Thursday, March 31, 2011

Georgia Black Caucus: Outlaw majority white cities.

Georgia Black Caucus: Outlaw majority white cities.

White people have fled Atlanta for obvious reasons. Parts of the majority black city now resemble the third world. Now a collection of “white flight” communities outside Atlanta want to secede from Fulton and Dekalb counties and form a new Milton County.

The black legislative caucus of Georgia filed a lawsuit demanding that the city charters of several “white flight” communities be dissolved. They claim that the majority white cities violate their “voting rights.”

Photo Right: Atlanta is a crime ridden cesspool. Instead of trying to improve the black community, race hustling black lawmakers want to outlaw white flight.

From Atlanta Journal Constitution…

The Georgia Legislative Black Caucus filed a lawsuit Monday against the state of Georgia seeking to dissolve the city charters of Dunwoody, Sandy Springs, Johns Creek, Milton and Chattahoochee Hills. Further, the lawmakers, joined by civil rights leader the Rev. Joseph Lowery, aim to dash any hopes of a Milton County.

The lawsuit, filed in a North Georgia U.S. District Court Monday, claims that the state circumvented the normal legislative process and set aside its own criteria when creating the “super-majority white ” cities within Fulton and DeKalb counties. The result, it argues, is to dilute minority votes in those areas, violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution.

“This suit is based on the idea that African Americans and other minorities can elect the people of their choice,” said Democratic State Sen. Vincent Fort.

The Office of the Governor and the Office of the Attorney General declined comment pending further review of the case.

Rep. Lynne Riley, R-Johns Creek, called the lawsuit “frivolous” and “disrespectful to the citizens of these cities who are most satisfied with their government.”



According to the 2010 census, Fulton County is 44.5 percent white and 44.1 percent black. About 54 percent of DeKalb County residents are black, and 33.3 percent are white.

Sandy Springs, created in 2005, is 65 percent white and 20 percent black. Milton, formed a year later, is 76.6 percent white and 9 percent black. Johns Creek, also formed that year, is 63.5 percent white and 9.2 percent black. Chattahoochee Hills, formed in 2007, is 68.6 percent white and 28 percent black, while Dunwoody, created in 2008, is 69.8 percent white and 12.6 percent black.

New York Times editor confesses to censoring information about black crime.

New York Times editor confesses to censoring information about black crime.

From the CofCC.org Staff.

Photo Right: Philip Corbett, associate managing editor of the New York Times.

A while back the Los Angeles Times publicly admitted to censoring the race of crime perpetrators when they are black or Latino “so as not to stigmatize any one group.”

Now Philip Corbett, associate managing editor of the New York Times, has publicly admitted to doing the same thing.

The New York Times ran a second article on the gang rape of a Mexican girl by 20+ black males in Cleveland, Texas. The first article clearly blamed the victim and caused such outrage that nearly 50,000 people signed an online petition denouncing the coverage. The Times issued a weak apology.

Now the Times has a second article. Once again focusing solely on portraying the victim and her family in a negative light, while censoring information about the perpetrators. The New York Times has yet to even mention that the perps were all black, and censored all the pictures of the suspect that other news outlets have shown.

When asked why there is no information about the perpetrators race in either article, Corbett answered with combination of truth and lies.

“We would mention race in a physical description only if it really is a detailed physical description that readers would learn something from … But if the description is a ‘white man in his 40s’ or ‘a black man in a hoodie,’ then you’re not really providing any useful information and it could be sort of boiler plate.”

What Corbett means by “boiler plate,” is that it would be “politically incorrect.” He would rather censor information about crime, putting the public at risk, than bring attention to the astronomical rates and horrific nature of black crime.

By the way. If a large group of white men did something this horrible to an eleven year old Mexican girl, it would have been the biggest story in the English speaking world. The New York Times would have been screaming “WHITE MEN do such and such…” and the top of the front page.

For a very detailed analysis of the New York Times’s miscoverage of the horrific Cleveland, Texas gang rape

Caesar Chavez nothing like left-wing portrayal.

Caesar Chavez nothing like left-wing portrayal.

The left-wing holds of fantastical versions of who Guevara and Chavez were. None of which have any resemblance of the truth.

Che Guevara was a spoiled brat rich white kid who traveled around Latin America on his rich parents dime and championed non-white Marxists, because he thought it was a cool thing to do. He then became an executioner for Fidel Castro and oversaw the murder of nearly one thousand “thought criminals.”

Castro then sent Guevara to the Congo to arm and train African Marxists. While in the Congo he had a change of heart. He wrote that the Negro race was untrainable, lazy, indolent, and unwashed. He wrote that Socialism would never work in Africa, because it’s people lacked the intelligence to have a complicated form of government.

Non of this stopped left-wingers from waving Che Guevara flags at Obama campaign rallies. Look at the picture of the moron to right with his Che Guevara portrait next to his Obama portrait. After returning from Africa, Guevara was opposed to putting members of the black race in positions of leadership.

Much like Guevara, the left-wing fantasy about Caesar Chavez has nothing to do with reality. The actual Caesar Chavez spent much of his political energy fighting illegal immigration from Mexico.

Cesar Chavez — The First Minuteman
by Steve Sailor

In California, only three birthdays are official state holidays: Jesus Christ’s, Martin Luther King’s, and Cesar Chavez’s. Beatification as a secular saint, though, isn’t always good for the soul. A recent four-part exposé by reporter Miriam Pawel in the Los Angeles Times revealed how the labor leader turned revered ethnic icon descended into paranoia, megalomania, and general crack-pottery in the 15 years before his death in 1993.

Today, his United Farm Workers functions less as a union—it represents only 2 percent of the California agricultural workforce—than as a lucrative Latino-pride fundraising machine providing sinecures for a dozen Chavez relatives. Pawel writes, “Chavez’s heirs run a web of tax-exempt organizations that exploit his legacy and invoke the harsh lives of farm workers to raise millions of dollars in public and private money. The money does little to improve the lives of California farm workers, who still struggle with the most basic health and housing needs and try to get by on seasonal, minimum-wage jobs.”

From 1965 to 1981, the UFW succeeded in raising wages significantly for stoop laborers in California. Since then, their pay has fallen, and they’ve lost most of the fringe benefits they had won. Today, most make less than $10,000 per year. Hundreds were discovered near Salinas living in caves, a mass indignity that even that town’s most famous son, John Steinbeck, barely anticipated in The Grapes of Wrath.

Unfortunately, in focusing on gossip about the personal foibles of Chavez and his successors, the LA Times series completely ignored the politically incorrect paradox of who was most responsible for wiping out the gains Mexican-American farm workers had achieved through strikes and consumer boycotts: illegal immigrants from Mexico.

Why does the left believe such fantasies? Some of their leaders actually know they are lying, but have no problem with lying as a political tactic. The rank and file leftists will simply believe anything.

Monday, March 28, 2011

The media war against white people.

New York Times demonizes all white town in Brazil.

The media war against white people.
by Kyle Rogers

Cândido Godói, Brazil has fewer than 7,000 residents, yet it is a paradise on earth. The sprawling rural population is 100% of German and Polish decent. The village is known for having a high level of a gene that increases a woman’s chance of having twins.

It stands in extreme contrast to the rest of Brazil.

If diversity was a “strength,” Cândido Godóis should be far worse off than the rest of Brazil. Brazil is possibly the most racially diverse nation in the world. Yet, much of it is covered in hellish 3rd world slums populated by drug addicts and underage prostitutes.

The media has such hatred and contempt for white communities that last Friday, the New York Times ran an article vilifying this tiny community as having a “high level of inbreeding.” No actual evidence of inbreeding is cited.

The residents of Cândido Godói are not wealthy. They live in small simple houses and and lead a simple, agrarian lifestyle. By American standards they certainly would not be considered wealthy. Many would even be considered poor. Wealth can not account for the differences between the town and the rest of Brazil.

Look at the picture to the right. This is how a large percentage of the population of Brazil lives. Brazil classifies almost half of its population as a tri-racial hodgepodge, and this is how they live. Despite boundless racial diversity, they live in squalid slums. The New York Times would never accuse these Brazilians of being highly inbred. However, many multiracial Brazilians don’t even know who their fathers is. This, combined with the alpha male breeding culture of Negro communities, means that the chance for accidental inbreeding alone is very high. In other words, you have individual males fathering large numbers of children in a small area. Those children grow up and select breeding partners without any way of knowing if they are actually half-siblings. The same phenomenon is undoubtedly occurring in America’s public housing projects as well.

Instead the New York Times accuses white people, who have close-knit two parent homes and detailed family records, of being highly inbred. The New York Times lists two women with Latino sounding names as the article’s authors.

Elderly Walmart greeter choked in brutal mother/daughter racially motived attack.

Elderly Walmart greeter choked in brutal mother/daughter racially motived attack.

Walmart shoppers in Elyria, Ohio witnessed a shocking spectacle when a mother/daughter duo attacked an elderly white greeter while screaming racial slurs. When another employee came to the rescue, they said they would be back to kill the greeter and “blow up the store.”

The pair had two small children with them and one of them is pregnant.

When police arrived, they defiantly blamed the elderly greeter.

So far police have refused to charge the pair with hate crimes, despite the explicit racial motivation. Nor were they charged with child endangerment. In fact, they were given special treatment because they had young children with them.

This is the type of crime that would be national news if the races were reversed. Remember the 16 year old kid who “said “all black people please leave the store?” That was a national news story and no one was even injured. However, the CofCC webmaster knows a young white female who was the victim of a nearly identical crime in his own hometown. She was working as a clerk. An obese black woman felt slighted and attacked her while aided by a teenage daughter, and in the presence of another five year old son. The victim was badly injured and could not return to work for months. The woman had a long criminal record, but was slapped on the wrist and the incident was hidden from the public.

Obama administration: California’s whitest county MUST BE FORCIBLY INTEGRATED.

Obama administration: California’s whitest county MUST BE FORCIBLY INTEGRATED.

The absolute hatred and contempt for white people by the media and the Obama administration is on full view in this CNN segment.

CNN admits that California’s “whitest county is one of the most desirable places to live in the world.” Then CNN goes on to declare that the county must be integrated and needs an influx of non-whites. The Obama administration has decreed that the county is in violation of the 1965 Civil Rights Act by not having more non-whites.

The CofCC told you that Obama’s Soviet style forced housing decree in Westchester County, NY was only the beginning. Westchester County is 35% non-white. Despite the high number of non-whites, Obama’s goons declared that county was violating the Civil Rights of non-whites by having Jewish and Italian enclaves. The county was ordered to build low income housing and recruit blacks and Latinos to break up these crime free, homogeneous enclaves. While most whites were against it, few were brave enough to speak out. Several CofCC members were among the few who publicly protest the draconian, Soviet style action by the Obama administration.

Now the Obama administration wants California’s whitest, and nicest county to build low income housing and recruit blacks and Latinos to move there! This is the exact same policy carried out by the Soviet Union after their conquest of Eastern Europe. Populations were forcibly moved to break up the ethnic homogeneity.

The following is the definition of Genocide as defined by United Nations General Assembly. Violation is an International Crime, punishable by the International Criminal Court.

…any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

– Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II

Big Setback for the Left in Wisconsin

State Unions Defeated in Wisconsin


Big Setback for the Left in Wisconsin

by Jeff Davis

The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reports: “After police carried demonstrators out of the state Assembly Thursday, Republicans entered the chamber and approved Gov. Scott Walker’s bill repealing most collective bargaining by public employee unions. The body voted 53-42 in favor of the budget-repair proposal, sending the bill to the Republican governor after an epic month of struggle unlike anything in living memory in Wisconsin politics. But even with the battle won by Republicans, a wider war remains for both sides. It will likely be fought in the courts and through recall efforts against 14 senators.”

The Democrats are really hysterical about this one because the Republicans have struck at the very heart of the Democrat party’s funding: The union dues involuntarily contributed to Democrat coffers by millions of unionized public sector workers from the closed shop blue states, many of whom have no desire whatsoever to support conservative candidates –ever.

The Journal-Sentinel goes on: “All Democrats voted against the bill and were joined by four [spineless] Republicans – Dean Kaufert of Neenah, Lee Nerison of Westby, Travis Tranel of Cuba City and Richard Spanbauer of Oshkosh. All other Republicans and the body’s lone independent, Bob Ziegelbauer of Manitowoc, voted for the bill. After Republicans in the Assembly cut off debate a little more than three hours after it started, Democrats jumped up to protest the vote on the bill repealing decades-old labor provisions. Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca (D-Kenosha) brought a megaphone out from under his desk and through it yelled, ‘Mr. Speaker, I demand to be recognized.’ He was ignored.”

That one sentence makes my day. It’s high time we simply started ignoring these liberal Democrat barking chihuahuas and started doing what has to be done to pull this country out of the hideous mess that they have created. The Democrats thought it was perfectly OK to create huge numbers of unnecessary state bureaucrat jobs, to pay these people excessive salaries, give them insane pension deals and dump all the costs on the rest of the people in the state. Well, the state was going bankrupt thanks to all this, and the governor of Wisconsin finally did something about it. Other states like California seem destined to go bankrupt rather than tackle the state union beast.

Journal-Sentinel: “In the tense atmosphere at the Capitol Thursday, Republican senators said they had received death threats for supporting the legislation.”

I thought us right-wingers were supposed to be the violent ones. Isn’t that the stereotype Hollywood has turned out for over 80 years? Meanwhile leftists have been stealing from the public and using thuggish brutality against anyone who disagrees with them.

Wisconsin will now be able to start trimming down the crushing debt that two generations of liberal Democrat rule have imposed on the state, to the tune of something like a four billion dollar deficit. Wisconsin state employees can no longer retire with a full pension at age 50 at the expense of everyone else.

There’s one other cost causing several states to go bankrupt: The illegal alien problem. Hopefully the Republicans will be courageous enough to go after this second sacred cow of the liberals.

Democrats Attack the Bill of Rights Again

Democrats Attack the Bill of Rights Again


Obama Leaning toward More Gun Control

by Jeff Davis

The Obama administration has always had three main objectives: Obamacare, (seizing control of one sixth of the American economy and turning it into a Democrat patronage slush fund), “immigration reform” (the Amnesty and voter registration of 20 to 30 million illegal alien Mexicans to ensure perpetual power for the Democrat party) and gun control (making sure White Americans do not have the means to resist the tyranny the Democrats want to create.)

The Huffington Post reports: “The Obama administration has conducted informal discussions with groups from both ends of the gun-policy spectrum, including law enforcement and gun-rights organizations, and is set to hold formal meetings as early as this week in an effort to chart out a set of new firearms policies, administration officials say.”

Since the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution clearly states that “the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed,” there is no need for any administration to have a “policy” on it. The question is settled for good and all –for anyone who can read and who respects the US Constitution, much like that passage in the Constitution that requires the president to be a natural born US citizen.

The article notes “Spearheaded by the Department of Justice, the talks were described by one individual involved in the discussions as a feeling-out process. With more official meetings set to begin shortly, they provide the clearest indication to date that the White House is readying a response to the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) and 19 others at Tucson in early January. ‘As the president said, we should focus on sound, effective steps that will keep guns out of the hands of the criminals, fugitives, people with serious mental illness, and others who have no business possessing a gun and who are prohibited by laws on the books from owning a gun,’ Justice Department spokesman Matthew Miller said.”

The law already prohibits mentally ill people and felons from owning a gun. It would be trivial to set up a government “800″ number so that anyone selling a gun can make sure the buyer isn’t mentally ill or an ex-felon. Why isn’t this done? There are two reasons: (1).The Democrats are concerned about protecting the privacy and “rights” of felons and the mentally ill (who tend to vote Democrat) and (2).the Democrats want a certain amount of gun violence in the US to “justify” gun control laws.

The article goes on “The goal is to finalize a set of policy changes, including, perhaps, legislation that could pass through a Congress hostile to abridgments of Second Amendment rights.”

I hope Obama is foolish enough to try to pass a gun control law. White Americans could use a reminder why they should never trust the Democrats.

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Obama Changes His Mind

Obama Changes His Mind


ADV Broadcast Of March 26, 2011

Hello, and welcome back to another edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

Well, as predicted, President Barack Obama, along with some of his NATO counterparts, including the Jewish president of France Nicolas Sarkozy, began a massive bombing campaign of Libya last Saturday. Obama, and his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, are still trying to shore up support for their international mission by claiming that the U.S. and allied efforts to halt the advances by Moammar Gaddafi’s military forces against rebels within his own country, has “saved lives.”

Saving lives? By bombing a sovereign nation’s infrastructure? Of course, Hillary Clinton should know something about “saving lives,” as it was her husband Bill who was sitting in the Oval Office when U.S. federal henchmen burned alive dozens of people, including women and children, at the Branch Davidian compound near Waco, Texas in 1993. And let’s not forget Slick Willie’s bombing bombardment of Serbia in 1999.

Anyway, the bombing of Libya, which Obama claims is not an act of war, has been labeled Odyssey Dawn. Now to bring you up-to-date, let’s review the operation. So far, 162 Tomahawk missiles, at a cost of over $1 million a piece, have been launched into Libya, a nation that did not threaten the United States in any way; a $30 million F-15 fighter jet has crash landed; the Libyan equivalent of the White House has been bombed, although Obama claims we’re not targeting Gaddafi; and, the campaign is costing U.S. taxpayers over $300 million per week.

What’s especially odd about all of this, is that Obama ran his 2008 presidential campaign under the premise that he would end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and bring all American troops home. I guess he must have “changed” his mind. After all, didn’t he claim to be a man of “change”?

Also ironically, current Vice President Joe Biden, just a few years ago, was quoted as saying that he would “lead and effort to impeach any president” who would declare war on a sovereign nation that posed no threat to the United States.



So why the “change” of heart in Obama and Biden? Well, they know full well that they hold their positions at the pleasure of Jews – like Senator Joe Lieberman and and former Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz – who are in positions of power and influence. Well, if the Jews in power want to see a sovereign nation bombed to smithereens, then by golly it’s time to launch the Tomahawk missiles and precision-guided satellite bombs. Now if you remember, Paul Wolfowitz, also known as Wolfman Jew, was one of the chief architects for the Iraq War, along with fellow Jews Richard Perle and Douglas Feith.

If we remember back far enough, one of former President George W. Bush’s first international moves after the tragedy of September 11th was to invade Afghanistan. Osama Bin Laden, who is a native of Saudi Arabia, was believed to be hiding out there and he had claimed responsibility for the attacks, so we sent in the troops in early October of 2001 and kicked the ruling Taliban out, all the while looking without success for Bin Laden and other Al-Qaeda kingpins. Whether Bush’s desire to find a man who was hiding out in the mountains of Afghanistan was sufficient justification for the United States to invade the country is still a matter of debate, but the fact remains that that’s what happened. The search for Bin Laden still continues today, although most Americans have given up on the idea of a successful ending, and one gets the impression that the U.S.’s effort is half-hearted, at best. Bin Laden has proved to be a sneaky character to track down, and the world and the American people are pretty bored of the story, so there is little chance that anything will change on that front.

Well, shortly after Bush took out the Taliban in Afghanistan, he ordered the invasion of the sovereign country of Iraq. That was in March of 2003. The invasion of Iraq, like the one of Afghanistan, was justified by George W. Bush on questionable grounds. In the case of Iraq, the grounds were a whole laundry list of lies. Bush lied when he told the American people that Iraq’s dictator Saddam Hussein had had something to do with the attacks of September 11th. Bush lied when he told the American people that Iraq had stockpiled massive quantities of weapons of mass destruction. Bush lied when he told the American people that Saddam Hussein was buying uranium from some country in Africa for the purpose of creating nuclear weapons.

And with the Jewish-dominated news media stirring up those lies and examining them from every angle – all day, every day – Bush finally whipped the American public into enough of a frenzy that they didn’t turn to violent rebellion when Bush demanded that they send their husbands and sons and brothers to catch shrapnel with their bodies and absorb energy from roadside bombs in the god-forsaken deserts of the Middle East.

Well, here we are, more than six years after the invasion of Iraq and nearly eight years after the invasion of Afghanistan, and there is no end in sight to the hemorrhaging – and resultant loss – of American manpower, money, and national honor that have come with the United States’ meddling in the affairs of Iraq and Afghanistan. Don’t get me wrong: There was some hope for a while. Despite the questionable rationales for the U.S. invading Afghanistan and Iraq, there were some quick successes. The Taliban was ousted from power in Afghanistan by the end of 2001, and Bush declared the end of major hostilities in Iraq on May 1 of 2003, a mere six weeks after the invasion was launched. Bush’s speech onboard the USS Abraham Lincoln – with a banner reading “Mission Accomplished” in the background – remains today as one of the most premature military announcements in the post-World War II era. But, of course, the work wasn’t done in Iraq. For years afterward, various factions of insurgent forces continued to defend their homeland against the Western invaders and to squabble for power among themselves.

Meanwhile, things had quieted down in Afghanistan following the fall of the Taliban. Whether that calming of hostilities in Afghanistan was due to the dispersion of Taliban fighters or to the Afghan people turning all of their energies to renewing the once-booming production of opium, which had been virtually shut down by the Taliban, is anybody’s guess. Anyway, by the middle of 2003, the servicemen and women who were sent to Afghanistan were thought by those sent to Iraq to be getting off easy.

And now the tables have turned. Iraq is the more peaceful and quiet place compared to Afghanistan, so much so that it looks like more Americans will be off soon to waste their lives and our tax dollars in the country that, prior to October of 2001, refused to deliver Osama Bin Laden to the United States, although it did offer to put Bin Laden on trial in an Islamic court: an offer that the U.S. refused before invading. Perhaps because the opium production in Afghanistan is back up and running full speed ahead, Afghans might be looking for something to do to keep from getting bored, and are now turning their efforts back to resisting foreign intervention in their country. The Taliban, once thought to be defeated, turned out to be merely dormant, and now they have asserted their control over a surprisingly large portion of the country.

According to an article on CNN’s Web site by Peter Bergen and Katherine Teidemann, about half of Afghanistan is considered to be “low risk;” that is, the Taliban has a small or negligible influence there. The other half of the country is classified anywhere between “medium risk” and “enemy controlled.”

At the moment, there are about 100,000 Americans in Afghanistan, but estimates suggest that about 600,000 members of security forces are required to maintain order in the country, which is not quite the size of the State of Texas, in terms of land area. With not quite 200,000 members of Afghani security forces, that leaves a need of about 300,000 from elsewhere, mainly the United States.

Not that we are going to send that many service members to Afghanistan. Despite President Obama’s support for more American forces in Afghanistan, the rest of the country and Congress aren’t thrilled with the prospect of escalating the conflict. The escalations may continue, but I will be very surprised if we reach the 400,000 mark anytime soon.

And what all of this means is that there can be no hope of victory in Afghanistan. By the term “victory,” what I mean here is a scenario like what George W. Bush must have envisioned when he gave the go-ahead to invade Afghanistan and Iraq in the first place: Countries essentially like the United States, with free speech, voting rights for everyone, and capitalism. Not that those countries in the Middle East have much of a history for those kinds of things or much experience with them, but I doubt that George spent too much time pondering nit-picky details like that. And if he wanted to really turn Middle Eastern countries into little Americas, I suppose he would make sure that the Jews controlled the overwhelming proportion of all of the media and, thus, the overwhelming proportion of the power in the government.

But the Jewish influence is what the whole thing essentially boils down to in the first place. There is strong evidence that the 9/11 attackers did what they did in order to strike a blow at an enemy that had, for so long, sided with their eternal enemies in the Middle East: the Israelis. On every issue known to man, when the Israelis were involved, the U.S. backed them and, while talking a good talk to the Arab nations, the U.S. essentially gave the Arabs the cold shoulder.

In the 1973 Arab-Israeli war, for example, Israel was close to defeat at the hands of Egypt and Syria. The Jews became so desperate that they contemplated launching nuclear weapons at their Arab enemies. But have no fear: The United States rushed tens of thousands of tons of materiel to the Jews. This aid played a big part in preventing Israel’s defeat at the hands of an enemy that had been trying to regain territory taken from it during the Six-Day War of 1967.

As another example, whenever Israel is called out on the carpet at the United Nations for its atrocious human rights record regarding either the Palestinians, the behavior of its soldiers in the Occupied Territories, or trafficking in human beings, the United States can always be counted upon to vote against any resolution – justified or not – that criticizes Israel.

The list could go on, but the unholy alliance between the United States and Israel was definitely one of the causes of the attacks of 9/11. Islamic fundamentalists have been waging a terrorist-like war within Israel and the occupied territories for decades, with variable success. On 9/11, they saw the chance to strike a blow at the unwitting big brother of the vermin nation of the Middle East, and they took it.

And now we have been led to become embroiled in wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that we cannot win. The guerillas in both countries have nothing to lose and everything to gain by striking back when it suits their fancy, holding out and prolonging the war until the invaders lose heart and pull out. That’s what happened to the Soviets in Afghanistan; they simply got sick of fighting a war that they finally realized could not be won. Why did Bush think things would be any different for him? Why does President Obama think that sending more troops into Afghanistan will change anything? These men are supposed to have access to the best and most up-to-date information anywhere, and yet they can’t grasp the most basic lessons of history and make decisions based on them.

Or maybe they CAN grasp those history

Is Paris Hilton a White Racialist?

Yet another celebrity exposed as a “racist.”

What is interesting here is this is the third time Paris Hilton has been outed as a “racist” by the gossip columns. There is even a video where she used the “n-word.” The stories never seem to take legs, whereas stories about “racist” male celebrities immediately become national news. Think Mel Gibson, Jesse James, Micheal Richards, ect. Paris Hilton is at least as well known as Jesse James, but the flimsy asinine charge of “racism” against him was national news for weeks.

Morris Dees to headline anti-white conference.

Morris Dees to headline anti-white conference.

Morris “The Sleaze” Dees runs an organization that calls the American Family Association a “hate group,” denounced Lord of the Rings as a “racist” movie, and advocates for the censorship of conservative authors.

It is no surprise that he will be headlining the “White Privileged Conference.” A conference who’s aim is to promote the idea that all white people oppress minorities.

Homeland Security Exercise “Operation Closed Campus”

Homeland Security Exercise “Operation Closed Campus”

Operation Closed Campus, Pottawattamie County Emergency Management Agency, Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program

Read the article

The exercise is scheduled for Saturday morning March 26, 2011, at Treynor High School in Pottawattamie County, Iowa. The Treynor public school superintendent says there are 735 students, 99% of them are white, and claims there has been no known local racial problems or white supremacist activity.

Federal officials require a terrorism scenario for the exercise to receive funding. Personal conflicts among students or between a student and teacher are not eligible. Possible choices from recent news stories might be:

Extremist religious fanatics
Illegal alien drug gangs
Violent thug public union members
Rioting and looting mobs following natural disasters and unfavorable court trials
Black militants threatening the white population

Instead they chose to vilify whites, gun owners and anyone opposing illegal immigration.

Download & read the official document

Excerpts from the Exercise Plan document

Scenario Set-Up:

In the past 6 months, the City of Treynor and Treynor Community School District has received a significant influx of minority residents. Increasing economic instability and public service cuts in a neighboring metropolitan area had forced minority populations into smaller, more affordable rural communities where commodities and cost of living is significantly less. The economic migration of minority residents, both legal and non-legal into Pottawattamie County Communities has sparked controversy regarding national immigration policies as well as racial tensions with a few embedded, typically silent, white supremacy affiliates. This tension has sparked public demonstrations, propelled city and state illegal immigrant legislation proposals and the law enforcement community has seen an increase in incidents of racially motivated crimes and incidents.

Suspect Background:

Susp1: Timothy Jasper. White male, 18 year old high school senior. Lives in isolated rural area in Treynor School District. Little is known of the family, not originally from the area. The suspect participates in no school activities, relatively low to mediocre grades and attendance. Has been disciplined for fights at school, threats to staff and students as well as being known to law enforcement. The student has been seen with anti-immigration demonstrators and community rumors indicate a violent, quick-tempered father with ties to an underground white supremacy group that was involved in a small demonstration and assault 30 days ago in another community. The family is known to be firearm enthusiasts, if not fanatics. Suspect 1 has access to a significant cache of firearms, ammunition and materials suitable to make improvised explosive devices.

Susp2: John Jackson. White male, 17 year old high school junior. Isolated, quiet personality at school. No social interaction with students in or out of the school setting. Has often been the victim of hazing and bullying his entire school career. He has participated in school athletics with little achievement often riding the bench, which has also contributed to continual hazing and a diminishing self-worth. This student has befriended Suspect1 within the past year. His attitude has began to migrate from quiet meekness to antisocial aggressiveness with changes in appearance, hair style and clothing style that mimics that of his new friend and quasi-protector.

Socialist schemes could drive Caterpillar out of Illinois.

Socialist schemes could drive Caterpillar out of Illinois.

Rapidly rising income and employment taxes has Caterpillar talking about leaving Illinois and taking it’s 23k jobs with it. At least a half dozen other states are courting the company. The move could mark the beginning of a trend that has devastated California. Outrageous tax increases in California has spurred a mass exodus of companies, big and small, for the past decade.

Caterpillar makes land moving equipment ranging from home use to armored military use.

From Pentagraph.com

The chairman and CEO of Peoria-based Caterpillar Inc. is raising the specter of moving the heavy equipment maker out of Illinois.

In a letter sent March 21 to Gov. Pat Quinn, Caterpillar chief executive officer Doug Oberhelman said officials in at least four other states have approached the company about relocating since Illinois raised its income tax in January.

“I want to stay here. But as the leader of this business, I have to do what’s right for Caterpillar when making decisions about where to invest,” Oberhelman wrote in the letter obtained Friday by the Lee Enterprises Springfield bureau. “The direction that this state is headed in is not favorable to business and I’d like to work with you to change that.”

Oberhelman said he’s being actively courted to move.

“I have been called, ‘cornered’ in meetings and ‘wined and dined’ — the heat is on,” Oberhelman wrote. “Before, I never really considered living anywhere else and certainly never considered the possibility of Caterpillar relocating. But I have to admit, the policymakers in Springfield seem to make it harder by the day.”

Cat spokesman Jim Dugan said the letter was designed to show Quinn that Oberhelman wants to be involved in finding solutions that benefit the company, which employs 23,000 people in Illinois.

“I view it as an olive branch to offer our help,” Dugan said.

Quinn plans on discussing the letter with Oberhelman April 5 when the two meet at a conference in Peoria. The governor also plans on touring Caterpillar facilities at that time, spokeswoman Brie Callahan said Friday.

“The governor welcomes frank and open exchanges between the business community and government, and we are always open to new ideas that can help our businesses grow, innovate and create jobs,” Callahan said.

Oberhelman didn’t single out any specific problem with the state’s policies in his one-page letter, but Dugan said the recent income tax increase — signed into law by Quinn in January — played a significant role in triggering the note.

The tax hike has led to attempts by other states, including Wisconsin, Indiana and New Jersey, to try and poach companies that don’t want to stay in the Land of Lincoln.

Whites Becoming a Minority

Population changes in South Carolina

South Carolina was one of the few states to see a significant increase in white people. (Largely because whites are moving to the coast.)

by Dr. Sean Murphy

The 2010 census results for South Carolina were published today.
Here is the result:

total = 4,625,364 (up from 4,012,012 in 2000)
white = 2,962,740 (up from 2,652,291 in 2000)
black = 1,279,998 (up from 1,178,486 in 2000)
hispanic = 235,682 (up from 95,076 in 2000)

The 10-year changes are approximately:
310,000 more whites
100,000 more blacks
140,000 more hispanics

Between 2000 and 2010, the percentage of whites in the state fell from 66 to 64%. However, the USA as a whole had a sharper decline from about 69% to 64%. It’s going to be a close call, and we’ll have to wait for the final results from NY, Maine and DC, but it could be that for the first time in history, South Carolina’s population is whiter than the national average. If not it’s very close.

The SC counties with the largest white population gains were:

Horry, +51,056
York, +38,634
Greenville, +30,534
Charleston, +28,718
Beaufort, +25,802

And now the bad news…

SC was not spared the immigration invasion during the 2000s decade. In 7 counties, the hispanic population between 2000 and 2010 more than tripled. In 19 other counties it more than doubled.

Here are some examples of hispanic growth.

Lexington county: up 250% from 4,146 to 14,529
Greenville county: up 156% from 14,283 to 36,495
Horry county: up 230% from 5,057 to 16,683

Generally, wherever there was a lot of growth in general, there was a large growth in the hispanic population as well. Only 1 county lost hispanic
population, tiny McCormick county, which overall had little change. Other counties with modest gains in their hispanic population also happened
to be counties that lost white population.

So, beware of boom towns. You won’t be alone. Other people will follow.

Thursday, March 24, 2011

The Racial Aspects Of Gang Rape

The Racial Aspects Of Gang Rape


In 1999 I witnessed a gang rape in Sierra Leone. I was forced to watch a group of rebel soldiers taking it in turns to rape a young girl in front of an audience of jeering men. It was the height of the civil conflict and rape had become a devastating weapon of war. When I moved to Britain I believed I had escaped such horrific sexual violence. As my Dispatches investigation tomorrow night shows, I was mistaken. Gang rape is happening here – and what I have found most disturbing as an African is that a disproportionate number of these attacks are being carried out by black or mixed-race young men.

Towards the end of last year, police and child welfare experts working on Channel 4's Street Weapons Commission told us of their concerns about gang rape. Then two big cases hit the headlines.

In December, nine schoolboys, some as young as 13 at the time of the attack, were convicted of raping a 14-year-old girl. She was dragged between tower blocks in Hackney where she was threatened with a knife, hit and raped during an ordeal that lasted an hour and a half – some of which was filmed on mobile phones. In January, three men were convicted of gang raping a 16-year-old with learning disabilities for two hours before dousing her with caustic soda in an effort to get rid of the evidence.

How prevalent is this crime and why it is happening in Britain? Despite the seriousness of the crime, I was amazed to discover that no national statistics exist: gang rape is simply not recorded as a separate crime category. So over a period of several months we set about collating our own.

We approached the Crown Prosecution Service, the Association of Chief Police Officers, all 50 police forces, crown courts, barristers and rape referral centres to try to establish the numbers.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/gang-rape-is-it-a-race-issue-1711381.html

Standards For Police Force In Ohio City Dropped To Aid Negro Recruits

Standards For Police Force In Ohio City Dropped To Aid Negro Recruits


DAYTON -- The Dayton Police Department is lowering its testing standards for recruits.

It's a move required by the U.S. Department of Justice after it says not enough African-Americans passed the exam.

Dayton is in desperate need of officers to replace dozens of retirees. The hiring process was postponed for months because the D.O.J. rejected the original scores provided by the Dayton Civil Service Board, which administers the test.

Under the previous requirements, candidates had to get a 66% on part one of the exam and a 72% on part two.

The D.O.J. approved new scoring policy only requires potential police officers to get a 58% and a 63%. That's the equivalent of an ‘F’ and a ‘D’.

“It becomes a safety issue for the people of our community,” said Dayton Fraternal Order of Police President, Randy Beane. “It becomes a safety issue to have an incompetent officer next to you in a life and death situation."

“The NAACP does not support individuals failing a test and then having the opportunity to be gainfully employed,” agreed Dayton NAACP President Derrick Foward.

http://abc.daytonsnewssource.com/shared/newsroom/top_stories/videos/wkef_vid_6103.shtml

Donald Trump on the View:Obama Show Your Birth Certificate

Thomas Jefferson:Quote of the Day

"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." ... Thomas Jefferson

The Jewish Plan for Genocide of USA Whites

The Jewish Plan for Genocide of USA Whites

ISRAEL COHEN (1912) top of page

"We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause."

Israel Cohen, A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century, 1912. Also in the Congressional Record, Vol. 103, p. 8559, June 7, 1957

Breaking the Taboo,part 3

Breaking the Taboo,part 2

Breaking the Taboo

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Jewish Plans for World Domination in Their Own Words

The Eternal Jew

Interracial love stories keep ending in murder for white women.

Interracial love stories keep ending in murder for white women.

Black men are at least nine times more likely to commit femicide than white men. In fact, the figure seems to go up when black men are involved in interracial relationships. A huge study on femicide in the United States found that white women married to black men were 12.4 times more likely to be murdered by their spouse than white women married to white men.

Black men are the leading cause of death for all young blacks, both male and female.

Australian model murdered by Sudanese Boyfriend.

From Australian News…

A PROMISING Tasmanian model and university student fought to fend off her ex-boyfriend before he fatally stabbed her and took his own life.

Police believe Sammi Hewitt, 24, and Kuol Piom, 29, had been arguing over the weekend about the status of their long-term relationship.

The disagreement turned violent when Ms Hewitt, who was a student at the University of Tasmania, Australia, visited Mr Piom at his rented home in Hobart on Monday.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Third Worlders are coming to take your jobs!

Third Worlders are coming to take your jobs!




Browning Out Quality in America

by Ian Mosley

The Conservative Voice website has run an interesting column by Liz Davis on “The Macaca Effect,” which is the first time I have heard the word used in this context. The column starts off: “What is the ‘macaca effect’? First of all, what is a macaca? A ‘macaca’ is a racial pejorative to refer to someone either from or with ancestry from India or Pakistan. And the ‘macaca effect’ is pejorative used by people in high tech to refer to East Indians driving down the wages of American and British high tech workers. In many fields (computer programming, engineering, medicine, nursing, accounting, etc.) companies are faking labor shortages to acquire an H1B visa and hire East Indians, with the net effect of driving down the wages of American and British employees. Thus, one hears disgruntled employees talking about the ‘macaca effect.’ ”

Well, one would think they should be disgruntled. I never cease to be amazed at what Americans put up with from their government and their bosses, but historically, Americans have usually put up at least some kind of a fight when their money and material lifestyle were threatened. Good-paying jobs are getting increasingly scarce thanks to all the Third Worlders with H1B visas, and the future good-paying tech jobs will be non-existent for the next generation of Americans if current trends continue.

The column goes on: “Paul Craig Roberts, assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury in the Reagan administration, has written: ‘Offshoring has reduced the availability of good-paying jobs for middle-class Americans. It is not only manufacturing jobs that are being moved abroad, but software-engineering jobs, IT jobs, and a wide range of other professional occupations. Consequently, the ladders of upward mobility are being dismantled. Many of the professional jobs that remain are being filled with foreigners, especially engineers and IT professionals from India, who are brought in on work visas and paid less by U.S. employers, who falsely claim worker shortages.’ …High-tech insider Tom Stern says: ‘Indians are generally nice people. But when your company starts hiring them, you know the end is near. It’s like the early stages of cancer. Within one year, all of our wages were driven down by 45%. Big business is bringing over Indians for the sole purpose of pushing down American salaries.’ Many complain that this may be the end of Western economies, as they are slowly transformed into Third World economies. Journalist Brian Watson comments: ‘It is no coincidence that Jean Raspail, author of the conservative classic Camp of the Saints, selected East Indians to lead the invasion of the West. Indians are best equipped to infiltrate and bring down Western countries – and they can do it with an obsequious smile.’”

Americans should always remember this simple truism: Mexicans are being brought into this country to replace blacks. Asians and Indians are being brought in to replace whites, because they can at least approximate the skill levels of white Americans, although only on an imitative basis.

There is a cult-like religion among executives and CEOs of tech companies, who believe that Third Worlders are just as good as White American tech workers. Never mind the horrible bureaucracy back in India, India’s general backwardness and the dubious quality of their schools. It is “blasphemy” in corporate America to point out that Third Worlders are not as good as White Americans or that the products that they produce -like Vista- turn out to be more disappointing Hindu bloat-ware.

The Tea Party needs to add stopping H1B visas and stopping outsourcing to their agenda. Otherwise every American high tech company will suffer a huge drop in competency and our ability to beat the world at high-tech innovation will be destroyed.

Lying Liberals May Lose a Propaganda Outlet

Lying Liberals May Lose a Propaganda Outlet




National Propaganda Radio

by Jeff Davis

Liberals are liars and they insist that everyone else believe their lies or face social ostracism. If anyone needs proof that liberals are liars, keep reading. The Washington Times reports: “Senior Vice President of NPR Ron Schiller met with individuals he believed to be potential donors. However, undercover video was running during this meeting. In the following clip, Mr. Schiller and his co-worker Betsy Liley describe how NPR covers those who deny climate change is happening. Ms. Liley talks about a donor who would only give to NPR if the outlet did not talk to those who believe climate change is not happening…”

But why stop the censorship at people who debunk Global Warming? It seems that NPR censors those who don’t believe in free discussion of whether Barack Obama was born in Hawaii or Kenya.

The article notes “We’re not covering the birthers. We are not covering them. There’s a whole movement within the conservative group about questioning something that Obama has said as fact, ‘I was born in Hawaii, when it was the United States.’ The group that questions this, some of whom are commentators…I don’t know any who are Democrats, but they are primarily conservative commentators and people who follow them question if Obama is [a citizen]…”

So we have a major issue in American society, whether or not the President of the United States is in fact Constitutionally eligible to hold office, and NPR admits they’re simply ignoring it or covering it up. Why am I not surprised by this?

The Times goes on: “Mr. Schiller chimes in later saying, ‘The main point here is that it is not our responsibility to present the opinion of a non-scientist through our science desk. All educated scientists accept that climate change as fact.’ ”

That’s not true, by the way, and Mr. Schiller has got to know it’s not true. A WorldNetDaily article reports “More than 31,000 scientists across the U.S. – including more than 9,000 Ph.D.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties – have signed a petition rejecting ‘global warming,’ the assumption that the human production of greenhouse gases is damaging Earth’s climate.”

NPR is now in some danger of losing their government funding although I’ll believe it when I see it –maybe NPR will lose its funding if the Tea Party gets the upper hand in the GOP and we get a non-puppet president elected in 2012. If that happens, NPR will have to replace their government money with private donations from Big Liberals, and this means that NPR will lean even farther to the left than usual, with not even so much as a pretense of balance any more.

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Coming To Grips With The Most Basic Issue

Coming To Grips With The Most Basic Issue


ADV Broadcast Of March 19, 2011

Hello, and welcome back to another edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

Is it all over now in the state of Texas? At least that’s what one demographer has concluded when he says it’s basically over for Whites in the Lone Star State. Two of every three Texas children are now non-White, and the trend will become even worse in the future, according to Steven Murdock, former U.S. Census Bureau director and current director of the Hobby Center for the Study of Texas at Rice University.

The population of Texas today can be divided into two groups: Old and aging White, and non-White. By the year 2040, the state’s public school enrollment will see a 15 percent decline in White children while mestizo children will increase by 213 percent.

And if the current trend continues, 30 percent of Texas’ labor force will not even have a high school diploma by 2040. And the average income will be about $6,500 lower than it was in 2000. That figure is not inflation adjusted, so it will be even worse than what it sounds.

So is it over for Whites in Texas? It certainly doesn’t sound encouraging.

If you have been tuning in to these American Dissident Voices programs for a while, you know that we spend a good portion of our time discussing current events and how those events affect the White race. We’ve talked about the wars in the Middle East, the Jewish control of our news and entertainment media, and the unrestrained flow of non-White immigrants across our southern borders. We’ve talked about the rottenness of the current democratic political system and about the corrupt politicians who use it to serve their own ends. And we’ve talked a little about the economy, too, because that has been making headlines for well over a year now: unemployment, government bail-outs, the rising fuel costs, and so on. All of these things and more I have tried to relate to the serious and fundamental issues that face the White race today, probably – to be honest – with varying degrees of success.



But what I want to do today is to focus on the most basic issue – that is, the most fundamental issue – that our race must come to grips with today. That most basic issue is the simple survival of our people: whether or not the Earth will continue to note the existence and contributions of the White race. And not only must our race come to grips with that issue, it must also aggressively address that issue and eventually solve it. In one way or another, in the not-too-distant future, the issue itself will cease to remain an issue: Either we will have overcome our present reluctance to act on behalf of our race and will again flourish as did our ancestors, or we will be wiped out by the more aggressive races who show no qualms about directing their altruism toward only their own kind.

I and the other members of the National Alliance value the existence of our people as a collective entity. That is, we value the White race not just as a collection of atomized individuals: individuals who simply go about their daily business with no thought for their ancestors, no thought for their descendents, and no thought for the racial basis of every enduring civilization. We admire the art and literature and science that were made possible by the structure of White civilization and the genetic makeup of the populations of those civilizations. We admire the great achievements of members of our race down through the ages. And we recognize that none of the other races on our planet are capable of producing OUR brand of art and OUR brand of literature and OUR brand of science. None of the creations of White civilizations could have been created from a civilization that wasn’t White because all of the things I’ve named above are expressions of the White race-soul.

Other races have made their own contributions to their own cultures, of course, and they made those contributions according to the bent of their own race-soul. We in the National Alliance aren’t saying that all art should be White art and that all literature should be White literature; what we’re saying is that the cultural contributions of the White race are being pushed out. In the schools, the past contributions of our race are being gradually devalued, gradually being pushed out of the curriculum in favor of the contributions of other races. And the future contributions of our race are being snuffed out before they even begin to take root by the insidious machinations of the men who, by and large, control what and how people in our world THINK. I am talking about the media masters, men who – with very few exceptions – are Jews.

The Jewish-controlled media is contributing to the destruction of the White race by feeding the public with all types of sensory imagery that serves to demean or ridicule our people, or to instill a sense of guilt for being White, or to push the idea that multiculturalism is a fact of life that cannot be stopped and that it is pointless to oppose. With very few exceptions, all television shows, movies, and popular books contain some element of multiculturalism. A disturbing percentage of them push their audience members to value romantic relationships between Whites and non-Whites. The prominent casting of mixed-race actors and actresses in TV and films further advances the notion that interracial relationships are a good thing.

And all of that work by the Jewish-controlled media has had the effect that the Jews have desired all along. Interracial relationships in the United States are at an all-time high; a high percentage of Whites feel guilty for past events over which they had no control and therefore cannot be held responsible for today; and Whites are frightened into staying quiet about everything going on in their world that is detrimental to the race. They have been taught that the White race doesn’t matter or, if it does matter, they have been taught by the media that it is sinful or wrong to believe that.

All of this, of course, amounts to the gradual strangulation of the White race. If unchecked, it will lead to our extinction, which is what the whole ball of wax is about. Forget conquering and ruling other races like the White Romans did more than two millennia ago. Forget colonizing the Third World like every European ethnicity did a few hundred years ago. Whether any of that was right or wrong is not the question today. The question before us today is: Is it morally right for us to tolerate the extinction of our people? Another way of putting this is: Are all of those in the media and the schools and the churches and the government who insist that White people must NOT stand up for their survival as a people… Are THEY morally in the right?

It goes without saying that I don’t think they are, and neither does any White racialist anywhere. The key idea that seems to evade a lot of White people, though, is that most White people would also agree with the idea that to act so as to destroy an entire race is morally wrong. Well, that is what the enemies of the White race are doing, and they are morally wrong. “Sinful,” the Christians would say. “Hateful,” the liberals would say. Those words describe our people’s enemies, who are consciously and willfully taking actions – through their media and through the farce of a government that they control – in an effort to bring about the eventual extinction of the White race.

And, as I’ve said, most White people would agree that to do that is evil. The Jewish media have repeated the term for such a plan so often and so forcibly that everyone has heard the term and knows what it means: The term is “genocide.”

The problem is that the media controlled by our enemies don’t present the situation in that way. Those media only talk about the “rights” of non-Whites, about the alleged past sins of White people who are long dead, and about the poor decisions made by racially-conscious Whites who lack the self-control to channel their energies and frustrations down productive paths and who lash out at the evils around them. Never do they state the obvious facts about the increases in the number of interracial marriages, the increases in the number of mixed-race children, and the decreasing percentage of Whites in every part of the formerly White world. Never do they stress the inescapable result of all of this browning down: that the White race must eventually cease to exist if those trends continue. If the media spent even one-tenth of the time focused on these facts that they do on race-destroying filth, our society would quickly be in a state of complete turmoil and on the verge of revolution. Revolution, of course, is something the Jews want to avoid; they would rather manage the situation carefully, slowly watching as our people succumb to multiculturalism and liberalism and conservatism and religious fundamentalism and feminism and libertarianism.

So the media would be crazy to do anything that would bolster the fortunes of the White race. First of all, the media are controlled by the Jews who, despite whatever they might say, care only about themselves… which leaves the White race out. And for the Jews to promote the simple survival of the White race would amount to them admitting that they have been scheming to destroy us for at least a hundred years; in fact, there is a good bit of evidence that the Jews have been scheming to destroy Gentile civilizations for quite a bit longer than that. It isn’t too big a stretch of the imagination to read the last book in the Christian Bible – the Revelation of the Jew called John – and to see in it John’s raw hatred for Rome and his lust for its utter humiliation and destruction. Anyway, whatever else they might be, the Jews aren’t stupid, so there won’t be any even-handed treatment of racial issues from the mainstream media any time soon.

Now, let’s review to make it perfectly clear what we in the National Alliance are primarily concerned about: the survival of the White race. Of course, there are other things over and above this “bare minimum” of concerns. For example, I haven’t even touched on working on elevating the race from a genetic standpoint; that is, breeding a stronger, more beautiful, more conscious, more intelligent people… a people that is more intensely ALIVE than anything we can imagine at this time. That is an important part of what we want, but first on our list is the simple and nonthreatening demand that our people be allowed to survive.

Is that too much to ask? Does the White race have just as much right to survive as any other race? I don’t know what kind of answer the typical non-White would give to that question, but the typical White – in keeping with the traits of the White race-soul – will answer in the affirmative. After all, for many decades in this country, White people have been affirming the right of non-Whites to get a fair education, to vote, to own property, to be American citizens, and so on. It is my firm belief that, at some level, most Whites would agree that their race has the right to survive. And I would go so far as to state that even Whites who claim to be liberals – or non-racialists or multiculturalists or whatever they want to call themselves – would agree.

Now the kicker is that, based on the best analysis of history that we can make at the present time, the White race CANNOT survive without a monoracial homeland. Any time our people have lived in close proximity with non-Whites, it isn’t too long on an evolutionary time scale that the White component of the population has disappeared through mongrelization. In other words, it isn’t enough anymore to say that one agrees that the White race should survive without – at the same time – insisting that the race should therefore have its own homeland.

We in the National Alliance want the White race to survive, and therefore we want to obtain a White racial homeland. To do that, we need the help of many more Whites of good will who agree that our race is worth saving. Whatever the alleged or perceived harm and ill that our ancestors have done throughout history… none of that justifies our enemies overseeing our extermination, as they are doing now.

Join with me to help create a better future for our race.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

Friday, March 18, 2011

Jewish Censorship Strengthens In Switzerland

Jewish Censorship Strengthens In Switzerland


The new Swiss national television network boss Roger de Weck has stated that he shall no longer invite pro-European politicians and thinkers from the pro-White SVP party to Swiss television debates. As usual for our Jewish masters, Roger de Weck mixed this shocking declaration with so much shrewd and weasly propaganda that it went through without a nation-wide scandal –- even as the targeted party SVP is the largest party in the country. It gathers 30 percent of Swiss vote.

Roger de Weck was nominated on May 18, 2010, head of Swiss television, and took his time before he disclosed his real agenda, in January 2011: smothering the vibrant pro-European party SVP (Swiss People’s Party) by dismissing its representatives from any television program.

Roger de Weck, originally a Christian, is married to a Jewess and is very close to Jewish circles. He may have converted to Judaism. Indeed, he was anchor of the Jewish organization Keren Hayessod’s debate in front of 280 Jews about poor Israeli children in January 2007 in Zurich. He animated in April 2007 an evening organized by the Jewry of Zurich (ICZ) in honour of Jewish philosopher André Glucksmann. He led in January 2008 the festivities by the Keren Hayessod in Zurich for Israel’s 60th anniversary.

Roger de Weck was one of the founders in 2005 of the so-called Club Helvetique, a group of Swiss Jewish politicians (among them Giusep Nay, Andreas Gross, Cecile Buehlmann) who plotted against pro-European SVP leader Christoph Blocher, then a Swiss government minister, and managed to oust him of this job in December 2007.

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Congress, AIPAC-Israel and 9/11

Congress, AIPAC-Israel and 9/11

We know they know but they don’t care

By Gordon Duff

This week, most members of congress, 100% of the new “Tea Party,” swore allegiance to the State of Israel. To those of us at Veterans Today, we have a problem with this. We have never been all that enthusiastic about Congress in the first place. They are a gutless bunch who feather their own nests, finance their campaigns with laundered drug money and have turned Washington into a modern day Gomorrah, a city of rent boys and call girls.

We have a few issues to pick with Israel.

There is no way any loyal member of the United States military or veteran of its services is likely to “kiss and make up” with Israel until we receive an official apology for the attack on the USS Liberty. Even the “official” veterans organizations, generally a gutless bunch made up of the same spineless sycophants as congress, have spoken up on this one.

Our next issue is 9/11. We know Israel was involved in a major way though there is no way Israel alone could have ordered NORAD to ground its planes. We know members of all key committees in Congress were given a “top secret” briefing on 9/11 and told the following things:

* The World Trade Center was destroyed, not by planes but because of a “national security issue” in order to “save lives.”
* The attack on the Pentagon was not the hijacked aircraft claimed but a different cause that is “classified.”
* The subsequent attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq were necessary for the US to maintain control of energy resources to prevent economic collapse.
* Israel “assisted” the United States on 9/11 and may “appear” culpable but was not.

These things are childish lies, of course. The perverts, cowards and gullible rubes that make up congress, one of the most corrupt institutions on earth, were beaming with self importance, having been briefed on a great conspiracy. After all, many members of congress went to college, some to law school, and are much more deserving and certainly much more important than “normal people.”

We call this condition “malignant narcissism.”

We believe there is reasonable proof that the State of Israel was clearly involved in the planning and execution of the 9/11 attack on the United State as part of a conspiracy involving rogue members of our military and intelligence community working with a cabal within the executive branch that may not have included the President of the United States but, in all certainty, nearly everyone around him.

We are privately aware that top members of the Democratic Party are in total agreement with this assessment, a not-insignificant number along with a dozen or more members of the Republican Party.

None have spoken publicly though two in particular have come very close.

As for the others, we can accept some ignorance of 9/11 as direct ties to Israel have, though hard evidence is there, not been established in a court of law. That has been blocked with considerable energy and violence.

We can only accept that many members of congress are devoid of even the most common abilities exercise judgement. Hearing President Obama and Secretary Clinton speak, people we know to have great intellect but highly questionable personal courage, only reinforces the concept of “fog of delusion” that allows members of America’s government to live in denial of rational truths, particularly when personal gain is involved.

Veterans Today’s last issue with Congress is over the plight of the citizens of the region known as Israel or Palestine or Judea or “Greater Israel.” The news has reports of “West Bank” or “East Jerusalem” housing issues and how upset the United States government “appears” to be from time to time over this issue.

Let us be clear what these issues are:

* People are being removed from their homes because of their religion, their property illegally seized and destroyed
* They are then relocated to areas surrounded by barbed wire, mines and armed guards. We call these places “concentration camps.”
* In recent years, several thousand members of these relocated families have been killed, some by “accidental shooting” by IDF forces, some by cluster bombs, some by tanks and some crushed by bulldozers. By our estimation, there have been over 300,000 such accidents in total.

Last week, a majority of members of Congress, including the entire Republican Party, certified that these actions, technically “ethic cleansing,” actions cited by the United Nations on dozens of occasions as violations of basic human rights, were “security issues” for Israel.

Congress voted funds to pay for these criminal acts. We have a problem with this also.

We know that every member of Congress is aware that military aid for Israel is only legal because the United States has vetoed sanctions against Israel using their power in the United Nations Security Council on dozens of occasions.

American weapons are being used to attack civilians in support of a program of ethnic cleansing more aggressive that than perpetrated by the apartheid regime in South Africa.

Those who support these policies in the American government are morally reprehensible. There is no question of doubt about this issue, the facts are in place and the appropriate human rights agencies are more than clear.

It is our belief that the members of Congress who continue to advocate military aid to Israel, the 5th most powerful nation on earth, the 3rd largest exporter of arms, a nation with no debt and massive wealth, whose citizenry control 40% of the worlds resources, while schools in America are being closed and millions are homeless, are criminals and are doing so because they have been bribed.


Article Source: Veteranstoday.com
Staff

Sunday, March 13, 2011

Americans Dying For Israeli Interests

Americans Dying For Israeli Interests


ADV Broadcast Of March 12, 2011

Hello, and welcome back to another edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

Lately we’ve been discussing the ongoing turmoil in the Middle East and North Africa, with Libya being the daily hot topic. Libya is now involved in a full-fledged civil war, and the Zionist-controlled political leaders in the U.S. and Europe are trying to figure out how to take advantage of this turmoil, to appease their stringpullers, of course.

The U.S. and their NATO allies are considering a no-fly zone over Libya, which would essentially be an act of war against the oil-rich nation. So far, Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi has laughed in the faces of the international Zionists amid calls for him to step down and turn the nation he has ruled for 41 years over to the rebels, but in reality it would be to the internationalists. Gaddafi appears to have the upper hand in the conflict, and the rebels are begging for outside help.

And President Obama, who ran a presidential campaign before his election on the premise of bringing American troops home from the Middle East, is making a feeble attempt at talking tough to Gaddafi. Obama has renewed a warning that Gaddafi and his associates would be held accountable “for whatever violence continues to take place.” But his warning appears to have neglible immediate impact.

And if you’ve been paying attention to Afghanistan these days, the Taliban is gaining strength. In fact, insurgents who were driven out of the Taliban stronghold of Sangin, are flowing back in and negating any of the so-called “gains” the U.S. Marines had supposedly achieved there, according to American commanders. Despite the influx of tens of thousands of additional U.S. troops, the Taliban is reclaiming some of the areas now held by U.S. and Afghan forces in the Helmand and Kandahar provinces.

It wasn’t so long ago that it was the military situation in Iraq that was on everyone’s mind. At the office, someone would mention in passing that such-and-such a relative was serving in the armed forces overseas, and someone else would ask, “Where?” If the answer that came back was “Iraq,” there would be a moment of silence, or everyone who was tuning into the conversation would shake his head and exhale or mutter things like, “Yikes. Scary.” On the other hand, if the answer came back, “Afghanistan,” there was a noticeable sigh of relief from the listeners: The prevailing thought was: “If you’ve gotta be over there in the Middle East, Afghanistan’s the place to be.”



At that time, of course – some months ago – Afghanistan was a pretty quiet place that the Taliban had once governed. It was supposedly still harboring Osama Bin Laden, but he was hiding out like a rat somewhere in the mountains in the southern part of the country, and who even wastes a minute of time thinking about him anymore anyway? He might have gotten a good jab in against the Jewocracy of the West during the attacks of 9/11, but Bin Laden was just puttering around in squalor somewhere now, and his organization – Al Qaeda – was all but impotent. Well, that was the thinking among most of us, and it was based on the idea that if someone isn’t doing something that the rest of us notice, he isn’t doing anything at all.

The view of Afghanistan that most people had just a few months ago has disappeared. Today, far from being viewed as an easy tour of duty for U.S. service men and women, Afghanistan is starting to look like the country that the Soviet Union couldn’t tame back during the 1980s. That’s right: the nasty, military-juggernaut, we’ll-report-it-to-the-world-any-way-we-please, and we-don’t-give-a-damn-about-human-rights Soviet Union couldn’t bring Afghanistan to its knees, no matter what methods it used. Even the big Red Beast threw in the towel in Afghanistan. The country that George W. Bush was the first to conquer during his Bush Crusade is now wide awake and prepared to hold out as long as it needs to before the Americans give up like the Russians did and go home. And our Chief Executive thinks that upping the number of U.S. troops in the country will turn things around. THAT is a vain hope that will only bring heartache to more young Americans’ families in the near future.

I think it is interesting that Barack Obama has turned a full 180 degrees on the issue of the American wars in the Middle East. As a first-term U.S. Senator from Illinois, before he announced his candidacy for the White House, he was a vehement opponent of Bush’s policy of taking over Afghanistan and Iraq. He wanted our troops brought home immediately, as did the many Democrats who were practically hurled bodily into Congress by a desperate American electorate during the mid-session elections of 2006.

But Obama, like all of the other Democrats, let down the American public, which wanted nothing more than an end to the hemorrhaging of American blood and American wealth on countries that no one cares about, at least no one that I know. Obama and the other Democrats, after saying they would do whatever was needed to bring the troops home, decided that that would ruin their political careers. After talking big, they acted small or not at all. After promising focused action, they delivered nebulous promises along the lines of “a workable solution.” They deliberately spat in the face of the American people, the very group that the Constitution says they are supposed to be serving. For one of the few times in history that a large number of Americans actually had a good idea and were trying to act on it, the so-called “leaders” of the people let them down.

And we might inquire as to WHY virtually every Democrat and other anti-war legislator who was grabbed by the collar and heaved into the monkey cage on Capitol Hill in 2006 suddenly had a calamitous drop in his testosterone level. Why was it that the anti-war movement silently slithered out of the rhetoric of those who were elected based on that rhetoric?

There are quite a few reasons that might be given. One reason offered is that, once the newly-elected legislators got into Congress, they suddenly realized that the U.S. couldn’t pull out of the Middle East without some discomfort to those whose countries we had basically ruined; namely, the Iraqis and the Afghans. “We have completely messed up their governments,” we were told, “and we have to stay in until the systems are back on their feet.” And along the same lines, the same people said: “To pull out now would be to leave unfinished the work we have started.”

Well, everyone knows that kind of justification to be simply a bunch of lame excuses. Countries, companies, and even individuals make mistakes all the time, and they sometimes back out and quit. No, things aren’t the same as they were before, and there are some people who end up inconvenienced by what happened, but that’s just the way things go.

Take the U.S. pullout in Vietnam, for instance. Our part in the war in that country was a mistake from the get-go, and when at last we had finally had enough, we just up and left. Plenty of Americans and lots more Vietnamese had been killed or maimed in that war, but the U.S. had had enough, and we quit. Vietnam was a different place upon our leaving, and it wasn’t very many months before the communists had taken over the whole country, thus negating all of the American blood and money and effort that we had foolishly sent to that malaria-infested jungle of a nation over more than a decade.

But you know what? People get over it. Sure, there are still hard feelings in this country about what happened in Vietnam, and I’m sure there are many Vietnamese who wish that the U.S. had never gone home, but it really just boils down to the fact that, as a nation, we simply didn’t care enough about the Vietnamese to waste any more time dealing with their internal squabbles. I’m not justifying our meddling in the internal affairs in Vietnam, nor am I condoning our abandoning the country to the yellow hordes of Asian communism; I’m simply saying that, once countries get tired of dealing with an issue in a foreign country, they simply pull up stakes and go home. It doesn’t make it right to do so, but neither is it wrong. When something stops serving the interests of the people who are committing the blood and the money to the project, they are free to pull the plug at any time.

That’s what we need to do in the Middle East: pull the plug. Get out. Leave Iraq and Afghanistan. Sure, George W. Bush and his Jew connivers like Paul Wolfowitz and Ari Fleischer tricked our entire country into tearing up both countries, but nobody should hold the American people responsible for the evil of the warhawks who used the 9/11 attacks to serve their own ends.

And what were those ends? Bush had an affinity for oil, we all know that, and Iraq sits atop the richest petroleum reserves in the entire world. So that certainly played a part, particularly in Bush’s little mind. But the factor that carried the most weight was that, in the years before and following 9/11, Iraq was the most powerful nation in the Middle East next to Israel. Iraq didn’t have the weapons that the Israelis did, of course; Iraq didn’t get all of the free military hardware developed and built courtesy of U.S. taxpayers and, furthermore, the Iraqis aren’t nearly arrogant enough to steal U.S. nuclear secrets, as the Israelis did in order to become the only Mideast nation that possesses a nuclear arsenal.

Anyway, Iraq was less developed than Israel, but the nation was relatively unified under Saddam Hussein, who almost miraculously and with a little arm-twisting had managed to bring together the various ethnicities in Iraq so that everyone was basically on the same page. The Jews in Israel and the U.S., always looking for ways to boost their race above everyone else AND – at the same time – knock everyone else down a peg or two, immediately saw 9/11 as a chance to take care of Saddam Hussein and Iraq. It took about a year and a half, but eventually the invasion of Iraq was launched, destroying all semblance of order in that country and pulling its leader down from his post of power.

It seems natural that, following the execution of Saddam Hussein, the U.S. would withdraw its troops, now that its alleged purpose of bringing down Hussein was complete. But now there was another problem that the Jews hadn’t anticipated. Iraq had destabilized to the point that the Jews feared that, without a continued U.S. presence, a rogue organization would seize power and pose an even greater threat to Israel than Saddam Hussein had. And for that reason – and ONLY for that reason – American politicians everywhere began backing down on their sincere pledges to bring the troops home. For that reason – TO PROTECT ISRAEL – the current U.S. President and all of his Democratic Party pansies did a complete roundabout on their position on the issue of the U.S. military in the Middle East.

And today, of course, vigilante groups in Iraq launching surprise attacks on Israel are really the least of the Jews’ worries. Today, U.S. troops remain in Iraq and Afghanistan NOT because we are really trying to stabilize the “new and improved” Iraqi and Afghan governments, and NOT because anyone anywhere is worried about Iraqis or Afghans attacking Israel, but because Iran has now assumed the role of the non-Jewish power-player in the region. The Jews want to make sure that there is a strong U.S. military presence in the Middle East as a deterrent, so that Iran doesn’t get any bright ideas like taking a few potshots at the rogue state of Israel, which hates every country as no other nation or race of people can.

THAT is where we stand today. THAT is why President Obama’s Middle East policy is virtually identical to George W. Bush’s: because the Jews who call the shots in the American media and government are steering the idiot Uncle Sam into doing things that are NOT good for Uncle Sam, but rather… good for Israel and good for Jews.

To see one’s country and race taken advantage of by a hateful and devious people like the Jews is painful to watch. If you have had enough, then you should join with the men and women of the National Alliance, who are trying to form an organization that will lead our people into forming a separate White nation. That nation’s domestic policy will benefit the White people of the nation, and its foreign policy will establish and maintain alliances and policies with other nations for the mutual benefit of both. And there is one thing we can be sure of: the new White nation we hope to create WON’T be good for Jews. I guess that’s why they are working around the clock to prevent us from succeeding.

But we can’t worry about that. We’ve got work to do and kinsmen to rally. And we’d like you to join us.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

Friday, March 11, 2011

Dr.William L.Pierce discusses Affirmative Action

BECK IS RIGHT! "SECULAR" JUDAISM IS LIKE RADICAL ISLAM

National Prayer Network

BECK IS RIGHT! "SECULAR" JUDAISM IS
LIKE RADICAL ISLAM
By Rev. Ted Pike
24 Feb 11

Tea Party leader and talk host Glenn Beck is under attack again by left-wing Jewry for this recent on-air comment: "There are the Orthodox rabbis, and there are the Reform rabbis. Reformed (sic) rabbis are generally political in nature. It's almost like radicalized Islam where it is just -- radicalized Islam is less about religion than it is about politics."

Jewish attack groups quickly demonized Beck's remarks, alleging that his comparison of the Jewish supremacist rabbis of Reform (secular) Judaism to Islamic supremacists merits immediate apology. ADL head Abe Foxman said Beck's remarks are "beyond the pale" and "discount the faith" of Reform Jews.

Yet Beck is getting very, very close to the truth. Jewish supremacism, epitomized by the secularist Reform rabbis who want Beck fired from FOX News, is actually much more of a threat to civilization than is radical Islam.

Here is my July 10, 2007 article explaining why:


WHY WE SHOULD FEAR ZIONISM MORE THAN ISLAM

By Rev. Ted Pike
10 Jul 07

Once, as I was speaking to an appreciative audience, a fly turned his undivided attention to me. Round and round he flew, landing on my nose, forehead, even lips. I sputtered and tried to ignore him. I couldn’t. I tried to swat him. You know it’s futile. The audience grew both embarrassed and amused as my speech was brought to a standstill by the power of the fly.

This tiny creature controlled the auditorium with his power to disrupt. He harmed my presentation, maybe my public image. But I wasn’t physically hurt, nor was my audience. The fly’s power was disproportionate to his size but was only the power to annoy, not destroy. Afterwards, life went on as usual for the dispersed audience, the institution where I spoke, and me.

My metaphor of the fly serves my premise: Powers of disruption do not necessarily equal lasting, substantive power – power that belongs to great nations and compelling systems of thought. In the six years since September 11, Islamic militancy (outside of Iraq) remains, not unlike my pesky fly, more of an irritant to the west than a force capable of truly overcoming our civilization.

Terrorists, apparently Islamic, recently struck in Scotland and England. Their attempts were bungled, but they reinforced the media-heightened conviction that Islamofascism is the western world’s greatest threat today. But is it?

Although possibly masterminded by Mossad, 9/11, carried out by Muslim hijackers, was an unprecedented outrage and tragedy. Yet it happened, like Pearl Harbor, to a nation whose guard was down. Today, relatively speaking, the guard of the world is raised. Could something like 9/11 happen again? Yes. But it is not necessary to agree that Islam is the west’s greatest threat in order to keep it from happening.

As a result of Israel's oppression and expulsion of the Palestinians over the past 75 years, the Arab world has been driven to frenzy. The largest percentage of terrorist crimes committed by a single ethnic/religious group is committed by Islamic radicals. Yet, despite the impression given by mainstream news media, these terrorist attacks against Israel and the West since 9/11 constitute no more than 25 percent of such violence worldwide. Most terrorist acts are committed by nationalist and Marxist insurgents, from Peru to Uzbekistan. (See, List of Terrorist Incidents) The feared “power” of Islamic militancy to actually create disasters like 9/11 has not materialized. But there is a power that can destroy the freedoms and moral values of the west, corrupting us from within.

Who Could Destroy Christian Civilization?

In contrast to the violent external disruptions of radical Islam, another power presents an even greater and dangerously unrecognized threat. It is the power of organized world Jewry—an elite and focused minority of Jews largely operating under the direction of ADL/B’nai B’rith International. This aggressive and powerful minority is intent on fulfilling their Talmudic religious mandate to “repair the universe” (tikkun olam) through worldwide control and destruction of Christianity and other “idolatry.”

For at least the past two centuries, Jewish revolutionary activists have pursued and attained positions of highest influence in western industrialized nations. These nations remain the dominant industrial, military, financial, economic, cultural, and educational powerhouses for the world. Jewish control of them is real abiding power. Consider the following realities.

In 1913, as a result of the most concentrated lobbying efforts by international Jewish bankers and their American representative, J.P. Morgan, Congress created the Federal Reserve System. Today, the Fed is owned not by the federal government and the American people but by a consortium of primarily European Jewish banking houses, members of whom also financed the Bolshevik revolution and Hitler. They control the money system in the United States , just as they have in Europe. Paper currency is created for pennies; then they loan it at face value to the US government. Interest on such loans charged to the American people totals at least $150 billion annually, which exponentially increases our federal deficit. The total debt, tens of trillions, is too staggering to ever fully repay. 1

During the first part of this century, European Jewish immigrants created the Hollywood film industry and what became the “Big Three” TV networks. Jews dominate entertainment and news media today, arguably the most influential part of our society. Today Jewish editors, writers, publishers and owners also control most of the largest newspaper and book publishing houses in America. No other social force has played as large a part in corrupting American culture and morals during the last century as the Jewish entertainment and news media. (See, Jews Confirm Big Media Is Jewish and the video "Zionism and Christianity: Unholy Alliance")

In 1913, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith was created, ostensibly to combat anti-Semitism. Since then, ADL and generations of liberal Jewish activists and their “civil liberties” organizations have tirelessly worked to strip America of its foundational Christian values. They have also created the hate crimes laws that now plague Christians and lovers of freedom in the western world. (See, the video "Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians" and this adl.org article)

In 1917, Jewish international bankers and activists overthrew the Russian czar, spawning the global cancer of communism. Twentieth century liberalism is the off-scouring of Jewish-inspired socialism and communism. These facts are all documented by prestigious sources—many of them Jewish! (See, Jewish Activists Created Communism and Why Most Jews Support the Hate Bill)

Congress today is dominated by the nation’s most powerful lobby, The American Israel Political Affairs Committee. AIPAC pressures members of Congress to unconditionally support Israel and its strife-engendering policies. Penalty for not cooperating: defeat of politicians by AIPAC in the next election! (See, Israel Lobby article by Walt and Mearsheimer. See They Dared to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel’s Lobby by Paul Findley)

High-level Jewish “neoconservatives” have surrounded recent presidents, especially Clinton and George W. Bush. They have successfully pressured America into Mideast wars that only exhaust our resources and make the Mideast safer for Israel. (For complete documentation read Michael Collin’s Pipers’ The High Priests of War and The New Jerusalem: Zionist Power in America, available from www.americanfreepress.net. Also see, NeoConned Again: Hypocrisy, Lawlessness and the Rape of Iraq, 2005 HIS Press)

The power I describe is real, substantive, long-term, and entrenched. It has one aim: to ultimately unite humanity under a Zionist-dominated one-world system centering in Jerusalem. According to Judaism's most sacred rabbinic scriptures, the Talmud and the Zohar, this global government will outlaw belief in Christ and even annihilate all Christians. On this foundation, Israel’s prophesied one-world ruler, Anti-Christ, will rule. (See, Coming Jewish 'Utopia' Ruled by Noahide Laws)

Yes, Arab terrorism has demonstrated power to annoy, disrupt, and even create horrific carnage. It should be resisted and punished. But today, relatively speaking, its power over the west is small compared to the established power of organized world Jewry – power to move all levels of the financial, political, military, media, and educational establishment toward global governance.

Opposing the Wrong Enemy

Thousands of years ago, when Ishmael, the half-breed father of the Arabs, was born to Abraham, God's angel prophesied of him and his posterity: “He will be a wild donkey of a man. His hand will be against everyone and everyone's hand against him; and he will live to the east of all his brothers.” (Gen.16:12) Time has proven the accuracy of that prediction. The Muslim faith, birthed in sword and conquest, has resulted in a far-flung eastern empire, largely alienated from the rest of humanity. Always weakened by vendettas and dissensions, Arabs have shown themselves as disorganized as Jews are organized. And now, with Jews controlling most of the major newspapers we read in the morning and the evening news we watch at night, it is incredibly easy for Zionist media moguls to create in Islam the caricature of an enemy surpassing all others. How easily are Christians deceived!

It's happened before. In the Middle Ages, rumors came to Europe from Palestine that Muslims were performing indignities against Christians and forbidding them to visit Christian holy places. A great cry erupted in Christian Europe to rally for battle against Islam. “It is the will of God!” resounded throughout Western Europe as every able-bodied man left family, farm, and business to embark on a “holy crusade" to make the Mideast safe for Christianity. Like lemmings, millions went, including children. The Crusades lasted nearly 200 years and about one and a half million people died. Eventually, Palestine reverted to Moslem control.

Déjà vu? Today, a similar alarm is going up that “Islamo-Fascism” is the great Satan that civilization should unite against. The Jewish media fans this flame to white-hot intensity, encouraging evangelicals and Christian-based nations that more and yet more must be done in the Mideast to pursue and subdue this Moslem bogey, even into Iran. Yet in the end, the result will be the same as followed our attempt to eradicate Saddam’s “weapons of mass destruction.” Disillusionment. Death. Defeat. Thousands more body bags shipped home.

The crusaders got their priorities all mixed up, as Christians today have. It's because we follow Jewish media and fanatics like John Hagee.

Can we learn from history and not repeat its mistakes? It’s going to be very difficult because our greatest threat to national security does not exist in the distant alleys of Baghdad and barren sands of Iraq. Rather it is rolled up in black and white on our doormat every morning and stares us in the face before we go to bed.



Endnotes:

1 On December 15, 1931 Rep. Louis T. McFadden, who for more than 10 years served as chairman of the Banking and Currency Committee in the House of Representatives, said: “The Federal Reserve Board and banks are the duly appointed agents of the foreign central banks of issue and they are more concerned with their foreign customers than they are with the people of the United States. The only thing that is American about the Federal Reserve Board and Banks is the money they use…” On June 10, 1932, McFadden said in an address to the Congress: “We have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks…Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States government institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers…The Federal Reserve Banks are the agents of the foreign central banks…In that dark crew of financial pirates, there are those who would cut a man’s throat to get a dollar out of his pocket…Every effort has been made by the Federal Reserve Board to conceal its powers, but the truth is the Fed has usurped the government. It controls everything here (in Congress) and controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will…When the Fed was passed, the people of the United States did not perceive that a world system was being set up…A super-state controlled by international bankers, and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure!”

Sen. Barry Goldwater wrote in his book, "With No Apologies:" "Does it not seem strange to you that these men just happened to be CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) and just happened to be on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve that absolutely controls the money and interest rates of this great country. A privately owned organization …which has absolutely nothing to do with the United States of America."

David Allen Rivera, in his excellent overview of the Federal Reserve conspiracy says, “R.F. McMaster, who published a newsletter called The Reaper, through his Swiss and Saudi Arabian contacts was able to find out which banks held a controlling interest in the Reserve. The Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris; Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy; Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam; Lehman Brothers Bank of New York; Kuhn Loeb and Co. Bank of New York; Chase Manhattan Bank of New York; and Goldman, Sachs of New York. These interests control the Reserve through about three hundred stockholders.” (The above were taken from David Allen Rivera’s article, "The Federal Reserve Act Final Warning: A History of the New World Order")





Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.

TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.

The freedom-saving outreach of Rev. Ted Pike and the National Prayer Network is solely supported by sale of books, videos and your financial support. All gifts are tax-deductible.

www.truthtellers.org

National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015