Monday, February 14, 2011

Who Rules America?

Who Rules America?


ADV Broadcast Of February 12, 2011

Hello, and welcome back to another broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

This weekend marks the 66th anniversary of the real holocaust, the bombing of the German civilian town of Dresden by British and American forces. Due primarily to Jewish censorship, most schoolchildren today have probably never even heard of Dresden, which was known as an art center and at the time was teeming with war refugees.

The Allies had begun a program of bombing German civilian towns into submission in an effort to break the backbone of the German population. After two nights of firebombing on February 13-14, 1945, the city of Dresden was totally destroyed. Perhaps anywhere from 350-400 thousand civilians were killed in the most horrific way, although the Jewish propagandists have ridiculously and predictably downplayed the casualty figures at 35,000.

More Germans were killed in the firebombing of Dresden than were Japanese killed during the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined!

So why have most schoolchildren never heard of the drestruction of Dresden? The answer to that is simple: Jewish media control. And we need to get the facts of Jewish media power to the general public.

Now I am happy to report that National Vanguard Books has recently published the updated research report on Jewish media control in a 24-page pamphlet entitled Who Rules America?”, which can be purchased in bulk quantities for mass distribution from our online bookstore at www.natvanbooks.com. Purchase your bulk copies today and help get the word out.



There is no greater power in the world today than that wielded by the manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or pope of old, no conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America’s mass media of news and entertainment.

Their power is not distant and impersonal; it reached into every home in America, and it works its will during nearly every waking hour. Their influence begins in early childhood and continues throughout our lives. It is the power that shapes and molds the mind of virtually every citizen, young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated.

In a modern democracy the people with the ability to mold public opinion are the ones who hold the real power. The mass media form our image of the world and then tell us, both explicitly and implicitly, what to think and how to vote. In our busy world, everything we know – or think we know – about events and people outside our own neighborhood or circle of acquaintances comes to us via our daily newspaper, our weekly news magazine, our radio, or our television. The mass media has particular influence on how we view our politicians and other world leaders. The universally positive media coverage of the Obama presidential campaign is just one example of blatant media bias. Similarly, world leaders who fail to comply with U.S. demands are portrayed as dangerous psychopaths or religious fanatics, paving the way for public acceptance of military intervention overseas.

It is not just the heavy-handed suppression of certain news stories from our newspapers or the blatant propagandizing of history-distorting TV “docudramas” that characterizes the opinion-manipulating techniques of the media masters. They exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in their management of the news and the entertainment that they present to us.

The way in which the news is covered, which items are emphasized and which are played down, the reporter’s choice of words, tone of voice, and facial expressions, the wording of headlines; the choice of illustrations—all of these things subliminally and yet profoundly affect the way in which we interpret what we see or hear.

On top of this, of course, the columnists and editors remove any remaining doubt from our minds as to just what we are to think about it all. Employing carefully developed psychological techniques, they guide our thought and opinion so that we can be in tune with the “in” crowd, the “beautiful people,” the “smart money.” They let us know exactly what our attitudes should be toward various types of people and behavior by placing those people or that behavior in the context of a TV drama or situation comedy and having the other TV characters react in the Politically Correct way.

For example, there are countless films and television shows where a racially mixed couple will be respected, liked, and socially sought after by other characters. Black characters are nearly universally characterized as “take charge” individuals-judges, successful businessmen, scientists and even the President. Homosexuals are characterized as talented and sensitive victims of discrimination. Illegal aliens are portrayed as hard workers, pursuing “the American Dream.” At the same time their vastly disproportional contribution to our nation’s crime problem and the social problems they create are virtually ignored. On the other hand, a White person who has pride in his or her heritage, looks down on illegal immigration, miscegenation, big government or the rapidly darkening racial situation in America is portrayed, at best, as a despicable bigot who is reviled by the other characters, or, at worst, as a dangerous psychopath who is fascinated by firearms and is a menace to all law-abiding citizens. The White racist “gun nut,” in fact, has become a familiar stereotype on TV shows. The media coverage of the so-called “Tea Party” tax protestors, who are almost universally White, is often portrayed not as protests against high taxes or big government, but as an expression of White racism against a Black president and his administration.

To the average American, who watches approximately 153 hours of TV every month, distinguishing between these fictional portrayals and reality becomes increasingly difficult. For young people making this distinction can be nearly impossible. Many people respond to the televised actions, statements, and attitudes of TV actors much as he does to his own peers in real life. For all too many Americans the real world has been replaced by the false reality of the TV environment, and it is to this false reality that his urge to conform responds. Thus, when a TV scriptwriter expresses approval of some ideas and actions through the TV characters for whom he is writing, and disapproval of others, he exerts powerful pressure on millions of viewers toward conformity with his own views.

And as it is with TV entertainment, so it is also with the news, whether televised or printed. The insidious thing about this form of thought control is that even when we realize that entertainment or news is biased, the media masters still are able to manipulate most of us. This is because they not only slant what they present, but also they establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion. Television viewers are presented with the illusion of diversity of opinion among the major news networks, when in reality, for all the issues that really matter, the news networks all speak with one voice. For example, networks like CNN or MSNBC are considered more “liberal,” while “conservatives” prefer the FOX News network. Yet these networks, and others, all tow the media party line when it comes to the major issues facing our nation and our people.

For example, consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some editors or commentators are slavishly pro-Israel in their every utterance, while others seem nearly neutral. No one, however, dares suggest that the U.S. government is backing the wrong side in the Arab-Jewish conflict, or that 9-11 was a result of that support. Nor does anyone dare suggest that it served Jewish interests, rather than American interests, to send U.S. forces to cripple Iraq, Israel’s principal rival in the Middle East. The coverage of Iran’s nuclear program is another example. All the networks, to some degree or another, portray Iran and its leader as a danger to the world, rather than a barrier to Israeli supremacy over the entire Middle East.

Similarly, the networks vary somewhat in their coverage of illegal immigration and the eventual displacement of White Americans into minority status. Some networks embrace the browning of America as a positive change while others focus on the fight to limit illegal immigration, yet they are virtually silent on the massive crime wave, drain on social services, and cultural change brought by Third World immigration. Similarly, there is universal condemnation of U.S. immigration policy before 1965, which favored European immigrants over those from the Third World.

Another example is the media treatment of racial issues in the United States. Some commentators seem almost dispassionate in reporting news of racial strife, while others are emotionally partisan—with the partisanship always on the non- White side. All of the media spokesmen without exception, however, take the position that “multiculturalism” and “diversity” are not only here to stay but that they are good things. The mantra “Diversity is our Strength” is echoed over and over not only in our media, but in our schools and government institutions. No mainstream media outlet is willing to comment on the balkanization, lack of social cohesion, crime, and displacement brought about by multiculturalism. Thus, a spectrum of permissible opinion on these issues and others is established. Opinions falling outside this spectrum are labeled as “extreme” or even “racist.” Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media masters—and no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it.

Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizen who complains about “managed news” falls into the trap of thinking that because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can escape the thought controllers’ influence by believing the editor or commentator of his choice. It’s a “heads I win, tails you lose” situation. By providing a “controlled opposition” for discontent citizens, they are able to steer them clear of Politically Incorrect opinions and keep their views within acceptable boundaries.

The control of the opinion-molding media is nearly monolithic. All of the controlled media — television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures — speak with a single voice, each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people that might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters. They are presented with a single view of the world — a world in which every voice proclaims the equality of the races, the inerrant nature of the Jewish “Holocaust” tale, the wickedness of attempting to halt the flood of illegal aliens pouring across our borders, the danger of permitting citizens to keep and bear arms, the moral equivalence of all sexual orientations, and the desirability of a “pluralistic,” cosmopolitan society rather than a homogeneous, White one. It is a view of the world designed by the media masters to suit their own ends, and the pressure to conform to that view is overwhelming. People adapt their opinions to it, vote in accord with it, and shape their lives to fit it.

And who are these all-powerful masters of the media? As we shall see, to a very large extent they are Jews. It isn’t simply a matter of the media being controlled by profit-hungry capitalists, some of whom happen to be Jews. If that were the case, the ethnicity of the media masters would reflect, at least approximately, the ratio of rich Gentiles to rich Jews. However, despite a few prominent exceptions, the preponderance of Jews in the media is so overwhelming that we are obliged to assume that it is due to more than mere happenstance.

Continuing government deregulation of the telecommunications industry has resulted, not in the touted increase of competition, but rather in an accelerating wave of corporate mergers and acquisitions that have produced a handful of multibillion- dollar media conglomerates. The largest of these conglomerates are rapidly growing even bigger by consuming their competition, almost tripling in size during the 1990s. This has placed virtually all of the American media in the hands of a very small number of mostly Jewish businessmen. Whenever you watch television, whether from a small local broadcasting station or via cable or a satellite dish; whenever you see a feature film in a theater or at home; whenever you listen to the radio or to recorded music; whenever you read a newspaper, book, or magazine — it is very likely that the information or entertainment you receive was produced and/or distributed by one of these four mega-media companies: Disney, News Corporation, Viacom, and Time Warner.

Let’s take a look at Disney. The Walt Disney Company is the world’s largest media conglomerate with annual revenue approaching $39 billion. In 2005 its Jewish CEO Michael Eisner resigned from Disney after a no-confidence vote by Disney shareholders. Eisner had been accused by Roy Disney, Walt Disney’s nephew, of turning the Walt Disney Company into a “rapacious, soul-less” company. In his place, however, Eisner’s Jewish assistant Robert Iger assumed control of the company in 2005. Iger is a committee member of Aish HaTorah, an orthodox, Zionist group that encourages Israeli settlement in Palestinian territories, promotes Jewish identity, and which is “committed to promoting universal Jewish precepts, foremost among them, perfecting the world” in accord with Jewish values.

Directly under Iger’s control are several television production companies (Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television) and cable networks with more than 100 million subscribers altogether. As for feature films, the Walt Disney Motion Pictures Group includes Walt Disney Pictures, Touchstone Pictures, Pixar, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, founded by the Jewish Weinstein brothers, Bob and Harvey, who have produced such ultra-raunchy movies as The Crying Game, Priest, and Kids. The Weinstein brothers left Miramax in 2005 to form their own company known simply as The Weinstein Company. Since then they have produced films like Inglorious Basterds, which glorifies the torture and mutilation of German prisoners by Jewish soldiers during WW2.

When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family prior to its Jewish takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White, the company under Eisner and now Iger has expanded into the production of a great deal of so-called “adult” material.

Disney acquired Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. in 1985, which owns the ABC television network, which in turn owns ten TV stations outright in such big markets as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Houston. In addition, in the United States ABC has 225 affiliated TV stations.

Sports network ESPN, an ABC cable subsidiary, is headed by president and CEO George W. Bodenheimer, who is a Jew. The corporation also controls the Disney Channel, Toon Disney (now Disney XD), A&E, Lifetime Television, SOAPnet, and the History Channel, with between 86 and 88 million subscribers each. The ABC Family television network, which targets older teens, young adults, and young families has 84 million subscribers and, in addition to broadcasting entertainment (some of it quite raunchy for a family channel), is also the network outlet for Christian Zionist TV evangelist Pat Robertson.

Since Iger’s takeover of Disney, the company has pushed a number of children’s programs and movies encouraging interracial relationships and teen sexuality including The Princess and the Frog, and The Secret Life of the American Teenager. After critics complained about a raunchy pole dancing performance by 16-year-old Disney Hannah Montana star Miley Cyrus at the Kid’s Choice Awards, for example, Disney spokesmen rebuffed their criticism and commented that all Disney content is “...consistent with what our brand values are."

Although primarily a telecommunications company, ABC/Disney earns over $1 billion in publishing, owning Walt Disney Company Book Publishing, Hyperion Books, and Miramax Books. It also owns six daily newspapers and publishes over 20 magazines. Disney Publishing Worldwide, the world's largest publisher of children’s books and magazines, publishes over 400 children's magazines and sells over 120 million children's books each year. Disney Publishing Worldwide is headed by president Russell Hampton, Jr, and Jewish senior vice-president Andrew Sugerman.

On the Internet, Disney runs Buena Vista Internet Group, ABC Internet Group, ABC.com, ABCNEWS.com, Oscar.com, Mr. Showbiz, Disney Online, Disney’s Daily Blast, Disney.com, Family.com, ESPN Internet Group, ESPN.sportzone.com, Soccernet.com, NFL.com, NBA.com, Infoseek (partial ownership), and Disney Interactive.

Those are some of the facts of media control in America. Anyone willing to spend a few hours in a large library looking into current editions of yearbooks on the radio and television industries and into directories of newspapers and magazines; into registers of corporations and their officers, such as those published by Standard and Poors and by Dun and Bradstreet; and into standard biographical reference works can verify their accuracy. They are undeniable. When confronted with these facts, Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. “Ted Turner isn’t a Jew!” they will announce triumphantly, as if that settled the issue. If pressed further they will accuse the confronter of “anti- Semitism” for even raising the subject. It is fear of this accusation that keeps many persons who know the facts silent.

But we must not remain silent on this most important of issues. The Jewish control of the American mass media is the single most important fact of life, not just in America, but in the whole world today. There is nothing—plague, famine, economic collapse, even nuclear war—more dangerous to the future of our people.

Jewish media control determines the foreign policy of the United States and permits Jewish interests rather than American interests to decide questions of war and peace. Without Jewish media control, there would have been no Persian Gulf War, for example. There would have been no NATO massacre of Serb civilians. There would have been no Iraq War, and thousands of lives would have been saved. There would have been little, if any, American support for the Zionist state of Israel, and the hatreds, feuds, and terror of the Middle East would never have been brought to our shores.

By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media we are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish films than by parents, schools, or any other influence.

The Jew-controlled entertainment media have taken the lead in persuading a whole generation that homosexuality is a normal and acceptable way of life; that there is nothing at all wrong with White women dating or marrying Black men, or with White men marrying Asian women; that all races are inherently equal in ability and character—except that the character of the White race is suspect because of a history of oppressing other races; and that any effort by Whites at racial self-preservation is reprehensible. We must oppose the further spreading of this poison among our people, and we must break the power of those who are spreading it. It would be intolerable for such power to be in the hands of any alien minority with values and interests different from our own. But to permit the Jews, with their 3,000-year history of nation-wrecking, from ancient Egypt to Russia, to hold such power over us is tantamount to race suicide. Indeed, the fact that so many White Americans today are so filled with a sense of racial guilt and self-hatred that they actively seek the death of their own race is a deliberate consequence of Jewish media control.

Once we have absorbed and understood the fact of Jewish media control, it is our inescapable responsibility to do whatever is necessary to break that control. We must shrink from nothing in combating this evil power that has fastened its deadly grip on our people and is injecting its lethal poison into our people’s minds and souls. If our race fails to destroy it, it certainly will destroy our race.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

No comments:

Post a Comment