Thursday, June 22, 2017
Friday, June 2, 2017
My how times and attitudes Change!! This "minority" uses pepper spray to repel store employees who try to stop him from shoplifting and local law enforcement treats the multiple attacks on innocent people like minor incidents. But when then-Columbus political activist Michael Weaver used pepper spray against a thug who tried to carjack his vehicle on the late afternoon of Dec. 4, 2010...he was arrested, cuffed and taken to jail. There were Two thug attackers, both with long criminal records, including numerous felonies, but only one of the would-be carjackers was sprayed. In Weaver's panicked state his aim was inaccurate, and the spray ran harmlessly down the back of his neck. The thug "victim" sustained no injuries and he subsequently declined medical attention. Weaver was charged with misdemeanor battery and, after paying a low bond, was released from the Muscogee County Jail. A State Court date was set. Weaver and I attended court as instructed, but his case was not called. Another court date was set. We attended. Again his case was not called. Yet Another hearing was set and, Again Weaver's case was Not called. Weaver approached the State prosecutor, then Suzzanne Goddard. Goddard then told Weaver that his case had been referred to the District Attorney's Office for prosecution as a felony...felony aggravated assault. Weaver and I were astounded!! No one in the history of Georgia "jurisprudence" had Ever been charged with a felony for using non-lethal pepper spray for the purpose of defense of property and Self Defense. But Weaver had a long-standing reputation as a non-PC political activist. His forte was placing tracts beneath car windshield wipers while the vehicles were parked on public access streets, an entirely Legal activity protected by the First Amendment to the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution. The ruling elites who rule Columbus with a velvet-lined Iron Fist saw their long-awaited chance to silence a voice with which they disagreed. No One has Ever been charged with a felony for using pepper spray, whether offensively or defensively. Weaver was indicted on the morning of Aug.23, 2011. He was arrested later that day and cast into jail again. After 3 months in jail, Weaver's case was Finally on the prosecution docket. He appeared before Superior Court Judge Bobby Peters on the Monday and Tuesday mornings of Nov. 22 and 23. Asst. D.A. Michael Eugene Craig prosecuted the case. This writer attended the hearings. The "hearings" were Kafkaesque spectacles. Hardly Any mention was made of the facts of the case...the circumstances that led to Weaver's arrest and indictment for defending his property, and possibly his life. Instead, the twin hearings were based Entirely on Weaver's political activism that had aroused the ire of the "important" people of the People's Republic of Columbus. Prosecutor Craig was a highly emotive actor. Addressing the judge he flailed about as if in agony; sobbing about how the carjacker multi-felon must have felt after the pepper spray ran harmlessly down the back of his neck. This, despite the police report that indicated that the "victim" had sustained No injuries and that he had declined medical attention. Not mentioned, too, was the fact that Both of Weaver's attackers were on felony probation at the time of the attack, and that thus the convicted felons were not legally allowed to consort with each other. Also not mentioned was the fact that both felons were wielding 40-ounce beer bottles at the time of the attack. Also ignored by the judge and prosecutor was the fact that Weaver had been illegally arrested by a black CPD officer who entered the residence in which Weaver had been visiting. The officer snatched Weaver out of the resident Without an arrest warrant. It was clear during the hearings that Weaver's prosecution was a Sham, a cynical Stalinesque tactic that was an oft-used ploy used against dissidents in the erstwhile Soviet Union and still used in Totalitarian States in many parts of the world. Weaver's "defense" attorney, Robin King told Weaver not to worry...the case was a "slam dunk." She was prepared to present his case to a jury. The jury forewoman indicated that the jury was ready to hear the case. This writer saw Peters shift nervously on his throne. It was Clear that neither he of the Trump "hair" nor Craig of Kojak hair did Not Want a trial by jury. Peters summoned Craig and King to his chambers, along with then-CPD detective Cathy Bush. Bush had long hated Weaver because of his politically incorrect ideology and was one of the driving forces behind Weaver's mal-prosecution. A few minutes later the respective parties emerged from Peters's chambers. It was Clear that something had happened in the judge's chambers. Perhaps promises and threats were made. "Defense" attorney King had changed her mind and now urged Weaver to accept a plea bargain: a 10-year sentence, a year to serve in prison, the remaining 9 years on probation. Included in the terms of the probation was the stipulation that Weaver be banished from his home town of Muscogee County, plus the other 5 counties that comprise the Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit. When Weaver asked Judge Peters if he could visit his elderly and ailing grandmother if her condition worsened, Peters told Weaver that he didn't care if his grandmother was on her deathbed. His grandmother passed on Feb. 9, 2015. Columbus has a Weaponized, Terrorist "justice" system. My how times and attitudes Change!!
Wednesday, May 31, 2017
Saturday, March 25, 2017
Facts about the Matt Hale case
I am Matthew Hales mother. Does anyone care that our corrupt justice system (Federal court system) in this case and the government (FBI) has locked away an innocent man for 40 years because he stood for and believed in the First Amendment, (Freedom of Speech) without any evidence. Matt was tried and convicted in federal court in Hammond, Indiana in 2005 for having solicited the murder of Chicago Federal Judge Joan Lefkow. James T. Moody was the judge in the trial. No evidence was ever presented during the trial that Matt ever asked anyone to commit murder. Matt is an innocent man that has suffered at the hands of our corrupt government, the FBI and our corrupt justice system.
The government had Tony Evola, a government informant which they paid $75,000 of our tax money to tape conversations with Matt over a 2 year period to attempt to get evidence that they could use to put Matt away. On these tapes, never once did Matt ever ask this informant to kill anybody. Matt refused Evola several times on the tapes. In fact, Evola was confused as to who the government wanted Matt to ask him to kill. He thought the target was a man. When the government (FBI)realized that Evola thought the target was a man, they had him send Matt an email referring to the target as being femala, (the word Evola used for female) (Evola is mentally challenged) to further their plan to charge Matt.
Matt arrived at the courthouse in chicago to go before Judge Joan Lefkow regarding a Trademark case and he was arrested. Judge Lefkow had ruled in Matts favor in the Trademark case and a higher court had ordered her to reverse her decision and Matt was there to appeal that ruling. He had no animosity towards Judge Lefkow. He never wanted her killed. He was there to appeal her ruling she had reversed. A higher court had ordered her to reverse her decision.
Matt was not present for the entire jury selection even though he never waived that right. His attorney made that decision without asking Matt. Matt was only present for 52%. The law is that he had the right to be present for the entire jury selection.
When Evola testified in the trial, because nothing on the tapes revealed Matt asking Evola to kill the judge, Evola testified that he asked Matt if he wanted him(Evola) to kill the judge and Matt nodded.
Matt suspected that Evola was a government informant, he wasn't concerned because he knew he would always follow the law and never do anything illegal. Matt went to Law School to become an attorney and work to make legal change in the government and our court system.
Recently, Matt discovered that the jury foreman had testified in another unrelated case that he had disobeyed the judges order not to read anything about Matt and the case or listen to the media. After being accepted as one of the jurors, he went home and did in fact follow the media coverage about Matt and the case disobeying the judges order. He had run home and removed a note on his door saying that he was going to be a juror on Matt Hales trial because he was afraid one of Matts supporters might harm him or his partner.
Matts attorney had a list of over 100 witnesses and never called one to testify. When Matt told his attorney that he wanted to testify, his attorney told Matt that he wasn't prepared to do that.
Judge James T. Moody allowed another mans crime into Matts trial. It was very obvious that the judge was prejudiced against Matt as was the prosecutor.
Matts attorney Thomas Durkin of Chicago told the jury they should find Matt guilty on moral charges. He told the jury how discusting Matt was in so many words.
The last statement the prosecutor said to the jury is that the government had evidence that Matthew Hale ordered one of his organization to go out and kill and injure many people. This is totally untrue. There was never any evidence presented at trial that Matt ever asked anybody to kill anyone. Matts attorney never objected, the judge never asked the jury to disallow that statement.
The trial was tainted and prejudiced, the jury foreman who was homosexual, feared Matt supporters. He went into the jury room ready to find Matt guilty before hearing any evidence (there was no evidence).
The judge sentenced Matt using the sentencing guidelines used to sentence a terrorist. Matt isn't a terrorist. He gave Matt a 40 year sentence, Matt has been in solitary confinement at Florence Supermax prison for over 12 years for a crime he never committed. He is innocent of any crime and Judge Moody, the prosecutor and the government know it. Matt is a political prisoner.
Matt has asked repeatedly to have a polygraph to prove his innocents and has been refused. Resently, he sent David Bindi, the prosecutor that has taken the place of David Weisman, the prosecutor that prosecuted Matt, a letter asking for a polygraph and was refused again. They know that a polygraph would prove Matt innocent.
For all the reasons given above, Matt is entitled to a new trial. Everything I have said in the above statements are true. I challenged anyone to read the trial transcript and find any untruths in any statement in the above factual accounts of the trial.This is a travesty, to have this kind of corruption in our government, our FBI and our court system. To lock a person away for 40 years because that person has unpopular views and opinions. What has happened to freedom of speech, freedom of religion? What has happened to our country?
Thursday, March 23, 2017
Saturday, January 7, 2017
Another GREAT EPICsode! 7:40-cucks of the week; 11:45-(((zikes))) of the week; 18:50-clever song "Found out about Jews"; GOYcotts of the week; 33:14 Michael Weaver joins for a while to explain the corruption & anti-White harassment he has endured by authorities in Columbus, GA.; other callers include Ken Reed & Kevin Harris of White lives matter, Greg Calhoun, & Matt West!; 1:08:45-new shocking social engineering in the Veteran's administration, what constitutes a "hate crime"? and more. PC/iPhone compatible, downloadable.