Saturday, January 29, 2011

Brendon O’Connell Found Guilty Of “Racial Hatred”

Brendon O’Connell Found Guilty Of “Racial Hatred”

An honest hero has been sent to jail. Evil destroys. Brendon O’Connell took an open stand against that destruction. The following are two articles about the wrongful accusation and wrongful guilty verdict of O’Connell. He is a man who exposed the truth about Zionist racism. Because Jewish supremacists see themselves above self-examination for their own wrongs, they tolerate absolutely no criticism whatsoever for any evil they commit. These diabolical supremacists daily exact their revenge by sacrificing others to protect themselves, scapegoating the innocent to preserve their own false self-image of perfection, and blaming and destroying people who expose their guilt, tactics they have perfected over the past 65 years.

The first article spotlights the Zionists’ lies and their deliberate attempts to confuse facts with their lies.

Evil people always attack rather than face their own failures. What is the failure of the Jewish Supremacists? They have forgotten the meaning of “Never Again”, but narcissistically use those words as license to commit genocide against the Palestinians. Why did they get revenge against Brendon O’Connell?–He Remembered.

–Admin

Memo To The Jury Who Convicted Brendon O’Connell

January 29, 2011

That it took you seven hours of deliberation to return a guilty verdict upon Brendon O’Connell demonstrates that there was much discussion among you as to whether Brendon was actually guilty of seven counts of “racial vilification” as charged. I wonder if you would have returned a guilty verdict had Brendon been allowed by the trial judge to present all of the evidence that he had prepared in his defence. I wonder what your reaction would have been after you had studied “The Russian Petition To Classify The Kitzur Shulchan Aruch As Hate Literature” by Michael A. Hoffman and had you read excerpts from “A Study In Anti-Gentilism” by former U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Gordon Mohr.

But the trial judge would not permit Brendon to present this vitally-important literature to you. Nor would he allow the accused to show you evidence of Jews being a religious group, not a race. Although you were allowed to hear evidence from Rabbi David Freilich in which it was contested that Jews are a race, the trial judge would not permit Brendon O’Connell to present evidence from Rabbi Harry Waton that they are not.

The following quotation is from the book “Jewish History, Jewish Religion : The Weight of Three Thousand Years” by Israel Shahak:

The Jews themselves universally described themselves as a religious community or, to be precise, a religious nation. ‘Our people is a people only because of the Torah (Religious Law)’ – this saying by one of the highest authorities, Rabbi Sa’adia Hagga’on who lived in the 10th century, has become proverbial.

This next quotation has been lifted from the book “The Thirteenth Tribe” by Arthur Koestler:

The large majority of surviving Jews in the world is of Eastern European-and thus mainly Khazar-origin. If so, this would mean that their ancestors came not from the Jordan but from the Volga, not from Canaan but from the Caucasus, once believed to be the cradle of the Aryan race; and that generally they are more closely related to the Hun, Uigur and Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Should this turn out to be the case, then the term ‘anti-Semitism’ would become void of meaning, based on misapprehension shared by both the killers and their victims. The story of the Khazar Empire, as it slowly emerges from the past, begins to look like the most cruel hoax which history has ever perpetrated.

Had you been allowed to read “Zionism and Race” by Fred E. Foldvary and had you been permitted to view the photographs of white-skinned Jews and coloured-skinned Jews that are available for perusal here, you might well have found yourselves deliberating much longer then the seven hours you did. And had the trial judge not denied Brendon O’Connell his legal right to present crucial evidence in his defence, you might well then have found yourselves asking one another this fundamental question: “How can Jews be a race when one faction are white-skinned and another black?”

After considering this peculiar anomaly you would surely have concluded that Jews cannot possibly be a race. Ergo you would not have returned a guilty verdict on six of the “racial vilification” charges upon which Brendon O’Connell stood trial. But the trial judge would not permit this crucial evidence to be presented for your consideration. Brendon was correct when he accused the trial judge of treason, for the “learned” Judge Wisbey has certainly shown himself to be a traitor to the cause of justice if nothing else.
You heard evidence from two young Jewish men, Stanley Keyser and Timothy Peach, of how they attended a protest at a supermarket in Perth on 2nd May 2009 that had been organised by the ‘Friends of Palestine’ group to express concern at the supermarket selling oranges which had been imported from Israel. According to Peach, he and Keyser were there to “observe” and to “hand out flyers to educate the protesters about Israel”. Keyser and Peach are not the only Jews who have shown-up at an event so to “observe” and document the proceedings. Keyser and Peach had been noticed by Brendon taking photographs of the pro-Palestine protestors and he decided to challenge them. The rest is history. And if you the jury seriously believe that two Jewish activists would turn-up at a pro-Palestinian protest so to “educate the protesters about Israel”, then I have a bridge in Manhattan to sell you. Did you not wonder why Stanley Keyser, an Australian citizen, is more concerned with Israel-related issues than he is with Australian affairs? Take a look at this filthy, little liar’s YouTube account and see how many videos relating to Australian issues you can find. If you can find just one, that will be one more than I managed to find. Did Keyser’s membership of the extremist Jewish group, Chabad Lubavitch, not trouble you? Obviously not.
Read the rest of the article and see the added videos, including one by David Duke, here.

Brendon O’Connell Found Guilty Of “Racial Hatred”

Brendan Lee O’Connell, 38, represented himself before a jury in the Perth District Court after firing the lawyer who had been defending him against an accusation that he posted an anti-semitic video online.

O’Connell faced seven charges related to the posting of a verbal altercation he had with Stanley Keyser and Timothy Peach, who are Jewish, and was found guilty on six.

An argument broke out between the three men at an IGA supermarket in South Perth on May 2, 2009, where a Friends of Palestine group was holding a protest against Israeli oranges.

Mr Peach, 19, told the court during the trial that he was a member of the Australasian Union of Jewish Students at the time and had attended the rally to “observe” and hand out flyers to educate the protesters about Israel.

He said he was “angry”, “confused” and “offended” by O’Connell when he started to film the two Jewish men and argue with them about their religion.

During the trial, O’Connell refused to acknowledge Judge Henry Wisbey when he entered the court and, instead, rose to bow to the jury.

About a dozen supporters in the court cheered when O’Connell labelled the proceedings “a kangaroo court” and gave a long, repetitive rant about the King James Bible and the Constitution.

The video that O’Connell posted online was shown on the first day of the trial.

“You have a religion of racism, hate, homicide and ethnic cleansing,” O’Connell says to the men on the video.

“You are a racist, homicidal maniac.”

When the jury found O’Connell guilty on Friday, he shouted: “Free Palestine! Free Iraq!” before being taken away.

Outside court, Mr Keyser’s mother Shelley said it was “a big relief” for the “terrible” ordeal to be over.

O’Connell was remanded in custody and is due to reappear in court on Monday.

Article source: Brendon O’Connell Blog

No comments:

Post a Comment