the space of a few hundred years, you'd better seriously consider becoming an activist in Our Cause. There's some uncertainty, and it's all based on probabilities, but it's better to be safe than sorry.

Remember, to NOT act just because we don't have every last detail of information is to voluntarily refuse to help. Yes, it's an uncertain world with an uncertain future, but you can increase the probability that your race survives and has a viable future by making the responsible choice.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

Thursday, June 23, 2011

For Love of My People 1 - David Duke Interview

Amnesty by Executive Order Ignored by Media

Obama tells Border Patrol that deporting certain illegal aliens is not necessary.




Amnesty by Executive Order Ignored by Media

by James Buchanan

Michelle Malkin noted in a recent article “NumbersUSA posted a letter on Monday from GOP Sen. Grassley and seven other Republican Senators challenging the White House on rumors of illegal alien-amnesty-by-executive order… This administration has accomplished its major policy agenda items through force, fiat, and fraud. Immigration will be no different. More to the point, as I’ve reported many times and in-depth in my blog posts, columns, and books, open-borders activists and open-borders politicians have accomplished illegal alien amnesty-by-special order with almost no grass-roots resistance for years.”

A link to a government website appears to confirm that there was an executive order, which incorporates ideas from the illegal alien “Dream Act” which patriots have been fighting against for years.

One small patriotic website noted “I’m losing count as to how many times this president is doing this type (of) thing and bypassing the Constitution…..acting like a dictator in a 3rd world country and Congress let’s him get away with it. On Friday, the Obama administration issued a memo announcing that federal immigration officials do not have to deport illegal aliens if they are enrolled in any type of education program, if their family members have volunteered for U.S. military service, or even if they are pregnant or nursing. This new policy of ‘prosecutorial discretion’ was quietly announced on Friday afternoon, and completely ignored by the mainstream press.”

The President does NOT have the authority to change existing US law. Any new laws must be passed by Congress, and then the president can veto or sign them. By giving the Border Patrol semi-secret orders to NOT obey the law, President Obama is supporting and even advocating criminal behavior.

Imagine the president deciding one day that espionage was no longer a crime. Imagine the president giving orders that any future spies “need not be prosecuted”. If the president tells law enforcement officials to not enforce the law, he is effectively promoting criminal behavior. Both Barack Obama and George W. Bush should be brought up on criminal charges for giving secret orders to the Border Patrol that have allowed a flood of illegal aliens across our border.

I strongly suggest that all patriotic Americans should contact their Congressman and demand that existing immigration laws be enforced and that all people who can be deported should be deported as soon as possible. You can contact your Congressman here.

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura: Police State "Full Episode"

Big Brother is Watching You!

Ode to a Dying People

Eyes shining bright with unspilt tears,
Thinking about all these wasted years.
Everything worth living for is gone,
Brother, i find it hard to keep fighting on.
Falling down towards the abyss,
The reaper embraces me with his kiss;
It makes me want to refuse to care,
To watch this all unfold - too much to bear.


If this is the way it ends -
If this is the way my race ends . . .
If this is the way it ends - i can't bear to witness

Disease encroaching on all i hold dear,
Somehow i gotta get my soul outta here.
Heart of agony, faint burning hope,
I'm finding it hard to try to cope . . .

Because liars own the world with conquering poise,
In a wasteland of meaningless noise;
We don't stand a chance with dormant pride,
The heroes of our race have already died . . .

If this is the way it ends - if this is the way my race ends. . .
If this is the way it ends - i can't bear to witness . . .

To imagine it has all come down to this,
Apathy and suicidal bliss . . .

It's all over except for the cryin',
With a whimper instead of the roar of a lion . . .

The greatest race to ever walk the earth,
Dying a slow death with insane mirth,
The tomb has been prepared, our race betrayed,
White man, fight the flight towards the grave . . .

If this is the way it ends - if this is the way my race ends . . .
If this is the way it ends - i can't bear to witness . . .
If this is the way it ends - if this is the way my race ends . . .
If this is the way it ends - i can't bear to witness . . .

Don't let it end this way,
Don't let it end this way,
Don't let it end this way, i can't bear to witness . .

Might is Right

Might was right when Caesar bled
Upon the stones of rome,
Might was right when Genghis led
His hordes over danube's foam,
And might was right when German troops
Poured down through paris way,
It's the gospel of the ancient world
And the logic of today.

Behind all kings and presidents -
All government and law,
Are army-corps and cannoneers -
To hold the world in awe.
And sword-strong races own the earth,
And ride the conqueror's car -
And liberty has never been won
Except by deeds of war.

What are the lords of hoarded gold -
The silent semite rings?
What are the plunder-patriots -
High-pontiffs, priests and kings?
What are they but bold master-minds,
Best fitted for the fray who comprehend
And vanquish by - the logic of today.

Cain's knotted club is scepter still -
The "right of man" is fraud:
Christ's ethics are for creeping things -
True manhood smiles at "god".
For might is right when empires sink
In storms of steel and flame;
And it is right when weakling breeds -
Are hunted down like game.

Then what's the use of dreaming dreams -
That "each shall get his own"?
By forceless votes of meek-eyed thralls,
Who blindly sweat and moan? no!
A curse is on their cankered brains -
Their very bones decay
Trace your fate in the iron game,
It's the logic of today.

The strong must ever rule the weak,
Is grim primordial law -
On earth's broad racial threshing floor,
The meek are beaten straw -
Then ride to power o'er foemen's necks
Let nothing bar your way:
If you are fit you'll rule and reign,
Is the logic of today.
You must prove you're right by deeds of might -
Of splendor and reknown.
If need be, march through flames of hell,
To dash opponents down - if need be,
Die on scaffold high -
In the morning's misty grey:
For "liberty or death" is still the logic of today.
Might was right when Gideon led
The "chosen" tribes of old,
And it was right when titus burnt,
Their temple roofed with gold:
And might was right from Bunker's hill,
To far Manilla bay,
By land and flood it's wrote in blood -
The gospel of today.

"Put not your trust in princes"
Is a saying old and true,
"Put not your hope in governments"
Rranslateth it anew.
All "books of law" and "golden rules"
Are fashioned to betray:
"The survival of the strongest"
Is the gospel of today.

Might was right when Carthage flames
Lit up the punic foam -
And when the naked steel of Gaul
Weighed down the spoil of Rome;
And might was right when Richmond fell -
And at Thermopylae -
It's the logic of the ancient world -
And the gospel of today.
Where pendant suns in millions swing,
Around this whirling earth,
It's might, it's force that holds the brakes,
And steers through death and birth:
Force governs all organic life,
Inspires all right and wrong.
It's nature's plan to weed-out man,
And test who are the strong.

Insane program by US government helped kill Border Patrol Agent.

Insane program by US government helped kill Border Patrol Agent.


US Government Armed Mexican Drug Gangs

by Jeff Davis

The U.K. Independent reports: “The lethal fallout from a botched operation by the US Department of Justice which allowed almost 2,000 illegally purchased firearms to be transported from the streets of Arizona to drug gangs in Mexico has been laid bare in a scathing Congressional report, which concludes that it resulted in countless deaths.”

No one even knows exactly what the point of this operation was. Did they want to trace where these firearms went? And why would that information justify putting guns into the hands of dangerous Mexican drug gangs?

The article notes “A mixture of arrogance, over-confidence, and staggering ineptitude by the Department’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives [ATF] was outlined in a 51-page investigation by two Republican members of a House panel charged with getting to the bottom of what went wrong during a two-year operation called Fast and Furious. It tells how, between 2009 and this year, the ATF instructed agents to turn a blind eye to hundreds of AK-47 assault rifles, sniper rifles, and revolvers purchased from gunshops in Phoenix and en route to Mexico. They hoped to eventually recover them from crime scenes and build a complex conspiracy case that might take down the leaders of a major drug cartel.”

When they say: “Recover them from crime scenes” that means after people had been shot. Anyone else see a problem with this operation? Also, many of the crimes were likely to happen in Mexico, where the BATFE has no jurisdiction. What would the Mexican police think if they found out our government was supplying criminals in their country with guns?

The Independent goes on: “In the event, the operation resulted in the arrest of a handful of small-time crooks. But it exacerbated an already-huge spike in violence on both sides of the border. Two of the guns allowed to ‘walk’ into the hands of criminals were used in a shoot-out that killed a US border patrol agent, Brian Terry. The report describes his death as a preventable tragedy, detailing how many of the ATF agents involved in Fast and Furious began to object to what they saw as the reckless nature of the operation, which conflicted with all known protocol and may turn out to have been illegal But when they raised their concerns, they faced punishment and retaliation from their superiors.”

This operation began in 2009 when Democrats were in power under Obama’s watch.

The Independent goes on: “In total, agents watched at least 1,730 guns flood on to the black market, knowing they would be used to commit murders and other violent crimes. Their concerns about the policy were ignored. In one email to field staff printed in the report, ATF supervisor David Voth suggested that staff who objected to his orders would be fired. ‘I will be damned if this case is going to suffer due to petty arguing, rumours, or other adolescent behavior,’ he wrote. ‘We are all adults, we are all professionals, and we have an exciting opportunity to use the biggest tool in our law-enforcement tool box. If you don’t think this is fun, you are in the wrong line of work, period!’”

So giving weapons to criminals and waiting to see what happens is “fun”. Why couldn’t our government take those 1,730 guns and give them to poor law-abiding Americans, who were living in bad neighborhoods, right here in the US. That way those Americans could defend themselves from criminals. I suppose that would make too much sense.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Another Minority Riot at a McDonald’s

Restaurant flash riots coming soon to a neighborhood near you.


Another Minority Riot at a McDonald’s

by Jeff Davis

A CBS article reports: “At least two people were stabbed and hospitalized, and three others injured after a massive brawl involving dozens of people broke out in the parking lot of a McDonald’s near San Jose State University. The fight happened around 10 p.m. about a block away from the university on the corner of San Jose and Third Streets, and just hours after a free downtown concert let out.”

What you have to bear in mind is that the media always speaks in code when it comes to race. “Free downtown concert” in a big city usually means a minority event that Whites would be terrified to approach.

The article notes “Police said a small crowd started gathering before it quickly turned into a mob of more than 100 people, many of who began screaming, yelling, and throwing punches when a fight broke out. Witnesses said the friends of one of the stabbing victims literally dragged him into a car and tried fleeing the scene, but police stopped them before they could get away. Those who work downtown said word is getting out that San Jose is laying off police officers, leading to a spike in crime. ‘A lot of things come from a lot of out-of-towners,’ said restaurant manager George Bracamonte.”

This, again, is liberal media code for black gang members, probably from Oakland.

The article continues “It’s not known what started the brawl, which witnesses said was so big it looked like a riot. Police spokesman Jose Garcia said race may have been a motive in the brawl, and that about half the group was Latino, the other half black.”

So it was a gang thing, and good luck to any White college kids who might have been out at night and getting hungry for some chicken McNuggets. The race of the stabbing victims is not known –actually that’s not true. The authorities know the race of the attackers and the victims, but they’re just not telling us, as usual.

If we’re lucky, someone may have made a cell phone video of this riot and we’ll be seeing it on youtube. Otherwise the authorities will simply sweep this incident under the rug along with who-knows-how-many other violent minority incidents. At the rate this violence is increasing, we’ll probably all be seeing it first hand pretty soon.

Monday, June 20, 2011

Law Aimed At Preventing Hurt Feelings Makes Mockery Of Constitution

Law Aimed At Preventing Hurt Feelings Makes Mockery Of Constitution


Lawmakers in Tennessee may have run afoul of the Constitution in passing a recent law. The law makes it illegal to “transmit or display an image” online if it is likely to “frighten, intimidate or cause emotional distress” to someone — anyone — who views it.

“Tennessee law already made it a crime to make phone calls, send emails, or otherwise communicate directly with someone in a manner the sender ‘reasonably should know’ would ‘cause emotional distress’ to the recipient,” Ars Technica reported.

“The new legislation adds images to the list of communications that can trigger criminal liability. But for image postings, the ‘emotionally distressed’ individual need not be the intended recipient. Anyone who sees the image is a potential victim. If a court decides you ‘should have known’ that an image you posted would be upsetting to someone who sees it, you could face months in prison and thousands of dollars in fines,” the article read.

http://www.personalliberty.com/conservative-politics/liberty/tennessee-lawmakers-censoring-the-internet/

Saturday, June 18, 2011

A Total Racial Renaissance

A Total Racial Renaissance


ADV Broadcast Of June 18, 2011

Hello, and welcome to another broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of the National Alliance. I’m your host and Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

With the NATO bombing campaign of the sovereign nation of Libya now nearing the 90-day mark, a handful of U.S. lawmakers – including Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul – are suing President Obama for abuse of power, particularly since he never declared war on Libya and the funding was never voted on by Congress.

Of course, the Jews’ true agenda for bombing Libya is, firstly, to shut down Moammar Gadhafi because he has an independent mind and doesn’t behave like world Jewry wants him to behave. The second part of the agenda is to cripple the military power of Libya and destroy the country’s infrastructure and political stability, in order to set up a Zionist-controlled puppet government. However, Gadhafi is hanging tough and fighting back, much to the chagrin of the New World Order’s Jewish powerbrokers.

One world leader who has been adamant since the beginning about bombing Libya into smithereens and installing a puppet government in the oil-rich North African nation, has been French president Nicolas Sarkozy. Now there is probably a good reason why sarkozy is so obsessed about removing Gadhafi from power and installing a Zionist-friendly puppet state.

If you’ve seen photographs of Sarkozy and wondered about his own racial origins, it’s probably because he doesn’t quite look like a typical White Frenchman. Well, the reason he doesn’t look quite like a Frenchman is because, of his four grandparents, only one of them is French: his maternal grandmother. His paternal grandparents were Hungarians, as was – obviously – his father, who immigrated to France in the aftermath of the Soviet incursions into Hungary beginning in the latter days of the Second World War.

This leaves us with Sarkozy’s maternal grandfather, who happened to be a Sephardic Jew born in Greece and who moved to the suburbs of Paris before the First World War. Sarkozy’s Jewish grandfather wisely converted to Catholicism – which made living in France much easier for him – and, according to Sarkozy himself, had a much larger influence on the new president’s early life than did his own father. For much of his early life, Sarkozy lived in a mansion owned by his Jewish grandfather, and many of Sarkozy’s independence-based and nationalist political views today seem to mirror the Gaullist political views of his grandfather.



Now the disease that threatens France – and not only France, but the entire White world – is a racial disease. I have stated before that no major revival of France is going to occur without a White racial revival. That is, until White Frenchmen start openly stating what everyone knows in his heart – which is that monoracial nation-states are historically the most stable and most culture-producing political entities – until that admission is honestly and openly stated, nothing is going to change in France. And not only must that admission be made, but it must also be coupled with positive action directed toward the attainment of White racial goals.

In my view, any remaking of a White nation must be founded on White racial purity, and no amount of crime reduction, economic growth, or halting of new non-White immigrants is going to please me. I and the other members of the National Alliance advocate a total racial renaissance that starts, of course, with total racial separation.

Perhaps France is too far down the road of multiracialism to be saved. It’s hard to get any solid racial data out of a nation that forbids the taking of solid racial data. I DO know that France has had a sickness of the psyche – or a sickness of the will, you might call it – for at least a century, and probably for much longer than that.

For example, the bloodbath of the French Revolution at the end of the 18th Century was certainly a low point in the history of what was once the most cultured nation in Europe. During that baleful period, French commoners – inspired by so-called “ideals” that were almost indistinguishable from what reappeared elsewhere in Europe some decades later as full-blown communism – came together in mobs and slew as many aristocrats as they could get their hands on. Some of those aristocrats, no doubt, were heartless snobs who were concerned about little more than their own possessions and pocketbooks, but killing them didn’t – in the long run – make France any better off. After all, the aristocracy DID constitute much of the highest-quality White genetic material that inhabited France at that time, and the loss of that genetic material resulted in a general weakening of the White gene pool.

Some years after the French Revolution, Napoleon Bonaparte came along and did his best to unite a fragmented Europe. Unfortunately, he only REALLY succeeded in uniting a good portion of Europe AGAINST him and this, of course, resulted in more fratricidal warfare between White men who were forced to look at uniforms – rather than faces – to distinguish friend from foe. But after Napoleon failed in his gamble – nearly bleeding France to death in the process – the leadership and vigor from the land of the Franks has been spotty, at best.

One of the bright spots for France within the last century was the willingness of forward-thinking Frenchmen to unite with National Socialist Germany in Hitler’s European crusade against communism during the Second World War. Two French fighting units, the “Charlemagne” and the “Assault Brigade,” were incorporated into the Pan-European Waffen-SS, and they fought – despite incomplete training, supply shortages, and the overwhelming Soviet numerical superiority – with exemplary idealism and valor against Stalin’s hordes.

A book on the subject of the French SS volunteers, entitled For Europe and written by Robert Forbes, has received complimentary reviews from several readers on amazon.com. Clearly, there were Frenchmen with racial-nationalist ideals back in the 1940s and no doubt there are still some today. For their sake and for that of France, I just hope that we can set our White nations back on the path to greatness before we go all the way down.

A story of bravery similar to that told by Robert Forbes is the incomparable Campaign in Russia written by the late Leon Degrelle. Degrelle was a rightist politician in Belgium during the 1930s, and when his nation was invaded by Germany, he and about 800 French-speaking volunteers joined Hitler’s anti-communist crusade. They were organized into the 28th SS division Wallonia and, despite enticements to take a leadership role, Degrelle declined to accept a position that he hadn’t earned, instead choosing to start out as a simple private.

As the war dragged on, Degrelle’s leadership abilities became more and more obvious and, as his experience grew, he assumed more and more of the responsibility for the fighting condition and spirit of his fellow countrymen. Other idealistic Belgians, following Degrelle’s example, left home and joined in the fight on the Eastern Front. Under Degrelle’s direction, SS Wallonia gained fame as one of the stingiest and fiercest fighting units of the anti-communist forces in the East, with its deeds of daring and valor rivaling those of the best all-German SS units.

Degrelle and his French-speaking Walloons were another plain example that the spirit of the White man in and around France was far from extinguished during the middle of the last century. And I refuse to believe that that spirit is dead today. I believe it is slumbering – and HAS BEEN slumbering for quite some time, and slumbering quite SOUNDLY, no less – but the spirit of the White man still flickers in the souls of some Frenchmen. I hope that spirit stands up and lets itself be noticed in the very near future.

As I mentioned briefly last week, there have been faint glimmerings of hope that racial realities are coming to a head not just in France, but all across Europe. Mostly, those glimmerings have taken the form of a hushed but steady opposition to immigration. Such opposition has become more and more open over the last several years, and myriad political hopefuls have jumped on the anti-immigration bandwagon, eager to ride the wave of unrest to a place at the democratic political feeding trough.

Many of these political hopefuls might, in fact, be sincere men, in the sense that they REALLY DO believe in whatever platform they have adopted. Unfortunately, the platform of the typical anti-immigration political hopeful stops at halting the immigration flood into Europe; it says nothing about what to do with the immigrants who are already comfortably settled in the traditional hotbed of Western civilization and culture.

And, of course, it’s no surprise WHY the White anti-immigration politicians have deliberately avoided the subject of what to do with naturalized non-White immigrants. The mere concept of repatriating immigrants back to their nations of origin – many of which are economic wastelands or little more than the scene of turf wars by gangs of rival thugs and criminals – is completely, totally, and utterly... Politically Incorrect.

One really can’t think of a MORE Politically Incorrect statement than: “Not only should all non-White immigrant-hopefuls be turned away at our borders (forcibly, if necessary), but also all of the non-Whites who are already here – legal or not – should be sent packing so that we Whites can have a homeland to ourselves.” Such a statement conjures up visions of jack-booted NKVD brutes kicking in the moonlit doors of bleary-eyed victims during one of the paranoid Stalin’s many purges of innocent Russians.

Nowhere in the White world today are there any serious political candidates who would dare to advocate repatriation on the basis of race. The ordinary, mainstream White European, who detests the immigrant presence in his country as much as anyone, draws the line at halting the flood. He can accept that. But the driving-back of the flood is not an idea he’s willing to consider.

The same is true in the United States. As a part of this audience, no doubt you are aware that the immigration situation on America’s southwestern borders is beyond ludicrous, and has been so for decades now. The hypocrisy, corruption, and hateful irresponsibility on the part of our government and our law enforcement agencies – that has resulted in the total chaos in the Southwest – are perhaps unparalleled in our nation’s history.

And because of the refusal of the entrenched authorities to deal with the problem, it’s no wonder that the uproar against immigration has been popular; that is, it has come from the American PEOPLE – the outsiders, rather than government insiders.

Actually, I misspoke just now. I mentioned the “uproar against immigration,” and I should have been more specific and said “the uproar against ILLEGAL immigration.” And this fine distinction is, in fact, the crux of the problem.

Opponents of immigration make it very clear that they are only opponents of ILLEGAL immigration. Immigrants who are already in the United States legally, or who immigrate here according to the existing immigration laws... the opponents of immigration have no quarrel with them. The largely Jewish-controlled media, of course, never let pass an opportunity to accuse the opponents of illegal immigration of wanting to stop ALL immigration which, like illegal immigration, is heavily non-White. When such accusations DO arise, the fervent cries of, “But we’re only against ILLEGAL immigration!” fill the air... and the airwaves, and the TV screens, and printed media of all kinds.

In America, as in Europe (France, for example), it has become possible – although still highly politically incorrect – for White citizens to advocate for new laws against illegal immigrants... or, what’s even more pathetic, to advocate for the EXISTING laws to be ENFORCED by the governments that are supposed to be enforcing them, but aren’t. No White mainstreamer has yet loudly advocated for not only the illegal immigrant flood to be halted, but the ENTIRE non-White flood to be halted. And for the thought of REPATRIATING all non-Whites in Europe or America, legal or not, to even silently cross the mind – much less audibly pass through the lips – well, that’s a fate at least as bad as death for most ordinary Whites.

But we in the National Alliance are not ordinary Whites. The hundreds of thousands of White racial-nationalists in Europe (yes, even in France) are not ordinary Whites. We’ll go along with the demands of the opponents of illegal immigration: enforce the existing laws, take illegals into custody and then send them home. So far, so good.

But we want to go further. We want ALL non-Whites – legal or not, foreign-born or not, gainfully employed or not...out. Out of our living space, out of our culture, out of our sight. Out, out, out.

Now, I’ve always been more of a tactician than a theoretician. This was true during my boxing career; I wasn’t one of those guys who developed his own fighting persona and stuck to it at all costs. I was more the type of fighter who studied his opponent and used whatever tools and tactics were necessary to beat that particular opponent. Sure, I had some basic rules of thumb that I pretty much stuck to, but those went out the window if the situation in the ring called for it. I was just interested in winning the bout, so I did whatever I had to do. For instance, if I thought I detected a flaw in my opponent, I would attack immediately and go for the quick knockout. And, if I thought my opponent was quite durable, I’d pick my shots and wear him down with body punches before going for the knockout victory.

So in achieving the White racial homeland that we are aiming for, I am again going to take the tactician’s mindset. From a practical standpoint, it just might not be feasible for the land area we call “America” today to become an all-White racial state. Some of that land area might have to be ceded to other racial groups in order to secure what we want. Certainly, I’m not going to settle for too small a living space, but I would be willing to cut a deal for land, as long as we get a White racial state.

In the creation of that state, some toes are going to get stepped on. Most non-Whites will move out of the White region on their own, but some will have to be removed. On the other hand, some Whites will find themselves in non-White territory and they’d better get out or risk paying a high and bloody price for sticking around too long.

So, yes, I imagine that there will be some repatriation occurring on both sides. I imagine that the economic situation will deteriorate during the transition time while the new racial states are being settled. And I imagine that some heads are going to get bashed in and some blood is going to be spilled in the shuffle. It can’t be otherwise.

But working NOW to achieve homogeneous racial states – both in the Western Hemisphere and in Europe – is VASTLY preferable to the bloodbath that awaits us if we continue down the road we’re presently on. Aside from racial idealism, even for the most self-centered egotist, it only makes sense to separate mutually-hostile groups into their own geographic regions. To NOT WANT to do so is the height of shortsightednes. To deliberately work AGAINST racial boundaries is criminal irresponsibility...plain and simple.

So for us White racialists, the battle against illegal immigration is just the tip of the iceberg, but the underlying cause of the problem remains in place, to grow stronger with time and to present more and bigger problems in the future.

Here in the National Alliance, we’re thinking the unthinkable: not only stop non-White immigration, but REVERSE it. Trust me: the world will be much better off in the long run if we start thinking the unthinkable... and start DOING what our lying opponents say is NOT DO-ABLE.

But of course it IS possible, and we mean to prove it to the world. I’d be pleased for you to join us in our noble Cause.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

When America Goes Down

When the quick and grinning fire burns our epitaph on ice,
When the mad seas breach the ramparts,
And demand we pay the price;
Will our 'twained lives split asunder?
Will our love submerge and drown?
Will we cling tight through the thunder as america goes down?
When the fungal growth that's fastened on our cities lifts and flies,
When the pioneering spirit of our forebears falls and dies;
Will we still lie curled together in our broken marriage bed?
Will our love still be forever when america is dead?

While the parasite is eating through our sweet and happy dream,
While the nightmare is descending,
And the sleeper cannot scream;
While the night is washed with creeping
In all shades of black and brown,
Will you wash my wounds by weeping
While this land of ours goes down?

When the rising god of history starts to beat the drums of doom,
When this rich and diverse culture seals its democratic tomb;
Will we march along in sorrow with a dumb, funeral tread?
Will we make love tomorrow when america is dead?

As the blood climbs through the rainbow
May i hold your heart once more?
As the color of our skin becomes our uniform of war;
Will your warmth still slide into my grip
When chaos marries dread?
Will your womb receive my worship
When our sacred land is dead?
When america goes down, my love, when the time arrives to pay,
For the malice of the piper and producer of the play
And our image on the screen is of a sad and tragic clown,
What will there be between us when america goes down?
When america goes down . . .
When america goes down . . .
When america goes down . . .
When america goes down . . .

Congressman Weiner Finally Resigns; “Buh-bye, pervert!”

Extremely arrogant and obnoxious liberal Congressman sunk by sex scandal.


Congressman Weiner Finally Resigns; “Buh-bye, pervert!”

by James Buchanan

Three weeks ago the Weinergate scandal began when Anthony Weiner sent a picture of his crotch to everyone on his twitter list, instead of just a 21 year old college student in Washington state. Congressman Anthony Weiner started off angrily denying all the charges, claiming he was the victim of a hacker. Most people (with any brains) were highly skeptical. Weiner would not deny that the picture of the shorts with a bulge was him. Shouldn’t most people have a clue if pictures of themselves in their underwear are floating around? (And if they don’t know; they’re drinking way too much.)

The scandal grew and grew. Suddenly six floozies were involved. Hundreds of lurid text messages had been sent out, and a porn star, named Ginger Lee was among the floozies. More pictures of Weiner half-dressed were revealed.

Then the bombshell dropped! Andrew Breitbart, who had earlier been (falsely) accused of hacking Weiner’s twitter account, announced that he had a naked picture of Weiner’s genitalia. A single mom in Texas, Meagan Broussard had contacted Breitbart about Anthony Weiner and had supplied him with the picture. This pretty much crossed the line for most Americans.

Breitbart said he didn’t want to release the picture, but a security camera captured the image when Breitbart showed it to Opie and Anthony while being interviewed on their radio show. Opie and Anthony then posted the slightly blurry picture of the picture on the Internet.

It was bad enough Weiner was -at the least- cheating on his wife on the Internet. This made him out to be a disgusting slimeball. The nude pictures clearly crossed a line from creepy to crazy. The vast majority of teenagers have enough sense not to send out nude pictures of themselves –not even to people they think they can trust.

Additional details came out that one of Weiner’s floosies, Lisa Weiss was a card dealer in Las Vegas. Weiner sent some explicit tweets to her indicating that he wanted to meet up with her to have sex. Weiner’s defenders had claimed that this was nothing but “cyber-sex” and flirtation, but Weiner made it more than obvious that he wanted to meet Miss Weiss for a very real encounter (and most Americans are no doubt wondering if Weiner had actually met up with other women for sexual encounters in previous months).

To cap all this off, two underage girls, one sixteen and one seventeen had been texting Weiner. Weiner added the sixteen year old as a friend. Then he unfriended her when someone pointed out she was only sixteen. Later Wiener added her back as a friend. Weiner used the expression “tights and a cape” with the seventeen year old. He had used the same expression with another woman in a conversation that was sexually charged, suggesting he was just a couple text messages away from trying to seduce a minor. Police were sufficiently alarmed that they talked with the 17 year old and her mother.

House minority leader Nancy Pelosi, Senator Harry Reid and even President Obama urged Anthony Weiner to resign. The growing embarrassment to the Democrat Party caused by Anthony Weiner was threatening to make the 2012 election even more disastrous for the Democrats, than the train wreck it is likely to be.

To make matters worse, photos of Anthony Weiner in college wearing a bra and panty hose turned up within the last couple days, further disgusting the American public and opening up a whole new range of perversity that Weiner had likely engaged in.

The straw that broke the camel’s back appears to have been the return of Anthony Weiner’s pregnant wife, Huma after an extended trip to Africa with Hillary Clinton. Just hours after her return, Weiner went from stubborn defiance to complete capitulation. It’s clear who wears the pants in that family (and who doesn’t wear pants).

Weiner’s resignation speech was not without incident. One news article reports “(It) Turns out Anthony Weiner’s worst nightmare wasn’t having to face the cameras and resign from public office today. It’s that Howard Stern show writer (turned professional heckler) Benjy Bronk was in the audience. Let’s just say the press conference quickly went from PG to R, and forced many a network censor to have a hand on the bleep button…. today, just as Weiner faced his most humiliating moment yet, Bronk took it even further… Weiner was just a few minutes into his speech when the microphones began picking up the shouts from Bronk, who was standing in the center of the throng of reporters covering the event. (Congressman Weiner announced his resignation, saying) ‘I’d hoped to be able to continue the work that the citizens of my district elected me to do, to fight for the middle class and those struggling to make it… Unfortunately the distraction I have created has made that impossible so today I am announcing my resignation from congress.’ (Weiner’s statement was immediately followed with:) ‘Yaaaaaaay! Buh-bye, pervert!’ Bronk screamed to gasps in the room from reporters.”

I’m glad that Mr. Bronk was in that room. His response to Anthony Weiner’s resignation was a lot closer to what most Americans were thinking in contrast to the gutless liberal reporters, who wouldn’t dare roast a Weiner, who so richly deserved it.

Thursday, June 16, 2011

DUI and the 4th Amendment

Information About Georgia DUI Checkpoints
Atlanta DUI Checkpoint

Typical DUI Checkpoint in Atlanta

As a well respected Atlanta DUI lawyer, I get a lot of calls about Georgia DUI Checkpoints. It seems that more and more counties around Georgia are setting up these checkpoints more frequently than ever. This creates a lot of problems for people and in the end many innocent people are arrested for a GeorgiaDUI. One of the main causes of this is over zealous police officers who have their minds made up to arrest people for DUI, misinterpreting the symptoms of a driver. For example, I recently defended a case where my client was arrested for DUI at a checkpoint outside of Atlanta because he had bloodshot eyes and looked drowsy, not from drinking but from some flu medication he was taking.
Why does Georgia Set Up DUI Checkpoints?

Supposedly, the justification of DUI checkpoints is to reduce the incidents of drunk driving in Georgia. However, it is very common for police to use DUI checkpoints to fight crime in general. In fact, Atlanta Police Commissioner George Turner recently admitted that DUI checkpoints were being used in and around Atlanta as a general crime prevention measure. This is highly unconstitutional. Under the Fourth Amendment, we are to be protected from search and seizure without probable cause. This means that if a police officer sees a group of teenagers in a car, for example, the officer cannot stop them and search for marijuana. Because having probable cause and proper warrants is cumbersome for police officers, they now use DUI checkpoints to work around the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled on this issue in The City of Indianapolis v. Edmond:

Petitioner city operates vehicle checkpoints on its roads in an effort to interdict unlawful drugs. Respondents, who were each stopped at such a checkpoint, filed suit, claiming that the roadblocks violated the Fourth Amendment. The District Court denied respondents a preliminary injunction, but the Seventh Circuit reversed, holding that the checkpoints contravened the Fourth Amendment.

Held: Because the checkpoint program’s primary purpose is indistinguishable from the general interest in crime control, the checkpoints violate the Fourth Amendment. Pp. 3-15.

(a) The rule that a search or seizure is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment absent individualized suspicion of wrongdoing has limited exceptions. For example, this Court has upheld brief, suspicionless seizures at a fixed checkpoint designed to intercept illegal aliens, United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U. S. 543, and at a sobriety checkpoint aimed at removing drunk drivers from the road, Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U. S. 444. The Court has also suggested that a similar roadblock to verify drivers’ licenses and registrations would be permissible to serve a highway safety interest. Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U. S. 648, 663. However, the Court has never approved a checkpoint program whose primary purpose was to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing. Pp. 3-7.

Another reason why Georgia police departments set up DUI checkpoints is money. There is a great deal of federal money that is awarded to police departments to subsidized the costs of these checkpoints. Police officers are often paid overtime to work DUI checkpoints and this is good news for them. The additional arrests and citations creates more revenue for the counties as well. However, money corrupts and there have been many cases of officers, motivated by greed, arresting people on false charges. A recent example happened in New York City where police officers motivated by arrest numbers and financial benefits framed two shopkeepers on drug charges.

Furthermore, there is a great deal of politics behind DUI enforcement, especially in big cities like Atlanta. There are a number of very powerful lobbies which are pushing for harsher DUI penalties and more arrests without ensuring that the police officers are properly trained to recognize DUI. This push for more arrests may sound like great law enforcement but when you look closely at the growing number of innocent people being falsely arrested you can quickly realize the downside. Innocent people are being arrested all over Atlanta and being put through the stress, expense and humiliation of having to clear their name in court.

If you or a loved one is arrested at an Georgia DUI checkpoint, please call The Law Offices of Douglas B. Chanco, for a free consultation at 404-250-3206 with an experienced Atlanta DUI Attorney.

RAPING RABBI USED RELIGION AS LURE

National Prayer Network

RAPING RABBI USED RELIGION AS LURE
By Rev. Ted Pike
16 Jun 11

Continuing a wave of child abuse indictments, another Orthodox rabbi has been arrested in Israel this week. Rabbi David Hafuta, age 64, is charged with forcing intercourse on a 12-year-old girl multiple times over a 10-month period. Hafuta is known as a “neighborhood rabbi and a familiar figure with a reputation in the field,” who abused the girl’s trust.

In an Orthodox culture in which rabbis are held in superstitious awe, the girl approached Hafuta with sincere religious questions. The rabbi then used religious pressures suffused with Kabbalistic/Messianic superstition and pedophile grooming techniques to molest his victim. Hafuta drove the girl to the beach and told her she must "atone for all the bad deeds that she has done so far" by allowing him to rape her. Using manipulation techniques shared by other pedophiles, the rabbi conducted a pretend marriage ceremony and described intercourse as possessing magical power to control destructive forces in the girl and even save her mother. The rabbi also sought access to other girls by asking his victim to bring her friends to his office, where some of his assaults had taken place.

As I have documented in previous articles (See, Child Sex Indictments Plague Orthodox Judaism and Pedophilia: The Talmud's Dirty Secret) the Talmud could not be more explicit that Jewish men have the right to “marry” three-year-old girls via sexual penetration and Jewish women have the right to sexually assault nine-year-old boys. In the dozens of child abuse cases emerging against Orthodox rabbis, we find them evidently feeling justified by the Talmud to abuse minors, both male and female. The Talmud says sexual assault by an adult Jew upon a minor is not like sexual contact with an adult. Under certain circumstances it may be indulged in with no moral consequences. The child is not a “man” and is thus outside the Mosaic command against illicit sexual intercourse.

The sexual neutrality of minors is laid down in Sanhedrin 52b. This tractate, of all in the vast Babylonian Talmud, is considered by Orthodox authorities to be most definitive concerning legal matters.

GEMARA. Our Rabbis taught [and the man that committeth adultery with another man’s wife, even he that committed adultery…shall surely be put to death.] ‘The Man’ excludes a minor; that committeth adultery with another man’s wife ‘excludes the wife of a minor;’ even he that committeth adultery with his neighbor’s wife ‘excludes the wife of a heathen.’ (1)

Because the Pharisees gave two meanings to the word “man,” pedophile rabbis today may be rationalizing that sex is permitted, not just between a minor and a minor but, by inference, between a rabbi and a minor, with the wife of a minor and the wife of a heathen (gentile), who is not a “man” according to Kerithoth 6b.

In my article “Judaism and Homosexuality: a Marriage Made in Hell,” I present a number of further examples of the dictum that minors can’t throw guilt on the adult who rapes them. Suffice to say, this latest case of child rape by an Orthodox rabbi in Israel combines the worst theological and moral perversions of the Talmud. This evil “sacred” literature undoubtedly helped another perverse rabbi justify his despicable choice to do what Christ said we must never, never do: betray the trust of a child wanting to learn about God (Luke 17:2).



Footnote:
(1) Sanhedrin 52b asserts that sex with a minor is exempt from punishment.



Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.

TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.

National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Alabama Gets Serious About Immigration Enforcement

Alabama Gets Serious About Immigration Enforcement


MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) - Alabama vaulted past Arizona on Thursday with what is being called the most restrictive law in the nation against illegal immigration, requiring schools to find out if students are in the country lawfully and making it a crime to knowingly give an illegal immigrant a ride.

Advocacy groups promised to challenge the sweeping measure, which like Arizona's law also allows police to arrest anyone suspected of being an illegal immigrant if the person is stopped for some other reason. In addition, it requires all businesses to check the legal status of workers using a federal system called E-Verify.

"It is clearly unconstitutional. It's mean-spirited, racist, and we think a court will enjoin it," said Mary Bauer, legal director for the Southern Poverty Law Center.

It takes effect Sept. 1.

Republican Gov. Robert Bentley, who signed it into law Thursday, expressed confidence it would withstand any legal challenges.

"We have a real problem with illegal immigration in this country," he said. "I campaigned for the toughest immigration laws, and I'm proud of the Legislature for working tirelessly to create the strongest immigration bill in the country."

http://www.nbc-2.com/story/14874706/ala-governor-signs-tough-illegal-immigration-law?redirected=true

Monday, June 13, 2011

Another milestone in our path toward destruction.

Another milestone in our path toward destruction.


The Lights Are Going out in the Nation’s Capital

by Ian Mosley

In August 1914, at the beginning of World War One, Sir Edward Grey said, “The lamps are going out all across Europe; we shall not see them lit again in our lifetime…” In our nation’s capital, the lights are going out as well, but it isn’t due to war; it’s copper wire thieves.

WTOP.com reports: “Copper thieves possibly posing as road crews are causing parts of the District to go dark. The D.C. Department of Transportation says thieves have stolen copper wire installed in underground conduits at least four times in recent weeks. Officials say in some cases the thieves may be posing as road contractors at staged work zones in order to commit the crime. They may even be detouring traffic. One wire theft caused an illuminated Interstate 295 sign to go dark on northbound Kenilworth Avenue between Polk Street and Eastern Avenue. Thieves also have taken wire that powers sidewalk lights along Kenilworth Avenue in Northeast between Foote and Hayes streets, and copper additionally has been stolen at North Capitol and Irving streets and at South Capitol and Potomac streets. In the 295 and Kenilworth Avenue incidents, officials say the wire was located between manholes in a grass median. The thefts come as scrap metal dealers are paying nearly $3 per pound for copper wire.”

It’s not just the cost of replacing the repeatedly stolen copper wires; crime will soar whenever the street lights go out in the bad neighborhoods of DC. When the power is cut to alarm systems, massive looting could take place.

America is beginning to cannibalize itself now. There is barely any maintenance of infrastructure. A major bridge collapsed in Minneapolis in 2007 killing 13 people and injuring 145. That bridge was ranked better than 10 percent of the bridges in the US by the way. It should be remembered that prior to fall 2007, the US economy was in fairly good shape. If politicians were neglecting infrastructure prior to 2007, imagine how much infrastructure is being neglected now that tax revenue has taken an enormous hit.

The rot is appearing first in the large stretches of urban areas which are controlled by blacks and Hispanics, such as Detroit, Los Angeles, Atlanta, New Jersey, Philadelphia and other big cities. New Orleans still has not been able to rebuild completely after Hurricane Katrina because the black city establishment lacks the competency to do so and seems to have stolen or wasted most of the tax money allocated for that purpose.

This story about copper thieves may sound like something that happens in the Third World, but America has 100 million Third World people within its borders. One day you’ll be driving through a big city as the street lamps and traffic lights suddenly lose power –hopefully you’ll be able to get back to the good part of town before any rioting or before someone tries to carjack you. This is what comes from a multi-racial society and we can expect things to get a lot worse as the number of minorities continues to increase.

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Cohesion For The Common Cause

Cohesion For The Common Cause


ADV Broadcast Of June 11, 2011

Hello, and welcome to another broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of the National Alliance. I’m your host and Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

With all the hoopla over the last month surrounding the so-called “killing” of Osama bin Laden, one important statistic of note has come out, although the mainstream media has made nothing of it. And that noteworthy news item is that Osama bin Laden left behind 23 children. TWENTY-THREE! Do you know how many White couples today, averaged out, it would take to bring into this world 23 children? More than a dozen White couples. To the White race, the disproportionately large number of these non-White Muslims having children compared to Whites is the number one greatest threat Islam represents, because they are flooding into our traditional White homelands of Europe, North America, and Australia.

Here are some alarming stats to keep in mind: The figure 2.1 to woman is considered to be a population replacement level. Well here are the numbers of children that women in the following European nations are having:

Norway – 1.81
Sweden – 1.75
Germany – 1.37
Italy – 1.33

As you can see, the populations in our ancestral lands are not sufficiently being replaced.

Now, let’s look at some Muslim population figures. In Germany there are currently over 4.1 million Muslims, or 5% of the population. And sometime in the next decade there will be over 5 million Muslims in Germany, representing 7% of the population. These figures show that the good German racial stock is being replaced by an alien population that is imploding.

The Muslim population in the United Kingdom currently stands at 2.9 million, roughly 4.6% of the population. In a decade, the U.K. Muslim population will reach over 5.5 million, around 8% of the population.



We are currently facing a serious, deadly threat to our survival, however, our history is indeed full of examples where Whites have stood together to confront a dangerous enemy. I think it is time we recall one of the most notable of such times, not only because of the great lesson we can learn from it in terms of White unity, but also because it shows that the single greatest threat which faces Europe today, has in fact been hammering at that continent’s door for centuries.

For more than two hundred years, ever since the fall of Constantinople in 1452, the Muslim invasion of Southeastern Europe had proceeded apace. First crossing from what is today Turkey, the Ottoman Turks had subjected one Eastern European people after another, reaching high up even into Ukraine. By the year 682, clashes between the Muslim invaders and the Austrians had intensified. The White Austrian army launched a pre-emptive strike into the then Muslim occupied part of central Hungary, providing the Ottoman Grand Vizier, Kara Mustafa Pasha, with a good reason to persuade the Sultan, Mehmet IV, to launch a full-scale invasion of Austria. The Ottoman Army was mobilized on January 21, 1682, and war was declared on August 6, 1682.

The Austrians knew what was at stake: if they lost this great battle, the last bulwark against the Islamification of all of central Europe would be gone. Western Europe had only narrowly escaped a similar fate from the defeated Moorish invasion, which had started over 900 years earlier.

The Ottoman Army set off on April 1, 1683 from Thracia in what is today Greece. The long period of mobilization and preparation, plus the time it took for the Muslim invaders to reach the borders of Austria, provided a much needed window of opportunity to the rulers of Austria, the Habsburg, to prepare their defenses.

Now, anyone who has studied European history knows that if there was one thing Europeans were good at in those times, it was fighting each other. The English fought the French, the Spanish fought the English, the Scots fought the English, the Germans fought each other, and everyone seemed to fight with the Poles. It was a never-ending merry-go-round of internecine wars, mostly fought over land or petty personal squabbles between the various kings or leaders. Unity amongst this lot seemed impossible.

Yet, the gravity of the situation was apparent to all. If the Muslim Ottoman invaders broke the Austrians, then the path to central Europe – and ultimately all of continental Europe – would be open to the non-White invaders. It was a prospect that shook even the formerly squabbling White leaders out of their mutual antipathy.

So it was that during the winter of 1682, the Habsburgs and Poland concluded a treaty in which the Austrian King Leopold I, would support the Polish King Jan Sobieski III if the Turks attacked Kraków; in return, the Polish Army would come to the relief of Vienna, if that city was attacked. Listeners who know the troubled history of relations between Germans and Poles will immediately appreciate the implications of such a pact.

By April 1683, the Muslim army had reached Belgrade, and by early May, was approaching the city of Vienna itself. About 40,000 Tartar Forces arrived about 28 miles east of Vienna on July 7th, twice as many as the Austrian forces in that area. After some initial skirmishes, the Austrians under Leopold I retreated to Linz with 80,000 inhabitants of Vienna. It seemed as if the city – and possibly Austria itself – would fall easily to the Islamic invasion force.

Jan Sobieski was, however, a man of his word. He prepared an army of some 30,000 Poles and marched south. This was an incredible act of bravery, for it meant leaving his own nation virtually undefended, at a time when he still had serious enemies with which to contend.

In the meanwhile, the main Turkish Army, about 138,000 men strong, had arrived and surrounded Vienna on July 14th. The city’s defender, Graf Ernst Rüdiger von Starhemberg, leading a pitifully small force of 11,000 men and only some 5,000 Viennese citizens, retreated behind the city walls and refused to surrender. They would fight to the death against the Muslim menace.

The Viennese had demolished many of the houses around the city walls and cleared the debris, leaving an empty plain that would expose the Turks to defensive fire if they tried to rush the city. The Turkish commander, Kara Mustafa Pasha, solved that problem by ordering his forces to dig long lines of trenches directly toward the city, to help protect them from the defenders as they advanced steadily toward the city.

As their 300 cannons were outdated and the fortifications of Vienna were up-to-date, the Turks had a more effective use for their gunpowder: undermining. Tunnels were dug under the massive city walls to blow them up with explosives, using sapping mines.

The Ottomans had essentially two options to take the city: both seemed to be guaranteed to succeed. The first would be an all-out assault on Vienna and, as they outnumbered the defenders by at least 20 to 1, they could take heavy losses but would still most likely win. The second option was to lay siege to the city, and suffer minimal losses while starving the defenders into surrendering. They chose the siege option, and settled down to what they thought was going to be an easy, if time consuming, victory.

The siege cut virtually every means of food supply into Vienna, and the garrison and civilian volunteers suffered extreme casualties. However, the Turks had not counted on the thing they expected the least: White unity. In August, the first hint of relief came when Austrian forces under Charles V, Duke of Lorraine, beat off Hungarian allies of the Turks at Bisamberg, three miles northeast of Vienna.

Then, on September 6th, the Poles crossed the Danube 20 miles north west of Vienna at Tulln, to unite with the Austrian forces. Additional men and supplies poured in from Saxony, Bavaria, Baden, Franconia, and Swabia – all previously squabbling German principalities who only a few years prior, had been at each others throats. A might army of Germans, Austrians, and Poles had now been drawn up.

At the same time, in early September, 5,000 Turkish sappers had blown up large portions of the city walls, the Burg bastion, the Löbel bastion, and the Burg ravelin in between, creating gaps of about 30 feet in width. The Austrians tried to counter by digging their own tunnels, to intercept the depositing of large amounts of gunpowder in subterranean caverns. The Turks finally managed to occupy the Burg ravelin and the Nieder wall in that area on September 8th. Anticipating a breach in the city walls, the remaining Austrians prepared to fight in Vienna itself.

The relief army had to act quickly to save the city from the Turks. Despite the international composition and the short time of only six days, an effective leadership structure was established, centered on the King of Poland and his heavy cavalry. The army’s motivation was high, as this war was not as usual for the interests of kings, but for the very survival of Europe itself.

The White army, now some 81,000-strong, arrived on the "Kahlen Berg" – the “bare hill” above Vienna, signaling their arrival with bonfires. In the early morning hours of September 12th, the battle for the soul of Europe was joined. Early in the morning at 4:00 am, the Muslim forces opened hostilities with an attack on the White army. This led to an unplanned for counterattack by the Austrian army on the left, and the German forces in the center.

Suddenly, Mustafa Pasha realized his error. He had needed to take Vienna before the new united White army arrived, but had not. Now he would have to do battle on two fronts, and divide his forces. Quickly he ordered another large and final detonation under the Löbelbastei walls of the city, to try and close the one front. While the Turks hastily finished their work and sealed the tunnel to make the explosion more effective, and an Austrian detachment, specializing in detecting Turkish tunnels, detected the cavern. One of them entered and defused the explosives just in time.

Simultaneously, the Polish infantry launched a massive assault upon the Turkish right flank. Instead of focusing on the battle with the relief army, the Turks tried to force their way into the city. After 12 hours of fighting, Sobieski's Polish force held the high ground on the right. At about five o'clock in the afternoon, after watching the ongoing infantry battle from the hills for the whole day, four cavalry groups, one of them Austrian-German, and the other three Polish, totaling 20,000 men, charged down the hills.

The attack was led by the Polish king in front of a spearhead of 3,000 heavily armed winged Polish lancer hussars. This charge broke the lines of the Ottomans, who were tired from the long fight on two fronts. In the confusion, the cavalry headed straight for the Ottoman camps, while the remaining Vienna garrison sallied out of its defenses and joined in the assault.

The Ottoman army was defeated and started breaking up. Units fled south and east. In less than three hours after the cavalry attack, the united White army had won the battle and had saved Vienna. The Turks lost about 15,000 men in the fighting, compared to approximately 4,000 for the Habsburg-Polish forces. Little wonder then, that after the battle, Sobieski paraphrased Julius Caesar's famous quote by saying, "Veni, vidi, Deus vicit" - "I came, I saw, God conquered."

Although no one realized it at the time, the battle shaped the outcome of the entire war as well. The Ottomans fought on for another 16 years, losing control of Hungary and Transylvania in the process, before finally giving up. The end of the conflict was finalized by the Treaty of Karlowitz. The Battle of Vienna was without question the beginning of the end of the Ottoman Empire’s attempts to seize more territory in Europe. From that time on, they were slowly driven south, until the end of the First World War, when they were finally driven off most of mainland Europe.

In honor of Sobieski, the Austrians erected a church atop a hill of Kahlenberg, north of Vienna. The train route from Vienna to Warsaw is also named in Sobieski's honor. The constellation Scutum Sobieskii (Sobieski’s Shield) was named to memorialize the battle.

Although the unity forged that day against a common enemy did not last (as the Poles and Germans soon set to fighting with one another again), the lesson which the siege of Vienne showed that in times of real crisis, it is possible for Whites of many different persuasions to stand together. This is lesson number one from that time: never mind what has happened in the past, European unity still remains a primary goal and objective. This is something all people involved in the pro-White Cause should carefully consider before attacking anyone else.

The second great lesson from this time is that the Muslim menace to Europe is centuries old. From the time of the first Moorish invasion of Iberia around the mid 700s right up to today, Europe has continually been the subject of attack by the Muslims in one form or another.

Previously, the Muslims used the sword and cannon to invade Europe. Today they use the passport, the immigration visa, illegal immigration, and the crib to achieve their goal. The tactics differ, but the goal remains the same: the Islamification of Europe. Europe is already home to some 12.5 million Muslims. Islam is Europe's fastest growing religion, with immigration and above average birth rates leading to a rapid increase in the Muslim population. There can be little doubt that the Muslim invasion today represents the single greatest threat to the immediate biological survival of Europe, in the same way that the Latino invasion of America has eclipsed the Negro population as the single largest threat.

All over Europe, Islamic militancy has reared its head. In Britain, that country’s worst ever peacetime terrorist attacks have been carried out by home grown Muslim extremists who have bombed trains and buses. In France, large Muslim riots have seen whole areas of Parisian suburbs burned to the ground. Germany was only spared a murderous train bombing by the failure of some detonators to ignite Muslim-placed explosive devices on some high speed trains. Spain has suffered dramatically from Muslim train bombings, and it is of interest to note that when the Spanish Muslim train bombers were surrounded by police in their Madrid apartment, they placed a telephone call to a Muslim Imam in London before blowing themselves up.

In Russia, militant Islamic terrorists from Chechnya have been responsible for an astonishing series of violent and murderous attacks upon White Russians, including the bombing of trains, the mass murder of patrons in a Moscow theater and, of course, the famous Beslan School siege, where dozens of innocent children were slaughtered.

How much longer can the Muslim threat to Europe be ignored? The answer is, not that much more. Already, there are populist anti-Muslim parties springing up in almost every single European country. While many of these parties are not White separatists by National Alliance standards, they are at least giving voice to a broadly pro-White sentiment, and are thus worthy of limited support.

It is, of course, interesting to see how the Jews in Europe are reacting to the Muslim threat. As many listeners will know, Jews in many European countries were behind the open borders immigration policies which have created these huge Muslim populations which now threaten both Jews and Europeans alike. As a result, some Jews are fleeing – mostly to America – but some are also going to Israel, although that number is fast declining. What makes the Muslim issue even more interesting is the fact that prior to the creation of Zionism, the Muslims and Jews were actually in alliance against the Europeans. When the Moors occupied Spain, for example, Jews were granted honored status in the Moorish Empire, and that time is even known in Jewish history as the Golden Age of Jewry in Spain. Jews held important political offices under the Moors, and when the last Moorish citadel, Grenada, fell to the avenging Spanish in 1452, no-one was surprised to find the Grand Vizier of Grenada to be a Jew, and not a Muslim at all. It also comes as no surprise, therefore, to find out that 1452 also marked the year that the Jews were expelled from Spain under pain of death.

Most of the Jews who fled Spain went to – you guessed it, the Ottoman Empire’s territory, and, after the fall of Constantinople, settled in that city when it was renamed Istanbul. In fact, Istanbul became the single largest Jewish city in the world for a good many years, and to this day contains some of the largest synagogues you will find outside of Israel or parts of America.

It was only when Zionism arose that the Jews and Muslims fell out with one another. As the Muslims realized that certain Jews actually wanted to take parts of Arab Muslim land for themselves, instead of focusing on their traditional victims – Europeans – so did the great conflict which we today see as the Jewish-Arabic wars break out. It is, however, important to realize that this conflict of Jew versus Muslim only dates from the last 100 years or so, whereas prior to that, these two self-declared enemies of Europe worked together hand-in-hand.

Where does that leave us, the White separatists in Europe and elsewhere? Simple: it means that we should always be aware of who our enemies are, and, if nay strategic alliances have to be formed to rid Europe of one or the other threat, then such alliances must only be done with the sure knowledge that unless the root of the problem is addressed – namely a Whites only living space – then all will be in vain.

Like Jan Sobieski then, we need to be prepared to put personal differences aside, and stand shoulder to shoulder with our White brethren who previously we might have been in conflict with, and be prepared to risk all for the common good. We also need to be aware that in Europe, Islam is currently the single greatest threat and has, in alliance with Jews, been hammering at that continent’s door for well over 1.200 years.

These are sobering thoughts. Let us learn the lessons of history. The time has come for White solidarity in the face of our greatest hour of need. I invite all of those who are interested in our race’s survival, to stop talking about it, and do something about it.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.